Barbara Cheney

Modelling the biological significance of behavioural change in coastal bottlenose dolphins in response to disturbance

Summary 1. Behavioural change in response to anthropogenic activities is often assumed to indicate a biologically significant effect on a population of concern. Disturbances can affect individual health through lost foraging time or other behaviours, which will impact vital rates and thus the population dynamics. However, individuals may be able to compensate for the observed shifts in behaviour, leaving their health and thus their vital rates and population dynamics, unchanged. 2. We developed a mathematical model simulating the complex social, spatial, behavioural and motivational interactions of coastal bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Moray Firth, Scotland, to assess the biological significance of increased rate of behavioural disruptions caused by vessel traffic. 3. We explored a scenario in which vessel traffic increased from 70 to 470 vessels a year in response to the construction of a proposed offshore renewables’ facility. Despite the more than sixfold increase in vessel traffic, the dolphins’ behavioural time budget, spatial distribution, motivations and social structure remain unchanged. 4. We found that the dolphins are able to compensate for their immediate behavioural response to disturbances by commercial vessels. If the increased commercial vessel traffic is the only escalation in anthropogenic activity, then the dolphins’ response to disturbance is not biologically significant, because the dolphins’ health is unaffected, leaving the vital rates and population dynamics unchanged. 5. Our results highlight that behavioural change should not automatically be correlated with biological significance when assessing the conservation and management needs of species of interest. This strengthens the argument to use population dynamics targets to manage human activities likely to disturb wildlife.

Scale‐dependent foraging ecology of a marine top predator modelled using passive acoustic data

Summary 1. Understanding which environmental factors drive foraging preferences is critical for the development of effective management measures, but resource use patterns may emerge from processes that occur at different spatial and temporal scales. Direct observations of foraging are also especially challenging in marine predators, but passive acoustic techniques provide opportunities to study the behaviour of echolocating species over a range of scales. 2. We used an extensive passive acoustic data set to investigate the distribution and temporal dynamics of foraging in bottlenose dolphins using the Moray Firth (Scotland, UK). Echolocation buzzes were identified with a mixture model of detected echolocation inter-click intervals and used as a proxy of foraging activity. A robust modelling approach accounting for autocorrelation in the data was then used to evaluate which environmental factors were associated with the observed dynamics at two different spatial and temporal scales. 3. At a broad scale, foraging varied seasonally and was also affected by seabed slope and shelf-sea fronts. At a finer scale, we identified variation in seasonal use and local interactions with tidal processes. Foraging was best predicted at a daily scale, accounting for site specificity in the shape of the estimated relationships. 4. This study demonstrates how passive acoustic data can be used to understand foraging ecology in echolocating species and provides a robust analytical procedure for describing spatiotemporal patterns. Associations between foraging and environmental characteristics varied according to spatial and temporal scale, highlighting the need for a multi-scale approach. Our results indicate that dolphins respond to coarser scale temporal dynamics, but have a detailed understanding of finer-scale spatial distribution of resources.

Using Tooth Rakes to Monitor Population and Sex Differences in Aggressive Behaviour in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

This study investigated intraspecific tooth rake scarring, an established indicator of received aggression by conspecifics, on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to gain knowledge of aggressive interactions. The differences in tooth rake scarring between male and female dolphins on the east coast of Scotland were examined, and overall levels of scarring were compared with dolphins on the west coast of Scotland (Sound of Barra and Hebrides). Photographs were examined for evidence of tooth rake scarring using four different methods. East coast males displayed significantly higher scarring percentages (i.e., body area covered by tooth rake scarring), numbers of dorsal fin rake directions (i.e., whether tooth rake scars were vertical, horizontal, diagonal, or curved), and nick percentage (i.e., amount of the dorsal fin missing due to nicks) than females. Differences also existed between the three areas, with bottlenose dolphins around the Sound of Barra showing significantly lower levels of dorsal fin rake directions than those on the east coast or Hebrides. Observed sex differences are likely the result of intrasexual conflict between males over access to females. However, other factors such as sex- or age-specific behaviours or sexual coercion of females may also be involved. Such information could potentially be used to differentiate between the sexes. The differences in dorsal fin scarring between these populations suggests differences in aggressive interactions, possibly indicating differences in social structure. The lower scarring levels seen in the Sound of Barra group may support the suggestion that bottlenose dolphins on the west coast belong to two communities. However, this variability in conspecific aggression may also be the result of different social behaviours, age or sex ratios, habitat, resources, or individual behavioural differences.