Barbara Jennings

A graded dose assessment of the efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol for severe chronic asthma

In a 26-wk double-blind controlled study of 34 patients whose asthma had been poorly controlled despite oral steroids, valuable clinical and pulmonary function improvement was derived by adding beclomethasone aerosol to the prednisone regimen. The amount of improvement correlated linearly with beclomethasone dosage over the range 200 to 1,600 microng/day. These patients required relatively high dosage. Success in achieving asymptomatic status was only 26% with the conventional 400 microng/day and 60% at 1,600 microng/day. Oropharyngeal candidiasis was also dose-related but did not prohibit the use of high-dosage beclomethasone. Respiratory infections, physical signs, blood glucose, and electrolytes were unaffected by the drug. A dose-related suppression of cortisol secretion was demonstrated, but about 1/4 of the group had normal plasma cortisol even at 1,600 microng/day plus the oral prednisone. An individualized risk-benefit assessment seems a better basis for choosing an optimal beclomethasone regimen for each patient than adherence to a conventionalized fixed dosage of 400 microng/day. This requires definition of: (1) a specific goal of treatment in the individual patient and the beclomethasone dosage required to achieve it; (2) the adrenocortical functional response of that particular patient to the desired dose of beclomethasone; and (3) the presence and degree of any dose-limiting constraints such as preexisting complications of steroid use.

Candidiasis and dysphonia complicating beclomethasone treatment of asthma.

Abstract Oropharyngeal candidiasis and dysphonia were assessed in 34 asthma patients whose risk of local complications of aerosol steroid therapy was considered to be higher than usual because of the doses of beclomethasone used for treatment of asthma (1,080 ± 360 μg/day). Cultures and examinations of the oropharynx were collated with symptom and medication-use records over a period of 2 yr. Positive cultures for Candida were found in 40% of the group before starting beclomethasone. Colonization of the oropharynx, clinical thrush, and dysphonia each increased in direct relationship to the daily dose of beclomethasone over a range from 200 to 1,600 μg/day. However, at peak prevalence, clinical thrush affected only 13% of the total group, i.e., about one quarter of the number with asymptomatic oropharyngeal candidiasis. Thrush was not increased by occasional use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or erythromycin. Dysphonia was a more common symptom, affecting up to 50% of the group, and occasionally was severe or persistent. It was related to the aerosolized steroid and not to the Freon propellants. Chronic voice stress appeared to be an important contributing factor to its onset or persistence. Although dysphonia and thrush were both related to beclomethasone usage, they did not appear to be directly related to one another, and they required different treatments (voice rest and nystatin). These complications diminished in severity with time and did not limit beclomethasone dosage in any patient. Therefore, they need not preclude the long-term use of beclomethasone, even in high dosage when required.

Bioequivalent doses of budesonide and prednisone in moderate and severe asthma

We determined the relative antiasthmatic and systemic glucocorticoid potencies of inhaled budesonide (BUD) versus morning-dose oral prednisone (PRED) in 34 adult patients with asthma over a dose range extending from conventional to high and potentially toxic levels, 3.2 mg of BUD or 40 mg of PRED per day. Changes in symptom frequency and severity, FEV1, and peak expiratory flow rate were measured during a double-blind, double-dummy controlled, crossover protocol. The drugs proved equally effective, provided a sufficient dosage was administered. The dose required to eliminate recurrently disabling asthma relapses in these patients was about 2.0 mg of BUD per day or greater than 40 mg of PRED per day. On the average, BUD doses greater than or equal to 1.84 mg/day/70 kg adult (26.3 micrograms/kg/day) exhibited systemic effects on the 8 AM serum cortisol level and blood eosinophil count equivalent to greater than or equal to 15 mg of PRED per day. The latter doses are known to be associated with steroid-induced complications, such as osteoporosis. However, the level of systemic glucocorticoid activity produced by any particular dose of BUD in these patients was consistently much lower than that produced by the dose of PRED needed to achieve an equivalent level of antiasthmatic response. Thus, the use of high-dose inhaled BUD appears clinically reasonable and ethically acceptable in patients with severe asthma in whom the alternative is their continuing dependency on PRED.

Influence of dosing frequency and schedule on the response of chronic asthmatics to the aerosol steroid, budesonide

The influence of various dosing regimens on the response of asthmatic patients to aerosol steroid was investigated. Budesonide, a topically active corticosteroid like beclomethasone dipropionate, was given q.i.d. or b.i.d., in the morning or A.M./P.M., at doses of 400, 800, and 1600 micrograms/day. Each patient (n = 34) took every treatment combination for 2 wk. The antiasthmatic and systemic effects, measured by changes in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), blood eosinophils, and serum cortisol levels increased approximately linearly on log dose budesonide (p less than 0.0005). Systemic effects of the drug were nonsignificant at low dosage. At high dosage, morning dosing conserved hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function, but at the cost of a marginal reduction in efficacy (delta PEFR, p = 0.12). Having the dose frequency reduced the antiasthmatic potency of the drug, i.e., PEFR fell by an amount equivalent to approximately eightfold reduction in daily dosage (p = 0.002). This effect was not evident when asthma was in remission but became so with asthma in relapse. Overall, the q.i.d. A.M./P.M. regimen showed the best risk-benefit relationships. The data indicate (1) that reductions in dose frequency made with the hope of improving patient compliance and thus conserving the drugs long-term efficacy are likely to lead to the reverse effect, (2) that the clinician can conserve a better balance of risk vs benefit by titrating dosage in terms of puffs per dose rather than doses per day, and (3) that patients can increase the antiasthmatic efficacy of this aerosol steroid without any increase in drug costs (or apparent risk) by simply increasing dosing frequency. These therapeutic considerations probably apply to some or all of the other topically active steroids currently used to treat asthma.

Bone mineral density and the risk of fracture in patients receiving long-term inhaled steroid therapy for asthma

To determine whether high-dose or prolonged inhaled steroid therapy for asthma increases a patients risk of osteoporosis and fracture, we measured bone density in 26 men and 43 women (41 postmenopausal, all of whom had received supplemental estrogen therapy) after treatment with an inhaled steroid for 10.1 +/- 5.5 years and oral prednisone for 10.7 +/- 9.7 years (mean +/- SD). Most had stopped receiving prednisone since commencing the inhaled steroid therapy. We found that bone densities (adjusted for age and sex to yield a z score) were lower in association with higher daily doses of inhaled steroid (p = 0.013 ANCOVA) and with the duration of past prednisone therapy (p = 0.032). Larger cumulative inhaled steroid doses were associated with higher bone densities (p = 0.002) and a reduction in the numbers of patients at risk of fracture. Bone density also increased with the amount of supplemental estrogen therapy (p = 0.058) and, at equivalent levels of inhaled and oral steroid use, women showed higher bone density z scores than did men. Women with a lifetime dose of inhaled steroid greater than 3 gm had normal bone density regardless of the amount of past or current prednisone use or the current dose of inhaled steroid. These data indicate that the daily dose, but not the duration, of inhaled steroid therapy may adversely affect bone density, and that estrogen therapy may offset this bone-depleting effect in postmenopausal women.

Effects of dose and dosing schedule of inhaled budesonide on bone turnover

To assess whether the use of larger than usual doses of inhaled steroid to treat severe asthma may adversely affect bone turnover and whether such an effect may be mitigated by altering the dose schedule, we investigated the effects of budesonide (BUD) on serum osteocalcin and the urinary output of hydroxyproline and calcium. Healthy adults were administered 1.2 or 2.4 mg of BUD per day (N = 40) or placebo (N = 8) in a crossover, double-blind comparison of morning versus diurnal dosing schedules for 1 month each. Both BUD doses reduced the 24-hour urinary free-cortisol output (p less than 0.001) and serum osteocalcin (p less than 0.001). The larger dose reduced the morning serum cortisol levels (p = 0.002). Neither dose increased the 8 AM urinary calcium or hydroxyproline output. Osteocalcin and plasma cortisol levels were higher on morning than on diurnal dosing (p = 0.01). The 24-hour urinary free-cortisol output was the same with either schedule (p = 0.96). Additional study is required to assess the clinical importance of the inhibitory effect of BUD on bone formation, as evidenced by the reduction in osteocalcin levels. Of concern is the possibility of serious bone complications resulting from the long-term use of inhaled steroid, particularly in growing children or patients in whom other risk factors for osteoporosis are present. The clinical advantage, if any, of morning dosing remains questionable.

Evaluation of single-dose inhaled corticosteroid activity with an allergen challenge model

BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroids are the most commonly used antiinflammatory agents for asthma. There is no simple way to compare objectively the relative potency of inhaled corticosteroids. The allergen-induced late asthmatic response (LAR) can be suppressed by a single dose of inhaled corticosteroid. OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to evaluate LAR as a model for the determination of the relative potency of single doses of inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS We compared doses of 200 and 800 microg of a highly active inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide) with placebo and a marginally active investigational inhaled corticosteroid (D5159). Ten atopic patients with asthma completed a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, four-way, crossover trial. A standardized allergen challenge with the identical dose of allergen was performed 10 minutes after each of four blinded, single-dose treatments: 200 microg of budesonide, 800 microg of budesonide, 8 mg of D5159, and placebo, all administered from Turbuhaler. The LAR was recorded as the maximum percent fall in FEV1 between 4 and 7 hours, and the allergen-induced increase in methacholine airway responsiveness at 24 hours was recorded as the A log PC20 from the day before to the day after allergen challenge. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the early asthmatic responses during the 4 days; the mean maximum percent in FEV1 fall ranged between 19.5% and 22%. D5159 produced a slight inhibition of the LAR with maximum percent fall in FEV1 recorded as 28.8% +/- 5.0% for D5159 versus 34.1% +/- 4.8% for placebo (p < 0.05). There was a greater reduction recorded after administration of the two doses of budesonide. The mean LAR was 15.1% +/- 3.8% for 200 microg of budesonide and 11.2% +/- 2.3% for 800 microg of budesonide (p < 0.01 compared with placebo and D5159). The two doses of budesonide were not statistically different. Airway responsiveness to methacholine increased by 1.07 doubling doses 24 hours after allergen challenge. This increased airway responsiveness was slightly, but not significantly, reduced by the three active treatments (0.6 to 0.91 doubling doses). CONCLUSION The allergen-induced LAR model was able to differentiate a single dose of an active inhaled corticosteroid from placebo and a highly potent inhaled corticosteroid from a weak inhaled corticosteroid. The model did not differentiate between 2 fourfold doses of the highly active inhaled corticosteroid (at the doses used in this study), neither for the fall in FEV1 nor for the increase in airway hyperresponsiveness.

Minimum dose requirements of steroid-dependent asthmatic patients for aerosol beclomethasone and oral prednisone☆

In 34 steroid-dependent asthma patients who improved markedly during 2 mo of treatment when progressively larger doses of beclomethasone aerosol were added to their oral prednisone regimen, we subsequently reduced both steroids to ascertain the minimum dose of each needed to prevent recurrence of significant asthmatic disability. After 80 wk of follow-up, 15 patients had successfully terminated oral prednisone; 19 were better controlled with a combination of aerosol plus oral steroid than with either drug alone; all patients previously unable to convert to alternate-day prednisone did so successfully during the combined therapy. The minimum effective maintenance dosage varied greatly among these patients-the median values being 2.5 mg prednisone and 1,200 microgram beclomethasone per day. The latter ranged from 200 to 1,8000 microgram. Only 4 patients were satisfactorily controlled without prednisone on 400 microgram beclomethasone per day or less. Seven needed extra intranasal beclomethasone to help control the nasal polyps which worsened after prednisone withdrawal. Suppression of plasma cortisol levels, apparently attributable to the beclomethasone, persisted in most patients, but on the average this was no worse than before commencing this treatment and valuable clinical improvement accrued. There were no other important complications of the regimen. In most of these patients with severe chronic asthma, optimum control of the disease required combined aerosol-oral therapy and maintenance doses of beclomethasone higher than those usually recommended. In some patients, effective control of chronic asthma by beclomethasone treatment may require acceptance of some persisting suppression of adrenal function as a considered risk.

A clinical trial of combined cromolyn/beclomethasone treatment for chronic asthma.

Some patients with chronic asthma treated with beclomethasone aerosol (BA) derive significant symptom benefit, yet have persisting adrenal suppression due in part to their BA therapy. The daily dose of BA required is higher in patients with atopy. We therefore assessed the usefulness of ancillary treatment with cromolyn sodium (CS), a drug known to inhibit atopic asthma, to try to improve the balance of risk vs benefit in such patients. Thirty asthmatics, well controlled on high-dose BA (mean, 1,040 micrograms +/- 97 SE) but with morning cortisol levels averaging approximately 10 micrograms/dl, were allocated randomly to placebo or CS inhalant, used in addition to their regular BA and other asthma medications. After 4 wk, their BA dose was halved. Both groups were monitored for greater than 6 mo by daily symptom diaries and peak flows, and by spirograms and morning serum cortisol tests every 4 wk. Mean cortisol levels rose 27% after BA dose reduction (p less than 0.05) but asthma worsened. Risk-benefit assessments 20 wk after reducing the BA showed a general tendency for higher cortisol values to be coupled with worsening of the asthma symptoms and FEF25%-75%. The distributions of good, fair, and poor risk-benefit responses were the same in both CS and placebo-treated groups (p = 0.20). In other asthmatics who may have less associated bronchitis or small airways obstruction than these patients, CS might prove useful, but in these adult chronic asthmatics with this particular therapeutic problem, there was no discernible BA-sparing effect or other clinical advantage from adding CS to their established BA regimen.

Comparison of 3 different doses of budesonide and placebo on the early asthmatic response to inhaled allergen

BACKGROUND A simple laboratory method to evaluate relative potency of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma would be valuable. Single-dose studies with the allergen-induced late asthmatic response have failed to show a useful dose-response relationship. Treatment for several days with inhaled corticosteroids will also inhibit the allergen-induced early asthmatic response. METHODS Twelve atopic asthmatic subjects were studied during a season when no medications were required except ipratropium bromide as needed. These subjects had positive allergen and methacholine inhalation tests and FEV1 greater than 70% of predicted value. A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study compared placebo and budesonide 100, 200, and 400 microg administered by means of Turbuhaler twice daily for 7 days with 6-day washout periods. Methacholine PC20 was measured before and after 6 days of treatment, and allergen PC15 was measured after 7 days of treatment. RESULTS The allergen PC15 (n = 11) was significantly larger (P = .0001) for all doses of budesonide compared with placebo, but there was no significant difference between the 3 doses of budesonide, and no dose response was demonstrated. The methacholine PC20 was significantly larger after all budesonide treatments compared with placebo (P = .024), but there was no difference between the 3 doses. There was a progressive increase in the allergen PC15 chronologically (sequence effect) that was not explained by improvement in FEV1 or airway responsiveness; sequence effects were not seen for FEV1 or for pretreatment or posttreatment methacholine PC20. Statistical adjustment for sequence effect did not alter allergen PC15 statistics. CONCLUSION A 7-day course of budesonide administered by means of Turbuhaler at 200, 400, or 800 microg per day provided marked and significant inhibition of the allergen-induced early asthmatic response compared with placebo. There was, however, no difference between the 3 doses. Therefore this method with these doses is not useful for providing assessment of relative potency.