Barry J. Materson
University of Miami
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Barry J. Materson.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1993
Barry J. Materson; Domenic J. Reda; William C. Cushman; Barry M. Massie; Edward D. Freis; Mahendr S. Kochar; Robert J. Hamburger; Carol L. Fye; Raj Lakshman; John S. Gottdiener; Eli A. Ramirez; William G. Henderson
BACKGROUND Characteristics such as age and race are often cited as determinants of the response of blood pressure to specific antihypertensive agents, but this clinically important issue has not been examined in sufficiently large trials, involving all standard treatments, to determine the effect of such factors. METHODS In a randomized, double-blind study at 15 clinics, we assigned 1292 men with diastolic blood pressures of 95 to 109 mm Hg, after a placebo washout period, to receive placebo or one of six drugs: hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 50 mg per day), atenolol (25 to 100 mg per day), captopril (25 to 100 mg per day), clonidine (0.2 to 0.6 mg per day), a sustained-release preparation of diltiazem (120 to 360 mg per day), or prazosin (4 to 20 mg per day). The drug doses were titrated to a goal of less than 90 mm Hg for maximal diastolic pressure, and the patients continued to receive therapy for at least one year. RESULTS The mean (+/- SD) age of the randomized patients was 59 +/- 10 years, and 48 percent were black. The average blood pressure at base line was 152 +/- 14/99 +/- 3 mm Hg. Diltiazem therapy had the highest rate of success: 59 percent of the treated patients had reached the blood-pressure goal at the end of the titration phase and had a diastolic blood pressure of less than 95 mm Hg at one year. Atenolol was successful by this definition in 51 percent of the patients, clonidine in 50 percent, hydrochlorothiazide in 46 percent, captopril in 42 percent, and prazosin in 42 percent; all these agents were superior to placebo (success rate, 25 percent). Diltiazem ranked first for younger blacks (< 60 years) and older blacks (> or = 60 years), among whom the success rate was 64 percent, captopril for younger whites (success rate, 55 percent), and atenolol for older whites (68 percent). Drug intolerance was more frequent with clonidine (14 percent) and prazosin (12 percent) than with the other drugs. CONCLUSIONS Among men, race and age have an important effect on the response to single-drug therapy for hypertension. In addition to cost and quality of life, these factors should be considered in the initial choice of a drug.
Journal of Hypertension | 2014
Michael A. Weber; Ernesto L. Schiffrin; William B. White; Samuel J. Mann; Lars H Lindholm; John G. Kenerson; John M. Flack; Barry L. Carter; Barry J. Materson; C. Venkata S. Ram; Debbie L. Cohen; Jean Claude Cadet; Roger R. Jean‐Charles; Sandra J. Taler; David S. Kountz; Raymond R. Townsend; John Chalmers; Agustin J. Ramirez; George L. Bakris; Ji-Guang Wang; Aletta E. Schutte; John D. Bisognano; Rhian M. Touyz; D Sica; Stephen B. Harrap
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension in the Community A Statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension | 2014
Michael A. Weber; Ernesto L. Schiffrin; William B. White; Samuel J. Mann; Lars H Lindholm; John G. Kenerson; John M. Flack; Barry L. Carter; Barry J. Materson; C. Venkata S. Ram; Debbie L. Cohen; Jean‐Claude Cadet; Roger R. Jean‐Charles; Sandra J. Taler; David S. Kountz; Raymond R. Townsend; John Chalmers; Agustin J. Ramirez; George L. Bakris; Ji-Guang Wang; Aletta E. Schutte; John D. Bisognano; Rhian M. Touyz; D Sica; Stephen B. Harrap
Michael A. Weber, MD; Ernesto L. Schiffrin, MD; William B. White, MD; Samuel Mann, MD; Lars H. Lindholm, MD; John G. Kenerson, MD; John M. Flack, MD; Barry L. Carter, Pharm D; Barry J. Materson, MD; C. Venkata S. Ram, MD; Debbie L. Cohen, MD; Jean-Claude Cadet, MD; Roger R. Jean-Charles, MD; Sandra Taler, MD; David Kountz, MD; Raymond R. Townsend, MD; John Chalmers, MD; Agustin J. Ramirez, MD; George L. Bakris, MD; Jiguang Wang, MD; Aletta E. Schutte, MD; John D. Bisognano, MD; Rhian M. Touyz, MD; Dominic Sica, MD; Stephen B. Harrap, MD
Circulation | 1997
John S. Gottdiener; Domenic J. Reda; Barry M. Massie; Barry J. Materson; David W. Williams; Robert J. Anderson
BACKGROUND Antihypertensive drugs may differ in their ability to reduce LV mass. Covariates other than drug selection, such as pretreatment LV mass, body weight, the magnitude of blood pressure reduction, race, and age may modify the response of LV mass to therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 109 mm Hg) were randomly allocated to treatment with atenolol, captopril, clonidine, diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide, or prazosin in a double-masked trial. Patients achieving the goal diastolic blood pressure of <90 mm Hg during drug titration entered a 1-year maintenance period. Longitudinal analysis examined changes from baseline echocardiogram in LV mass at 8 weeks and at 1 year, statistically adjusted for pretreatment LV mass, systolic blood pressure, body weight, sodium excretion, physical activity, race, and age. Significant reductions at 1 year in adjusted LV mass were seen for patients in the highest tertile of pretreatment LV mass treated with hydrochlorothiazide (mean, -42.9; 95% confidence limits, -65.5, -20.2 g), captopril (mean, -38.7; 95% confidence limits, -61.0, -16.4 g), and atenolol (mean, -28.1; 95% confidence limits, -50.9, -5.3 g). These treatment effects differed from those of prazosin, diltiazem, or clonidine. CONCLUSIONS Antihypertensive drugs have disparate effects on LV mass independent of the magnitude of blood pressure reduction. Patients with adequate blood pressure control on captopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and atenolol show a reduction of LV mass after 1 year of treatment, whereas patients on diltiazem, clonidine, or prazosin do not.
American Heart Journal | 1993
Simon Chakko; Reynaldo F Mulingtapang; Heikki V. Huikuri; Kenneth M. Kessler; Barry J. Materson; Robert J. Myerburg
Heart rate variability (HRV) and its circadian rhythm were evaluated in 22 patients with treated hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in whom coronary artery disease was excluded by stress thallium or angiography. By using 24-hour Holter monitoring, HRV and its spectral components were measured. Findings were compared with 11 age-matched normal controls. The difference between mean R-R intervals during sleep (11 PM to 7 AM) and while awake (9 AM to 9 PM) (73 +/- 33 vs 263 +/- 63 msec, p < 0.0001) and the mean 24-hour SD of the R-R intervals (55 +/- 6.3 vs 93 +/- 11, p < 0.0001) were lower among the hypertensive patients compared with controls. The percentage of difference between successive R-R intervals that exceeded 50 msec, a measure of parasympathetic tone, was also lower among the hypertensive patients (6.8 +/- 7.1 vs 13.6 +/- 8.9, p < 0.002); it increased at night and decreased during the day among the controls, and this circadian rhythm was blunted among the patients. Spectral analysis showed that power in the high-frequency range (0.15 to 0.40 Hz) was lower among the hypertensive patients during 21 of 24 hours but that the difference was statistically significant only during 9 hours (p ranging from < 0.05 to 0.009). Power in the low-frequency range (0.04 to 015 Hz) was lower at night, increased in the morning, and higher during the day among controls; this circadian rhythm was absent among hypertensive patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
American Journal of Cardiology | 1991
Simon Chakko; Manuel Mayor; Mark Allison; Kenneth M. Kessler; Barry J. Materson; Robert J. Myerburg
Left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling pattern of obese subjects with eccentric LV hypertrophy was studied. Findings were compared with those of normal control subjects and hypertensive patients with concentric LV hypertrophy. M-mode, 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiograms were recorded in 11 obese (body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2) normotensive patients with eccentric LV hypertrophy, 10 normal control subjects, and 18 nonobese, hypertensive patients with concentric LV hypertrophy whose antihypertensive medications were discontinued 2 weeks before study. LV hypertrophy was defined as LV mass/height greater than 143 g/m. Hypertrophy in the obese patients was eccentric: Their LV internal dimension (61 +/- 3 mm) was greater than that of hypertensive patients (55 +/- 5 mm, p less than 0.001) and normal control subjects (55 +/- 2 mm, p less than 0.01); their septal (10.7 +/- 0.7 mm) and posterior (10.9 +/- 0.6 mm) wall thicknesses were smaller than those of the hypertensive patients (12.2 +/- 1.7 mm, p less than 0.05 and 11.7 +/- 1.2 mm, respectively, difference not significant). Pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiographic filling indexes were used to evaluate LV diastolic filling. Obese patients had a higher peak velocity of atrial filling (69 +/- 14 vs 54 +/- 15 cm/s, p less than 0.05), lower early/atrial filling velocity ratio (1.0 +/- 0.26 vs 1.32 +/- 0.21, p less than 0.05), prolonged deceleration half-time (108 +/- 9 vs 86 +/- 15 ms, p less than 0.01) and lower peak filling rate corrected to stroke volume (4.08 +/- 0.68 vs 4.96 +/- 0.88 stroke volume/s, p less than 0.05) than normal control subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Journal of Clinical Hypertension | 2014
Michael A. Weber; Ernesto L. Schiffrin; William B. White; Samuel J. Mann; Lars H Lindholm; John G. Kenerson; John M. Flack; Barry L. Carter; Barry J. Materson; C. Venkata S. Ram; Debbie L. Cohen; Jean‐Claude Cadet; Roger R. Jean‐Charles; Sandra J. Taler; David S. Kountz; Raymond R. Townsend; John Chalmers; Agustin J. Ramirez; George L. Bakris; Ji-Guang Wang; Aletta E. Schutte; John D. Bisognano; Rhian M. Touyz; D Sica; Stephen B. Harrap
Michael A. Weber, MD; Ernesto L. Schiffrin, MD; William B. White, MD; Samuel Mann, MD; Lars H. Lindholm, MD; John G. Kenerson, MD; John M. Flack, MD; Barry L. Carter, Pharm D; Barry J. Materson, MD; C. Venkata S. Ram, MD; Debbie L. Cohen, MD; Jean-Claude Cadet, MD; Roger R. Jean-Charles, MD; Sandra Taler, MD; David Kountz, MD; Raymond R. Townsend, MD; John Chalmers, MD; Agustin J. Ramirez, MD; George L. Bakris, MD; Jiguang Wang, MD; Aletta E. Schutte, MD; John D. Bisognano, MD; Rhian M. Touyz, MD; Dominic Sica, MD; Stephen B. Harrap, MD
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 1990
Richard A. Preston; Craig L. Stemmer; Barry J. Materson; Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable; Victoriano Pardo
We studied the clinical and pathological data for 334 patients age 65 or more who underwent renal biopsy for acute renal failure (ARF, n = 55), subacute renal failure (SRF, n = 72), chronic renal failure (CRF, n = 57), proteinuria (n = 137), and hematuria (n = 13). Tissue diagnoses were glomerulopathy (n = 252, 75.4%), acute tubular lesions (n = 18), interstitial nephritis (n = 23), vascular diseases (n = 36, including 14 with cholesterol emboli), and five miscellaneous diagnoses. Of the 55 patients with ARF, 23 had a glomerular lesion, 15 had acute tubular necrosis, and 8 had acute interstitial nephritis. Of 72 patients with SRF, 49 had a glomerulopathy, 12 had a vascular disorder, and six had acute interstitial nephritis. Hence, patients with ARF or SRF exhibited a high potential for reversible lesions. Only 11.3% of patients with CRF had potentially reversible causes. The most common causes of proteinuria were membranous glomerulopathy (34.3%), minimal change disease (14.6%), focal segmental sclerosis (11.7%), and amyloidosis (8.8%). Of the 25 patients with advanced nephrosclerosis, 24 had renal failure, 20 were hypertensive, and 13 had cholesterol emboli. Of 33 patients with diabetes mellitus, 66.7% were found to have lesions not related to diabetes. We conclude that renal biopsy is most useful in older patients with ARF or SRF because of potentially reversible renal disease. Old age alone is not a contraindication to performing a renal biopsy.
Journal of Hypertension | 2002
Richard A. Preston; Marlies Ledford; Barry J. Materson; Neyton M. Baltodano; Abdul Memon; Alberto B. Alonso
Objectives The molecular mechanisms whereby severe, uncontrolled hypertension (SHT) is translated into acute vascular target organ dysfunction have not been completely defined. We sought to determine whether SHT is associated with pressure-dependent endothelial activation as assessed by soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and von Willebrand Factor (vWF). Methods We determined sVCAM-1, sICAM-1 and vWF in three groups: (i) untreated patients referred specifically for treatment of SHT [diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ⩾ 120 mmHg;n = 24]; (ii) untreated patients with established mild hypertension (MHT; DBP 95–100 mmHg;n = 19); and (iii) normotensive volunteers (DBP ⩽ 90;n = 16). Results By analysis of variance, sVCAM-1 (P = 0.002), sICAM-1 (P = 0.02) and vWF (P = 0.009) were greater in SHT and MHT than in normotensives but did not differ between SHT and MHT. We observed a significant positive correlation between blood pressure and soluble activation markers at lower blood pressures (normotensives and MHT considered together) that was not present in SHT. Conclusions Even mild elevation of blood pressure may be sufficient to activate the expression of adhesion molecules. Mechanisms other than the endothelial expression of adhesion molecules may be important in mediating the accelerated target organ injury produced by SHT in humans. Concentrations of soluble adhesion molecules and vWF may depend more strongly upon factors in the hypertensive microenvironment other than the absolute level of blood pressure.
Journal of Clinical Hypertension | 2009
Thomas D. Giles; Barry J. Materson; Jay N. Cohn; John B. Kostis
Since the publication of a paper by the American Society of Hypertension, Inc. Writing Group in 2003, some refinements have occurred in the definition of hypertension. Blood pressure is now recognized as a biomarker for hypertension, and a distinction is made between the various stages of hypertension and global cardiovascular risk. This paper discusses the logic underlying the refinements in the definition of hypertension.