Barbara Di Fiore

The Small-Molecule Inhibitor BI 2536 Reveals Novel Insights into Mitotic Roles of Polo-like Kinase 1

BACKGROUND The mitotic kinases, Cdk1, Aurora A/B, and Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) have been characterized extensively to further understanding of mitotic mechanisms and as potential targets for cancer therapy. Cdk1 and Aurora kinase studies have been facilitated by small-molecule inhibitors, but few if any potent Plk1 inhibitors have been identified. RESULTS We describe the cellular effects of a novel compound, BI 2536, a potent and selective inhibitor of Plk1. The fact that BI 2536 blocks Plk1 activity fully and instantaneously enabled us to study controversial and unknown functions of Plk1. Cells treated with BI 2536 are delayed in prophase but eventually import Cdk1-cyclin B into the nucleus, enter prometaphase, and degrade cyclin A, although BI 2536 prevents degradation of the APC/C inhibitor Emi1. BI 2536-treated cells lack prophase microtubule asters and thus polymerize mitotic microtubules only after nuclear-envelope breakdown and form monopolar spindles that do not stably attach to kinetochores. Mad2 accumulates at kinetochores, and cells arrest with an activated spindle-assembly checkpoint. BI 2536 prevents Plk1s enrichment at kinetochores and centrosomes, and when added to metaphase cells, it induces detachment of microtubules from kinetochores and leads to spindle collapse. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that Plk1s accumulation at centrosomes and kinetochores depends on its own activity and that this activity is required for maintaining centrosome and kinetochore function. Our data also show that Plk1 is not required for prophase entry, but delays transition to prometaphase, and that Emi1 destruction in prometaphase is not essential for APC/C-mediated cyclin A degradation.

Emi1 is needed to couple DNA replication with mitosis but does not regulate activation of the mitotic APC/C.

Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis is critical for the alternation between DNA replication and mitosis and for the key regulatory events in mitosis. The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a conserved ubiquitin ligase that has a fundamental role in regulating mitosis and the cell cycle in all eukaryotes. In vertebrate cells, early mitotic inhibitor 1 (Emi1) has been proposed as an important APC/C inhibitor whose destruction may trigger activation of the APC/C at mitosis. However, in this study, we show that the degradation of Emi1 is not required to activate the APC/C in mitosis. Instead, we uncover a key role for Emi1 in inhibiting the APC/C in interphase to stabilize the mitotic cyclins and geminin to promote mitosis and prevent rereplication. Thus, Emi1 plays a crucial role in the cell cycle to couple DNA replication with mitosis, and our results also question the current view that the APC/C has to be inactivated to allow DNA replication.

The ABBA Motif Binds APC/C Activators and Is Shared by APC/C Substrates and Regulators

The anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C) is the ubiquitin ligase that regulates mitosis by targeting specific proteins for degradation at specific times under the control of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). How the APC/C recognizes its different substrates is a key problem in the control of cell division. Here, we have identified the ABBA motif in cyclin A, BUBR1, BUB1, and Acm1, and we show that it binds to the APC/C coactivator CDC20. The ABBA motif in cyclin A is required for its proper degradation in prometaphase through competing with BUBR1 for the same site on CDC20. Moreover, the ABBA motifs in BUBR1 and BUB1 are necessary for the SAC to work at full strength and to recruit CDC20 to kinetochores. Thus, we have identified a conserved motif integral to the proper control of mitosis that connects APC/C substrate recognition with the SAC.

Mitotic Functions of the Ran GTPase Network The Importance of Being in the Right Place at the Right Time

The Ran GTPase has important roles in nucleocytoplasmic transport, cell cycle progression, nuclear organization and nuclear envelope (NE) assembly. In this review, we discuss emerging evidence that implicate the Ran GTPase system in mitotic control in mammalian cells. Recent work indicates that members of the Ran network control two fundamental aspects of the mammalian mitotic apparatus: (i) centrosome and spindle pole function, and (ii) kinetochore function. It is also emerging that, after NE breakdown, specific Ran network components assemble in local combinations at crucial sites of the mitotic apparatus. In the light of these findings, the original notion that nucleotide-bound forms of the Ran GTPase are distributed along a unique “gradient” in mitotic cells should be re-examined. Available data also suggest that the Ran system is deregulated in certain cellular contexts: this may represent a favoring condition for the onset and propagation of mitotic errors that can predispose cells to become genetically unstable and facilitate neoplastic growth.

Importin β is transported to spindle poles during mitosis and regulates Ran-dependent spindle assembly factors in mammalian cells

Spatial control is a key issue in cell division. The Ran GTPase regulates several fundamental processes for cell life, largely acting through importin molecules. The best understood of these is protein import through the nuclear envelope in interphase, but roles in mitotic spindle assembly are also established. In mammalian cells, in which centrosomes are major spindle organizers, a link is emerging between the Ran network, centrosomes and spindle poles. Here, we show that, after nuclear envelope breakdown, importin β is transported to the spindle poles in mammalian cells. This localization is temporally regulated from prometaphase until anaphase, when importin β dissociates from poles and is recruited back around reforming nuclei. Importin β sediments with mitotic microtubules in vitro and its accumulation at poles requires microtubule integrity and dynamics in vivo. Furthermore, RNA interference-dependent inactivation of TPX2, the major Ran-dependent spindle organizer, abolishes importin β accumulation at poles. Importin β has a functional role in spindle pole organization, because overexpression yields mitotic spindles with abnormal, fragmented poles. Coexpression of TPX2 with importin β mitigates these abnormalities. Together, these results indicate that the balance between importins and spindle regulators of the TPX2 type is crucial for spindle formation. Targeting of TPX2/importin-β complexes to poles is a key aspect in Ran-dependent control of the mitotic apparatus in mammalian cells.

How cyclin A destruction escapes the spindle assembly checkpoint

Cyclin A outcompetes inhibitory spindle assembly checkpoint proteins for binding to the APC/C ubiquitin ligase coactivator Cdc20 to promote its self-destruction even when the checkpoint is active (see also a paper from van Zon et al., in this issue).

Mechanisms controlling the temporal degradation of Nek2A and Kif18A by the APC/C–Cdc20 complex

The Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) in complex with its co‐activator Cdc20 is responsible for targeting proteins for ubiquitin‐mediated degradation during mitosis. The activity of APC/C–Cdc20 is inhibited during prometaphase by the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) yet certain substrates escape this inhibition. Nek2A degradation during prometaphase depends on direct binding of Nek2A to the APC/C via a C‐terminal MR dipeptide but whether this motif alone is sufficient is not clear. Here, we identify Kif18A as a novel APC/C–Cdc20 substrate and show that Kif18A degradation depends on a C‐terminal LR motif. However in contrast to Nek2A, Kif18A is not degraded until anaphase showing that additional mechanisms contribute to Nek2A degradation. We find that dimerization via the leucine zipper, in combination with the MR motif, is required for stable Nek2A binding to and ubiquitination by the APC/C. Nek2A and the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) have an overlap in APC/C subunit requirements for binding and we propose that Nek2A binds with high affinity to apo‐APC/C and is degraded by the pool of Cdc20 that avoids inhibition by the SAC.

Defining the role of Emi1 in the DNA replication–segregation cycle

Ordered progression through the cell cycle is essential to maintain genomic stability, and fundamental to this is ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. In particular, the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase destabilises specific regulators at defined times in the cycle to ensure that each round of DNA replication is followed by cell division. Thus, the proper regulation of the APC/C is crucial in each cell cycle. There are several APC/C regulators that restrict its activity to specific cell cycle phases, and amongst these the early mitotic inhibitor 1 (Emi1) protein has recently come to prominence. Emi1 has been proposed to control APC/C in early mitosis; however, recent evidence questions this role. In this review we discuss new evidence that indicates that Emi1 is essential to restrict APC/C activity in interphase and, by doing so, ensure the proper coordination between DNA replication and mitosis.

Nuclear reformation after mitosis requires downregulation of the Ran GTPase effector RanBP1 in mammalian cells

The GTPase Ran regulates nucleocytoplasmic transport in interphase and spindle organisation in mitosis via effectors of the importin beta superfamily. Ran-binding protein 1 (RanBP1) regulates guanine nucleotide turnover on Ran, as well as its interactions with effectors. Unlike other Ran network members that are steadily expressed, RanBP1 abundance is modulated during the mammalian cell cycle, peaking in mitosis and declining at mitotic exit. Here, we show that RanBP1 downregulation takes place in mid to late telophase, concomitant with the reformation of nuclei. Mild RanBP1 overexpression in murine cells causes RanBP1 to persist in late mitosis and hinders a set of events underlying the telophase to interphase transition, including chromatin decondensation, nuclear expansion and nuclear lamina reorganisation. Moreover, the reorganisation of nuclear pores fails associated with defective nuclear relocalisation of NLS cargoes. Co-expression of importin beta, together with RanBP1, however mitigates these defects. Thus, RanBP1 downregulation is required for nuclear reorganisation pathways operated by importin beta after mitosis.

Interactions with single-stranded and double-stranded DNA-binding factors and alternative promoter conformation upon transcriptional activation of the Htf9-a/RanBP1 and Htf9-c genes.

The murine Htf9-a/RanBP1 andHtf9-c genes are divergently transcribed from a shared TATA-less promoter. Transcription of both genes is initiated on complementary DNA strands and is controlled by cell cycle-dependent mechanisms. The bidirectional promoter harbors a genomic footprint flanking the major transcription start site of both genes. Transient promoter assays showed that the footprinted element is important for transcription of both genes. Protein-binding experiments and antibody assays indicated that members of the retinoid X receptor family interact with the double-stranded site. In addition, distinct factors interact with single DNA strands of the element. Double-stranded binding factors were highly expressed in liver cells, in which neither gene is transcribed, while single-stranded binding proteins were abundant in cycling cells, in which transcription of both genes is efficient. In vivo S1 analysis of the promoter depicted an S1-sensitive organization in cells in which transcription of both genes is active; S1 sensitivity was not detected in conditions of transcriptional repression. Thus, the same element is a target for either retinoid X receptor factors, or for single-stranded binding proteins, and form distinct complexes in different cellular conditions depending on the DNA conformation in the binding site.