Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Barbara Depreter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Barbara Depreter.


Clinica Chimica Acta | 2013

Accuracy of three automated 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays in hemodialysis patients

Barbara Depreter; Annemieke C. Heijboer; Michel Langlois

INTRODUCTION We evaluated the accuracy of three automated assays for 25(OH)D measurement in comparison to ID-XLC-MS/MS in hemodialysis patients, considering the importance of their vitamin D status and reported discrepant results obtained with automated assays. METHODS All three assays were heterogeneous, competitive immunoassays or vitamin D binding protein assays on Architect (Abbott), Modular E170 (Roche) and iSYS (IDS). Measurements were performed in serum of 99 hemodialysis patients and 50 healthy subjects, double blind with a different operator and aliquot for each method. RESULTS Architect showed the highest deviation for hemodialysis (slope 0.3864, intercept 8.7409) and healthy subjects (slope 0.5024, intercept 6.8426) and reported significant lower results. Considering 30 ng/ml as cut-off for optimal 25(OH)D concentration, Architect falsely assigned 48.5% of the hemodialysis and 6% of the healthy subgroup a suboptimal vitamin D status. iSYS results of hemodialysis patients also deviated (slope 0.6136, intercept 8.6604) but showed less discordant values than Modular E170 in patients with 25(OH)D concentrations between 10 and 40 ng/ml. CONCLUSION We conclude that not all automated 25(OH)D assays may be considered equally accurate in samples from hemodialysis patients compared to samples from healthy subjects. We found most deviating results with Abbott (Architect) measurements compared to ID-XLC-MS/MS in hemodialysis patients as well as in healthy subjects. We suggest a possible role of matrix effects like elevated urea or other retained metabolites in hemodialysis sera, causing incomplete binding disruption between 25(OH)D and DBP, in the poor assay accuracy.


Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine | 2016

Differences in lupus anticoagulant final conclusion through clotting time or Rosner index for mixing test interpretation

Barbara Depreter; Katrien Devreese

Abstract Background: Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) testing includes a screening, mixing and confirmation step. Although recently published guidelines on LAC testing are a useful step towards standardization, a lack of consensus remains whether to express mixing tests in clotting time (CT) or index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA). The influence of anticoagulant therapy, e.g. vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) on both methods of interpretation remains to be investigated. The objective of this study was to contribute to a simplification and standardization of the LAC three-step interpretation on the level of the mixing test. Methods: Samples from 148 consecutive patients with LAC request and prolonged screening step, and 77 samples from patients non-suspicious for LAC treated with VKA (n=37) or DOAC (n=30) were retrospectively evaluated. An activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and dilute Russell’s viper venom time (dRVVT) were used for routine LAC testing. The supplemental anticoagulant samples were tested with dRVVT only. We focused on the interpretation differences for mixing tests expressed as CT or ICA and compared the final LAC conclusion within each distinct group of concordant and discordant mixing test results. Results: Mixing test interpretation by CT resulted in 10 (dRVVT) and 16 (aPTT) more LAC positive patients compared to interpretation with ICA. Isolated prolonged dRVVT screen mix ICA results were exclusively observed in samples from VKA-treated patients without suspicion for LAC. Conclusions: We recommend using CT in respect to the 99th percentile cut-off for interpretation of mixing steps in order to reach the highest sensitivity and specificity in LAC detection.


Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine | 2017

Dilute Russell's viper venom time reagents in lupus anticoagulant testing : a well-considered choice

Barbara Depreter; Katrien Devreese

Abstract Background: Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) detection represents diagnostic challenges among which the multitude of available reagents and interference by anticoagulant treatment. One of the two advised tests is the dilute Russell’s viper venom time (dRVVT). However, it is currently not clear whether all dRVVT reagents may be considered equivalent. The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of two dRVVT reagents, with special attention to the influence of anticoagulant therapy. Methods: STA®-Staclot® dRVV Screen/Confirm (Stago, Asnières-sur-Seine, France) and dRVT-LS/dRVTL-LR (Haematex, Hornsby, Australia) were evaluated on 443 patient samples [358 consecutive patients with LAC request including six antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients, 18 non-consecutively selected APS patients and 37 vitamin K antagonists (VKA)-treated and 30 direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC)-treated non-APS patients]. Additionally, pooled normal plasma (PNP) was spiked with factor deficient plasma (n=33) and DOAC calibrators (n=21) to evaluate sensitivity for factor deficiencies and false-positivity rates, respectively. Results: A higher number of samples were defined as LAC positive by Stago vs. Haematex [11.5% (41/358) vs. 3.63% (13/358)]. Most discordances were in the VKA and DOAC group. Haematex was less prone to VKA-related factor deficiencies, explaining the absence of false-positive LAC results in VKA-treated non-APS patients compared to 10.8% with Stago. We observed no false-positive LAC ratios with Haematex in DOAC-spiked PNP and a lower number in DOAC-treated non-APS patients. However, increased specificity seemed to be at cost of a reduced sensitivity as Haematex showed less positive APS patient samples (45.8% vs. 87.5%). Conclusions: dRVVT reagents differ in LAC sensitivity and for VKA and DOAC interference.


Journal of the Neurological Sciences | 2015

Bing-Neel syndrome: Two unexpected cases and a review of the literature.

M.G. Van Cauwenberge; Barbara Depreter; Els Dumoulin; Jan Emmerechts; Friedel Nollet; L.J. Vanopdenbosch

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma characterized by the proliferation of small B-lymphocytes in the bone marrow that produce monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM). We describe two patients with WM who presented with neurological symptoms due to infiltration of lymphoplasmacytoid tumor cells in the central nervous system, a condition known as Bing-Neel syndrome. A literature review revealed that this syndrome is rare and commonly missed in clinical practice due to its variable presentation and a lack of awareness or knowledge. Brain and spinal magnetic resonance imaging may show a focal mass or diffuse infiltration. The diagnosis of Bing-Neel syndrome requires proof of IgM or lymphoplasmacytoid cells in cerebrospinal fluid or in a brain biopsy. Treatment with intravenous and/or intrathecal chemotherapy and cranial radiotherapy is described in literature with generally poor outcome, although a combination of these therapies seems to improve outcome. Nevertheless, insufficient data are currently available to make general treatment recommendations.


British Journal of Haematology | 2017

Leukaemic stem cell load at diagnosis predicts the development of relapse in young acute myeloid leukaemia patients

Diana Hanekamp; Barbara Denys; Gertjan J. L. Kaspers; Jeroen G. te Marvelde; Gerrit Jan Schuurhuis; Valerie de Haas; Barbara De Moerloose; Eveline S. J. M. de Bont; C. Michel Zwaan; Anja de Jong; Barbara Depreter; Tim Lammens; Jan Philippé; Jacqueline Cloos; V H J van der Velden

Giosu e Costa Apollinaire Ngankeu Rami I. Aqeilan Carlo M. Croce Francesco Bertoni Stefano Alcaro Francesco Trapasso Lymphoma and Genomics Research Programme, The Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland, Biomedical Section, Tecnologica Research Institute, Crotone, Italy, Laboratory for Biomedical Neurosciences Ente Cantonale Ospedaliero, Bellinzona, Switzerland, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University ‘Magna Græcia’ of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy, Departimento Scienze della Vita, University ‘Magna Græcia’ of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy, Department of Molecular Immunology, Virology and Medical Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, and The Lautenberg Centre for Immunology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]


Cytometry Part B-clinical Cytometry | 2018

Cancer-related mRNA expression analysis using a novel flow cytometry-based assay

Barbara Depreter; Jan Philippé; Magali Meul; Barbara Denys; Karl Vandepoele; Barbara De Moerloose; Tim Lammens

Cancer‐related gene expression data mostly originate from unfractionated bulk samples, leading to “expression averaging” of heterogeneous populations. Multicolor flow cytometry (FCM) may distinguish heterogeneous populations based on the phenotypic characterization of single‐cells, but is not applicable for RNA targets. Here, we evaluated the PrimeFlow™ RNA assay, a novel FCM‐based assay designed to measure gene expressions, in two cancer entities with high and low RNA target levels.


Clinical Biochemistry | 2016

Sampling on ice will not yield reliable uric acid monitoring in rasburicase-treated patients

Barbara Depreter; Veronique Stove; Joris R. Delanghe


2016 European congress on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ECTH 2016) | 2016

Differences between dilute Russell's viper venom time reagents in lupus anticoagulant testing

Barbara Depreter; Katrien Devreese


23rd Annual meeting of the Belgian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (BSTH 2015) | 2015

Clotting time or Rosner index for mixing test interpretation makes a difference in the overal lupus anticoagulant test result

Barbara Depreter; Katrien Devreese


NEDERLANDS TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR HEMATOLOGIE | 2014

Uw diagnose?: Sebastian Syndrome

Barbara Depreter; Els Dumoulin; Dominik Selleslag; Jan Emmerechts; Johan Billiet

Collaboration


Dive into the Barbara Depreter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Els Dumoulin

Ghent University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Emmerechts

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara Denys

Ghent University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Philippé

Ghent University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tim Lammens

Ghent University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge