Barbara J. Norton

Skin temperature biofeedback and migraine.

SYNOPSIS

The effect of within-session instruction on lumbopelvic motion during a lower limb movement in people with and people without low back pain

The purpose of the current study was to examine how effectively people with and people without low back pain (LBP) modify lumbopelvic motion during a limb movement test. Nineteen subjects with LBP and 20 subjects without LBP participated. Kinematic data were collected while subjects performed active hip lateral rotation (HLR) in prone. Subjects completed trials (1) using their natural method (Natural condition) of performing HLR, and (2) following standardized instructions to modify lumbopelvic motion while performing HLR (Modified condition). Variables of interest included (1) the amount of HLR completed prior to the start of lumbopelvic motion, and (2) the maximum amount of lumbopelvic motion demonstrated during HLR. Compared to the Natural Condition, all subjects improved their performance during the Modified condition by (1) completing a greater amount of HLR prior to the start of lumbopelvic motion, and (2) demonstrating less lumbopelvic motion (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). There was a tendency for people without LBP to demonstrate a greater difference in maximal lumbopelvic rotation between the Natural and Modified conditions (P = 0.07). In conclusion, people are able to modify lumbopelvic motion following instruction. Further study is needed to determine if people without LBP improve lumbopelvic motion following instruction to a greater extent than people with LBP.

Differences in symmetry of lumbar region passive tissue characteristics between people with and people without low back pain

BACKGROUND Several investigators have suggested that passive tissue characteristics of the lumbar region may be altered in people with low back pain. Passive stiffness of the lumbar region has been examined during physiological movements in healthy individuals and intersegmental spine mobility and stiffness have been examined in people with and people without low back pain. However, no investigators have examined differences in passive tissue characteristics of the lumbar region during a physiological movement between people with and people without low back pain. METHODS Subjects were moved passively through a trunk lateral bending motion on a passive movement device. Lumbar region kinematics were measured with a motion capture system and force required to move the subject was measured with a force transducer. Lumbar region extensibility was defined as the maximum excursion of the lumbar region. Passive elastic energy was defined as the area under the torque-lumbar region angle curve. Differences in lumbar region extensibility and passive elastic energy between sides were examined in people with and people without low back pain (n=41). FINDINGS People in the Rotation with Extension low back pain subgroup demonstrated greater asymmetry of passive elastic energy than people without low back pain (P=0.04). There were no differences between groups in symmetry of lumbar region extensibility (P=0.37). INTERPRETATION Asymmetry in passive elastic energy of the lumbar region may be related to the low back pain problem in the Rotation with Extension subgroup. The asymmetry in passive elastic energy may be associated with asymmetry of loading on the spine, which has been reported to be a risk factor for low back pain. Thus, it may be important to consider the asymmetry when planning an intervention strategy for people in the Rotation with Extension subgroup.

Use of Movement System Diagnoses in the Management of Patients With Neuromuscular Conditions: A Multiple-Patient Case Report

Background and Purpose Medical diagnoses are not sufficient to guide physical therapy intervention. To provide a rational basis for treatment selection by physical therapists, we developed a set of diagnoses at the level of impairment that are relevant to the human movement system. The diagnoses describe the primary human movement system problem and provide a basis for matching a specific problem with appropriate treatment. The purposes of this 3-patient case report are to illustrate an updated version of the diagnostic system and to show how treatment decisions can be made relative to both the movement system diagnosis and the patients prognosis. Case Descriptions and Outcomes We diagnosed 3 patients with hemiplegia due to stroke as having 3 different movement system problems: force production deficit, fractionated movement deficit, and perceptual deficit. Specific intervention and actual patient outcomes for each case are outlined. Discussion Use of movement system diagnoses may have multiple benefits for patient care. The possible benefits include decreasing the variability in management of patients with neuromuscular conditions, minimizing the trial-and-error approach to treatment selection, improving communication among health care professionals, and advancing research by enabling creation of homogenous patient groupings.

Is lumbar lordosis related to low back pain development during prolonged standing

BACKGROUND An induced-pain paradigm has been used in back-healthy people to understand risk factors for developing low back pain during prolonged standing. OBJECTIVES The purposes of this study were to (1) compare baseline lumbar lordosis in back-healthy participants who do (Pain Developers) and do not (Non-Pain Developers) develop low back pain during 2 h of standing, and (2) examine the relationship between lumbar lordosis and low back pain intensity. DESIGN Cross-sectional. METHOD First, participants stood while positions of markers placed superficial to the lumbar vertebrae were recorded using a motion capture system. Following collection of marker positions, participants stood for 2 h while performing light work tasks. At baseline and every 15 min during standing, participants rated their low back pain intensity on a visual analog scale. Lumbar lordosis was calculated using marker positions collected prior to the 2 h standing period. Lumbar lordosis was compared between pain developers and non-pain developers. In pain developers, the relationship between lumbar lordosis and maximum pain was examined. RESULTS/FINDINGS There were 24 (42%) pain developers and 33 (58%) non-pain developers. Lumbar lordosis was significantly larger in pain developers compared to non-pain developers (Mean difference = 4.4°; 95% Confidence Interval = 0.9° to 7.8°, Cohens d = 0.7). The correlation coefficient between lumbar lordosis and maximum pain was 0.46 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION The results suggest that standing in more lumbar lordosis may be a risk factor for low back pain development during prolonged periods of standing. Identifying risk factors for low back pain development can inform preventative and early intervention strategies.

Diagnosis and Management of a Patient With Knee Pain Using the Movement System Impairment Classification System

STUDY DESIGN Case report. BACKGROUND Selecting the most effective conservative treatment for knee pain continues to be a challenge. An understanding of the underlying movement system impairment that is thought to contribute to the knee pain may assist in determining the most effective treatment. Our case report describes the treatment and outcomes of a patient with the proposed movement system impairment (MSI) diagnosis of tibiofemoral rotation. CASE DESCRIPTION The patient was a 50-year-old female with a 3-month history of left anteromedial knee pain. Her knee pain was aggravated with sitting, standing, and descending stairs. A standardized clinical examination was performed and the MSI diagnosis of tibiofemoral rotation was determined. The patient consistently reported an increase in pain with activities that produced abnormal motions or alignments of the lower extremity in the frontal and transverse planes. The patient was educated to modify symptom-provoking functional activities by restricting the abnormal motions and alignments of the lower extremity. Exercises were prescribed to address impairments of muscle length, muscle strength, and motor control proposed to contribute to the tibiofemoral rotation. Tape also was applied to the knee in an attempt to restrict tibiofemoral rotation. OUTCOMES The patient reported a cessation of pain and an improvement in her functional activities that occurred with correction of her knee alignment and movement pattern. Pain intensity was 2/10 at 1 week. At 10 weeks, pain intensity was 0/10 and the patient reported no limitations in sitting, standing, or descending stairs. The patients score on the activities of daily living scale increased from 73% at the initial visit to 86% at 10 weeks and 96% at 1 year after therapy was discontinued. DISCUSSION This case report presented a patient with knee pain and an MSI diagnosis of tibiofemoral rotation. Diagnosis-specific treatment resulted in a cessation of the patients pain and an improved ability to perform functional activities.

Age Group Differences in Postural Adjustments Associated With a Stepping Task

In this study, differences among age groups in the postural adjustments associated with a stepping task were identified. Twenty subjects from each of 3 age groups, children (8-12 years), young adults (25-35 years), and older adults (65-73 years), performed the task in 2 movement contexts: place and step. In place, the subject simply lifted the foot and placed it on the step. In step, the subject lifted the foot, placed it on the step, and stepped up onto the step. Latencies of postural and focal muscle activation were determined by using surface electromyography and pressure switches. Center of pressure (CP) data were obtained by using a force platform. Subjects in all 3 age groups consistently demonstrated postural adjustments before movement initiation. Children displayed longer postural latencies than young adults as well as disproportionately large values for CP path length. Older adults showed prolonged postural-focal latencies and decreased CP excursions compared with the 2 younger age groups. These results suggest that maturation of coordination between posture and movement may not be fully complete in 8- to 12-year-olds and that increased restraint characterizes the performance of postural adjustments in healthy persons over 65 years of age.

Validity and reliability of a system to measure passive tissue characteristics of the lumbar region during trunk lateral bending in people with and people without low back pain

The current study examined the validity and reliability of a new system that was developed to measure lumbar region passive stiffness and end range of motion during a trunk lateral bending movement in vivo. Variables measured included force, end range lumbar region motion, torque, lumbar region stiffness, and passive elastic energy. Validity of the force measurements was examined using standard weights. Validity of lumbar region angle measurements was examined using an instrumented trunk with an electrogoniometer. Reliability of the measurements between trials within a session was examined in a sample of 50 people (25 men, 25 women; mean +/- standard deviation age = 30.7 +/- 8.9 yr); 31 people reported a history of chronic or recurrent low back pain (LBP) and 19 reported no prior history of LBP. The end range lumbar region motion and force measurements demonstrated an excellent linear relationship with the criterion standard measures. Average error between the criterion standard and observed measurements was minimal for all measurements. For reliability testing, the majority of intraclass correlation coefficient values were >0.75. The validity and reliability of the current system are sufficient to examine lumbar region stiffness and end range of motion in people with and people without LBP.

What is backward disequilibrium and how do i treat it? A complex patient case study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Postural vertical refers to a component of an individuals perception of verticality that is derived from information about the direction of gravitational forces. Backward disequilibrium (BD) is a postural disorder observed in some older adults who have a distortion in their perception of postural vertical. Individuals with BD sustain their center of mass (COM) posterior to their base of support and resist correction of COM alignment. The purposes of this case study are to describe a patient with BD and propose a physical therapy management program for this condition. CASE DESCRIPTION AND INTERVENTION The patient was an 83-year-old woman admitted for home care services 4 months after falling and sustaining a displaced right femoral neck fracture and subsequent hemiarthroplasty. Details of the clinical examination, diagnosis, and intervention are provided and a treatment protocol for physical therapy management is suggested. OUTCOMES During the episode of care, the patient (1) decreased her dependence on caregivers, (2) surpassed minimal detectable change or minimal clinically important improvements in gait speed and on the Short Physical Performance Battery and Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment, and (3) achieved her primary goal of staying in her own apartment at an assisted living facility. DISCUSSION Knowledge of BD coupled with a thorough clinical examination may assist physical therapists in identifying this condition and employing the specific intervention we have proposed. We believe that failure to recognize and manage our patients condition appropriately would have led to nursing home placement.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A94).

Factors contributing to lumbar region passive tissue characteristics in people with and people without low back pain

BACKGROUND Previously, we demonstrated that people in the Rotation with Extension low back pain subgroup display greater asymmetry of passive tissue characteristics during trunk lateral bending than people without low back pain. The purpose of this secondary analysis is to examine factors that explain the group differences. METHODS Twenty-two people in the Rotation with Extension subgroup, and 19 people without low back pain were examined. Torque, lumbar region kinematics, and trunk muscle activity were measured during passive and isometric resisted trunk lateral bending. The dependent variables were lumbar region passive elastic energy to each side; the independent variables included group, gender, anthropometrics, trunk muscle characteristics, and an interaction factor of group and trunk muscle characteristics. Multiple linear regression was used for the analysis. FINDINGS Anthropometrics explained passive measures to the left (P=.03). Anthropometrics (P<.01), trunk muscle characteristics (P<.01), and the interaction of group and trunk muscle characteristics (P=.01) explained passive measures to the right. After accounting for gender and anthropometrics, 43.7% of the variance in passive measures to the right was uniquely accounted for by trunk muscle characteristics for the Rotation with Extension subgroup, compared to 0.5% for the group without low back pain. INTERPRETATION Anthropometrics explained passive measures with trunk lateral bending to both sides, in both groups. For people in the Rotation with Extension subgroup, there was a direct relationship between trunk muscle performance and passive measures to the right. Muscle is an important contributing factor to asymmetry in this subgroup and should be considered in treatment.