Barbara Przewlocka

Opioids in chronic pain

The advance in our understanding of the biogenesis of various endogenous opioid peptides, their anatomical distribution, and the characteristics of the multiple receptors with which they interact open a new avenue for understanding the role of opioid peptide systems in chronic pain. The main groups of opioid peptides: enkephalins, dynorphins and beta-endorphin derive from proenkephalin, prodynorphin and proopiomelanocortin, respectively. Recently, a novel group of peptides has been discovered in the brain and named endomorphins, endomorphin-1 and -2. They are unique in comparison with other opioid peptides by atypical structure and high selectivity towards the mu-opioid receptor. Another group, which joined the endogenous opioid peptide family in the last few years is the pronociceptin system comprising the peptides derived from this prohormone, acting at ORL1 receptors. Three members of the opioid receptor family were cloned in the early 1990s, beginning with the mouse delta-opioid receptor (DOR1) and followed by cloning of mu-opioid receptor (MOR1) and kappa-opioid receptor (KOR1). These three receptors belong to the family of seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors, and share extensive structural homologies. These opioid receptor and peptide systems are significantly implicated in antinociceptive processes. They were found to be represented in the regions involved in nociception and pain. The effects of opioids in animal models of inflammatory pain have been studied in great detail. Inflammation in the periphery influences the central sites and changes the opioid action. Inflammation increased spinal potency of various opioid receptor agonists. In general, the antinociceptive potency of opioids is greater against various noxious stimuli in animals with peripheral inflammation than in control animals. Inflammation-induced enhancement of opioid antinociceptive potency is characteristic predominantly for mu opioid receptors, since morphine elicits a greater increase in spinal potency of mu- than of delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists. Enhancement of the potency of mu-opioid receptor agonists during inflammation could arise from the changes occurring in opioid receptors, predominantly in affinity or number of the mu-opioid receptors. Inflammation has been shown to alter the expression of several genes in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Several studies have demonstrated profound alterations in the spinal PDYN system when there is peripheral inflammation or chronic arthritis. Endogenous dynorphin biosynthesis also increases under various conditions associated with neuropathic pain following damage to the spinal cord and injury of peripheral nerves. Interestingly, morphine lacks potent analgesic efficacy in neuropathic pain. A vast body of clinical evidence suggests that neuropathic pain is not opioid-resistant but only that reduced sensitivity to systemic opioids is observed in this condition, and an increase in their dose is necessary in order to obtain adequate analgesia. Reduction of morphine antinociceptive potency was postulated to be due to the fact that nerve injury reduced the activity of spinal opioid receptors or opioid signal transduction. Our recent study with endogenous ligands of the mu-opioid receptor, endomorphins, further complicates the issue, since endomorphins appear to be effective in neuropathic pain. Identification of the involved differences may be of importance to the understanding of the molecular mechanism of opioid action in neuropathic pain, as well as to the development of better and more effective drugs for the treatment of neuropathic pain in humans.

Importance of glial activation in neuropathic pain

Glia plays a crucial role in the maintenance of neuronal homeostasis in the central nervous system. The microglial production of immune factors is believed to play an important role in nociceptive transmission. Pain may now be considered a neuro-immune disorder, since it is known that the activation of immune and immune-like glial cells in the dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord results in the release of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, as well as algesic and analgesic mediators. In this review we presented an important role of cytokines (IL-1alfa, IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-15, IL-18, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, TGF-beta 1, fractalkine and CCL2); complement components (C1q, C3, C5); metaloproteinases (MMP-2,-9) and many other factors, which become activated on spinal cord and DRG level under neuropathic pain. We discussed the role of the immune system in modulating chronic pain. At present, unsatisfactory treatment of neuropathic pain will seek alternative targets for new drugs and it is possible that anti-inflammatory factors like IL-10, IL-4, IL-1alpha, TGF-beta 1 would fulfill this role. Another novel approach for controlling neuropathic pain can be pharmacological attenuation of glial and immune cell activation. It has been found that propentofylline, pentoxifylline, minocycline and fluorocitrate suppress the development of neuropathic pain. The other way of pain control can be the decrease of pro-nociceptive agents like transcription factor synthesis (NF-kappaB, AP-1); kinase synthesis (MEK, p38MAPK, JNK) and protease activation (cathepsin S, MMP9, MMP2). Additionally, since it is known that the opioid-induced glial activation opposes opioid analgesia, some glial inhibitors, which are safe and clinically well tolerated, are proposed as potential useful ko-analgesic agents for opioid treatment of neuropathic pain. This review pointed to some important mechanisms underlying the development of neuropathic pain, which led to identify some possible new approaches to the treatment of neuropathic pain, based on the more comprehensive knowledge of the interaction between the nervous system and glial and immune cells.

Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase enhances morphine antinociception in the rat spinal cord

NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 400-1500 micrograms), administered intrathecally (ith.), elicits a slight but dose-related antinociception in rats, assessed by tail-flick and paw pressure tests. L-NAME (400 micrograms) and morphine (0.5 microgram) coadministered ith. elicit a profound and long-lasting antinociception, which is abolished by ith. administration of 3-morpholino-sydnonimine (SIN-1, 100 micrograms). Hemoglobin (266 micrograms) administered ith. also slightly potentiates morphine antinociception. These results suggest that nitric oxide (NO) is involved in spinal nociceptive events, and that the increased production of NO following the nociceptive input may diminish the efficiency of opioid antinociception in the spinal cord.

Local peripheral opioid effects and expression of opioid genes in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia in neuropathic and inflammatory pain.

ABSTRACT We investigated the efficacy of local intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of peptide and non‐peptide μ‐, δ‐ and κ‐opioid receptor agonists in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Locally applied agonists dose‐dependently reduced formalin‐induced flinching of the inflamed paw and induced antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects in sciatic nerve ligation‐induced neuropathic pain. These effects were mediated by peripheral opioid receptors localized at the side of tissue/nerve injury, as was demonstrated by selective and non‐selective opioid receptors antagonists. The ED50 dose range of μ‐ and κ‐agonists required to induce analgesia in neuropathy was much higher than the ED50 for inflammation; moreover, only δ‐agonists were effective in the same dose range in both pain models. Additionally, effective antinociception was achieved at a lower dose of peptide, compared to non‐peptide, opioids. Such findings support the use of the peripheral administration of opioid peptides, especially δ‐agonists, in treating chronic pain. Furthermore, in order to assess whether adaptations in the expression of opioid genes could underlie the clinical observation of reduced opioid effectiveness in neuropathic pain, we analyzed the abundance of opioid transcripts in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) during the neuropathy and inflammation. Nerve injury down‐regulated mRNA for all types of opioid receptors in the DRG, which is predicted to decrease in the synthesis of opioid receptors to possibly account for the reduced effectiveness of locally administered opioids in neuropathy. The obtained results differentiate inflammatory and neuropathic pain and provide a novel insight into the peripheral effectiveness of opioids in both types of pain.

Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase attenuates the development of morphine tolerance and dependence in mice

The effect of the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 5-20 mg/kg i.p.) and NG-nitro-L-arginine (NO2Arg, 5-20 mg/kg i.p.) on morphine-induced analgesia, as well as on morphine induced tolerance and dependence was examined in male albino Swiss mice. Neither acute nor repeated (for 5 days) administration of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NAME affected the morphine induced analgesia, as measured by hot plate and tail-flick tests. On the other hand, administration of L-NAME or NO2Arg along with morphine prevented the development of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine for at least 7 days, whereas the analgesic effect of morphine alone disappeared after 5 days. L-NAME and NO2Arg also attenuated some signs of morphine dependence, as assessed by naloxone (2 mg/kg)-precipitated withdrawal. These results indicate that NO may play a role in the development of morphine tolerance and dependence.

Spinal analgesic action of endomorphins in acute, inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats.

We studied spinal analgesic and antiallodynic effects of endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 administered i.t. in comparison with Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-MePhe-Gly-ol (DAMGO) or morphine, during acute, inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats chronically implanted with intrathecal cannulas. Endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 (2.5, 5, 10 microg i.t.) increased the tail-flick latency and, to the lesser extent, the paw pressure latency. The range of potencies in both those models of acute pain was as follows: DAMGO > morphine = endomorphin-1 > endomorphin-2. In a model of inflammatory pain, the number of formalin-induced flinching episodes was decreased by endomorphin-1. The effect of endomorphin-2 was much less pronounced. Both DAMGO and morphine significantly inhibited the pain-related behavior evoked by formalin. In a neuropathic pain model (sciatic nerve crushing in rats), endomorphin-1 and -2 (5 microg i.t.) had a statistically significant effect on the tail-flick latency and on the cold-water tail flick latency. Morphine, 5 microg, was found to be ineffective. Endomorphin-1 and -2 (2.5 and 5 microg i.t.) dose-dependently antagonized allodynia. Those effects of endomorphins were antagonized in acute (30 microg), inflammatory (30 microg) and neuropathic pain models (60 microg) by cyprodime, a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist. In conclusion, our results show a strong analgesic action of endomorphins at the spinal cord level. The most interesting finding is a strong, stronger than in the case of morphine, antiallodynic effect of endomorphins in rats subjected to sciatic nerve crushing, which suggests a possible use of these compounds in a very difficult therapy of neuropathic pain.

Differential activation of spinal microglial and astroglial cells in a mouse model of peripheral neuropathic pain.

The pharmacological attenuation of glial activation represents a novel approach for controlling neuropathic pain, but the role of microglial and astroglial cells is not well established. To better understand the potential role of two types of glial cells, microglia and astrocytes, in the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain, we examined markers associated with them by quantitative RT-PCR, western blot and immunohistochemical analyses in the dorsal horn of the lumbar spinal cord 7days after chronic constriction injury (CCI) to the sciatic nerve in mice. The mRNA and protein of microglial cells were labeled with C1q and OX42(CD11b/c), respectively. The mRNA and protein of astrocytes were labeled with GFAP. The RT-PCR results indicated an increase in C1q mRNA that was more pronounced than the increased expression of GFAP mRNA ipsilateral to the injury in the dorsal spinal cord. Similarly, western blot and immunohistochemical analyses demonstrated an ipsilateral upregulation of OX42-positive cells (72 and 20%, respectively) and no or little (8% upregulation) change in GFAP-positive cells in the ipsilateral dorsal lumbar spinal cord. We also found that chronic intraperitoneal injection of the minocycline (microglial inhibitor) and pentoxifylline (cytokine inhibitor) attenuated CCI-induced activation of microglia, and both, but not fluorocitrate (astroglial inhibitor), diminished neuropathic pain symptoms and tactile and cold sensitivity. Our findings indicate that spinal microglia are more activated than astrocytes in peripheral injury-induced neuropathic pain. These findings implicate a glial regulation of the pain response and suggest that pharmacologically targeting microglia could effectively prevent clinical pain syndromes in programmed and/or anticipated injury.

Glutamate receptor ligands attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia and potentiate morphine effects in a mouse model of neuropathic pain.

Abstract Recent studies have indicated that metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR5, mGluR2/3 and mGluR7 are present in the regions of central nervous system important for nociceptive transmission, but their involvement in neuropathic pain has not been well established. We demonstrated that acute and chronic administration of MPEP (mGluR5 antagonist), LY379268 (mGluR2/3 agonist), and AMN082 (mGluR7 agonist) attenuated allodynia (von Frey test) and hyperalgesia (cold plate test) as measured in Swiss albino mice on day seven after chronic constriction injury (CCI) to the sciatic nerve. Moreover, single administration of MPEP (30 mg/kg; i.p.) or LY379268 (10 mg/kg; i.p.) injected 30 min before morphine potentiated morphine’s effects (20 mg/kg; i.p.) in the mouse CCI model, as measured by both the tests mentioned above. However, a single administration of AMN082 (3 mg/kg; i.p.) potentiated the effects of a single morphine injection (20 mg/kg; i.p.) in the von Frey test only. Chronic administration (7 days) of low doses of MPEP, LY379268 or AMN082 (all drugs at 3 mg/kg; i.p.) potentiated the effects of single doses of morphine (3, 10, and 20 mg/kg; i.p.) administered on day seven; however, AMN082 only potentiated the effect in the cold plate test. Additionally, the same doses of MPEP and LY379268 (but not AMN082) chronically co‐administered with morphine (40 mg/kg; i.p.) attenuated the development of morphine tolerance in CCI‐exposed mice. Our data suggest that mGluR5, mGluR2/3, and mGluR7 are involved in injury‐induced plastic changes in nociceptive pathways and that the mGluR5 and mGluR2/3 ligands enhanced morphine’s effectiveness in neuropathy, which could have therapeutic implications.

Opioids in neuropathic pain.

Opiates lack potent analgesic efficacy in neuropathic pain although it is now generally accepted that the poor effect of these drugs reflects a reduction in their potency. Reduction of morphine antinociceptive potency was postulated to be due to the fact that nerve injury altered the activity of opioid systems or opioid specific signaling. Endogenous opioid systems were found to be represented in the regions involved in the nociception and are implicated in chronic pain. Opioid peptides biosynthesis and opioid receptors density in the nociceptive pathways and their functions change under various conditions associated with neuropathic pain following damage to the spinal cord and injury of peripheral nerves. Identification of a role of opioid systems in neuropathic pain and molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying these processes are of importance to understanding of the opioid action in neuropathic pain that will hopefully facilitate development of therapeutic strategies in which effectiveness of opioids in alleviation neuropathic pain is increased.

Attenuation of morphine tolerance by minocycline and pentoxifylline in naive and neuropathic mice

We have previously demonstrated that glial inhibitors reduce the development of allodynia and hyperalgesia, potentiating the effect of a single morphine dose in a neuropathic pain model. This study explores the effects of two glial activation inhibitors, minocycline and pentoxifylline, on the development of tolerance to morphine in naive and chronic constriction injury (CCI)-exposed mice. Administration of morphine to naive (20 mg/kg; i.p.) and CCI-exposed mice (40 mg/kg; i.p.) twice daily resulted in tolerance to its anti-nociceptive effect after 6 days. Injections of morphine were combined with minocycline (30 mg/kg, i.p.) or pentoxifylline (20 mg/kg, i.p.) administered as two preemptive doses before first morphine administration in naive or pre-injury in CCI-exposed mice, and repeated twice daily 30 min before each morphine administration. With treatment, development of morphine tolerance was delayed by 5 days (from 6 to 11 days), as measured by the tail-flick test in naive and by tail-flick, von Frey, and cold plate tests in CCI-exposed mice. Western blot analysis of CD11b/c and GFAP protein demonstrated that minocycline and pentoxifylline, at doses delaying development of tolerance to morphine analgesia, significantly diminished the morphine-induced increase in CD11b/c protein level. We found that repeated systemic administration of glial inhibitors significantly delays development of morphine tolerance by attenuating the level of this microglial marker under normal and neuropathic pain conditions. Our results support the idea that targeting microglial activation during morphine therapy/treatment is a novel and clinically promising method for enhancing morphines analgesic effects, especially in neuropathic pain.