Barbara Liebert
University of New South Wales
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Barbara Liebert.
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology | 1998
Ulrich Schall; Stanley V. Catts; Shail Chaturvedi; Barbara Liebert; Joanna Redenbach; Frini Karayanidis; Philip B. Ward
There are several reports that performance-based measures as well as symptom ratings improve with clozapine in patients with schizophrenia who previously responded poorly to typical neuroleptic treatment. It is not clear whether improved cognitive function following initiation of clozapine is simply related to relief of psychotic symptoms and extrapyramidal side-effects associated with prior use of typical neuroleptics, or reflects another dimension of the greater efficacy of clozapine compared with typical neuroleptics. To elucidate this issue and better specify the cognitive changes associated with use of clozapine, the authors have assessed cognitive function psychometrically and using event-related potentials (ERPs), pre- and 8-12 wk post-initiation of clozapine treatment. Patients were rated on the BPRS, the SAPS and the SANS and completed a number of tests tapping aspects of frontal lobe function. ERP recordings were conducted using an auditory task twice, which was repeated under passive and active attention conditions. It was found that clozapine differentially affects tests reflecting executive and planning function, and not stimulus-driven cognitive functions. The results were not consistent with the hypothesis that these effects were simply due to relief of medication side-effects but could be related to the D(1) receptor antagonist actions of clozapine.
Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 1996
Philip B. Ward; Lee Hoffer; Barbara Liebert; Stanley V. Catts; Maryanne O'Donnell; Lawrence E. Adler
Schizophrenic patients reportedly have a deficit in the control of sensitivity to auditory stimuli as shown by the P50 auditory evoked potential wave in a conditioning-testing paradigm that measures suppression of response to a repeated stimulus. Although this finding has been replicated by several US laboratories, one European group has not found differences between schizophrenic patients and normal control subjects. In the present study, investigators in the Schizophrenia Research Center at the Prince of Wales Hospital in Sydney, Australia, selected 22 normal control subjects, 11 acutely ill schizophrenic inpatients, and 11 clinically stable schizophrenic outpatients. Both schizophrenic groups were treated with similar doses of classical neuroleptic medications. Evoked potentials were recorded by an investigator from the US laboratory that initially reported the difference; five averages, each the response to 32 stimulus pairs, were recorded from each subject. The normal control subjects demonstrated significantly more suppression of the P50 response to the repeated stimuli than the schizophrenic groups, as previously reported. There were no significant changes in the suppression measure over the five trials. The suppression of the P50 wave by schizophrenic outpatients was somewhat greater than that by schizophrenic inpatients, but both schizophrenic groups had decreased suppression, compared with the normal subjects. The mean P50 suppression for five averages was successfully used in a logistic regression to classify subjects as normal or schizophrenic. This method was more accurate than attempts to classify subjects with only one average. The mean amplitude of the initial conditioning response did not differ between groups. Schizophrenic patients had slightly shorter mean latencies. There was no direct relationship of P50 suppression to measures of clinical psychopathology.
Australian Health Review | 2001
Barbara Liebert; Michael Parle; Kate White; Alan Rodger
The unmet needs of women with breast cancer have been extensively documented. In the United Kingdom, the introduction of the specialist breast nurse (SBN) role has been one strategy to improve the psychological wellbeing of women. This paper describes a SBN model of care and clinical pathway for Australian treatment settings, developed from systematic reviews of research and clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and psychosocial care of women with breast cancer. The model acknowledges the SBN as an integral member of the multi-disciplinary team with a key role to meet the emotional and informational needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer from the time of diagnosis through to follow up after treatment.
American Journal of Psychiatry | 1995
Stanley V. Catts; Anne-Marie Shelley; Philip B. Ward; Barbara Liebert; Nathaniel McConaghy; Sally Andrews; Patricia T. Michie
Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 1996
Maryanne O'Donnell; Stanley V. Catts; Philip B. Ward; Barbara Liebert; Andrew Lloyd; Denis Wakefield; Neil McConaghy
Psycho-oncology | 2001
Michael Parle; Jill Gallagher; Christine Gray; Gina Akers; Barbara Liebert
Australian Health Review | 2004
Barbara Liebert; Susan Furber
Schizophrenia Research | 1995
Philip B. Ward; Celia Loneragan; Barbara Liebert; S.V. Catts; S. Chaturvedi; Mark Pearson; E.L. Ganser; J. Redenbach; Patricia T. Michie; Sally Andrews; Neil McConaghy
Schizophrenia Research | 1993
L.J. Hoffer; Philip B. Ward; Barbara Liebert; S.V. Catts; Maryanne O'Donnell; M.C. Waldo; Lawrence E. Adler
Schizophrenia Research | 1998
Stanley V. Catts; Sally Andrews; Kevin Bird; Philip B. Ward; Barbara Liebert; Narelle Spinks; Neil McConaghy