Barbie L. Byrd
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Barbie L. Byrd.
Fishery Bulletin | 2014
Barbie L. Byrd; Aleta A. Hohn; Gretchen N. Lovewell; Karen M. Altman; Susan G. Barco; Ari S. Friedlaender; Craig A. Harms; William A. McLellan; Kathleen M. T. Moore; Patricia E. Rosel; Victoria G. Thayer
The adjacency of 2 marine biogeographic regions off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (NC), and the proximity of the Gulf Stream result in a high biodiversity of species from northern and southern provinces and from coastal and pelagic habitats. We examined spatiotemporal patterns of marine mammal strandings and evidence of human interaction for these strandings along NC shorelines and evaluated whether the spatiotemporal patterns and species diversity of the stranded animals reflected published records of populations in NC waters. During the period of 1997–2008, 1847 stranded animals were documented from 1777 reported events. These animals represented 9 families and 34 species that ranged from tropical delphinids to pagophilic seals. This biodiversity is higher than levels observed in other regions. Most strandings were of coastal bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) (56%), harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) (14%), and harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) (4%). Overall, strandings of northern species peaked in spring. Bottlenose dolphin strandings peaked in spring and fall. Almost half of the strandings, including southern delphinids, occurred north of Cape Hatteras, on only 30% of NC’s coastline. Most stranded animals that were positive for human interaction showed evidence of having been entangled in fishing gear, particularly bottlenose dolphins, harbor porpoises, short-finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus), harbor seals, and humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Spatiotemporal patterns of bottlenose dolphin strandings were similar to ocean gillnet fishing effort. Biodiversity of the animals stranded on the beaches reflected biodiversity in the waters off NC, albeit not always proportional to the relative abundance of species (e.g., Kogia species). Changes in the spatiotemporal patterns of strandings can serve as indicators of underlying changes due to anthropogenic or naturally occurring events in the source populations.
Journal of Marine Biology | 2013
Aleta A. Hohn; David S. Rotstein; Barbie L. Byrd
A marked increase in the frequency of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) stranded in North Carolina in 2005 was declared as an Unusual Mortality Event (UME). Strandings occurred in January through May when harbor porpoises are seasonally present. Increased stranding rates were measured relative to a threshold to determine that the UME was occurring. The threshold analysis also revealed elevated strandings during 1999, an undeclared UME year. Recovered carcasses during 1999 and 2005 accounted for 39% of 261 strandings during 1997–2009. During 2005, of 43 strandings, primary or secondary causes of mortality included fishery interactions, emaciation, and interspecific aggression. Apart from small but significant differences in timing and condition of strandings, composition of strandings during UME and non-UME years was similar, with most being young-of-the-year and occurring during March and April, north of Cape Hatteras. Porpoises had high levels of parasitic infestation typical for this species. However, no indication of infectious disease and no cause of the 2005 event were found from gross and histologic findings. Response to UMEs is challenging, particularly along the expanses of North Carolina beaches, requiring additional effort to obtain carcasses in sufficiently fresh condition to determine the cause of these events.
Southeastern Naturalist | 2010
Barbie L. Byrd; Aleta A. Hohn
Abstract Each fishery presents its own challenges for observers to document bycatch. The North Carolina (NC) stop net fishery is especially challenging because it uses anchored gear (the stop net) that soaks up to 15 days to herd fish, which are then hauled to shore via another gear (a beach seine). Three Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose Dolphin) entanglements in stop nets and six Bottlenose Dolphin strandings, each suspected of having been entangled in stop net gear based on injuries noted (lesions) and spatio-temporal overlap with the fishery, were documented by the NC Marine Mammal Network between 1992 and 2007. In 2001–2002, new observational techniques and surveys were used to observe this fishery to estimate bycatch and to document dolphin behavior around the gear. Techniques included observations from the beach during net retrievals and in situ surveys using a vessel with a sonar-video camera system. No entangled dolphins were observed, and, in fact, observations indicated dolphins were not attracted to stop nets and generally changed direction to avoid the gear. Nonetheless, characteristics of the fishery impose severe limitations on the efficacy of bycatch observer methods, rendering those results unreliable. Given low levels of known or suspected entanglements and the challenges of observing this fishery, stranding network data may be the most practical and effective method to monitor dolphin bycatch.
Journal of North Carolina Academy of Science | 2016
Barbie L. Byrd; Lisa R. Goshe; Trip Kolkmeyer; Aleta A. Hohn
Abstract: Sea turtle bycatch has been documented in the large-mesh gillnet fishery that targets flounder in estuarine waters of North Carolina (NC). However, only portions of the fishery operated under Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permits and had regular observer coverage to determine the occurrence and extent of sea turtle bycatch. From June through November 2009, an Alternative Platform Observer Program (APOP) was initiated in southeastern Carteret County, NC, to document turtle entanglements. Observers covered 1.6% of the total number of large-mesh gillnet trips reported (1.1% of landings) and documented turtle bycatch (n = 22) on 36% of the observed trips (12 of 33). Most turtles were recovered alive (n = 15), and all interactions occurred in June, July, and August. Bycaught sea turtle species included 12 greens (Chelonia mydas), 5 Kemp’s ridleys (Lepidochelys kempii), and 5 loggerheads (Caretta caretta). Hauls with bycaught turtles in June had a significantly greater mean string length than...
Archive | 2014
Antoinette M. Gorgone; Tomoharu Eguchi; Barbie L. Byrd; Karen M. Altman; Aleta A. Hohn
The Northern North Carolina Estuarine System (NNCES) stock of the common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) has a small population size and low Potential Biological Removal level (PBR). Levels of serious injury and mortality due to commercial fisheries interactions may exceed the PBR. In addition, the prior abundance estimate, from a survey in 2006, is no longer valid for computing the PBR for the stock after 2014. To obtain a new abundance estimate, we conducted a capture-mark-recapture survey of the NNCES stock in the Pamlico-Albemarle Estuarine Complex (PAEC) from 15 June to 27 July 2013. The PAEC is the primary summer habitat for the stock. We surveyed 4,779 km of trackline, encountering 128 dolphin groups. We took 30,991 photographs, from which 471 individual dolphins were identified from distinctive nicks and notches on dorsal fins. Because dolphins in the most southern portion of the summer habitat overlap with the Southern North Carolina Estuarine System (SNCES) stock in July, some photographed dolphins could have been members of the SNCES stock. We developed a decision tree to identify dolphins that may have belonged to the SNCES stock, thereby allowing us to estimate abundance using all dolphins and then excluding those that might belong to the SNCES stock. We then calculated lower (823; 95% posterior interval (PI) = 733-931) and upper (873; 95% PI = 775-989) bounds on the abundance estimate based on habitat-use assumptions from the decision tree. Both estimates were obtained using closed capture-mark-recapture models and a novel method to correct for dolphins with indistinctive fins.
Archive | 2008
Barbie L. Byrd; Aleta H. Hohn; Fentress H. Munden; Gretchen N. Lovewell; Rachel E. Lo Piccolo
Archive | 2013
Gordon T. Waring; Elizabeth Josephson; Katherine Maze-Foley; Patricia E. Rosel; Kevin Barry; Barbie L. Byrd; Timothy V. N. Cole; Laura Engleby; Carol P. Fairfield; Lance P. Garrison; Allison G. Henry; Larry J. Hansen; Jenny Litz; Christopher Orphanides; Richard M. Pace; Debra L. Palka; Marjorie C. Rossman; Carrie Sinclair; Frederick W. Wenzel
Archive | 2015
Barbie L. Byrd; Gordon T. Waring; Elizabeth Josephson; Katherine Maze-Foley; Patricia E. Rosel; Timothy V. N. Cole; Laura Engleby; Lance Preston Garrison; Joshua M. Hatch; Allison G. Henry; Stacey C. Horstman; Jenny Alison Litz; Keith D. Mullin; Christopher Orphanides; Richard M. Pace; Debra L. Palka; Marjorie Lyssikatos; Frederick W. Wenzel
Archive | 2007
Trip Kolkmeyer; Barry Guthrie; Barbie L. Byrd; Aleta A. Hohn
Aquatic Mammals | 2017
Barbie L. Byrd; Aleta A. Hohn