Barbara Masschalck

Antimicrobial Properties of Lysozyme in Relation to Foodborne Vegetative Bacteria

The purpose of this review is to describe the antibacterial properties and mode of action of lysozyme against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and to provide insight in the underlying causes of bacterial resistance or sensitivity to lysozyme. Such insight improves our understanding of the role of this ubiquitous enzyme in antibacterial defense strategies in nature and provides a basis for the development and improvement of applications of this enzyme as an antibacterial agent. The bactericidal properties of lysozyme are primarily ascribed to its N-acetylmuramoylhydrolase enzymic activity, resulting in peptidoglycan hydrolysis and cell lysis. However, an increasing body of evidence supports the existence of a nonenzymic and/or nonlytic mode of action. Because Gram-negative bacteria, including some major foodborne pathogens, are normally insensitive to lysozyme by virtue of their outer membrane that acts as a physical barrier preventing access of the enzyme, several strategies have been developed to extend the working spectrum of lysozyme to Gram-negative bacteria. These include denaturation of lysozyme, modification of lysozyme by covalent attachment of polysaccharides, fatty acids and other compounds, attachment of C-terminal hydrophobic peptides to lysozyme by genetic modification, and the use of outer membrane permeabilizing agents such as EDTA or polycations or permeabilizing treatments such as high hydrostatic pressure treatment.

Comparison of sublethal injury induced in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by heat and by different nonthermal treatments

We have studied sublethal injury in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium caused by mild heat and by different emerging nonthermal food preservation treatments, i.e., high-pressure homogenization, high hydrostatic pressure, pulsed white light, and pulsed electric field. Sublethal injury was determined by plating on different selective media, i.e., tryptic soy agar (TSA) plus 3% NaCl, TSA adjusted to pH 5.5, and violet red bile glucose agar. For each inactivation technique, at least five treatments using different doses were applied in order to cover an inactivation range of 0 to 5 log units. For all of the treatments performed with a technique, the logarithm of the viability reductions measured on each of the selective plating media was plotted against the logarithm of the viability reduction on TSA as a nonselective medium, and these points were fined by a straight line. Sublethal injury between different techniques was then compared by the slope and the y intercept of these regression lines. The highest levels of sublethal injury were observed for the heat and high hydrostatic pressure treatments. Sublethal injury after those treatments was observed on all selective plating media. For the heat treatment, but not for the high-pressure treatment, sublethal injury occurred at low doses, which were not yet lethal. The other nonthermal techniques resulted in sublethal injury on only some of the selective plating media, and the levels of injury were much lower. The different manifestations of sublethal injury were attributed to different inactivation mechanisms by each of the techniques, and a mechanistic model is proposed to explain these differences.

Inactivation of Escherichia coli in milk by high-hydrostatic-pressure treatment in combination with antimicrobial peptides

We studied the inactivation in milk of four Escherichia coli strains (MG1655 and three pressure-resistant mutants isolated from MG1655) by high hydrostatic pressure, alone or in combination with the natural antimicrobial peptides lysozyme and nisin and at different temperatures (10 to 50 degrees C). Compared with that of phosphate buffer, the complex physicochemical environment of milk exerted a strong protective effect on E. coli MG1655 against high-hydrostatic-pressure inactivation, reducing inactivation from 7 logs at 400 MPa to only 3 logs at 700 MPa in 15 min at 20 degrees C. An increase in lethality was achieved by addition of high concentrations of lysozyme (400 microg/ml) and nisin (400 IU/ml) to the milk before pressure treatment. The additional reduction amounted maximally to 3 logs in skim milk at 550 MPa but was strain dependent and significantly reduced in 1.55% fat and whole milk. An increase of the process temperature to 50 degrees C also enhanced inactivation, particularly for the parental strain, but even in the presence of lysozyme and nisin, a 15-min treatment at 550 MPa and 50 degrees C in skim milk allowed decimal reductions of only 4.5 to 6.9 for the pressure-resistant mutants. A substantial improvement of inactivation efficiency at ambient temperature was achieved by application of consecutive, short pressure treatments interrupted by brief decompressions. Interestingly, this pulsed-pressure treatment enhanced the sensitivity of the cells not only to high pressure but also to the action of lysozyme and nisin.

Inactivation of Gram-Negative Bacteria by Lysozyme, Denatured Lysozyme, and Lysozyme-Derived Peptides under High Hydrostatic Pressure

ABSTRACT We have studied the inactivation of six gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas fluorescens,Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Salmonella enteritidis, Shigella sonnei, and Shigella flexneri) by high hydrostatic pressure treatment in the presence of hen egg-white lysozyme, partially or completely denatured lysozyme, or a synthetic cationic peptide derived from either hen egg white or coliphage T4 lysozyme. None of these compounds had a bactericidal or bacteriostatic effect on any of the tested bacteria at atmospheric pressure. Under high pressure, all bacteria except bothSalmonella species showed higher inactivation in the presence of 100 μg of lysozyme/ml than without this additive, indicating that pressure sensitized the bacteria to lysozyme. This extra inactivation by lysozyme was accompanied by the formation of spheroplasts. Complete knockout of the muramidase enzymatic activity of lysozyme by heat treatment fully eliminated its bactericidal effect under pressure, but partially denatured lysozyme was still active against some bacteria. Contrary to some recent reports, these results indicate that enzymatic activity is indispensable for the antimicrobial activity of lysozyme. However, partial heat denaturation extended the activity spectrum of lysozyme under pressure to serovar Typhimurium, suggesting enhanced uptake of partially denatured lysozyme through the serovar Typhimurium outer membrane. All test bacteria were sensitized by high pressure to a peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 96 to 116 of hen egg white, and all except E. coliand P. fluorescens were sensitized by high pressure to a peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 143 to 155 of T4 lysozyme. Since they are not enzymatically active, these peptides probably have a different mechanism of action than all lysozyme polypeptides.

High pressure increases bactericidal activity and spectrum of lactoferrin, lactoferricin and nisin.

We have studied the inactivation of a panel of eight test bacteria (two Escherichia coli strains, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella sonnei, Shigella flexneri, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus aureus) by high pressure in the presence of bovine lactoferrin (500 microg/ml), pepsin hydrolysate of lactoferrin (500 microg/ml), lactoferricin (20 microg/ml) and nisin (100 IU/ml). None of these compounds, at the indicated dosage, were bactericidal when applied at atmospheric pressure, except nisin, which caused a low level of inactivation of the bacteria. Under high pressure, lactoferrin, lactoferrin hydrolysate and lactoferricin displayed bactericidal activity against some of the test bacteria, however, the former had a narrower bactericidal spectrum than the two latter compounds. The bactericidal efficiency and spectrum of nisin were also enhanced under high pressure. The sensitisation of the test bacteria to these antimicrobials under pressure was transient, since no bactericidal activity was observed when bacteria were pressure treated before exposure to the compounds. We propose a mechanism of pressure-promoted uptake of these antimicrobial proteins and peptides in gram-negative bacteria to explain this sensitisation.

A New Family of Lysozyme Inhibitors Contributing to Lysozyme Tolerance in Gram-Negative Bacteria

Lysozymes are ancient and important components of the innate immune system of animals that hydrolyze peptidoglycan, the major bacterial cell wall polymer. Bacteria engaging in commensal or pathogenic interactions with an animal host have evolved various strategies to evade this bactericidal enzyme, one recently proposed strategy being the production of lysozyme inhibitors. We here report the discovery of a novel family of bacterial lysozyme inhibitors with widespread homologs in gram-negative bacteria. First, a lysozyme inhibitor was isolated by affinity chromatography from a periplasmic extract of Salmonella Enteritidis, identified by mass spectrometry and correspondingly designated as PliC (periplasmic lysozyme inhibitor of c-type lysozyme). A pliC knock-out mutant no longer produced lysozyme inhibitory activity and showed increased lysozyme sensitivity in the presence of the outer membrane permeabilizing protein lactoferrin. PliC lacks similarity with the previously described Escherichia coli lysozyme inhibitor Ivy, but is related to a group of proteins with a common conserved COG3895 domain, some of them predicted to be lipoproteins. No function has yet been assigned to these proteins, although they are widely spread among the Proteobacteria. We demonstrate that at least two representatives of this group, MliC (membrane bound lysozyme inhibitor of c-type lysozyme) of E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, also possess lysozyme inhibitory activity and confer increased lysozyme tolerance upon expression in E. coli. Interestingly, mliC of Salmonella Typhi was picked up earlier in a screen for genes induced during residence in macrophages, and knockout of mliC was shown to reduce macrophage survival of S. Typhi. Based on these observations, we suggest that the COG3895 domain is a common feature of a novel and widespread family of bacterial lysozyme inhibitors in gram-negative bacteria that may function as colonization or virulence factors in bacteria interacting with an animal host.

Lytic and Nonlytic Mechanism of Inactivation of Gram-Positive Bacteria by Lysozyme under Atmospheric and High Hydrostatic Pressure

A different behavior was observed in three gram-positive bacteria exposed to hen egg white lysozyme by plate counts and phase-contrast microscopy. The inactivation of Lactobacillus johnsonii was accompanied by spheroplast formation, which is an indication of peptidoglycan hydrolysis. Staphylococcus aureus was resistant to lysozyme and showed no signs of peptidoglycan hydrolysis, and Listeria innocua was inactivated and showed indications of cell leakage but not of peptidoglycan hydrolysis. Under high hydrostatic pressure, S. aureus also became sensitive to lysozyme but did not form spheroplasts and was not lysed. These results suggested the existence of a nonlytic mechanism of bactericidal action of lysozyme on the latter two bacteria, and this mechanism was further studied in L. innocua. Elimination of the enzymic activity of lysozyme by heat denaturation or reduction with beta-mercaptoethanol eliminated this bactericidal mechanism. By means of a LIVE/DEAD viability stain based on a membrane-impermeant fluorescent dye, the nonlytic mechanism was shown to involve membrane perturbation. In the absence of lysozyme, high-pressure treatment was shown to induce autolytic activity in S. aureus and L. innocua.

Inactivation of high pressure resistant Escherichia coli by lysozyme and nisin under high pressure

Abstract We studied the inactivation (by high hydrostatic pressure at 20°C) of Escherichia coli MG1655 and the selected pressure-resistant mutants that were derived previously from this strain, and which are the most pressure-resistant vegetative cells described to date. The natural antimicrobial peptides, lysozyme (50 μg/ml) and nisin (100 IU/ml), enhanced considerably the inactivation of the target bacteria under pressure. However, kinetic inactivation experiments in the presence of these compounds revealed pronounced tailing, which limited the level of inactivation that could be achieved under mild conditions of pressure and temperature. Interrupted pressure treatments enhanced the effectiveness of lysozyme and nisin, allowing a reduction by at least 6 logs of all strains at 400 MPa. A hypothetical mechanism of ‘pressure-promoted uptake’ is proposed to explain E. coli outer membrane permeabilization for lipophilic and cationic peptides like lysozyme and nisin under pressure.

Periplasmic lysozyme inhibitor contributes to lysozyme resistance in Escherichia coli

The product of the Escherichia coli ORFan gene ykfE was recently shown to be a strong inhibitor of C-type lysozyme in vitro. The gene was correspondingly renamed ivy (inhibitor of vertebrate lysozyme), but its biological function in E. coli remains unknown. In this work, we investigated the role of Ivy in the resistance of E. coli to the bactericidal effect of lysozyme in the presence of outer-membrane-permeabilizing treatments. Both in the presence of lactoferrin (3.0 mg/ml) and under high hydrostatic pressure (250 MPa), the lysozyme resistance of E. coli MG1655 was decreased by knock-out of Ivy, and increased by overexpression of Ivy. However, knock-out of Ivy did not increase the lysozyme sensitivity of an E. coli MG1655 mutant previously described to be resistant to lysozyme under high pressure. These results indicate that Ivy is one of several factors that affect lysozyme resistance in E. coli, and suggest a possible function for Ivy as a host interaction factor in commensal and pathogenic E. coli.

Moderate temperatures affect Escherichia coli inactivation by high-pressure homogenization only through fluid viscosity.

The inactivation of suspensions of Escherichia coli MG1655 by high‐pressure homogenization was studied over a wide range of pressures (100–300 MPa) and initial temperatures of the samples (5–50 °C). Bacterial inactivation was positively correlated with the applied pressure and with the initial temperature. When samples were adjusted to different concentrations of poly(ethylene glycol) to have the same viscosity at different temperatures below 45 °C and then homogenized at these temperatures, no difference in inactivation was observed. These observations strongly suggest, for the first time, that the influence of temperature on bacterial inactivation by high‐pressure homogenization is only through its effect on fluid viscosity. At initial temperatures ≥45 °C, corresponding to an outlet sample temperature >65 °C, the level of inactivation was higher than what would be predicted on the basis of the reduced viscosity at these temperatures, suggesting that under these conditions heat starts to contribute to cellular inactivation in addition to the mechanical effects that are predominant at lower temperatures. Second‐order polynomial models were proposed to describe the impact of a high‐pressure homogenization treatment of E. coli MG1655 as a function of pressure and temperature or as a function of pressure and viscosity. The pressure‐viscosity inactivation model provided a better quality of fit of the experimental data and furthermore is more comprehensive and versatile than the pressure‐temperature model because in addition to viscosity it implicitly incorporates temperature as a variable.