Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Barry D. Schoub is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Barry D. Schoub.


American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2010

Laboratory Systems and Services Are Critical in Global Health: Time to End the Neglect?

John N. Nkengasong; Peter Nsubuga; Okey Nwanyanwu; Guy-Michel Gershy-Damet; Giorgio Roscigno; Marc Bulterys; Barry D. Schoub; Kevin M Decock; Deborah L. Birx

Abstract The


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2012

Influenza in Africa: Uncovering the Epidemiology of a Long-Overlooked Disease

Mark A. Katz; Barry D. Schoub; Jean-Michel Heraud; Robert F. Breiman; M. Kariuki Njenga; Marc-Alain Widdowson

63 billion comprehensive global health initiative (GHI) emphasizes health systems strengthening (HSS) to tackle challenges, including child and maternal health, HIV/AIDS, family planning, and neglected tropical diseases. GHI and other initiatives are critical to fighting emerging and reemerging diseases in resource-poor countries. HSS is also an increasing focus of the


PLOS ONE | 2013

Measles Outbreak in South Africa: Epidemiology of Laboratory-Confirmed Measles Cases and Assessment of Intervention, 2009–2011

Genevie Ntshoe; Johanna M. McAnerney; Brett N. Archer; Sheilagh B. Smit; Bernice Nerine Harris; Stefano Tempia; Mirriam Mashele; Beverley Singh; Juno Thomas; Ayanda Cengimbo; Lucille Blumberg; Adrian Puren; Jocelyn Moyes; Johann Van den Heever; Barry D. Schoub; Cheryl Cohen

49 billion program of the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Laboratory systems and services are often neglected in resource-poor settings, but the funding offers an opportunity to end the neglect. To sustainably strengthen national laboratory systems in resource-poor countries, the following approaches are needed: (1) developing integrative national laboratory strategic plans and policies and building systems to address multiple diseases; (2) establishing public-private partnerships; (3) ensuring effective leadership, commitment, and coordination by host governments of efforts of donors and partners; (4) establishing and/or strengthening centers of excellence and field epidemiology and laboratory training programs to meet short- and medium-term training and retention goals; and (5) establishing affordable, scalable, and effective laboratory accreditation schemes to ensure quality of laboratory tests and bridge the gap between clinicians and laboratory experts on the use of test results.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Influenza Epidemiology and Vaccine Effectiveness among Patients with Influenza-Like Illness, Viral Watch Sentinel Sites, South Africa, 2005–2009

Genevie Ntshoe; Johanna M. McAnerney; Stefano Tempia; Lucille Blumberg; Jocelyn Moyes; Amelia Buys; Dhamari Naidoo; Marietjie Venter; Terry G. Besselaar; Barry D. Schoub; Bernice Nerine Harris; Cheryl Cohen

Influenza is a well-documented cause of morbidity and mortality in high- and middle-income countries. In the past few decades and particularly during the recent influenza pandemic, numerous studies and surveillance reports in the United States, Europe, Australia, and parts of Asia have improved our understanding of the epidemiology and burden of influenza in those regions. In Africa, however, the picture is quite different. Until the latter half of the last decade minimal effort had been made to understand the epidemiology, burden, and seasonality of influenza in Africa, a continent where some of the poorest populations in the world reside; where human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria have long ravaged residents; and where resources for health are scarce and often directed at securing basic healthcare and prevention measures. As a result, the impact of the disease in this region has been considered negligible [1].


Vaccine | 2012

Introduction of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) into the routine immunization schedule of South Africa

Barry D. Schoub

Background Since 1995, measles vaccination at nine and 18 months has been routine in South Africa; however, coverage seldom reached >95%. We describe the epidemiology of laboratory-confirmed measles case-patients and assess the impact of the nationwide mass vaccination campaign during the 2009 to 2011 measles outbreak in South Africa. Methods Serum specimens collected from patients with suspected-measles were tested for measles-specific IgM antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and genotypes of a subset were determined. To estimate the impact of the nationwide mass vaccination campaign, we compared incidence in the seven months pre- (1 September 2009–11 April 2010) and seven months post-vaccination campaign (24 May 2010–31 December 2010) periods in seven provinces of South Africa. Results A total of 18,431 laboratory-confirmed measles case-patients were reported from all nine provinces of South Africa (cumulative incidence 37 per 100,000 population). The highest cumulative incidence per 100,000 population was in children aged <1 year (603), distributed as follows: <6 months (302/100,000), 6 to 8 months (1083/100,000) and 9 to 11 months (724/100,000). Forty eight percent of case-patients were ≥5 years (cumulative incidence 54/100,000). Cumulative incidence decreased with increasing age to 2/100,000 in persons ≥40 years. A single strain of measles virus (genotype B3) circulated throughout the outbreak. Prior to the vaccination campaign, cumulative incidence in the targeted vs. non-targeted age group was 5.9-fold higher, decreasing to 1.7 fold following the campaign (P<0.001) and an estimated 1,380 laboratory-confirmed measles case-patients were prevented. Conclusion We observed a reduction in measles incidence following the nationwide mass vaccination campaign even though it was conducted approximately one year after the outbreak started. A booster dose at school entry may be of value given the high incidence in persons >5 years.


Vaccine | 2013

Afriflu2--second international workshop on influenza vaccination in the African continent--8 November 2012, Cape Town (South Africa).

Barry D. Schoub; Bradford D. Gessner; William Ampofo; Adam L. Cohen; Christoph Steffen

Background There is limited data on the epidemiology of influenza and few published estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) from Africa. In April 2009, a new influenza virus strain infecting humans was identified and rapidly spread globally. We compared the characteristics of patients ill with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus to those ill with seasonal influenza and estimated influenza vaccine effectiveness during five influenza seasons (2005–2009) in South Africa. Methods Epidemiological data and throat and/or nasal swabs were collected from patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) at sentinel sites. Samples were tested for seasonal influenza viruses using culture, haemagglutination inhibition tests and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 by real-time PCR. For the vaccine effectiveness (VE) analysis we considered patients testing positive for influenza A and/or B as cases and those testing negative for influenza as controls. Age-adjusted VE was calculated as 1-odds ratio for influenza in vaccinated and non-vaccinated individuals. Results From 2005 through 2009 we identified 3,717 influenza case-patients. The median age was significantly lower among patients infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus than those with seasonal influenza, 17 and 27 years respectively (p<0.001). The vaccine coverage during the influenza season ranged from 3.4% in 2009 to 5.1% in 2006 and was higher in the ≥50 years (range 6.9% in 2008 to 13.2% in 2006) than in the <50 years age group (range 2.2% in 2007 to 3.7% in 2006). The age-adjusted VE estimates for seasonal influenza were 48.6% (4.9%, 73.2%); −14.2% (−9.7%, 34.8%); 12.0% (−70.4%, 55.4%); 67.4% (12.4%, 90.3%) and 29.6% (−21.5%, 60.1%) from 2005 to 2009 respectively. For the A(H1N1)pdm09 season, the efficacy of seasonal vaccine was −6.4% (−93.5%, 43.3%). Conclusion Influenza vaccine demonstrated a significant protective effect in two of the five years evaluated. Low vaccine coverage may have reduced power to estimate vaccine effectiveness.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2012

Evolutionary Dynamics of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A Virus Subtype H1N1 in South Africa During 2009–2010

Marietjie Venter; Dhamari Naidoo; Marthi Pretorius; Amelia Buys; Johanna M. McAnerney; Lucille Blumberg; Shabir A. Madhi; Cheryl Cohen; Barry D. Schoub

South Africa is currently the only country on the African continent using inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) for routine immunization in a sequential schedule in combination with oral polio vaccine (OPV). IPV is a component of an injectable pentavalent vaccine introduced nationwide in April 2009 and administered according to EPI schedule at 6, 10 and 14 weeks with a booster dose at 18 months. OPV is administered at birth and together with the first IPV dose at 6 weeks, which stimulates gut immune system producing a memory IgA response (OPV), followed by IPV to minimize the risk of vaccine associated paralytic polio (VAPP). OPV is also given to all children under 5 years of age as part of regular mass immunizations campaigns. The decision to incorporate IPV into the routine schedule was not based on cost-effectiveness, which it is not. Other factors were taken into account: Firstly, the sequence benefits from the initial mucosal contact with live(vaccine) virus which promotes the IgA response from subsequent IPV, as well as herd immunity from OPV, together with the safety of IPV. Secondly, given the widespread and increasing use of IPV in the developed world, public acceptance of vaccination in general is enhanced in South Africa which is classified as an upper middle income developing country. Thirdly, to address equity concerns because of the growing use of IPV in the private sector. Fourthly, the advent of combination vaccines facilitated the incorporation of IPV into the EPI schedule.


Vaccine | 2012

Introducing new vaccines into the South African national immunisation programme - a case study.

Barry D. Schoub; Mphahlele Mj; Ngcobo Nj; Hoosen Aa; André Meheus

The second meeting of the Afriflu conferences took place in Cape Town, South Africa, with over 60 participants from 15 countries in Africa and also outside the continent. Significant progress in surveillance has been made in better understanding the illness burden of influenza on the continent, which limited evidence suggests is greater than that in the developed world. In southern Africa HIV and TB coinfections play a major role in increasing hospitalisation and mortality, while elsewhere in Africa other cofactors still need to be determined. There is currently no indigenous vaccine production in sub-Saharan Africa and only one facility, based in South Africa, capable of filling imported bulk. Innovative vaccine strategies will need to be explored, such as maternal immunisation, and also the possibility of other influenza vaccine options, such as live attenuated influenza vaccine for young children. Sustained indigenous vaccine production is essential for the continent to have vaccine security in the event of a pandemic even though establishing local production faces considerable challenges especially ensuring adequate markets on the continent. There is an urgent need to develop effective communication messages for decision makers as well as healthcare workers addressing the importance of influenza even in the face of the major competing health burdens of the continent.


Vaccine | 2016

The Cape Town Declaration on Vaccines 2012: Unlocking the full potential of vaccines in Africa

Charles Shey Wiysonge; Zainab Waggie; Anthony Hawkridge; Barry D. Schoub; Shabir A. Madhi; Helen Rees; Gregory D. Hussey

BACKGROUND The 2009 pandemic influenza A virus subtype H1N1 (A[H1N1]pdm09) was first detected in June 2009 in South Africa and later resulted in extensive transmission throughout Africa. Established routine surveillance programs and collaboration between private and public sector laboratories allowed for comprehensive molecular epidemiological and antigenic investigation of the first and second waves of 2009-2010 pandemic influenza in South Africa. METHODS We used reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to screen for influenza virus in 9792 specimens recovered during 2009 and 6915 specimens recovered during 2010 from inpatients and outpatients with influenza-like illness or severe acute respiratory illness symptoms identified by surveillance programs. Influenza-positive specimens were subjected to genetic and antigenic characterization. Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of the hemagglutinin genes of 96 A(H1N1)pdm09 strains were used for molecular epidemiological investigations. Hemagglutination inhibition assays and sequencing of the PB2 and neuraminidase genes were used to investigate pathogenicity and resistance mutations. RESULTS The A(H1N1)pdm09 epidemic occurred as a second epidemic peak following seasonal influenza A virus subtype H3N2 cases in 2009 and in 2010. Progressive drift away from the A/California/7/2009 vaccine strain was observed at both the nucleotide and amino acid level, with 2010 strains clustering separate to 2009 strains. A few unique clusters of amino acid changes in severe cases were identified, but most strains were antigenically similar to the vaccine strain, and no resistance or known pathogenicity mutations were detected. CONCLUSION Despite limited drift observed over the 2 seasons in South Africa, circulating A(H1N1)pdm09 strains remained antigenically similar to strains identified in other northern and southern hemisphere countries from 2010 and 2011.


Journal of Medical Virology | 2002

Molecular epidemiological analysis of community circulating respiratory syncytial virus in rural South Africa: Comparison of viruses and genotypes responsible for different disease manifestations

Marietjie Venter; Mark A. Collinson; Barry D. Schoub

ed/indexed in: Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, AIDS, AIDS Information, Adonis, Biological Abstracts, Biotechnology Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current AIDS Literature, Elsevier BIOBASE/Current Awareness in Biological Science, Current

Collaboration


Dive into the Barry D. Schoub's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cheryl Cohen

University of the Witwatersrand

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johanna M. McAnerney

National Health Laboratory Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lucille Blumberg

National Health Laboratory Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amelia Buys

National Health Laboratory Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dhamari Naidoo

National Health Laboratory Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Genevie Ntshoe

National Health Laboratory Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jocelyn Moyes

National Health Laboratory Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shabir A. Madhi

University of the Witwatersrand

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge