Barbara Cattadori

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: hemodynamic characteristics and changes.

OBJECTIVE To see whether degree of pulmonary hypertension or severity of cardiac failure affect the success of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. METHODS From May 1996 to June 1999, 33 patients, all in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4 were treated with PTE. Preoperative hemodynamic values were: central venous pressure (CVP) 8+/-6 (1-23), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) 50+/-10 (30-69), cardiac output (CO) 3.3+/-0.9 (1.8-5.2), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) 1056+/-344 (523-1659), and right ventricle ejection fraction (RVEF) 12+/-5 (5-21). To establish whether some hemodynamic or cardiac variables correlate with surgical failure (early death or functional non-success), these patients were divided into a low risk or a high risk group for each variable: CVP (<9 or > or =9), mPAP (<50 or > or =50), CO (> or =3.5 or <3.5), PVR (> or =1100 or <1100), and RVEF (> or = 10 or <10). The duration of 3-4 NYHA class period (<24 or > or = 24 months) was also included in the study. RESULTS Three patients (9. 1%) died in hospital, one (3.0%) underwent lung transplant shortly after PTE, and in five cases (15.2%) mPAP and PVR at the 3-month follow-up examination corresponded with our definition of functional nonsuccess (mPAP and PVR decreased by less than 40% of preoperative values). One of the five functional nonsuccess patients underwent lung transplant 3 months after the operation and another died 17 months after the operation from a non-related cause. Thus PTE was successful in 24 patients and unsuccessful in nine. None of the hemodynamic variables considered was found to be associated with the disparate outcomes. At the 3-month examination, all surviving patients were in NYHA class 1 or 2 except for three in NYHA class 3. At 2 years, hemodynamic values were: CVP 2+/-2 (0-4), mPAP 16+/-3 (12-21), CO 5.0+/-1.0 (3.4-6.5), PVR 182+/-51 (112-282), and RVEF 35+/-5 (26-40). All differences were significant with respect to baseline values (P<0.001). Preoperative mPAP and RVEF values had a strict linear correlation (R=0.45; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS None of the variables considered was correlated with early death or functional nonsuccess. Neither preoperative severity of pulmonary hypertension nor degree of cardiac failure influenced the outcome of the operation. PTE leads to hemodynamic recovery even in very compromised patients.

Port-access minimally invasive surgery for atrial septal defects: A 10-year single-center experience in 166 patients

OBJECTIVE We assessed the surgical results and the benefits to the patient of a minimally invasive surgical approach for atrial septal defects. METHODS Between May 1998 and May 2008, 166 patients (median age, 44 years) had surgery for atrial septal defects in our institution. Of these patients, 118 (71%) had a patent foramen ovale (associated with atrial septal aneurysm in 48 cases), 33 (20%) had a wide ostium secundum defect, 6 (3.6%) had an ostium primum defect, 6 (3.6%) had a sinus venosus defect with abnormal pulmonary vein connection, and 1 (0.6%) had a coronary sinus defect. In 2 cases (1.2%) patients were referred to our department for surgical correction after failure of interventional occluder placement. All patients were operated on via a right minithoracotomy (mean incision, 5.5 + or - 1 cm) in the fourth intercostal space and under cardiopulmonary bypass. RESULTS The HeartPort access system was used in 106 patients (64%), with an endoaortic clamp (central kit in 50 cases and peripheral kit in 56). In the remaining patients (36%), we preferred the Portaclamp system (37 cases) or the Chitwood clamp (23 cases). Average crossclamp time was 38.4 + or - 22.2 minutes with a mean cardiopulmonary bypass time of 64.9 + or - 34.5 minutes. There was no conversion in classic sternotomy. There were no early or late hospital deaths. Surgical revision was performed in 6 patients for bleeding from the thoracic wall. The mean hospital stay was 5.8 days. At 51 months mean follow-up, 4 patients died of non-cardiac-related causes. CONCLUSIONS Port-access minimally invasive surgery for atrial septal defects is a safe, less-invasive, reproducible, and cosmetic operation, providing an excellent outcome and an effective correction, and could be now considered the standard approach for this type of patient.

Port-access surgery as elective approach for mitral valve operation in re-do procedures

BACKGROUND Re-do mitral valve procedures performed through median sternotomy carry substantial mortality and morbidity. To avoid complications of sternal re-entry and to provide adequate mitral valve exposure, antero-lateral thoracotomy has been suggested by some authors. METHODS From October 1997 to January 2007, 677 mitral valve operations have been performed in our centre using port-access video-assisted right mini-thoracotomy. Among these, 241 (35.6%) were performed on patients who had undergone one or more previous cardiac surgery procedures. RESULTS Mean cardio-pulmonary bypass time and endo-clamp time were 117+/-46 min and 71+/-31 min, respectively. Arterial cannulation was performed either on the ascending aorta, with the endo-direct cannula (112 patients, 46.5%), or peripherally with a femoral artery approach (129 patients, 53.5%). Conversion to median sternotomy was necessary in only two patients (0.8%) due to aortic dissection (one case) and left ventricle free wall rupture (one case). Median intensive care unit stay was 24h, median mechanical ventilation time was 12h; median hospital stay was 8 days. Bleeding requiring surgical revision occurred in 12 patients (4.9%). Hospital mortality was 4.9% (12/241 patients). CONCLUSIONS Port-access video-assisted right mini-thoracotomy allows good results in a difficult subset of patients; it allows minimal adhesion dissection, short ICU and hospital stay. In our practice, this technique has become the treatment of choice for mitral valve re-do surgery.

The axillary artery as an alternative site of cannulation for redo port access-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: early report of 2 cases

The minimally invasive Heartport (HP)-assisted technique has become first choice option for mitral valve surgery in many centres.The pool of patients potentially treated using HP techniques, however, is still limited by the presence of peripheral vessel disease, expecially in the elderly population. Alternative approaches to using the HP technique safely in such a subset of patients, therefore, should be evaluated. Here, we present our preliminary experience using the axillary artery as an alternative site of cannulation for HP-assisted redo mitral valve surgery in patients with concomitant peripheral vessel disease.

Should we perform heart retransplantation in early graft failure

Cardiac retransplantation represents the gold standard treatment for a failing cardiac graft but the decision to offer the patient a second chance is often made difficult by both lack of donors and the ethical issues involved. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether retransplantation is a reasonable option in case of early graft failure. Between November 1985 and June 2008, 922 patients underwent cardiac transplantation at our Institution. Of these, 37 patients (4%) underwent cardiac retransplantation for cardiac failure resulting from early graft failure (n = 11) or late graft failure (acute rejection: n = 2, transplant‐related coronary artery disease: n = 24). Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years of patients with retransplantation was 59%, 50% and 40% respectively. An interval between the first and the second transplantation of less than (n = 11, all in early graft failure) or more than (n = 26) 1 month was associated with a 1‐year survival of 27% and 73%, and a 5‐year survival of 27% and 65% respectively (P = 0.01). The long‐term outcome of cardiac retransplantation is comparable with that of primary transplantation only in patients with transplant‐related coronary artery disease. Early graft failure is a significant risk factor for survival after cardiac retransplantation and should be considered as an exclusion criteria.

Minimally Invasive Heart-Port Assisted Technique as Standard First Choice Approach for Left Ventricle Endoplasty: A Ten-Year Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND Although the port-access technique has been shown to be an effective and safe approach for cardiac surgery procedures it has never become routine practice, and it is still limited to few and selected centers. Furthermore, such technique has rarely been applied to treat left ventricle disease. In 1999 we introduced left ventricle aneurysm repair through a left minithoracotomy using the port-access technique. Here we present the results in terms of early and medium-term follow-up using such technique as a routine first choice approach for left ventricle endoplasty. METHODS From 1999 to date, out of 38 patients undergoing left ventricle endoplasty (+/-associate procedures), mini-left thoracotomy and port-access techniques have been used in 32 patients (84%). All patients underwent endoventricular patch-repair with ventricular reshaping and associated procedures were performed in 8 patients. RESULTS All patients survived the operation and were discharged from the hospital (30 days mortality 0%). Two patients (6.2%) experienced prolonged mechanical ventilations and 3 patients (9.3%) prolonged intensive care unit stay. Mean follow-up was 40+/-34 months (range, 2 to 105). One patient died during follow-up (cumulative mortality 3.3%). Follow-up revealed an improvement of hemodynamic performances (left ventricular ejection fraction 0.44+/-0.09 compared with 0.34+/-0.09 preoperatively, p=0.004) and improved clinical conditions (New York Heart Association class 1.4+/-0.5 compared with 2.3+/-1 preoperatively, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS The port-access technique can be safely applied to perform left ventricle endoplasty through a left minithoracotomy. Such approach allows optimal surgical view and therefore optimal surgical correction. Based on our satisfactory experience we support left minithoracotomy as a valuable alternative approach for left ventricle endoplasty in view of an extended use of minimally invasive techniques.