Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Barbara Marcolla is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Barbara Marcolla.


Environmental Research Letters | 2012

An underestimated role of precipitation frequency in regulating summer soil moisture

Chaoyang Wu; Jing M. Chen; Jukka Pumpanen; Alessandro Cescatti; Barbara Marcolla; Peter D. Blanken; Jonas Ardö; Yanhong Tang; Vincenzo Magliulo; Teodoro Georgiadis; H. Soegaard; David R. Cook; Richard Harding

Soil moisture induced droughts are expected to become more frequent under future global climate change. Precipitation has been previously assumed to be mainly responsible for variability in summer soil moisture. However, little is known about the impacts of precipitation frequency on summer soil moisture, either interannually or spatially. To better understand the temporal and spatial drivers of summer drought, 415 site yr measurements observed at 75 flux sites world wide were used to analyze the temporal and spatial relationships between summer soil water content (SWC) and the precipitation frequencies at various temporal scales, i.e., from half-hourly, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h measurements. Summer precipitation was found to be an indicator of interannual SWC variability with r of 0.49 (p < 0.001) for the overall dataset. However, interannual variability in summer SWC was also significantly correlated with the five precipitation frequencies and the sub-daily precipitation frequencies seemed to explain the interannual SWC variability better than the total of precipitation. Spatially, all these precipitation frequencies were better indicators of summer SWC than precipitation totals, but these better performances were only observed in non-forest ecosystems. Our results demonstrate that precipitation frequency may play an important role in regulating both interannual and spatial variations of summer SWC, which has probably been overlooked or underestimated. However, the spatial interpretation should carefully consider other factors, such as the plant functional types and soil characteristics of diverse ecoregions.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2011

Redefinition and global estimation of basal ecosystem respiration rate

Wenping Yuan; Yiqi Luo; Xianglan Li; Shuguang Liu; Guirui Yu; Tao Zhou; Michael Bahn; Andy Black; Ankur R. Desai; Alessandro Cescatti; Barbara Marcolla; C.M.J. Jacobs; Jiquan Chen; Mika Aurela; Christian Bernhofer; Bert Gielen; Gil Bohrer; David R. Cook; Danilo Dragoni; Allison L. Dunn; Damiano Gianelle; Thomas Grünwald; Andreas Ibrom; Monique Y. Leclerc; Anders Lindroth; Heping Liu; Luca Belelli Marchesini; Leonardo Montagnani; Gabriel Pita; Mirco Rodeghiero

Basal ecosystem respiration rate (BR), the ecosystem respiration rate at a given temperature, is a common and important parameter in empirical models for quantifying ecosystem respiration (ER) globally. Numerous studies have indicated that BR varies in space. However, many empirical ER models still use a global constant BR largely due to the lack of a functional description for BR. In this study, we redefined BR to be ecosystem respiration rate at the mean annual temperature. To test the validity of this concept, we conducted a synthesis analysis using 276 site-years of eddy covariance data, from 79 research sites located at latitudes ranging from similar to 3 degrees S to similar to 70 degrees N. Results showed that mean annual ER rate closely matches ER rate at mean annual temperature. Incorporation of site-specific BR into global ER model substantially improved simulated ER compared to an invariant BR at all sites. These results confirm that ER at the mean annual temperature can be considered as BR in empirical models. A strong correlation was found between the mean annual ER and mean annual gross primary production (GPP). Consequently, GPP, which is typically more accurately modeled, can be used to estimate BR. A light use efficiency GPP model (i.e., EC-LUE) was applied to estimate global GPP, BR and ER with input data from MERRA (Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications) and MODIS (Moderate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer). The global ER was 103 Pg C yr (-1), with the highest respiration rate over tropical forests and the lowest value in dry and high-latitude areas.


Ecosystems | 2008

Biotic, Abiotic, and Management Controls on the Net Ecosystem CO2 Exchange of European Mountain Grassland Ecosystems

Georg Wohlfahrt; Margaret Anderson-Dunn; Michael Bahn; Manuela Balzarolo; Frank Berninger; Claire Campbell; Arnaud Carrara; Alessandro Cescatti; Torben R. Christensen; Sabina Dore; Werner Eugster; Thomas Friborg; Markus Furger; Damiano Gianelle; Cristina Gimeno; K.J. Hargreaves; Pertti Hari; Alois Haslwanter; Torbjörn Johansson; Barbara Marcolla; C. Milford; Zoltán Nagy; E. Nemitz; Nele Rogiers; M. J. Sanz; Rolf T. W. Siegwolf; Sanna Susiluoto; Mark A. Sutton; Zoltán Tuba; Francesca Ugolini

The net ecosystem carbon dioxide (CO2) exchange (NEE) of nine European mountain grassland ecosystems was measured during 2002–2004 using the eddy covariance method. Overall, the availability of photosynthetically active radiation (PPFD) was the single most important abiotic influence factor for NEE. Its role changed markedly during the course of the season, PPFD being a better predictor for NEE during periods favorable for CO2 uptake, which was spring and autumn for the sites characterized by summer droughts (southern sites) and (peak) summer for the Alpine and northern study sites. This general pattern was interrupted by grassland management practices, that is, mowing and grazing, when the variability in NEE explained by PPFD decreased in concert with the amount of aboveground biomass (BMag). Temperature was the abiotic influence factor that explained most of the variability in ecosystem respiration at the Alpine and northern study sites, but not at the southern sites characterized by a pronounced summer drought, where soil water availability and the amount of aboveground biomass were more or equally important. The amount of assimilating plant area was the single most important biotic variable determining the maximum ecosystem carbon uptake potential, that is, the NEE at saturating PPFD. Good correspondence, in terms of the magnitude of NEE, was observed with many (semi-) natural grasslands around the world, but not with grasslands sown on fertile soils in lowland locations, which exhibited higher maximum carbon gains at lower respiratory costs. It is concluded that, through triggering rapid changes in the amount and area of the aboveground plant matter, the timing and frequency of land management practices is crucial for the short-term sensitivity of the NEE of the investigated mountain grassland ecosystems to climatic drivers.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015

Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology

Jianyang Xia; Shuli Niu; Philippe Ciais; Ivan A. Janssens; Jiquan Chen; C. Ammann; Altaf Arain; Peter D. Blanken; Alessandro Cescatti; Damien Bonal; Nina Buchmann; Peter James Curtis; Shiping Chen; Jinwei Dong; Lawrence B. Flanagan; Christian Frankenberg; Teodoro Georgiadis; Christopher M. Gough; Dafeng Hui; Gerard Kiely; Jianwei Li; Magnus Lund; Vincenzo Magliulo; Barbara Marcolla; Lutz Merbold; Leonardo Montagnani; E.J. Moors; Jørgen E. Olesen; Shilong Piao; Antonio Raschi

Significance Terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP), the total photosynthetic CO2 fixation at ecosystem level, fuels all life on land. However, its spatiotemporal variability is poorly understood, because GPP is determined by many processes related to plant phenology and physiological activities. In this study, we find that plant phenological and physiological properties can be integrated in a robust index—the product of the length of CO2 uptake period and the seasonal maximal photosynthesis—to explain the GPP variability over space and time in response to climate extremes and during recovery after disturbance. Terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) varies greatly over time and space. A better understanding of this variability is necessary for more accurate predictions of the future climate–carbon cycle feedback. Recent studies have suggested that variability in GPP is driven by a broad range of biotic and abiotic factors operating mainly through changes in vegetation phenology and physiological processes. However, it is still unclear how plant phenology and physiology can be integrated to explain the spatiotemporal variability of terrestrial GPP. Based on analyses of eddy–covariance and satellite-derived data, we decomposed annual terrestrial GPP into the length of the CO2 uptake period (CUP) and the seasonal maximal capacity of CO2 uptake (GPPmax). The product of CUP and GPPmax explained >90% of the temporal GPP variability in most areas of North America during 2000–2010 and the spatial GPP variation among globally distributed eddy flux tower sites. It also explained GPP response to the European heatwave in 2003 (r2 = 0.90) and GPP recovery after a fire disturbance in South Dakota (r2 = 0.88). Additional analysis of the eddy–covariance flux data shows that the interbiome variation in annual GPP is better explained by that in GPPmax than CUP. These findings indicate that terrestrial GPP is jointly controlled by ecosystem-level plant phenology and photosynthetic capacity, and greater understanding of GPPmax and CUP responses to environmental and biological variations will, thus, improve predictions of GPP over time and space.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015

The uncertain climate footprint of wetlands under human pressure

A.M.R. Petrescu; Annalea Lohila; Juha-Pekka Tuovinen; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Ankur R. Desai; Nigel T. Roulet; Timo Vesala; A. J. Dolman; Walter C. Oechel; Barbara Marcolla; Thomas Friborg; Janne Rinne; Jaclyn Hatala Matthes; Lutz Merbold; Ana Meijide; Gerard Kiely; Matteo Sottocornola; Torsten Sachs; Donatella Zona; Andrej Varlagin; Derrick Y.F. Lai; Elmar M. Veenendaal; Frans-Jan Parmentier; U. Skiba; Magnus Lund; A. Hensen; Jacobus van Huissteden; Lawrence B. Flanagan; Narasinha J. Shurpali; Thomas Grünwald

Significance Wetlands are unique ecosystems because they are in general sinks for carbon dioxide and sources of methane. Their climate footprint therefore depends on the relative sign and magnitude of the land–atmosphere exchange of these two major greenhouse gases. This work presents a synthesis of simultaneous measurements of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes to assess the radiative forcing of natural wetlands converted to agricultural or forested land. The net climate impact of wetlands is strongly dependent on whether they are natural or managed. Here we show that the conversion of natural wetlands produces a significant increase of the atmospheric radiative forcing. The findings suggest that management plans for these complex ecosystems should carefully account for the potential biogeochemical effects on climate. Significant climate risks are associated with a positive carbon–temperature feedback in northern latitude carbon-rich ecosystems, making an accurate analysis of human impacts on the net greenhouse gas balance of wetlands a priority. Here, we provide a coherent assessment of the climate footprint of a network of wetland sites based on simultaneous and quasi-continuous ecosystem observations of CO2 and CH4 fluxes. Experimental areas are located both in natural and in managed wetlands and cover a wide range of climatic regions, ecosystem types, and management practices. Based on direct observations we predict that sustained CH4 emissions in natural ecosystems are in the long term (i.e., several centuries) typically offset by CO2 uptake, although with large spatiotemporal variability. Using a space-for-time analogy across ecological and climatic gradients, we represent the chronosequence from natural to managed conditions to quantify the “cost” of CH4 emissions for the benefit of net carbon sequestration. With a sustained pulse–response radiative forcing model, we found a significant increase in atmospheric forcing due to land management, in particular for wetland converted to cropland. Our results quantify the role of human activities on the climate footprint of northern wetlands and call for development of active mitigation strategies for managed wetlands and new guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) accounting for both sustained CH4 emissions and cumulative CO2 exchange.


Boundary-Layer Meteorology | 2003

Footprints and Fetches for Fluxes over Forest Canopies with Varying Structure and Density

Tiina Markkanen; Üllar Rannik; Barbara Marcolla; Alessandro Cescatti; Timo Vesala

A stochastic trajectory model was used to estimate scalar fluxfootprints in neutral stabilityfor canopies of varying leaf area distributions andleaf area indices. An analytical second-order closure model wasused to predict mean wind speed, second moments and the dissipationrate of turbulent kinetic energy within a forest canopy.The influence of source vertical profile on the flux footprint wasexamined. The fetch is longer for surface sourcesthan for sources at higher levels in the canopy. In order tomeasure all the flux components, and thus the total flux, with adesired accuracy, sources were located at the forest floor in thefootprint function estimation. The footprint functions werecalculated for five observation levels above the canopy top. Itwas found that at low observation heights both canopy density andcanopy structure affect the fetch. The higher abovethe canopy top the flux is measured, the more pronounced is the effectof the canopy structure. The forest fetch for flux measurements isstrongly dependent on the required accuracy: The 90% flux fetchis greater by a factor of two or more compared to the 75% fetch. Theupwind distance contributing 75% of flux is as large as 45 timesthe difference between canopy height and the observation heightabove the canopy top, being even larger for low observationlevels.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011

Seasonal variation of photosynthetic model parameters and leaf area index from global Fluxnet eddy covariance data

M. Groenendijk; A. J. Dolman; C. Ammann; Almut Arneth; Alessandro Cescatti; Danilo Dragoni; J.H.C. Gash; Damiano Gianelle; B. Gioli; Gerard Kiely; Alexander Knohl; Beverly E. Law; Magnus Lund; Barbara Marcolla; M. K. van der Molen; Leonardo Montagnani; E.J. Moors; Andrew D. Richardson; Olivier Roupsard; Hans Verbeeck; G. Wohlfahrt

Global vegetation models require the photosynthetic parameters, maximum carboxylation capacity (V(cm)), and quantum yield (alpha) to parameterize their plant functional types (PFTs). The purpose of this work is to determine how much the scaling of the parameters from leaf to ecosystem level through a seasonally varying leaf area index (LAI) explains the parameter variation within and between PFTs. Using Fluxnet data, we simulate a seasonally variable LAI(F) for a large range of sites, comparable to the LAI(M) derived from MODIS. There are discrepancies when LAI(F) reach zero levels and LAI(M) still provides a small positive value. We find that temperature is the most common constraint for LAI(F) in 55% of the simulations, while global radiation and vapor pressure deficit are the key constraints for 18% and 27% of the simulations, respectively, while large differences in this forcing still exist when looking at specific PFTs. Despite these differences, the annual photosynthesis simulations are comparable when using LAI(F) or LAIM (r(2) = 0.89). We investigated further the seasonal variation of ecosystem-scale parameters derived with LAI(F). V(cm) has the largest seasonal variation. This holds for all vegetation types and climates. The parameter alpha is less variable. By including ecosystem-scale parameter seasonality we can explain a considerable part of the ecosystem-scale parameter variation between PFTs. The remaining unexplained leaf-scale PFT variation still needs further work, including elucidating the precise role of leaf and soil level nitrogen.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013

Modeling biomass burning and related carbon emissions during the 21st century in Europe

Mirco Migliavacca; Alessandro Dosio; Andrea Camia; Rasmus Hobourg; Tracy Houston‐Durrant; Johannes W. Kaiser; Nikolay Khabarov; A.A. Krasovskii; Barbara Marcolla; Jesús San Miguel-Ayanz; Daniel S. Ward; Alessandro Cescatti

In this study we present an assessment of the impact of future climate change on total fire probability, burned area, and carbon (C) emissions from fires in Europe. The analysis was performed with the Community Land Model (CLM) extended with a prognostic treatment of fires that was specifically refined and optimized for application over Europe. Simulations over the 21st century are forced by five different high-resolution Regional Climate Models under the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios A1B. Both original and bias-corrected meteorological forcings is used. Results show that the simulated C emissions over the present period are improved by using bias corrected meteorological forcing, with a reduction of the intermodel variability. In the course of the 21st century, burned area and C emissions from fires are shown to increase in Europe, in particular in the Mediterranean basins, in the Balkan regions and in Eastern Europe. However, the projected increase is lower than in other studies that did not fully account for the effect of climate on ecosystem functioning. We demonstrate that the lower sensitivity of burned area and C emissions to climate change is related to the predicted reduction of the net primary productivity, which is identified as the most important determinant of fire activity in the Mediterranean region after anthropogenic interaction. This behavior, consistent with the intermediate fire-productivity hypothesis, limits the sensitivity of future burned area and C emissions from fires on climate change, providing more conservative estimates of future fire patterns, and demonstrates the importance of coupling fire simulation with a climate driven ecosystem productivity model.


Ecology Letters | 2013

Convergence of potential net ecosystem production among contrasting C3 grasslands

Matthias Peichl; Oliver Sonnentag; Georg Wohlfahrt; Lawrence B. Flanagan; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Gerard Kiely; Marta Galvagno; Damiano Gianelle; Barbara Marcolla; Casimiro Pio; Mirco Migliavacca; Michael Jones; Matthew Saunders

Metabolic theory and body size constraints on biomass production and decomposition suggest that differences in the intrinsic potential net ecosystem production (NEPPOT ) should be small among contrasting C3 grasslands and therefore unable to explain the wide range in the annual apparent net ecosystem production (NEPAPP ) reported by previous studies. We estimated NEPPOT for nine C3 grasslands under contrasting climate and management regimes using multiyear eddy covariance data. NEPPOT converged within a narrow range, suggesting little difference in the net carbon dioxide uptake capacity among C3 grasslands. Our results indicate a unique feature of C3 grasslands compared with other terrestrial ecosystems and suggest a state of stability in NEPPOT due to tightly coupled production and respiration processes. Consequently, the annual NEPAPP of C3 grasslands is primarily a function of seasonal and short-term environmental and management constraints, and therefore especially susceptible to changes in future climate patterns and associated adaptation of management practices.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2013

Trade‐offs between global warming and day length on the start of the carbon uptake period in seasonally cold ecosystems

Georg Wohlfahrt; Edoardo Cremonese; Albin Hammerle; Lukas Hörtnagl; Marta Galvagno; Damiano Gianelle; Barbara Marcolla; Umberto Morra di Cella

[1] It is well established that warming leads to longer growing seasons in seasonally cold ecosystems. Whether this goes along with an increase in the net ecosystem carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake is much more controversial. We studied the effects of warming on the start of the carbon uptake period (CUP) of three mountain grasslands situated along an elevational gradient in the Alps. To this end, we used a simple empirical model of the net ecosystem CO2 exchange, calibrated, and forced with multiyear empirical data from each site. We show that reductions in the quantity and duration of daylight associated with earlier snowmelts were responsible for diminishing returns, in terms of carbon gain, from longer growing seasons caused by reductions in daytime photosynthetic uptake and increases in nighttime losses of CO2. This effect was less pronounced at high, compared to low, elevations, where the start of the CUP occurred closer to the summer solstice when changes in day length and incident radiation are minimal.

Collaboration


Dive into the Barbara Marcolla's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leonardo Montagnani

Free University of Bozen-Bolzano

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Damiano Gianelle

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E.J. Moors

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerard Kiely

University College Cork

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christian Bernhofer

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Grünwald

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrej Varlagin

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge