Barbara Melosky

treatment of Aids-related Cutaneous Kaposi's Sarcoma With Topical Alitretinoin (9 - cis -retinoic Acid) Gel

BACKGROUND Kaposis sarcoma (KS) is the most frequent malignancy in patients with HIV. Given the promise that retinoids show in the treatment of various hyperproliferative skin disorders and in vitro evidence of inhibition of proliferation of KS cells, a randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted. METHODS AND RESULTS A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled safety and efficacy evaluation of topical alitretinoin 0.1% gel applied to cutaneous KS lesions was conducted in HIV-infected patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the patients response rate, as determined by evaluating six index lesions representative of the patients overall KS cutaneous disease using AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) response criteria applied to topical therapy. Of 268 patients entered in the blinded treatment phase of the study (alitretinoin group, n = 134; vehicle group, n = 134), 47 patients (35%) treated with alitretinoin 0.1% gel had a positive response, compared with 24 patients (18%) treated with vehicle gel. Of 184 patients receiving open-label alitretinoin treatment following the blinded phase of the trial, 90 patients (49%) met criteria for a positive response. This superior efficacy of alitretinoin gel over vehicle gel was maintained when the data were adjusted or analyzed for age, race, Kamofsky scores, baseline CD4+ lymphocyte counts, number of raised lesions at baseline, and aggregate area of index lesions. Alitretinoin 0.1% gel was superior to vehicle gel regardless of the number of concurrent antiretroviral therapies. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, limited to the application site, and reversible on reduction in frequency or suspension of application. Relatively few patients (7%) discontinued alitretinoin therapy because of to related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The results show that alitretinoin gel application is safe and generally well tolerated, and they indicate the superiority of alitretinoin 0.1% gel over vehicle gel in the treatment of cutaneous AIDS-related KS lesions.

Review of EGFR TKIs in Metastatic NSCLC, Including Ongoing Trials.

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Most of these recent trials were conducted in patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors. As our knowledge of the EGFR mutation and its resistant pathways develops, the complexity of the situation expands. This article briefly reviews the pivotal trials leading to approval of EGFR TKIs in the first-line setting for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung carcinomas. It discusses the historical use of EGFR TKIs after the first-line setting in unselected patients and briefly describes ongoing trials.

Correlations of EGFR mutations and increases in EGFR and HER2 copy number to gefitinib response in a retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients

BackgroundGefitinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), has shown limited efficacy in the treatment of lung cancer. Recognized clinical predictors of response to this drug, specifically female, non-smoker, Asian descent, and adenocarcinoma, together suggest a genetic basis for drug response. Recent studies have addressed the relationship between response and either sequence mutations or increased copy number of specific receptor tyrosine kinases. We set out to examine the relationship between response and the molecular status of two such kinases, EGFR and HER2, in 39 patients treated with gefitinib at the BC Cancer Agency.MethodsArchival patient material was reviewed by a pathologist and malignant cells were selectively isolated by laser microdissection or manual recovery of cells from microscope slides. Genomic DNA was extracted from 37 such patient samples and exons 18–24, coding for the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR, were amplified by PCR and sequenced. EGFR and HER2 copy number status were also assessed using FISH in 26 samples. Correlations between molecular features and drug response were assessed using the two-sided Fishers exact test.ResultsMutations previously correlated with response were detected in five tumours, four with exon 19 deletions and one with an exon 21 missense L858R point mutation. Increased gene copy number was observed in thirteen tumours, seven with EGFR amplification, three with HER2 amplification, and three with amplification of both genes. In our study cohort, a correlation was not observed between response and EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion p = 0.0889, we observed a single exon 21 mutation in a non-responder) or increases in EGFR or HER2 copy number (p = 0.552 and 0.437, respectively).ConclusionNeither mutation of EGFR nor increased copy number of EGFR or HER2 was diagnostic of response to gefitinib in this cohort. However, validation of these features in a larger sample set is appropriate. Identification of additional predictive biomarkers beyond EGFR status may be necessary to accurately predict treatment outcome.

Epoetin Alfa in Cancer Patients: Evidence-Based Guidelines

Anemia is a common cause of cancer-related fatigue. A systematic review of the literature was performed to establish guidelines on the use of epoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia. The evidence in support of these guidelines was selected, reviewed, and summarized by the members of the Canadian Cancer and Anemia Guidelines Development Group. The effects of epoetin alfa on quality of life (QOL) in patients with cancer were examined in 5 randomized, placebo-controlled trials and 2 large, open-label, nonrandomized, community-based studies. The effects of epoetin alfa on red blood cell transfusion requirements were examined in 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 21 comparisons. All trials compared epoetin alfa to a suitable control group, examined specified outcome measures that could be analyzed, and studied patients with cancer who were receiving chemotherapy. Trials involving patients with hematologic malignancies originating in the bone marrow were excluded. Outcome measures included 1) quality of life (QOL) (as measured by scales including the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment [LASA] and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy [FACT] subscales), and 2) transfusion requirements (as measured by the proportion of patients requiring transfusion and amount of transfusion). The analysis confirmed that epoetin alfa produced statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in QOL in patients with cancer. The overall relative risk ratio for transfusion among patients receiving epoetin alfa was calculated to be 0.60 (95% Cl, 0.53-0.69; P < 0.00001), representing a 40% reduction in the proportion of patients requiring transfusion. These results support recommendations for the use of epoetin alfa in patients with cancer-related anemia.

Pointed Progress in Second-Line Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Rapidly Evolving Field of Checkpoint Inhibition

PURPOSE Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is globally prevalent and associated with high rates of mortality. Immune checkpoint pathways are often exploited by tumors to evade immunity-mediated destruction, and checkpoint inhibitors can reactivate tumor-related immune responses. This review considers available clinical evidence for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of second-line advanced NSCLC. METHODS Our systematic search revealed 20 clinical trials evaluating checkpoint inhibitors in the second-line setting, three of which were randomized trials comparing programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to docetaxel, the current standard of care in this setting. RESULTS A randomized phase II trial comparing the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab to docetaxel did not demonstrate improved survival for atezolizumab in patients overall, although a trend toward improved survival with increased PD-L1 expression was apparent. Twin phase III trials showed significantly improved survival for the programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor nivolumab compared with docetaxel in patients with both squamous and nonsquamous disease. PD-L1 expression correlated with improved survival in patients with nonsquamous disease, and patients with low levels of PD-L1 expression (< 10%) and those with EGFR mutations are unlikely to benefit. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is generally well tolerated and associated with low rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events compared with standard care. CONCLUSION Level 1 evidence exists to support the use of nivolumab as second-line treatment of patients with squamous advanced NSCLC, as well as in select patients with nonsquamous disease. Benefits remain unknown in patients with targetable driver mutations, and use of PD-L1 expression to guide therapy remains controversial. Results from ongoing randomized trials evaluating biomarkers and other checkpoint inhibitors will further our understanding of this rapidly evolving area of oncology.

Pan Canadian Rash Trial: A Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating the Impact of a Prophylactic Skin Treatment Regimen on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Induced Skin Toxicities in Patients With Metastatic Lung Cancer

PURPOSE Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor approved for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose epidermal growth factor receptor expression status is positive or unknown. Although it is efficacious, erlotinib can cause skin toxicity. This prospective, randomized phase III trial examined the effect of prophylactic treatment of erlotinib-induced skin rash. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients receiving erlotinib in the second- or third-line setting for advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to prophylactic minocycline (100 mg twice per day for 4 weeks), reactive treatment (after rash developed, per grade of rash), or no treatment unless severe (grade 3). Rash incidence and severity, time to maximal rash, time to resolution, and overall survival (OS) were compared among treatment groups. RESULTS In all, 150 patients were randomly assigned, 50 to each of three treatment arms. The incidence of skin toxicity was 84% regardless of treatment arm. Prophylactic treatment with minocycline significantly lengthened the time to the most severe grade of rash. Grade 3 rash was significantly higher in the no-treatment arm. OS was not significantly different among treatment arms, but patients receiving prophylactic or reactive treatments had a longer OS (7.6 and 8 months, respectively) than those who received no rash treatment (6 months). Rash was not self-limiting. CONCLUSION The incidence of all grades of rash did not differ statistically among the three arms, so the trial was negative. The incidence of grade 3 skin toxicities was reduced in patients who were treated with prophylactic minocycline or reactive treatment. Efficacy was not compromised. Prophylactic minocycline and reactive treatment are both acceptable options for the necessary treatment of erlotinib-induced rash in the second- or third-line setting of metastatic NSCLC.

Mapping the FACT-G cancer-specific quality of life instrument to the EQ-5D and SF-6D

ObjectiveTo help facilitate economic evaluations of oncology treatments, we mapped responses on cancer-specific instrument to generic preference-based measures.MethodsCancer patients (n = 367) completed one cancer-specific instrument, the FACT-G, and two preference-based measures, the EQ-5D and SF-6D. Responses were randomly divided to form development (n = 184) and cross-validation (n = 183) samples. Relationships between the instruments were estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized linear models (GLM), and censored least absolute deviations (CLAD) regression approaches. The performance of each model was assessed in terms of how well the responses to the cancer-specific instrument predicted EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE).ResultsPhysical, functional, and emotional well-being domain scores of the FACT-G best explained the EQ-5D and SF-6D. In terms of accuracy of prediction as measured in RMSE, the CLAD model performed best for the EQ-5D (RMSE = 0.095) whereas the GLM model performed best for the SF-6D (RMSE = 0.061). The GLM predicted SF-6D scores matched the observed values more closely than the CLAD and OLS.ConclusionOur results demonstrate that the estimation of both EQ-5D and SF-6D utility indices using the FACT-G responses can be achieved. The CLAD model for the EQ-5D and the GLM model for the SF-6D are recommended. Thus, it is possible to estimate quality-adjusted life years for economic evaluation from studies where only cancer-specific instrument have been administered.

Management of Common Toxicities in Metastatic NSCLC Related to Anti-Lung Cancer Therapies with EGFR–TKIs

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the standard of care treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TKIs are used first line in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC; erlotinib is the only TKI approved for subsequent lines of treatment in EGFR wild-type NSCLC. As promising as TKIs are in helping patients avoid some of the side effects of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, they do come with a variety of side effects. This article will describe the most common adverse events associated with the epidermal EGFR family of TKIs including diarrhea, rash, mucositis, and paronychia. The objective of this paper is to provide simple guidelines to assist oncologists in managing these common toxicities. As patient survival is often directly correlated with successful therapeutic drug delivery, the management of TKI-induced adverse events ensures proper treatment and may avoid discontinuation or reduction of the therapeutic.

Erlotinib or docetaxel for second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world cost-effectiveness analysis.

Introduction: Erlotinib was recently approved in British Columbia (BC) as a second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted which compares costs and effectiveness in patients who received second-line erlotinib with those in patients who received docetaxel. Methods: In a population of patients who have been treated with drugs (either erlotinib or docetaxel) for advanced NSCLC, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and probability of survival 1 year after beginning of second-line treatment (1YS) were determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis, as well as &khgr;2 test. Costs were collected retrospectively from the perspective of the BC health care system. Results: Incremental mean OS was 1 day, and incremental mean cost was

Erlotinib or best supportive care for third-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A real-world cost-effectiveness analysis

2891. Neither costs nor effectiveness were statistically significantly different between groups. PFS and 1YS were also nonsignificantly different. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate multivariate confounding. Conclusions: Erlotinib and docetaxel are statistically equivalent in terms of treatment cost and overall survival. As treatment practice patterns change, docetaxel may become more frequently prescribed. Therefore, the choice of whether to use erlotinib or docetaxel should be based on factors relating to patient preference rather than costs or effectiveness.