Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Barbara Barrett is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Barbara Barrett.


Archive | 2010

ArticlesParent-mediated communication-focused treatment in children with autism (PACT): a randomised controlled trial

Jonathan Green; Tony Charman; Helen McConachie; Catherine Aldred; Vicky Slonims; Patricia Howlin; Ann S Le Couteur; Kathy Leadbitter; Kristelle Hudry; Sarah Byford; Barbara Barrett; Kathryn Temple; Wendy Macdonald; Andrew Pickles

Summary Background Results of small trials suggest that early interventions for social communication are effective for the treatment of autism in children. We therefore investigated the efficacy of such an intervention in a larger trial. Methods Children with core autism (aged 2 years to 4 years and 11 months) were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to a parent-mediated communication-focused (Preschool Autism Communication Trial [PACT]) intervention or treatment as usual at three specialist centres in the UK. Those assigned to PACT were also given treatment as usual. Randomisation was by use of minimisation of probability in the marginal distribution of treatment centre, age (≤42 months or >42 months), and autism severity (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic [ADOS-G] algorithm score 12–17 or 18–24). Primary outcome was severity of autism symptoms (a total score of social communication algorithm items from ADOS-G, higher score indicating greater severity) at 13 months. Complementary secondary outcomes were measures of parent-child interaction, child language, and adaptive functioning in school. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN58133827. Results 152 children were recruited. 77 were assigned to PACT (London [n=26], Manchester [n=26], and Newcastle [n=25]); and 75 to treatment as usual (London [n=26], Manchester [n=26], and Newcastle [n=23]). At the 13-month endpoint, the severity of symptoms was reduced by 3·9 points (SD 4·7) on the ADOS-G algorithm in the group assigned to PACT, and 2·9 (3·9) in the group assigned to treatment as usual, representing a between-group effect size of −0·24 (95% CI −0·59 to 0·11), after adjustment for centre, sex, socioeconomic status, age, and verbal and non-verbal abilities. Treatment effect was positive for parental synchronous response to child (1·22, 0·85 to 1·59), child initiations with parent (0·41, 0·08 to 0·74), and for parent-child shared attention (0·33, −0·02 to 0·68). Effects on directly assessed language and adaptive functioning in school were small. Interpretation On the basis of our findings, we cannot recommend the addition of the PACT intervention to treatment as usual for the reduction of autism symptoms; however, a clear benefit was noted for parent-child dyadic social communication. Funding UK Medical Research Council, and UK Department for Children, Schools and Families.


BMC Psychiatry | 2015

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a communication-focused therapy for pre-school children with autism: results from a randomised controlled trial

Sarah Byford; Maria Cary; Barbara Barrett; Catherine Aldred; Tony Charman; Patricia Howlin; Kristelle Hudry; Kathy Leadbitter; Ann Le Couteur; Helen McConachie; Andrew Pickles; Vicky Slonims; Kathryn Temple; Jonathan Green

BackgroundAutism is associated with impairments that have life-time consequences for diagnosed individuals and a substantial impact on families. There is growing interest in early interventions for children with autism, yet despite the substantial economic burden, there is little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of such interventions with which to support resource allocation decisions. This study reports an economic evaluation of a parent-mediated, communication-focused therapy carried out within the Pre-School Autism Communication Trial (PACT).Methods152 pre-school children with autism were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or PACTu2009+u2009TAU. Primary outcome was severity of autism symptoms at 13-month follow-up. Economic data included health, education and social services, childcare, parental productivity losses and informal care.ResultsClinically meaningful symptom improvement was evident for 53xa0% of PACTu2009+u2009TAU versus 41xa0% of TAU (odds ratio 1.91, pu2009=u20090.074). Service costs were significantly higher for PACTu2009+u2009TAU (mean difference £4,489, pu2009<u20090.001), but the difference in societal costs was smaller and non-significant (mean difference £1,385, pu2009=u20090.788) due to lower informal care rates for PACTu2009+u2009TAU.ConclusionsImprovements in outcome generated by PACT come at a cost. Although this cost is lower when burden on parents is included, the cost and effectiveness results presented do not support the cost-effectiveness of PACTu2009+u2009TAU compared to TAU alone.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN58133827


Archive | 2014

Results of sensitivity analyses

Mike J Crawford; Rahil Sanatinia; Barbara Barrett; Sarah Byford; Madeleine Dean; John Green; Rachael Jones; Baptiste Leurent; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Michael Sweeting; Robin Touquet; Peter Tyrer; Helen Ward


London: Youth Justice Board; 2005. | 2005

Mental Health Needs and Provision

Richard Harrington; Susan Bailey; Prathiba Chitsabesan; Wendy Macdonald; Stephanie Sneider; Cassandra Kenning; Greg Taylor; Leo Kroll; Sarah Byford; Barbara Barrett; Wales


Archive | 2015

Data collection fields

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with support to taper and/or discontinue antidepressant medication

Willem Kuyken; Rachel Hayes; Barbara Barrett; Richard Byng; Tim Dalgleish; David Kessler; Glyn Lewis; Edward R. Watkins; Nicola Morant; Rod S Taylor; Sarah Byford


Archive | 2015

Stage 3: stakeholder consultation

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Health economics component: unit costs

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Stage 1: policy into practice review and clinical audit

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft


Archive | 2015

Implementation strategy following clinical audit

Susan Lea; Lynne Callaghan; Susan Eick; Margaret Heslin; John F. Morgan; Mark Bolt; Andrew Healey; Barbara Barrett; Diana Rose; Anita Patel; Graham Thornicroft

Collaboration


Dive into the Barbara Barrett's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Kessler

National Institute for Health Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tim Dalgleish

Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Byng

Plymouth State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Glyn Lewis

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge