Barbro Linderholm

Vascular endothelial growth factor is of high prognostic value in node-negative breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE The prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein, known to stimulate endothelial growth and angiogenesis, was evaluated in node-negative breast carcinoma (NNBC) and compared with established prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS In 525 consecutive patients with primary invasive NNBC (T1-2N0M0; tumor, node, metastasis stage), of whom 500 patients did not receive any systemic therapy, the cytosolic levels of VEGF165 were measured by using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median follow-up was 46 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS VEGF level was significantly inversely correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) positivity but positively associated with tumor size and histologic grade. Patients with VEGF levels above the median value (2.40 pg/microg of DNA) showed a significantly shorter survival time (P=.0012) than patients with levels less than the median value, also when analyzed as a continuous variable (P=.0277). Tumor size, grade, and ER expression were all statistically significant for overall survival in univariate analyses (P=.0069, P=.014, and P < .001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that VEGF level was the strongest predictor of overall survival (P=.0199). Histologic grade was also an independent predictor of survival (P=.0477). Among the 381 patients with ER-positive tumors, a group in general considered to have a good prognosis, we found a significant reduction in survival for those with levels of VEGF greater than the median value (P=.0009). CONCLUSION The results suggest that the level of VEGF165 protein is an independent, strong prognostic factor for survival in patients with NNBC, especially in the subgroup of patients with ER positivity. Thus, cytosolic VEGF165 might be useful to select patients for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Correlation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Content With Recurrences, Survival, and First Relapse Site in Primary Node-Positive Breast Carcinoma After Adjuvant Treatment

PURPOSE To determine the predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in primary node-positive breast cancer (NPBC) after adjuvant endocrine treatment or adjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS VEGF was quantitatively measured in tumor cytosols from 362 consecutive patients with primary NPBC using an enzyme immunoassay for human VEGF(165). Adjuvant treatment was given to all patients, either as endocrine therapy (n = 250) or chemotherapy (n = 112). The median follow-up time was 56 months. RESULTS Univariate analysis showed VEGF to be a significant predictor of RFS (P =.0289) and OS (P =.0004) in the total patient population and in patients who received adjuvant endocrine treatment (RFS, P =.0238; OS, P =.0121). In the group of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, no significant difference was seen in RFS, but a difference was seen in OS (P =.0235). Patients with bone recurrences tended to have lower VEGF expression (median, 2.17 pg/microg DNA) than patients with visceral metastasis (4.41 pg/microg), brain metastasis (8.29 pg/microg), or soft tissue recurrences (3.16 pg/microg). Multivariate analysis showed nodal status (P =.0004), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P <.0001), and tumor size (P =.0085) to be independent predictors of RFS. VEGF was found to be an independent predictor of OS (P =.0170; relative risk [RR] = 1.82), as were ER (P <.0001; RR = 5.19) and nodal status (P =.0002; RR = 2.58). For patients receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment, multivariate analysis showed VEGF content to be an independent predictor of OS (P =.0420; RR = 1.90) but not of RFS. CONCLUSION The results suggest that VEGF(165) content in tumor cytosols is a predictor of RFS and OS in primary NPBC. VEGF content might also predict outcome after adjuvant endocrine treatment, but further studies in a prospective setting with homologous treatments are required.

Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacking expression of steroid receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, having chemotherapy as the only therapeutic option, is characterised by early relapses and poor outcome. We investigated intratumoural (i.t.) levels of the pro-angiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and survival in patients with TNBC compared with non-TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS VEGF levels were determined by an enzyme immunosorbent assay in a retrospective series consisting of 679 consecutive primary breast cancer patients. RESULTS Eighty-seven patients (13%) were classified as TNBC and had significantly higher VEGF levels; median value in TNBC was 8.2 pg/microg DNA compared with 2.7 pg/microg DNA in non-TNBC (P < 0.001). Patients with TNBC had statistically significant shorter recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.8; P = 0.0023], breast cancer-corrected survival (HR = 2.2; P = 0.004) and overall survival (HR = 1.8; P = 0.005) compared with non-TNBC. Patients with TNBC relapsed earlier than non-TNBC; mean time from diagnosis to first relapse was 18.8 and 30.7 months, respectively. The time between first relapse and death was also shorter in TNBC: 7.5 months versus 17.5 months in non-TNBC (P = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS Our results show that TNBC have higher i.t. VEGF levels compared with non-TNBC. Ongoing clinical trials will answer if therapy directed towards angiogenesis may be an alternative way to improve outcome in this poor prognosis group.

Tumor specific VEGF-A and VEGFR2/KDR protein are co-expressed in breast cancer.

Angiogenesis is a prognostic indicator in primary breast cancer regulated by specific angiogenic factors and their receptors. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), so far considered the most important, acts through dimerization of the receptor VEGFR2/KDR within the receptor tyrosine kinase family of VEGF receptors. In order to study the interplay between VEGF-A and VEGFR2/KDR in breast cancer we evaluated their expression by immunohistochemistry in 102 breast cancers organized in a tumor tissue array system allowing semi-quantitative evaluation of cytoplasmatic staining intensity. In addition, VEGF-A165 was analyzed by an enzyme immuno assay (ELISA) in protein extracts prepared from frozen tissue from 98 of 102 tumors included in the array. Cytoplasmatic staining of VEGF of varying intensity was observed in all samples and correlated with the ELISA results of VEGF content (p = 0.007). Interestingly, VEGFR2/KDR expression correlated with VEGF expression using immunohistochemistry, indicating that VEGF and VEGFR2/KDR may be co-expressed in breast cancer. Furthermore, high levels of VEGF-A165 in the protein extracts was associated with impaired short time survival but not long term survival whereas immunohistochemically assessed VEGF and VEGFR2/KDR were not significantly associated with survival. In summary, immunohistochemically based analysis of VEGF using a tumor tissue array system seems to be a useful method for VEGF quantification in breast cancer here validated using an ELISA based method. The tumor tissue array system enables opportunities of simultaneous analysis of markers engaged in angiogenesis justifying further studies using larger series of tumors.

An Autocrine VEGF/VEGFR2 and p38 Signaling Loop Confers Resistance to 4-Hydroxytamoxifen in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells

Tamoxifen, a partial estrogen receptor antagonist, is part of the standard treatment of both primary and advanced breast cancers. However, significant proportions of breast cancers are either de novo resistant or develop tamoxifen resistance during the course of treatment through mechanisms which have been only partly characterized. We have previously found that high vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) expression and concomitant high p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity within breast cancers predict a poor outcome for tamoxifen-treated patients. Here, we have molecularly dissected how VEGF/VEGFR2 and p38 are linked, and contribute to tamoxifen resistance within breast cancer using a MCF-7 BC cell model with different 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) responsiveness. We report that MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines with tamoxifen resistance have increased secretion of VEGF and increased signaling through VEGFR2 compared with parental MCF-7 cells. 4-OHT treatment caused the ablation of VEGF secretion in parental MCF-7 cells, whereas in the tamoxifen-resistant subline, a VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling loop was still evident upon treatment. Increased basal levels of total and phosphorylated p38 were observed in tamoxifen-resistant cells. Pharmacologic inhibition of p38 reduced the proliferation of both tamoxifen-responsive and tamoxifen-resistant cells and showed an additive growth-inhibitory effect in combination with 4-OHT. A connection between VEGF/VEGFR2 and p38 signaling was identified by VEGF and VEGFR2 knockdown, which equally reduced both the total and the active forms of p38 in tamoxifen-resistant cells. Taken together, our results suggest that decreased sensitivity to 4-OHT is caused by a death-protecting VEGF/VEGFR2 and p38 growth factor loop in breast cancer cells. Inhibition of these signaling pathways may be beneficial to overcome tamoxifen resistance. (Mol Cancer Res 2008;6(10):1630–8)

Overexpression of c-erbB-2 is related to a higher expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and constitutes an independent prognostic factor in primary node-positive breast cancer after adjuvant systemic treatment

The aim of this study was to investigate possible associations between the expression of c-erbB-2 and the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), p53 status, routine breast cancer prognostic factors and survival. Expression of c-erbB-2, VEGF, bFGF, and p53 protein was determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 656 patients with primary breast cancer (median follow-up time of 83 months). In 60 cases, we also used immunohistochemistry (IHC) for c-erbB-2 evaluation, to be used as a reference for the ELISA. Overexpression of c-erbB-2 was significantly related to a higher expression of VEGF, lower bFGF content, negative steroid receptor status, and a high S-phase fraction. In multivariate analysis, c-erbB-2 was an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in all patients, and in node-positive patients, irrespective of the adjuvant systemic therapy. Combined survival analyses regarding c-erbB-2 and VEGF yielded additional prognostic information.

Comparative Proteome Analysis Revealing an 11-Protein Signature for Aggressive Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background Clinical outcome of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly variable. This study aims to identify and validate a prognostic protein signature for TNBC patients to reduce unnecessary adjuvant systemic therapy. Methods Frozen primary tumors were collected from 126 lymph node–negative and adjuvant therapy–naive TNBC patients. These samples were used for global proteome profiling in two series: an in-house training (n = 63) and a multicenter test (n = 63) set. Patients who remained free of distant metastasis for a minimum of 5 years after surgery were defined as having good prognosis. Cox regression analysis was performed to develop a prognostic signature, which was independently validated. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results An 11-protein signature was developed in the training set (median follow-up for good-prognosis patients = 117 months) and subsequently validated in the test set (median follow-up for good-prognosis patients = 108 months) showing 89.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69.2% to 98.1%), 70.5% specificity (95% CI = 61.7% to 74.2%), 56.7% positive predictive value (95% CI = 43.8% to 62.1%), and 93.9% negative predictive value (95% CI = 82.3% to 98.9%) for poor-prognosis patients. The predicted poor-prognosis patients had higher risk to develop distant metastasis than the predicted good-prognosis patients in univariate (hazard ratio [HR] = 13.15; 95% CI = 3.03 to 57.07; P = .001) and multivariable (HR = 12.45; 95% CI = 2.67 to 58.11; P = .001) analysis. Furthermore, the predicted poor-prognosis group had statistically significantly more breast cancer–specific mortality. Using our signature as guidance, more than 60% of patients would have been exempted from unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy compared with conventional prognostic guidelines. Conclusions We report the first validated proteomic signature to assess the natural course of clinical TNBC.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of plasma levels of two forms of cytokeratin 18 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE Cytokeratin 18 (CK18) can be used as a serum biomarker for carcinoma cell death, whereas caspase-cleaved (ccCK18) fragments reflect tumour apoptosis. We explored the potential diagnostic and prognostic role of circulating CK18 and ccCK18 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in comparison with Cyfra 21.1, a fragment of cytokeratin 19. METHODS Subject cohorts consisted of 200 healthy blood donors (HBD), 113 patients with benign lung diseases (BLD) and 179 NSCLC cases. Plasma levels of ccCK18, total CK18 and Cyfra 21.1 were determined with ELISA assays. RESULTS Plasma levels of ccCK18 and total CK18 were higher in the NSCLC group compared to the HBD and BLD cohorts (p<0.0001). Using a cut-off of 104 U/L for ccCK18 and 302 U/L for total CK18 (95% specificity in the HBD group) the diagnostic accuracy of both CK18 forms to distinguish between NSCLC and BLD cases was 56%, whereas it was 94% for Cyfra 21.1. Multivariate survival analysis showed that total CK18 was a stronger prognostic factor than both ccCK18 and Cyfra 21.1 (HR 0.64 for low versus high total CK18 levels, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.82; p=0.0004) in the entire NSCLC cohort and in 78 patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease treated with chemoradiotherapy or first-line chemotherapy (HR 0.70 95% CI 0.52-0.94; p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS Cyfra 21.1 is a useful diagnostic biomarker for NSCLC. Total CK18 shows a promising potential as prognostic marker in NSCLC patients, independently of the therapeutical intervention. In contrast, ccCK18 was not of prognostic value in NSCLC, suggesting that tumour necrosis is of particular importance in this disease.

Retinoic acid receptor alpha is associated with tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer

About one-third of oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen relapse. Here we identify the nuclear receptor retinoic acid receptor alpha as a marker of tamoxifen resistance. Using quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we show that retinoic acid receptor alpha protein networks and levels differ in a tamoxifen-sensitive (MCF7) and a tamoxifen-resistant (LCC2) cell line. High intratumoural retinoic acid receptor alpha protein levels also correlate with reduced relapse-free survival in oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen solely. A similar retinoic acid receptor alpha expression pattern is seen in a comparable independent patient cohort. An oestrogen receptor alpha and retinoic acid receptor alpha ligand screening reveals that tamoxifen-resistant LCC2 cells have increased sensitivity to retinoic acid receptor alpha ligands and are less sensitive to oestrogen receptor alpha ligands compared with MCF7 cells. Our data indicate that retinoic acid receptor alpha may be a novel therapeutic target and a predictive factor for oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.

HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) evaluation in primary breast carcinoma by fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry with special focus on intratumor heterogeneity and comparison of invasive and in situ components.

We have studied the intratumor HER-2/neu heterogeneity in 78 consecutive and population-based primary invasive breast carcinomas. Within the invasive component, heterogeneity was detected in only 1 of 78 tumors. In 48 tumors (62%), we found both in situ and invasive components in analyzed tissue sections. Twelve of these 48 tumors had a difference of at least 2 arbitrary units in the in situ compared with the invasive part of the tumor with regard to the HER-2/neu status analyzed by HercepTest (immunohistochemistry). Eight of these 12 tumors were reanalyzed with fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry with and without a new Automated Cellular Imaging System. In this limited material, immunohistochemistry in combination with the Automated Cellular Imaging System seemed to have a better correlation with fluorescent in situ hybridization than immunostaining analyzed manually. In conclusion, HER-2/neu expression is not seldom heterogeneous in invasive compared with in situ components within a tumor. This finding should be considered in the choice of evaluation method. To avoid heterogeneity as a confounding factor in HER-2/neu analyses, detection methods such as immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization, which can provide evaluation in a preserved tissue architecture, should be used. Perhaps the intratumor HER-2/neu heterogeneity can explain some of the unexpected failures of trastuzumab therapy.