Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Baron S. Lonner is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Baron S. Lonner.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2006

Thoracoscopic Spinal Fusion Compared with Posterior Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Baron S. Lonner; Dimitry Kondrachov; Farhan Siddiqi; Victor Hayes; Carrie Scharf

BACKGROUND Posterior spinal fusion with segmental instrumentation is the gold standard for the surgical treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. More recently, anterior surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with spinal instrumentation have become available. The purpose of the present study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes as well as pulmonary function in patients managed with either anterior thoracoscopic or posterior surgery. METHODS Radiographic data, Scoliosis Research Society patient-based outcome questionnaires, pulmonary function, and operative records were reviewed for fifty-one patients undergoing surgical treatment of scoliosis. Data were collected preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the time of the final follow-up. The radiographic parameters that were analyzed included coronal curve correction, the most caudad instrumented vertebra tilt angle correction, coronal balance, and thoracic kyphosis. The operative parameters that were evaluated included the operative time, the estimated blood loss, the blood transfusion rate, the number of levels fused, the type of bone graft used, and the number of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The pulmonary function parameters that were analyzed included vital capacity and peak flow. RESULTS The thoracoscopic group included twenty-eight patients with a mean age of 14.6 years, and the posterior fusion group included twenty-three patients with a mean age of 14.3 years. The percent correction was 54.5% for the thoracoscopic group and 55.3% for the posterior group. With the numbers available, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of kyphosis (p = 0.84), coronal balance (p = 0.70), or tilt angle (p = 0.91) at the time of the final follow-up. The mean number of levels fused was 5.8 in the thoracoscopic group, compared with 9.3 levels in the posterior group (p < 0.0001). The estimated blood loss in the thoracoscopic group was significantly less than that in the posterior fusion group (361 mL compared with 545 mL; p = 0.03), and the transfusion rate in the thoracoscopic group was significantly lower than that in the posterior fusion group (14% compared with 43%; p = 0.01). Operative time in the thoracoscopic group was significantly greater than that in the posterior group (6.0 compared with 3.3 hours, p < 0.0001). There were no intraoperative complications in either group. Vital capacity and peak flow had returned to baseline levels in both groups at the time of the final follow-up. Patients in the thoracoscopic group scored higher than those in the posterior group in terms of the total score (p < 0.0001) and all of the domains (p < 0.01) of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire at the time of the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Thoracoscopic spinal instrumentation compares favorably with posterior fusion in terms of coronal plane curve correction and balance, sagittal contour, the rate of complications, pulmonary function, and patient-based outcomes. The advantages of the procedure include the need for fewer levels of spinal fusion, less operative blood loss, lower transfusion requirements, and improved cosmesis as a result of small, well-hidden incisions. However, the operative time for the thoracoscopic procedure was nearly twice that for the posterior approach. Additional study is needed to determine the precise role of thoracoscopic spinal instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.


Spine | 2007

Operative management of Scheuermann's kyphosis in 78 patients: Radiographic outcomes, complications, and technique

Baron S. Lonner; Peter O. Newton; Randy Betz; Carrie Scharf; Michael J. O'Brien; Paul D. Sponseller; Lawrence G. Lenke; Alvin H. Crawford; Thomas G. Lowe; Lynn Letko; Jürgen Harms; Harry L. Shufflebarger

Study Design. A retrospective multicenter review of 78 patients with Scheuermanns kyphosis treated operatively was conducted. Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate correction of sagittal alignment, maintenance of correction, and occurrence of, and etiologic factors associated with, junctional kyphosis in patients managed operatively for Scheuermanns kyphosis. Summary of Background Data. There is a paucity of literature regarding the surgical treatment of Scheuermanns kyphosis using current implant systems and operative techniques. Junctional kyphosis has been shown to occur in up to one third of patients. Factors causing junctional kyphosis have not been clearly elucidated. Loss of correction has been variable based on the technique used. No clear-cut advantages or disadvantages have been shown for the use of anterior release. Methods. Kyphosis, lordosis, C7 sagittal plumbline, apical translation, junctional sagittal alignment, and pelvic incidence were assessed among other radiographic parameters from a centralized database. The incidence of junctional kyphosis and its association to the above parameters and to fusion levels were assessed. Complication rates and differences between patients undergoing combined anteroposterior surgery and those having posterior surgery alone were evaluated. Results. Of the 78 patients, 42 underwent combined anteroposterior procedures (Group 1) and 36 had posterior surgery only (Group 2). Mean age was 16.7 years. Overall, the greatest Cobb kyphosis of 78.8° was corrected to 51.4° at follow-up. Preoperative kyphosis was 82.6° and 74.4° for Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.001) and 55.8° and 46.2° at follow-up (P = 0.000). Loss of correction was 3.2° (not significant) and 6.4° (P = 0.000), respectively. Lordosis corrected from −65.5° to −51.7°.Proximal and distal junctional kyphosis of ≥10° occurred in 25 (32.1%) and 4 (5.1%), respectively. The development of a proximal junctional kyphosis correlated directly with kyphosis at follow-up and indirectly with percent correction. Among patients with proximal junctional kyphosis, the magnitude of junctional kyphosis correlated directly with the degree of pelvic incidence. Pelvic incidence correlated directly with lumbar lordosis but not kyphosis. Twelve complications occurred in 12 patients, including posterior wound infection (1), distal (2), and proximal (1) junctional kyphosis, and pseudarthrosis (1), those requiring reoperation. Conclusion. This is one of the largest reported series of Scheuermanns kyphosis treated operatively to our knowledge. A high rate of junctional kyphosis, especially at the proximal end, is associated with surgery for Scheuermanns kyphosis using current techniques. Proximal junctional kyphosis is associated with higher magnitude of kyphosis at follow-up, less percent correction; its magnitude correlated directly with pelvic incidence. Loss of correction is less in patients undergoing combined anteroposterior surgery. Pelvic incidence correlates directly with lordosis but not kyphosis, suggesting that these parameters are not causative of Scheuermanns kyphosis.


Spine | 2010

Preservation of thoracic kyphosis is critical to maintain lumbar lordosis in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Peter O. Newton; Burt Yaszay; Vidyadhar V. Upasani; Jeff Pawelek; Tracey P. Bastrom; Lawrence G. Lenke; Thomas G. Lowe; Alvin H. Crawford; Randal R. Betz; Baron S. Lonner

Study Design. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected multicenter series. Objective. To evaluate the sagittal profile of surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. Summary of Background Data. With the increasing popularity of segmental pedicle screw spinal instrumentation, thoracic kyphosis (TK) is often sacrificed to achieve coronal and axial plane correction. Methods. Radiographs of AIS patients with a Lenke type 1 deformity and minimum 2-year follow-up after selective thoracic fusion (lowest instrumented vertebra of T11, T12, or L1) were evaluated. Changes in TK were correlated with changes in lumbar lordosis (LL). Patients were divided according to approach (open/thoracoscopic anterior vs. posterior). Analysis of variance was used to compare pre and postoperative radiographic measures. Results. Two hundred fifty-one patients (age: 14 ± 2 years) were included. Sixty seven percentages of the patients had anterior surgery (97 open anterior, 71 thoracoscopic) and 33% (83 patients) had posterior spinal fusion. A decrease in postoperative TK was significantly correlated (P ≤ 0.001) with a decrease in LL at first erect (r = 0.3), 1 year (r = 0.4) and 2 years (r = 0.4), independent of surgical approach. LL decreased significantly at the first erect regardless of approach (P = 0.003); however, at 2-year postoperative TK and LL were significantly decreased after a posterior approach (P ≤ 0.001) when compared with an anterior approach that added kyphosis. The decrease in LL (5.6° ± 9.7°) was nearly twice the decrease in TK (2.8° ± 11.4°) in the posterior group at 2-years. Conclusion. Given that thoracic AIS is often associated with a preexisting reduction in TK, ideal surgical correction should address this deformity. Procedures which further reduce TK also reduce LL. It is unclear if the loss of LL from thoracic scoliosis correction will compound the loss of LL that occurs with age and lead to further decline in sagittal balance. With this concern, we recommend a posterior column lengthening and/or an anterior column shortening to achieve restoration of normal TK and maximal LL.


Spine | 2007

Analysis of sagittal alignment in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how do these two curve types differ?

Vidyadhar V. Upasani; John E. Tis; Tracey P. Bastrom; Jeff Pawelek; Michelle C. Marks; Baron S. Lonner; Alvin H. Crawford; Peter O. Newton

Study Design. Retrospective chart review and radiographic analysis. Objective. To determine if differences exist in the sagittal alignment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with thoracic versus thoracolumbar curve patterns. Summary of Background Data. Relative anterior overgrowth has been suggested as the possible pathomechanism behind thoracic scoliosis. Given the proposed importance of the sagittal alignment on the development of AIS and the known association between pelvic parameters and sagittal alignment, the authors postulate that pelvic incidence may influence the location of vertebral column collapse associated with different AIS curve types. Methods. A multicenter surgical database was used to compare preoperative radiographic measurements between patients with primary thoracic curves (Lenke 1A, B), primary thoracolumbar curves (Lenke 5), and normal adolescents. Results. Pelvic incidence was significantly greater in both groups of AIS patients compared with normal adolescents. Patients in the primary thoracic curve group were found to have a significantly increased sacral slope and a decreased thoracic kyphosis relative to the control group. Patients in the primary thoracolumbar curve group had a significantly increased pelvic tilt; however, a relatively normal thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and sacral slope compared with the respective control values. Conclusion. An increased pelvic incidence, associated with both thoracic and thoracolumbar curves when compared with the normal adolescent population, does not appear to be the potential determinant of the development of thoracic versus thoracolumbar scoliosis, but may be a risk factor for the development of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The theory of anterior overgrowth may be supported by the identification of thoracic hypokyphosis, despite an increased pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis, in patients with thoracic scoliosis. The association between sagittal measurements and the etiology of thoracolumbar curve formation is less clear; however, regional anterior overgrowth in the lumbar spine may also be responsible for the deformity.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2010

Hospital cost analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery in 125 consecutive cases.

Jonathan R. Kamerlink; Martin Quirno; Joshua D. Auerbach; Andrew H. Milby; Lynne Windsor; Laura Dean; Joseph Dryer; Thomas J. Errico; Baron S. Lonner

BACKGROUND Although achieving clinical success is the main goal in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, it is becoming increasingly important to do so in a cost-effective manner. The goal of the present study was to determine the surgical and hospitalization costs, charges, and reimbursements for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery at one institution. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 16,536 individual costs and charges, including overall reimbursements, for 125 consecutive patients who were managed surgically for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by three different surgeons between 2006 and 2007. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were recorded for each patient. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was employed to assess independent correlation with total cost and charge. Nonparametric descriptive statistics were calculated for total cost with use of the Lenke curve-classification system. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 15.2 years. The mean main thoracic curve measured 50 degrees, and the thoracolumbar curve measured 41 degrees. The cost varied with Lenke curve type:


Spine | 2009

Thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: the learning curve and evolution in technique in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Baron S. Lonner; Joshua D. Auerbach; Michael Estreicher; Kristin E. Kean

29,955 for type 1,


Spine | 2009

Sagittal Cervical Alignment After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion : Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Okechukwu A. Anakwenze; Joshua D. Auerbach; Andrew H. Milby; Baron S. Lonner; Richard A. Balderston

31,414 for type 2,


Spine | 2005

The Learning Curve Associated With Thoracoscopic Spinal Instrumentation

Baron S. Lonner; Carrie Scharf; Darryl Antonacci; Yael Goldstein; Georgia Panagopoulos

31,975 for type 3,


The Spine Journal | 2015

Efficacy of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding in spine surgery: a meta-analysis.

Thomas Cheriyan; Stephen P. Maier; Kristina Bianco; Kseniya Slobodyanyuk; Rachel Rattenni; Virginie Lafage; Frank J. Schwab; Baron S. Lonner; Thomas J. Errico

60,754 for type 4,


Spine | 2011

Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.

Joshua D. Auerbach; Okechukwu A. Anakwenze; Andrew H. Milby; Baron S. Lonner; Richard A. Balderston

32,652 for type 5, and

Collaboration


Dive into the Baron S. Lonner's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter O. Newton

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Randal R. Betz

Shriners Hospitals for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suken A. Shah

Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amer F. Samdani

Shriners Hospitals for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tracey P. Bastrom

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge