Barbara A. Fink

The thickness of the tear film

Measurements of the thickness of the pre-corneal tear film, pre-lens tear film, post-lens tear film, and the lipid layer on the surface of the tear film are summarized. Spatial and temporal variations in tear film thickness are described. Theoretical predictions of tear film thickness are discussed. Mechanisms involved in the upward drift of the tear film after a blink, and in the formation of dry spots, are considered.

Three interferometric methods for measuring the thickness of layers of the tear film.

The thickness of different layers of the tear film has been measured by three types of interference method, namely, wavelength-dependent fringes (WDFs), thickness-dependent fringes (TDFs), and angle-dependent fringes (ADFs). This review begins with a discussion of characteristics which are common to all these methods--high-, intermediate-, and low-index layers, phase, optical path difference, and contrast. For each of the three methods, we present a figure showing constructive and destructive interference, derive equations for calculating tear layer thickness, describe a typical optical system, and show representative results. The particular advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. Given the clinical importance of the tear film in dry eye syndrome and contact lens wear, it is unfortunate that there are considerable discrepancies among the results of interferometric and other methods for measuring tear film thickness; further development of these noninvasive, interferometric methods should help to provide a clearer picture of the thickness of different layers of the tear film, in normal and dry eyes, and in contact lens wear.

Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus

Purpose. To report baseline differences between eyes on key variables in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study cohort compared with a retrospectively assembled group of myopic contact lens wearers without ocular disease. Methods. A total of 1,079 keratoconus patients who had not undergone a penetrating keratoplasty in either eye before their baseline visit were enrolled and examined at baseline. Records from 330 contact lens-wearing myopes were reviewed. Corneal curvature (keratometry), visual acuity, refractive error (manifest refraction), and corneal scarring were measured. Results. The mean differences between keratoconic eyes are as follows (better eye–worse eye for each variable, separately). Flat keratometry: −3.59 ±4.46 D and steep keratometry: −4.35 ±4.41 D; high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity: 7.30 ±6.83 letters; low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity: 8.53 ±7.51 letters; high-contrast entrance visual acuity: 9.03 ±8.40 letters; low-contrast entrance visual acuity: 9.43 ±7.88 letters; spherical equivalent refractive error: 3.15 ±3.84 D; and refractive cylinder power 1.55 ±1.42 D. Twenty-one percent of the keratoconus patients had corneal scarring in only one eye. There is an association between patient-reported unilateral eye rubbing and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature, and between a history of unilateral eye trauma and greater asymmetry in corneal curvature and refractive error, with the rubbed/traumatized eye being the steeper eye most of the time. Conclusions. Keratoconus is asymmetric in the CLEK Study sample.

The Contribution of Lipid Layer Movement to Tear Film Thinning and Breakup

PURPOSE To investigate whether the tear film thinning between blinks is caused by evaporation or by tangential flow of the tear film along the surface of the cornea. Tangential flow was studied by measuring the movement of the lipid layer. METHODS Four video recordings of the lipid layer of the tear film were made from 16 normal subjects, with the subjects keeping their eyes open for up to 30 seconds after a blink. To assess vertical and horizontal stretching of the lipid layer and underlying aqueous layer, lipid movement was analyzed at five positions, a middle position 1 mm below the corneal center, and four positions respectively 1 mm above, below, nasal, and temporal to this middle position. In addition, in 13 subjects, the thinning of the tear film after a blink was measured. RESULTS The total upward movement could be fitted by the sum of an exponential decay plus a slow steady drift; this drift was upward in 14 of 16 subjects (P = 0.002). Areas of thick lipid were seen to expand causing upward or downward drift or horizontal movement. The velocity of the initial rapid upward movement and the time constant of upward movement were found to correlate significantly with tear film thickness but not with tear-thinning rate. CONCLUSIONS Analysis indicated that the observed movement of the lipid layer was too slow to explain the observed thinning rate of the tear film. In the Appendix, it is shown that flow under a stationary lipid layer cannot explain the observed thinning rate. It is concluded that most of the observed tear thinning between blinks is due to evaporation.

Contributions of evaporation and other mechanisms to tear film thinning and break-up.

Purpose. To evaluate the contribution of three mechanisms—evaporation of the tear film, inward flow of water into the corneal epithelium or contact lens, and “tangential flow” along the surface of epithelium or contact lens—to the thinning of the tear film between blinks and to tear film break-up. In addition to a discussion of relevant studies, some previously unpublished images are presented illustrating aspects of tear film break-up. Contributions of Three Mechanisms to Tear Film Break-Up. Inward flow of water into the epithelium or contact lens is probably unimportant, and a small flow in the opposite direction may actually occur. Tangential flow is probably important in certain special cases of tear film break-up—at the black line near the tear meniscus, over surface elevations, after partial blinks, and from small thick lipid spots in the tear film. In all these special cases it is argued that tangential flow is important initially, but evaporation may be needed for final thinning to break-up. It is argued that most of the observed tear film thinning between blinks is due to evaporation, rather than tangential flow, and that large “pool” break-up regions are the result of evaporation over an extended area. Conclusion. Evaporation in our “free-air” conditions may be four to five times faster than the average of the values reported in the literature when air currents are prevented by preocular chambers. However, recent evaporation measurements using “ventilated chambers” give higher values, which may correspond better to free-air conditions. Thus evaporation may be fast enough to explain many cases of tear film break-up, and to give rise to considerable increases in the local osmolarity of the tear film between blinks.

CORNEAL SCARRING IN THE COLLABORATIVE LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF KERATOCONUS (CLEK) STUDY : BASELINE PREVALENCE AND REPEATABILITY OF DETECTION

PurposeThe multicenter Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study is a prospective, observational study of 1,209 keratoconus patients. We report on the prevalence of corneal scarring in these patients. We also report on the test-retest repeatability of corneal scar documentati

Factors Associated with Corneal Scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study

Purpose. The multicenter Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study is a prospective, observational study of 1,209 keratoconus patients. We report on the factors associated with corneal scarring at baseline. Methods. We defined corneal scarring as scars that had been detected both by the clinician examining the patient with the slit-lamp biomicroscope and by masked readers of corneal photographs at the CLEK Photography Reading Center. We investigated associations between corneal scarring and patient variables including gender, ethnicity, a family history of keratoconus, a history of ocular trauma, eye rubbing, contact lens wear, rigid contact lens fitting relationships, and corneal findings (such as curvature, Vogts striae, Fleischers ring, and central/apical staining). Multiple logistic regression analysis using generalized estimating equations to adjust for the correlation between eyes was used for analysis. Results. The following factors were found to increase the odds of corneal scarring at baseline in the CLEK Study: corneal staining (odds ratios (OR) = 3.40, 95% confidence interval 2.53–4.59), contact lens wear (OR = 3.51, 95% confidence interval 2.27–5.45), Fleischers ring (OR = 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.11–2.40), steeper first definite apical clearance lens base curve radius (per diopter, OR = 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.25–1.33), and age (per decade, OR = 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.35–1.75). Conclusions. These baseline data suggest that corneal scarring in keratoconus is associated with corneal staining, contact lens wear, Fleischers ring, a steeper cornea, and increasing age. The factors that imply added risk for corneal scarring that may be affected by practitioner intervention are staining of the cornea, contact lens wear, and the contact lens fitting relationship.

Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments.

Purpose: Both between-session and within-session repeatability were determined for measurement of corneal thickness with the following techniques: ultrasound pachymetry (UP), confocal microscopy (CS), Orbscan pachymetry (ORB), spectral oscillation interferometry (SOI), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: The right eyes of 20 normal subjects were tested on 2 different days. For each session, 2 central corneal thickness measurements were determined using the ConfoScan 3 microscope, the Orbscan system, and the Stratus OCT system; 5 measurements were found with the Sonogage ultrasound pachymeter; and between 2 and 10 measurements were found with the SOI system. Results: This study showed that SOI had the best repeatability, whereas CS had the worst repeatability for both within-session and between-session repeatability. Based on 95% limits of agreement (LoA), the within-session repeatability can be ranked as: (1) SOI; (2) UP; (3) OCT; (4) Orbscan pachymetry; and (5) CS. SOI had a bias of 0.13 and 95% LoA of −1.07 to 1.33, whereas UP had a bias of −0.98 and 95% LoA of −7.35 to 5.40. The between-session repeatability of the instruments can be ranked as: (1) SOI; (2) OCT; (3) UP; (4) Orbscan pachymetry; and (5) CS. Of the optical methods, SOI had the best repeatability with a bias of 1.26 and 95% LoA of −6.14 to 8.66, followed by OCT with a bias of 0.75 and 95% LoA of −16.22 to 17.27. Conclusions: Of the 4 instruments that are commercially available, the UP was the most repeatable for within sessions, and the OCT was the most repeatable for between sessions.

Disease severity and family history in keratoconus

Background/aims: To determine if disease severity is associated with a family history of keratoconus. Methods: Markers of disease severity in the CLEK Study cohort were assessed to determine if they could discriminate individuals with and without family history. Logistic regression was used to examine association between corneal scarring, average corneal power, flat and steep keratometry readings, and higher-order root mean square (RMS) wavefront error with family history. Results: In univariate analyses, none of the severity indices had any significant associations with family history; however, contact lens use, gender, and Caucasian race were found to be significant predictors. After controlling for these confounders, there were no significant associations between any severity indices and family history. Conclusions: Presence or absence of family history is not associated with more severe clinical disease, at least when each marker for severity is considered independently. The results of this analysis are important for genetic studies of keratoconus in that it will allow recruitment of keratoconus patients across all stages of disease severity because it does not influence familial aggregation.

The Influence of Gender and Hormone Status on the Severity and Progression of Keratoconus

Purpose: To assess the effects of gender and hormone status on the severity and progression of keratoconus in patients enrolled in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus Study. Methods: The severity and progression of keratoconus in both men (M) and women were evaluated over a 4-year period that encompassed menopausal transition for hormone-active women (HA) and hormone-inactive women (HI). Four outcome measures were selected as indicators of the severity of keratoconus: high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity, low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity, the steep keratometric measurement, and corneal scarring (yes/no). Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (M, HA, and HI) in race, history of atopic disease, family history of keratoconus, or rigid contact lens wear in the right and left eyes. At baseline, there were no significant differences among the 3 groups in high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity, low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity, or steep keratometric reading. Progression of keratoconus, as assessed by changes in these 3 continuous variables, was equal for the 3 groups. M had more corneal scarring than did HA or HI; however, there was no progression of scarring for any of the groups. Conclusion: Keratoconus progressed in both men and women, aged 48-59 years; however, there were no differences among the groups in progression.