Barbara Howe

Immunogenicity and safety of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and three-component acellular pertussis vaccine in adults 19-64 years of age.

PURPOSE This study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine containing three pertussis antigens (Boostrix, Tdap3v), currently licensed in the US for use in adolescents 10-18 years of age, in adults 19-64 years of age. METHODS 2284 healthy adults, aged 19-64 years, were randomized to receive a single dose of Tdap vaccine, either Tdap3v or a five-pertussis component Tdap vaccine (Adacel, Tdap5v) licensed for adult use in the US. Blood samples were taken before and 1 month after vaccination. Reactogenicity was assessed for 15 days after vaccination. RESULTS Tdap3v was comparable to Tdap5v in eliciting seroprotective levels of antibodies to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, with >98% of subjects having post-vaccination seroprotective antibody levels (> or =0.1 IU/mL) against diphtheria or tetanus toxoids. The pertussis components of Tdap3v were shown to be immunogenic in adults, with booster responses to pertussis toxoid (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), and pertactin (PRN) observed in 77.2%, 96.9%, and 93.2%, respectively, of Tdap3v recipients, and in 47.1%, 94.0%, and 91.7%, respectively, of Tdap5v recipients. Anti-pertussis antibody GMCs in Tdap3v recipients exceeded those observed in infants following primary DTaP vaccination, in whom efficacy against pertussis disease was subsequently demonstrated. Injection site reactions (pain, redness, and swelling) and fever > or =37.5 degrees C (99.5 degrees F) were reported significantly more often (p<0.05) by Tdap5v recipients than by Tdap3v recipients. Fatigue preventing normal daily activities was reported by a small but significantly greater percentage of Tdap3v recipients (2.5%) than Tdap5v recipients (1.2%, p<0.05). CONCLUSION In adult recipients, Tdap3v was comparable to an approved Tdap vaccine in providing seroprotection against diphtheria and tetanus, and produced immune responses to pertussis antigens consistent with protection against disease. The overall safety profile of Tdap3v was generally comparable to that of Tdap5v [NCT #106316].

Vaccination of adults 65 years of age and older with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Boostrix(®)): results of two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND Pertussis can cause significant morbidity in elderly patients, who can also transmit this disease to infants and young children. There is little data available on the use of acellular pertussis vaccines in recipients ≥65 years of age. METHODS Two studies examined the safety and immunogenicity of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine (Boostrix(®)) in healthy ≥65 year olds. In Study A subjects received single doses of Tdap and seasonal influenza vaccine either co-administered or given one month apart. In Study B subjects received either Tdap or tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine. Antibodies were measured before and one month after vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were actively assessed using diary cards. RESULTS A total of 1104 subjects 65 years of age and older received a Tdap vaccination in the two studies. In study A, no differences in immune responses to Tdap or influenza vaccine were observed between co-administered or sequentially administered vaccines. In study B, Tdap was non-inferior to Td with respect to diphtheria and tetanus seroprotection, and anti-pertussis GMCs were non-inferior to those observed in infants following a 3-dose diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) primary vaccination series, in whom efficacy against pertussis was demonstrated. Reports of adverse events were similar between Tdap and Td groups. CONCLUSIONS Tdap was found to be immunogenic in subjects ≥65 years, with a safety profile comparable to US-licensed Td vaccine. Tdap and influenza vaccine may be co-administered without compromise of either the reactogenicity or immunogenicity profiles of the two vaccines.

Post-marketing safety evaluation of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and 3-component acellular pertussis vaccine administered to a cohort of adolescents in a United States health maintenance organization.

Background: Prelicensure clinical studies may not include sufficient numbers of subjects to assess the potential for rare postvaccination adverse events. The aim of this postlicensure study (NCT00297856) was to evaluate uncommon outcomes following vaccination with a tetanus, reduced-antigen-content diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap, Boostrix GlaxoSmithKline) in a large adolescent cohort. Methods: We monitored safety outcomes among 13,427 10 to 18-year-old adolescents enrolled in the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Health Care Plan who received Tdap vaccination as part of their normal health care. Subjects were evaluated using self-control analysis comparing days 0 to 29 to days 30 to 59 postvaccination for neurologic events, hematologic events and allergic reactions. We evaluated new onset chronic illnesses within 6 months of Tdap vaccination by comparing with historical Td controls matched for age at vaccination, season, sex, and geographic area. We also compared the incidence of events of interest between the Tdap and historical cohorts as exploratory analyses. Results: No increased risk for medically attended neurologic (odds ratio [OR], 0.962; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.533–1.733) or allergic reactions (OR, 1.091; 95% CI, 0.441–2.729) was observed following Tdap vaccination when comparing the first 30 postvaccination days to the second 30 postvaccination days. There was one hematologic event within 30 days of Tdap, compared with 0 events within days 30 to 59 (P = 1.0). When compared with matched historical Td recipients, no increase in new onset chronic illnesses (OR, 0.634; 95% CI, 0.475–0.840) was seen after Tdap. No deaths occurred in the Tdap cohort during the study. Conclusions: This study provides no evidence for an increased risk for neurologic, hematologic, allergic events, or new onset of chronic illnesses among adolescents vaccinated with Tdap.

Persistence of antibodies 3 years after booster vaccination of adults with combined acellular pertussis, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids vaccine.

The duration of protection after vaccination with reduced antigen content diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccines (Tdap) is not known. Long-term post-vaccination serological data will help to improve understanding of the duration of humoral immunity and guide vaccination policy for the timing of repeat dose administration. The persistence of antibodies to Tdap antigens was measured 3 years after vaccination of adults 19-64 years of age with one of 2 Tdap vaccines (Boostrix(®), GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; Tdap-B: or Adacel(®), Sanofi Pasteur; Tdap-A). In both groups, geometric mean concentrations for antibodies to diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine antigens were decreased at year 3 relative to levels observed 1 month and 1 year following vaccination, but remained higher than pre-vaccination levels. Seroprotection rates for diphtheria and tetanus remained high for both Tdap vaccines (for diphtheria, 96.9% and 97.8% for the Tdap-B and Tdap-A groups, respectively; for tetanus, 98.1% and 99.6%, respectively).

Investigation of a regulatory agency enquiry into potential porcine circovirus type 1 contamination of the human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix™: Approach and outcome

In January 2010, porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) DNA was unexpectedly detected in the oral live-attenuated human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix™ (GlaxoSmithKline [GSK] Vaccines) by an academic research team investigating a novel, highly sensitive analysis not routinely used for adventitious agent screening. GSK rapidly initiated an investigation to confirm the source, nature and amount of PCV1 in the vaccine manufacturing process and to assess potential clinical implications of this finding. The investigation also considered the manufacturer’s inactivated poliovirus (IPV)-containing vaccines, since poliovirus vaccine strains are propagated using the same cell line as the rotavirus vaccine strain. Results confirmed the presence of PCV1 DNA and low levels of PCV1 viral particles at all stages of the Rotarix™ manufacturing process. PCV type 2 DNA was not detected at any stage. When tested in human cell lines, productive PCV1 infection was not observed. There was no immunological or clinical evidence of PCV1 infection in infants who had received Rotarix™ in clinical trials. PCV1 DNA was not detected in the IPV-containing vaccine manufacturing process beyond the purification stage. Retrospective testing confirmed the presence of PCV1 DNA in Rotarix™ since the initial stages of its development and in vaccine lots used in clinical studies conducted pre- and post-licensure. The acceptable safety profile observed in clinical trials of Rotarix™ therefore reflects exposure to PCV1 DNA. The investigation into the presence of PCV1 in Rotarix™ could serve as a model for risk assessment in the event of new technologies identifying adventitious agents in the manufacturing of other vaccines and biological products.

Safety and immunogenicity of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine when co-administered with influenza vaccine in adults.

Annual vaccination with trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV), and a single dose of tetanus toxoid-reduced diphtheria toxoid-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine, are both recommended for adults in the US. This study was conducted to obtain information on the safety and immunogenicity of co-administered TIV and a Tdap vaccine (Boostrix®) in US adults. The immunogenicity and safety of Tdap and TIV was evaluated in 1497 adult subjects 19-64 years of age, who were randomized to receive Tdap and TIV either concomitantly or one month apart (TIV followed by Tdap). Seroprotection rates for diphtheria, tetanus and influenza antigens were high (≥94.1%) for both vaccine regimens, and immune responses to these antigens in the concomitant group were non-inferior to those observed in the sequential group. Although antibody concentrations for pertussis antigens were lower in the concomitant group than in the sequential group, concomitant administration was shown to be non-inferior to sequential administration with respect to anti-pertussis toxoid concentrations one month after Tdap vaccination. For filamentous haemagglutinin and pertactin, the between-group differences in antibody concentrations marginally exceeded pre-specified limits for defining non-inferiority. In both groups, anti-pertussis antibody concentrations were greater than those observed in infants following primary DTaP vaccination, in whom vaccine efficacy against pertussis was demonstrated .Reporting of adverse events appeared to be similar between groups. The data support the conclusion that Tdap and TIV vaccines may be co-administered without compromising either the effectiveness or tolerability of either vaccine.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of co-administered tetanus–diphtheria–acellular pertussis (Tdap) and tetravalent meningococcal conjugate (MCV4) vaccines compared to their separate administration

In the United States, co-administration of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine and tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) is recommended in adolescents. In this clinical study, 1341 adolescents received Tdap (Boostrix® GlaxoSmithKline) and MCV4 (Menactra®, Sanofi-Pasteur) simultaneously or sequentially one month apart. Co-administration of Tdap+MCV4 was well tolerated and immunogenic, resulting in high levels of antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and meningococcal serogroup A,C,W-135 and Y antigens. The data provide support for current recommendations for co-administration of Tdap and MCV4 vaccines at the same office visit.

Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccines Given Separately or Combined for Booster Dosing at 4-6 Years of Age

Background: In the United States, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) and inactivated poliovirus (IPV) booster vaccinations are recommended for children 4–6 years of age. A combined DTaP-IPV vaccine is being developed, which would reduce by one the number of injections in this age group. Methods: Children 4–6 years of age were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive booster vaccination with 1 of 3 combined DTaP-IPV lots plus the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (N = 3156 for pooled lots) or separate doses of DTaP + IPV + measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (N = 1053). Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of children (N = 1331). Safety (solicited and unsolicited symptoms) including detailed assessment of local swelling reactions, was assessed in all children. Results: Increases in antibody geometric mean concentrations/titers 1 month after vaccination were observed for the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and polio antigens. At least 92.2% of combined DTaP-IPV subjects and 92.6% of separate DTaP + IPV subjects had a postvaccination booster response for one or more DTaP antigens. Booster responses to one or more poliovirus antigens were observed in at least 96.6% of combined DTaP-IPV subjects and 92.8% of separate DTaP + IPV subjects. The combined DTaP-IPV vaccine was noninferior to separately administered DTaP and IPV vaccines with respect to DTaP antigen booster response rates and poliovirus antibody geometric mean titers ratios. Reporting of solicited local and systemic events was comparable between both groups. Conclusions: The combination DTaP-IPV vaccine provided immunogenicity and reactogenicity that is comparable to separately administered DTaP and IPV vaccines, with the advantage of requiring one less injection.

An open-label, randomized, multi-center study of the immunogenicity and safety of DTaP-IPV (Kinrix™) co-administered with MMR vaccine with or without varicella vaccine in healthy pre-school age children.

BACKGROUND In the US, it is recommended that 4-6 year old children receive diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP), inactivated poliovirus (IPV), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), varicella (V), and influenza vaccines. Data relating to the concomitant administration of combination DTaP-IPV vaccine (Kinrix™; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) and influenza or V vaccines are currently limited. This study was undertaken to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of Kinrix™ when co-administered with MMR (M-M-RII(®), Merck & Co.) and Varivax™ (Merck & Co.) in 4-6 year old children. METHODS Phase IIIb, open-label, non-inferiority study (NCT00871117). We randomized (1:1) healthy 4-6 year olds to receive Kinrix™+MMR+V on day 0 (Group 1), or Kinrix™+MMR on day 0, followed by V at month 1 (Group 2). We measured DTaP-IPV immunogenicity before and 1 month post-vaccination (prior to V vaccination in Group 2). We collected local and general solicited symptoms within 4 days after vaccination and serious adverse events (SAEs) through 6 months post-vaccination. RESULTS We enrolled 478 subjects. One month post-vaccination, >95% of subjects in both groups had booster responses to diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis antigens and all subjects had seroprotective anti-poliovirus antibody titers. Immune responses in Group 1 were non-inferior to Group 2 for responses to DTaP-IPV antigens according to pre-specified criteria. Reporting of solicited local events at the DTaP-IPV site appeared to be similar between the two vaccine groups, as was reporting of solicited general adverse events within 4 days of vaccination; no vaccine related SAEs were reported. CONCLUSION Concomitant administration of varicella vaccine with Kinrix™ and MMR did not impact the immunogenicity of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis or poliovirus antigens. Both vaccine regimens were well tolerated. These results support the co-administration of DTaP-IPV, MMR, and V vaccines in 4-6-year-old children, providing protection against multiple diseases in a timely and efficient manner.