Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Barry A. Gusterson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Barry A. Gusterson.


Nature | 2002

Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer

Helen Davies; Graham R. Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; S. M. Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J. Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A. Gusterson; Colin S. Cooper; Janet Shipley

Cancers arise owing to the accumulation of mutations in critical genes that alter normal programmes of cell proliferation, differentiation and death. As the first stage of a systematic genome-wide screen for these genes, we have prioritized for analysis signalling pathways in which at least one gene is mutated in human cancer. The RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK–MAP kinase pathway mediates cellular responses to growth signals. RAS is mutated to an oncogenic form in about 15% of human cancer. The three RAF genes code for cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinases that are regulated by binding RAS. Here we report BRAF somatic missense mutations in 66% of malignant melanomas and at lower frequency in a wide range of human cancers. All mutations are within the kinase domain, with a single substitution (V599E) accounting for 80%. Mutated BRAF proteins have elevated kinase activity and are transforming in NIH3T3 cells. Furthermore, RAS function is not required for the growth of cancer cell lines with the V599E mutation. As BRAF is a serine/threonine kinase that is commonly activated by somatic point mutation in human cancer, it may provide new therapeutic opportunities in malignant melanoma.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2001

Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer.

Ingrid Hedenfalk; David J. Duggan; Yidong Chen; Michael Radmacher; Michael L. Bittner; Richard Simon; Paul S. Meltzer; Barry A. Gusterson; Manel Esteller; Mark Raffeld; Zohar Yakhini; Amir Ben-Dor; Edward R. Dougherty; Juha Kononen; Lukas Bubendorf; Wilfrid Fehrle; Stefania Pittaluga; Sofia Gruvberger; Niklas Loman; Oskar Johannsson; Håkan Olsson; Benjamin S. Wilfond; Guido Sauter; Olli Kallioniemi; Åke Borg; Jeffrey M. Trent

BACKGROUND Many cases of hereditary breast cancer are due to mutations in either the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene. The histopathological changes in these cancers are often characteristic of the mutant gene. We hypothesized that the genes expressed by these two types of tumors are also distinctive, perhaps allowing us to identify cases of hereditary breast cancer on the basis of gene-expression profiles. METHODS RNA from samples of primary tumor from seven carriers of the BRCA1 mutation, seven carriers of the BRCA2 mutation, and seven patients with sporadic cases of breast cancer was compared with a microarray of 6512 complementary DNA clones of 5361 genes. Statistical analyses were used to identify a set of genes that could distinguish the BRCA1 genotype from the BRCA2 genotype. RESULTS Permutation analysis of multivariate classification functions established that the gene-expression profiles of tumors with BRCA1 mutations, tumors with BRCA2 mutations, and sporadic tumors differed significantly from each other. An analysis of variance between the levels of gene expression and the genotype of the samples identified 176 genes that were differentially expressed in tumors with BRCA1 mutations and tumors with BRCA2 mutations. Given the known properties of some of the genes in this panel, our findings indicate that there are functional differences between breast tumors with BRCA1 mutations and those with BRCA2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS Significantly different groups of genes are expressed by breast cancers with BRCA1 mutations and breast cancers with BRCA2 mutations. Our results suggest that a heritable mutation influences the gene-expression profile of the cancer.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1992

Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

Barry A. Gusterson; R. D. Gelber; A. Goldhirsch; Karen N. Price; J Säve-Söderborgh; R Anbazhagan; J Styles; Carl-Magnus Rudenstam; Rastko Golouh; Richard J. Reed

PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic importance of immunocytochemically determined c-erbB-2 overexpression in the primary tumors of patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary tumors from 1,506 breast cancer patients (760 node-negative and 746 node-positive) who were treated in the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group Trial V were studied. Node-negative patients were allocated randomly to either a single cycle of perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) or no adjuvant treatment, and node-positive patients received either a prolonged chemotherapy (with tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients) or a single perioperative cycle. RESULTS Tumors from 16% of the node-negative patients and 19% of the node-positive patients were found to be c-erbB-2-positive. In both groups c-erbB-2 positivity correlated with negative progesterone receptors (PR), negative estrogen receptors (ER), and high tumor grade. Lobular carcinomas were all negative, and, thus support the view that such tumors represent a defined subtype of breast carcinoma. The expression of c-erbB-2 was prognostically significant for node-positive but not for node-negative patients. However, in both subgroups, the prognostic significance was greater for patients who had received more adjuvant therapy. For node-positive patients, the effect of prolonged-duration therapy on disease-free survival (DFS) was greater for patients without c-erbB-2 overexpression (hazards ratio [HR], = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.72) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.16). Similarly, for node-negative patients, the effect of PeCT on DFS was greater for those without c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.09) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66 to 2.25). CONCLUSION We conclude that tumors with overexpression of the c-erbB-2 oncogene are less responsive to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-containing adjuvant therapy regimens than those with a normal amount of gene product.


Clinical Cancer Research | 2005

Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype.

Sunil R. Lakhani; Jorge S. Reis-Filho; Laura G. Fulford; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Marc van der Vijver; Suzanne Parry; Timothy Bishop; Javier Benitez; Carmen Rivas; Yves-Jean Bignon; Jenny Chang-Claude; Ute Hamann; Cees J. Cornelisse; Peter Devilee; Matthias W. Beckmann; Carolin Nestle-Krämling; Peter A. Daly; Neva E. Haites; Jenny Varley; Fiona Lalloo; Gareth Evans; Christine Maugard; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; J.G.M. Klijn; Edith Olah; Barry A. Gusterson; Silvana Pilotti; Paolo Radice; Siegfried Scherneck; Hagay Sobol

Purpose: To investigate the proportion of breast cancers arising in patients with germ line BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations expressing basal markers and developing predictive tests for identification of high-risk patients. Experimental Design: Histopathologic material from 182 tumors in BRCA1 mutation carriers, 63 BRCA2 carriers, and 109 controls, collected as part of the international Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium were immunohistochemically stained for CK14, CK5/6, CK17, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and osteonectin. Results: All five basal markers were commoner in BRCA1 tumors than in control tumors (CK14: 61% versus 12%; CK5/6: 58% versus 7%; CK17: 53% versus 10%; osteonectin: 43% versus 19%; EGFR: 67% versus 21%; P < 0.0001 in each case). In a multivariate analysis, CK14, CK5/6, and estrogen receptor (ER) remained significant predictors of BRCA1 carrier status. In contrast, the frequency of basal markers in BRCA2 tumors did not differ significant from controls. Conclusion: The use of cytokeratin staining in combination with ER and morphology provides a more accurate predictor of BRCA1 mutation status than previously available, that may be useful in selecting patients for BRCA1 mutation testing. The high percentage of BRCA1 cases positive for EGFR suggests that specific anti-tyrosine kinase therapy may be of potential benefit in these patients.


The Lancet | 1999

Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph-node metastases in management of breast cancer

Rj Cote; H Fpeterson; B Chaiwun; R. D. Gelber; A. Goldhirsch; M Castiglione-Gertsch; Barry A. Gusterson; A.M. Neville

BACKGROUND This study was designed to ascertain whether immunohistochemical methods could improve the detection of metastases in primary breast-cancer patients whose axillary lymph nodes were classified, by conventional methods, as disease free. METHODS Ipsilateral lymph nodes (negative for metastases by routine histology) from 736 patients (participants in Trial V of the International [Ludwig] Breast Cancer Study) were examined by serial sectioning and staining with haematoxylin and eosin (two sections from each of six levels) and by immunohistochemistry of a single section (with two anticytokeratins AE-1 and CAM 5.2). After median follow-up of 12 years, disease-free and overall survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. FINDINGS Occult nodal metastases were detected by serial sectioning and haematoxylin and eosin in 52 (7%) of 736 patients and by immunohistochemistry in 148 (20%). Only two (3%) of 64 invasive lobular or mixed invasive lobular and ductal cancers had node micrometastases, detected by haematoxylin and eosin, compared with 25 (39%) by immunohistochemistry. Occult metastases, detected by either method, were associated with significantly poor disease-free and overall survival in postmenopausal but not in premenopausal patients. Immunohistochemically detected occult lymph-node metastases remained an independent and highly significant predictor of recurrence even after control for tumour grade, tumour size, oestrogen-receptor status, vascular invasion, and treatment assignment (hazard ratio 1.79 [95% CI 1.17-2.74], p=0.007). INTERPRETATION The immunohistochemical examination of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes is a reliable, prognostically valuable, and simple method for the detection of occult nodal metastases. Immunohistochemistry is recommended as a standard method of node examination in postmenopausal patients.


Nature Genetics | 2000

A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour.

Maria Carmen Marin; Christine A. Jost; Louise Brooks; Meredith S. Irwin; Jenny O'Nions; John A. Tidy; Nick James; Jane M. McGregor; Catherine A. Harwood; Isik G. Yulug; Karen H. Vousden; Martin J. Allday; Barry A. Gusterson; Shuntaro Ikawa; Philip W. Hinds; Tim Crook; William G. Kaelin

The p73 protein, a homologue of the tumour-suppressor protein p53, can activate p53-responsive promoters and induce apoptosis in p53-deficient cells. Here we report that some tumour-derived p53 mutants can bind to and inactivate p73. The binding of such mutants is influenced by whether TP53 (encoding p53) codon 72, by virtue of a common polymorphism in the human population, encodes Arg or Pro. The ability of mutant p53 to bind p73, neutralize p73-induced apoptosis and transform cells in cooperation with EJ-Ras was enhanced when codon 72 encoded Arg. We found that the Arg-containing allele was preferentially mutated and retained in squamous cell tumours arising in Arg/Pro germline heterozygotes. Thus, inactivation of p53 family members may contribute to the biological properties of a subset of p53 mutants, and a polymorphic residue within p53 affects mutant behaviour.


Oncogene | 2000

The mammary pathology of genetically engineered mice: the consensus report and recommendations from the Annapolis meeting{

Robert D. Cardiff; Miriam R. Anver; Barry A. Gusterson; Lothar Hennighausen; Roy A. Jensen; Maria J. Merino; Sabine Rehm; Jose Russo; Fattaneh A. Tavassoli; Lalage M. Wakefield; Jerrold M. Ward; Jeffrey E. Green

NIH sponsored a meeting of medical and veterinary pathologists with mammary gland expertise in Annapolis in March 1999. Rapid development of mouse mammary models has accentuated the need for definitions of the mammary lesions in genetically engineered mice (GEM) and to assess their usefulness as models of human breast disease. The panel of nine pathologists independently reviewed material representing over 90% of the published systems. The GEM tumors were found to have: (1) phenotypes similar to those of non-GEM; (2) signature phenotypes specific to the transgene; and (3) some morphological similarities to the human disease. The current mouse mammary and human breast tumor classifications describe the majority of GEM lesions but unique morphologic lesions are found in many GEM. Since little information is available on the natural history of GEM lesions, a simple morphologic nomenclature is proposed that allows direct comparisons between models. Future progress requires rigorous application of guidelines covering pathologic examination of the mammary gland and the whole animal. Since the phenotype of the lesions is an essential component of their molecular pathology, funding agencies should adopt policies ensuring careful morphological evaluation of any funded research involving animal models. A pathologist should be part of each research team.


Cancer Cell | 2003

p53 polymorphism influences response in cancer chemotherapy via modulation of p73-dependent apoptosis

Daniele Bergamaschi; Milena Gasco; Louise Hiller; Alexandra Sullivan; Nelofer Syed; Giuseppe Trigiante; Isik G. Yulug; M. Merlano; Gianmauro Numico; Alberto Comino; Marlene Attard; Olivier Reelfs; Barry A. Gusterson; Alexandra K. Bell; Victoria J. Heath; Mahvash Tavassoli; Paul J. Farrell; Paul Smith; Xin Lu; Tim Crook

Intact p73 function is shown to be an important determinant of cellular sensitivity to anticancer agents. Inhibition of p73 function by dominant-negative proteins or by mutant p53 abrogates apoptosis and cytotoxicity induced by these agents. A polymorphism encoding either arginine (72R) or proline (72P) at codon 72 of p53 influences inhibition of p73 by a range of p53 mutants identified in squamous cancers. Clinical response following cisplatin-based chemo-radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer is influenced by this polymorphism, cancers expressing 72R mutants having lower response rates than those expressing 72P mutants. Polymorphism in p53 may influence individual responsiveness to cancer therapy.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007

Prognostic and Predictive Value of Centrally Reviewed Expression of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in a Randomized Trial Comparing Letrozole and Tamoxifen Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Early Breast Cancer: BIG 1-98

Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M. Regan; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G. Mastropasqua; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Johnny Raffoul; Patrick Neven; Zsolt Orosz; Stephen Braye; Christian Öhlschlegel; Beat Thürlimann; Richard D. Gelber; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Karen N. Price; Aron Goldhirsch; Barry A. Gusterson; Alan S. Coates

PURPOSE To evaluate locally versus centrally assessed estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor status and the impact of PgR on letrozole adjuvant therapy compared with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 randomly assigned 8,010 patients to four arms comparing letrozole and tamoxifen with sequences of each agent. The Central Pathology Office received material for 6,549 patients (82%), of which 79% were assessable (6,291 patients). Prognostic and predictive value of both local and central hormone receptor expression on disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated among 3,650 assessable patients assigned to the monotherapy arms. Prognostic value and the treatment effect were estimated for centrally assessed ER and PgR expression levels using the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot. RESULTS Central review confirmed 97% of tumors as hormone receptor-positive (ER and/or PgR > or =10%). Of 105 tumors locally ER-negative, 73 were found to have more than 10% positive cells, and eight had 1% to 9%. Of 6,100 tumors locally ER positive, 66 were found to have no staining, and 54 had only 1% to 9%. Discordance was more marked for PgR than ER. Patients with tumors reclassified centrally as ER-negative, or as hormone receptor-negative, had poor DFS. Centrally assessed ER and PgR showed prognostic value. Among patients with centrally assessed ER-expressing tumors, letrozole showed better DFS than tamoxifen, irrespective of PgR expression level. CONCLUSION Central review changed the assessment of receptor status in a substantial proportion of patients, and should be performed whenever possible in similar trials. PgR expression did not affect the relative efficacy of letrozole over tamoxifen.


British Journal of Cancer | 1991

c-erbB-2 protein overexpression in breast cancer is a risk factor in patients with involved and uninvolved lymph nodes.

W J Gullick; S B Love; C Wright; Diana M. Barnes; Barry A. Gusterson; Adrian L. Harris; Douglas G. Altman

The c-erbB-2 gene is overexpressed in about 20% of human breast cancers. Four hundred and eighty-three cases previously examined by immunohistochemical staining for c-erbB-2 expression were analysed to assess the risk associated with the elevated protein expression. Oncoprotein expression was correlated with increasing tumour grade but not with oestrogen receptor status, nodal involvement, tumour size or age. There was an increased risk of relapse and death associated with c-erbB-2 expression irrespective of nodal involvement. This marker thus appears to be a significant prognostic factor in the early as well as the late stages of breast cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Barry A. Gusterson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janet Shipley

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan S. Coates

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giuseppe Viale

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tim Crook

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. O'Hare

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Monaghan

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge