Barry M. Brenner

Prevention of diabetic glomerulopathy by pharmacological amelioration of glomerular capillary hypertension.

Two groups of adult male Munich-Wistar rats and a third group of nondiabetic age-matched and weight-matched normal control rats underwent micropuncture study 1 mo, and morphologic studies 14 mo, after induction of streptozotocin diabetes or sham treatment. All animals were fed standard rat chow. Diabetic rats received daily ultralente insulin to maintain stable moderate hyperglycemia (approximately 350 mg/dl). In addition, one group of diabetic rats was treated with the angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, 15 mg/liter of drinking water. Average kidney weight, whole kidney and single-nephron glomerular filtration rate, and glomerular plasma flow rate were elevated to similar values in both groups of diabetic rats, relative to normal control rats. Non-enalapril-treated diabetic rats exhibited significant elevations in mean glomerular capillary hydraulic pressure and transcapillary hydraulic pressure gradient, compared with the other groups studied, and only this group eventually developed marked and progressive albuminuria. Likewise, histological examination of the kidneys at 14 mo disclosed a high incidence of glomerular structural abnormalities only in non-enalapril-treated diabetic rats. These findings indicate that prevention of glomerular capillary hypertension in rats with diabetes mellitus effectively protects against the subsequent development of glomerular structural injury and proteinuria. This protection is afforded despite pronounced hyperglycemia and elevated levels of glucosylated hemoglobin, further supporting our view that hemodynamic rather than metabolic factors predominate in the pathogenesis of diabetic glomerulopathy.

Therapeutic advantage of converting enzyme inhibitors in arresting progressive renal disease associated with systemic hypertension in the rat.

Micropuncture and morphologic studies were performed in six groups of male Munich-Wistar rats after removal of the right kidney and segmental infarction of two-thirds of the left kidney. Groups 1 and 4 received no specific therapy. Groups 2 and 5 were treated with the angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, 50 mg/liter, in the drinking water. Groups 3 and 6 were treated with reserpine (5 mg/liter), hydralazine (80 mg/liter), and hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/liter). All rats were fed standard chow. Groups 1-3 underwent micropuncture study 4 wk after renal ablation. Untreated group 1 rats exhibited systemic hypertension and elevation of the single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) due to high average values for the mean glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure gradient (delta P) and glomerular plasma flow rate (QA). In group 2 rats, treatment with enalapril prevented systemic hypertension and maintained delta P at near-normal levels without significant reduction in SNGFR and QA. In contrast, triple drug therapy normalized systemic hypertension, but failed to lower delta P in group 3 rats. Groups 4-6 were followed for 12 wk after renal ablation. Untreated group 4 rats demonstrated continuous systemic hypertension, progressive proteinuria, and glomerular structural lesions, including mesangial expansion and frequent areas of segmental sclerosis. In group 5 rats, treatment with enalapril maintained systemic blood pressure at normal levels over the 12-wk period and dramatically limited the development of proteinuria and glomerular lesions. Despite equivalent systemic blood pressure control in group 6 rats, failure of triple drug therapy to control glomerular hypertension was associated with progressive proteinuria and glomerular lesions comparable to those seen in untreated group 4 rats. Thus, unless glomerular capillary hypertension is corrected, control of systemic blood pressure is insufficient to prevent progressive renal injury in rats with reduced renal mass.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Progression of Nondiabetic Renal Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Patient-Level Data

Chronic renal disease is a major public health problem in the United States. According to the 1999 Annual Data Report of the U.S. Renal Data System, more than 357 000 people have end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and the annual cost of treatment with dialysis and renal transplantation exceeds

Control of glomerular hypertension limits glomerular injury in rats with reduced renal mass.

15.6 billion (1). Patients undergoing dialysis have reduced quality of life, a high morbidity rate, and an annual mortality rate of 20% to 25% (1). Identification of therapies to prevent ESRD is an important public health goal. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are highly effective in slowing the progression of renal disease due to type 1 diabetes (26), and evidence of their efficacy in type 2 diabetes is growing (712). However, although 14 randomized, controlled trials have been completed (1325; Brenner BM; Toto R. Personal communications), no consensus exists on the use of ACE inhibitors in nondiabetic renal disease (2628). In a previous meta-analysis of 11 randomized, controlled trials, we found that therapy with ACE inhibitors slowed the progression of nondiabetic renal disease (29). Since our meta-analysis was performed on group data rather than individual-patient data, we could not fully assess the relationship between the effect of ACE inhibitors and blood pressure, urinary protein excretion, or other patient characteristics (30). Thus, we could not determine whether an equal reduction in blood pressure or urinary protein excretion by using other antihypertensive agents would be as effective in slowing the progression of renal disease. Nor could we determine whether the baseline blood pressure, urinary protein excretion, or other patient characteristics modified the response to treatment. In the current report, we used pooled analysis of individual-patient data to answer these questions. We reasoned that the large number of patients in the pooled analysis would provide sufficient statistical power to detect relationships between patient characteristics and risk for progression of renal disease and interactions of patient characteristics with treatment effect. In principle, strong and consistent results from analysis of this large database would clarify the effects of ACE inhibitors for treatment of nondiabetic renal disease. Methods Study Design We obtained individual-patient data from nine published (1322) and two unpublished (Brenner BM; Toto R. Personal communications) randomized, controlled trials assessing the effects of ACE inhibitors on renal disease progression in predominantly nondiabetic patients. Search strategies used to identify clinical trials have been described elsewhere and are reviewed in Appendix 2. We included 11 randomized trials on progression of renal disease that compared the effects of antihypertensive regimens including ACE inhibitors to the effects of regimens without ACE inhibitors, with a follow-up of at least 1 year. In these studies, the institutional review board at each participating center approved the study, and all patients gave informed consent. Patients underwent randomization between March 1986 and April 1996. Hypertension or decreased renal function was required for entry into all studies. Exclusion criteria common to all studies were acute renal failure, treatment with immunosuppressive medications, clinically significant congestive heart failure, obstructive uropathy, renal artery stenosis, active systemic disease, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, history of transplantation, history of allergy to ACE inhibitors, and pregnancy. Table 1 shows characteristics of the patients in each study. Table 1. Study and Patient Characteristics in the Randomized, Controlled Trials Included in the Pooled Analysis Before randomization, patients already taking an ACE inhibitor were switched to alternative medications for at least 3 weeks. After randomization, the ACE inhibitor groups received enalapril in seven studies (1419; Brenner BM; Toto R. Personal communications) and captopril (13), benazepril (20), cilazapril (18), and ramipril (21, 22) in one study each. The control groups received placebo in five studies (1922; Brenner BM; Toto R. Personal communications), a specified medication in five studies (nifedipine in two studies [13, 17] and atenolol or acebutolol in three studies [15, 16, 18]), and no specified medication in one study (14). Other antihypertensive medications were used in both groups to reach the target blood pressure, which was less than 140/90 mm Hg in all studies. All patients were followed at least once every 6 months for the first year and at least once yearly thereafter. Blood pressure and laboratory variables were measured at each visit. Table 1 shows outcomes of each study. We pooled the 11 clinical trials on the basis of similarity of study designs and patient characteristics. In addition, the presence of preexisting hypertension and use of antihypertensive agents in most patients in the control groups in each clinical trial justified pooling data from placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. Thus, the pooled analysis addresses the clinically relevant question of whether antihypertensive regimens including ACE inhibitors are more effective than anti-hypertensive regimens not including ACE inhibitors in slowing the progression of nondiabetic renal disease. Outcomes Two primary outcomes were defined: ESRD, defined as the initiation of long-term dialysis therapy, and a combined outcome of a twofold increase in serum creatinine concentration from baseline values or ESRD. Because ESRD is a clinically important outcome, we believed that definitive results of analyses using this outcome would be clinically relevant. However, because most chronic renal diseases progress slowly, few patients might reach this outcome during the relatively brief follow-up of these clinical trials, resulting in relatively low statistical power for these analyses. Doubling of baseline serum creatinine is a well-accepted surrogate outcome for progression of renal disease in studies of antihypertensive agents (2, 20) and would be expected to occur more frequently than ESRD, providing higher statistical power for analyses using this outcome. Doubling of baseline serum creatinine concentration was confirmed by repeated evaluation in only one study, which used this variable as the primary outcome. Therefore, we did not require confirmation of doubling for our analysis. Other outcomes included death and a composite outcome of ESRD and death. Withdrawal was defined as discontinuation of follow-up before the occurrence of an outcome or study end. Reasons for withdrawal were 1) nonfatal side effects possibly due to ACE inhibitors, including hyperkalemia, cough, angioedema, acute renal failure, or hypotension; 2) nonfatal cardiovascular disease events, including myo-cardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or claudication; 3) other nonfatal events, such as malignant disease, pneumonia, cellulitis, headache, or gastrointestinal disturbance; and 4) other reasons, including loss to follow-up, protocol violation, or unknown. Statistical Analysis Five investigators participated in data cleaning. Summary tables were compiled from the individual-patient data from each study and checked against tables in published and unpublished reports. Discrepancies were resolved by contacting investigators at the clinical or data coordinating centers whenever possible. Because the studies followed different protocols, we had to standardize the variable definitions, follow-up intervals, and run-in periods; details of our approach are provided in Appendix 2. S-Plus (MathSoft, Inc., Seattle, Washington) and SAS (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) software programs were used for all statistical analyses (31, 32). Univariate analysis was performed to detect associations between the covariates and outcomes. Baseline patient characteristics were treatment assignment (ACE inhibitor vs. control), age (logarithmic transformation), sex, ethnicity, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, serum creatinine concentration (reciprocal transformation), and urinary protein excretion. Study characteristics were blinding, type of antihypertensive regimen in the control group, planned duration of follow-up, whether dietary protein or sodium was restricted, and year of publication. Baseline patient characteristics and study characteristics were introduced as fixed covariates. Since renal biopsy was not performed in most cases and since criteria for classification of cause of renal disease were not defined, the cause of renal disease was not included as a variable in the analysis. Follow-up patient characteristics (blood pressure and urinary protein excretion) were adjusted as time-dependent covariates; the value recorded at the beginning of each time segment was used for that segment. This convention was used so that each outcome would be determined only by previous exposure. The intention-to-treat principle was followed for comparison of randomized groups. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to determine the effect of assignment to ACE inhibitors (treatment effect) and other covariates on risk for ESRD and the combined outcome (33, 34). Multivariable models were built by using candidate predictors that were associated with the outcome (P<0.2) in the univariate analysis. Each model was adjusted for study, but since some studies had no events, we could not include a dummy variable for each study. Rather, we adjusted models for studies that differed significantly from the rest (studies 2 [14], 5 [15], 10 [20], and 11 [21, 22]). We also performed tests for interactions between all covariates and treatment effect. All P values were based on two-sided tests, and significance was set at a P value less than 0.05. Results are expressed as relative risks with 95% CIs. Residual diagnostics were performed on these final models (33, 34)

The case for intrarenal hypertension in the initiation and progression of diabetic and other glomerulopathies

Micropuncture and morphologic studies were performed in four groups of male Munich-Wistar rats after removal of the right kidney and segmental infarction of two-thirds of the left kidney. Groups 1 and 3 received no specific therapy. Groups 2 and 4 were treated with the angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, 50 mg/liter of which was put in their drinking water. All rats were fed standard chow. Groups 1 and 2 underwent micropuncture study 4 wk after renal ablation. Untreated group 1 rats exhibited systemic hypertension and elevation of the single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) due to high average values for the mean glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure difference and glomerular plasma flow rate. In group 2 rats, treatment with enalapril prevented systemic hypertension and maintained the mean glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure gradient at near-normal levels without significantly compromising SNGFR and the glomerular capillary plasma flow rate, as compared with untreated group 1 rats. Groups 3 and 4 were studied 8 wk after renal ablation. Untreated group 3 rats demonstrated persistent systemic hypertension, progressive proteinuria, and glomerular structural lesions, including mesangial expansion and segmental sclerosis. In group 4 rats, treatment with enalapril maintained systemic blood pressure at normal levels over the 8-wk period and significantly limited the development of proteinuria and glomerular lesions. These studies suggest that control of glomerular hypertension effectively limits glomerular injury in rats with renal ablation, and further support the view that glomerular hemodynamic changes mediate progressive renal injury when nephron number is reduced.

Cardiorenal end points in a trial of aliskiren for type 2 diabetes

G ross defects in glomerular capillary function manifested as heavy proteinuria and severely reduced glomerular filtration rates occur with long-standing diabetes mellitus. However, substantial changes in glomerular function appear even at an early phase of this metabolic disorder, and studies of these early alterations have begun to yield insights into potential mechanisms of the late, overt injury. In 1959, Stalder and Schmid [l] demonstrated supernormal glomerular filtration rate values in diabetic children and young adults, a finding confirmed by Ditzel and Schwartz [2] and extensively investigated in recent years by Mogensen [3,4]. Mogensen [3] described a 40 percent increment in glomerular filtration rate in 11 patients with newly diagnosed juvenile diabetes when compared to values in 31 normal subjects of similar age. This remarkable hyperfiltration was shown to be related to the patient’s metabolic status, since reduction of blood sugar levels over several days to weeks by standard insulin therapy tended to return glomerular filtration rate to normal or near-normal values. Indeed, recent studies by Christiansen et al. [5] have demonstrated that with reduction in blood glucose levels to normal by continuous insulin infusion, glomerular filtration rate also declines from elevated to near-normal values in a matter of hours. A number of clinical studies have been performed, largely by these and other Danish investigators, in an attempt to dissect the particular component or components of the diabetic state responsible for these early elevations in glomerular filtration rate. One factor that has been incriminated is hyperglycemia per se. Indeed, acute elevations of glomerular filtration rate occur in response to glucose infusion in normal subjects [ 6-81. While the structural hypertrophy observed in kidneys of diabetic humans and animals, best documented by

Albuminuria, a Therapeutic Target for Cardiovascular Protection in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy

sterby, Gunderson and co-workers [ 9, lo], has also been proposed to contribute to the augmented glomerular filtration rate, this process would be unlikely to explain the relatively rapid changes in glomerular filtration rate that occur with insulin therapy. Augmented levels of glucagon and growth hormone are usual accompaniments of diabetic hyperglycemia, and each of these hormones is capable of inducing a rise in glomerular filtration rate in normal subjects at plasma levels comparable to those found in hyperglycemic diabetic patients [ 1 l-141. However, increments in glomerular filtration rate achieved by these hormones are substantially less than the usual increment observed in the early insulin-dependent diabetic patient. Finally, changes in circulating and tissue levels of classic vasoactive hormones such as angiotensin II, catecholamines and prostaglandins have been demonstrated in a variety of circumstances in diabetes [ 1% 171. Also, changes in responsiveness to angiotensin II and catecholamines have been demonstrated in several extrarenal vascular beds in diabetic patients and animals [ 18,191. Whether changes in the levels of these hormones or the vascular response to them contribute to the hyperfiltration is as yet unknown. In any case, a variety of factors present in the diabetic state may contribute to hyperfiltration, and no single factor appears to account fully for this phenomenon. Although insights into the stimuli responsible for diabetic hyperfiltration have been forthcoming from such

Congenital Oligonephropathy and the Etiology of Adult Hypertension and Progressive Renal Injury

BACKGROUND This study was undertaken to determine whether use of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren would reduce cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or both. METHODS In a double-blind fashion, we randomly assigned 8561 patients to aliskiren (300 mg daily) or placebo as an adjunct to an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin-receptor blocker. The primary end point was a composite of the time to cardiovascular death or a first occurrence of cardiac arrest with resuscitation; nonfatal myocardial infarction; nonfatal stroke; unplanned hospitalization for heart failure; end-stage renal disease, death attributable to kidney failure, or the need for renal-replacement therapy with no dialysis or transplantation available or initiated; or doubling of the baseline serum creatinine level. RESULTS The trial was stopped prematurely after the second interim efficacy analysis. After a median follow-up of 32.9 months, the primary end point had occurred in 783 patients (18.3%) assigned to aliskiren as compared with 732 (17.1%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.20; P=0.12). Effects on secondary renal end points were similar. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower with aliskiren (between-group differences, 1.3 and 0.6 mm Hg, respectively) and the mean reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was greater (between-group difference, 14 percentage points; 95% CI, 11 to 17). The proportion of patients with hyperkalemia (serum potassium level, ≥6 mmol per liter) was significantly higher in the aliskiren group than in the placebo group (11.2% vs. 7.2%), as was the proportion with reported hypotension (12.1% vs. 8.3%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS The addition of aliskiren to standard therapy with renin-angiotensin system blockade in patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk for cardiovascular and renal events is not supported by these data and may even be harmful. (Funded by Novartis; ALTITUDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00549757.).

Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with mortality and end-stage renal disease. A collaborative meta-analysis of kidney disease population cohorts

Background—Albuminuria is an established risk marker for both cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Albuminuria can be reduced with drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). We questioned whether the short-term drug-induced change in albuminuria would predict the long-term cardioprotective efficacy of RAS intervention. Methods and Results—We analyzed data from Reduction in Endpoints in Non–insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL), a double-blind, randomized trial in 1513 type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy, focusing on the relationship between the prespecified cardiovascular end point (composite) or hospitalization for heart failure and baseline or reduction in albuminuria. Patients with high baseline albuminuria (≥3 g/g creatinine) had a 1.92-fold (95% CI, 1.54 to 2.38) higher risk for the cardiovascular end point and a 2.70-fold (95% CI, 1.94 to 3.75) higher risk for heart failure compared with patients with low albuminuria (<1.5 g/g). Among all available baseline risk markers, albuminuria was the strongest predictor of cardiovascular outcome. The association between albuminuria and cardiovascular outcome was driven by those patients who also had a renal event. Modeling of the initial 6-month change in risk parameters showed that albuminuria reduction was the only predictor for cardiovascular outcome: 18% reduction in cardiovascular risk for every 50% reduction in albuminuria and a 27% reduction in heart failure risk for every 50% reduction in albuminuria. Conclusions—Albuminuria is an important factor predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Reducing albuminuria in the first 6 months appears to afford cardiovascular protection in these patients.

Interleukin 1 induces prolonged L-arginine-dependent cyclic guanosine monophosphate and nitrite production in rat vascular smooth muscle cells.

Based on the associations reviewed in this report, we have hypothesized that retardation of renal development as occurs in individuals of low birth weight gives rise to increased postnatal risks for systemic and glomerular hypertension as well as enhanced risk of expression of renal disease. This hypothesis draws on observations suggesting (1) a direct relationship between birth weight and nephron number, (2) an inverse relationship between birth weight and later-life hypertension, and (3) an inverse relationship between nephron number and blood pressure, irrespective of whether nephron number is reduced congenitally or in postnatal life (as from partial renal ablation or acquired renal disease). Additional clinical and epidemiologic studies are needed to assess these initial impressions.