Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Barry Muhlfelder is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Barry Muhlfelder.


Advances in Space Research | 1989

The gravity-probe-b relativity gyroscope experiment: Development of the prototype flight instrument

John P. Turneaure; C.W.F. Everitt; Bradford W. Parkinson; Doron Bardas; John V. Breakwell; Sasha Buchman; W.S. Cheung; D.E. Davidson; D. DeBra; William M. Fairbank; Salah El-Din Feteih; D. Gill; R. Hacker; G. M. Keiser; James M. Lockhart; Barry Muhlfelder; Richard T. Parmley; Xinhua Qin; M.A. Taber; R.A. Van Patten; Y.M. Xiao; Pingli Zhou

The Gravity-Probe-B Relativity Gyroscope Experiment (GP-B) will measure the geodetic and frame-dragging precession rates of gyroscopes in a 650 km high polar orbit about the earth. The goal is to measure these two effects, which are predicted by Einsteins General Theory of Relativity, to 0.01% (geodetic) and 1% (frame-dragging). This paper presents the development progress for full-size prototype flight hardware including the gyroscopes, gyro readout and magnetic shielding system, and an integrated ground test instrument. Results presented include gyro rotor mass-unbalance values (15–86 nm) due the thickness variations of the thin niobium coating on the rotor, interior sphericities (163–275 nm peak-to-valley) of fused-quartz gyro housings produced by tumble lapping, gyro precession rates (gyroscopes at 5 K) which imply low mass-unbalance components parallel to the gyro axis (23–62 nm), and demonstration of a magnetic shielding factor of 2×1010 for the gyro readout system with one shielding component missing (the gyro rotor). All of these results are at or near flight requirements for the GP-B Science Mission, which is expected to be launched in 1995.


Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015

The Gravity Probe B test of general relativity

C.W.F. Everitt; Barry Muhlfelder; D. DeBra; Brad Parkinson; John P. Turneaure; A S Silbergleit; E B Acworth; M Adams; Ronald J. Adler; William J. Bencze; J E Berberian; R J Bernier; K A Bower; Robert W. Brumley; Sasha Buchman; K Burns; B. Clarke; John Conklin; M L Eglington; G Green; Gregory M. Gutt; D H Gwo; G Hanuschak; X He; M I Heifetz; David Hipkins; T. Holmes; R A Kahn; G. M. Keiser; J. Kozaczuk

The Gravity Probe B mission provided two new quantitative tests of Einsteins theory of gravity, general relativity (GR), by cryogenic gyroscopes in Earths orbit. Data from four gyroscopes gave a geodetic drift-rate of −6601.8 ± 18.3 marc-s yr−1 and a frame-dragging of −37.2 ± 7.2 marc-s yr−1, to be compared with GR predictions of −6606.1 and −39.2 marc-s yr−1 (1 marc-s = 4.848 × 10−9 radians). The present paper introduces the science, engineering, data analysis, and heritage of Gravity Probe B, detailed in the accompanying 20 CQG papers.


Advances in Space Research | 2003

Development of the Gravity Probe B flight mission

John P. Turneaure; C.W.F. Everitt; Brad Parkinson; Doron Bardas; Sasha Buchman; D. DeBra; H. J. Dougherty; Dale Gill; J. Grammer; G. B. Green; Gregory M. Gutt; D.-H. Gwo; M. Heifetz; N.J. Kasdin; G. M. Keiser; John A. Lipa; J.M. Lockhart; John Mester; Barry Muhlfelder; R.T. Parmley; A S Silbergleit; M. Sullivan; M. A. Taber; R.A. Van Patten; R. H. Vassar; S. Wang; Y.M. Xiao; P. Zhou

Abstract Gravity Probe B is an experiment to measure the geodetic and frame-dragging precessions, relative to the “fixed” “stars”, of a gyroscope placed in a 650 km altitude polar orbit about the earth. For Einsteins general relativity, the precessions are calculated to be 6.6 arcsec/yr for the geodetic precession and 0.042 arcsec/yr for the frame-dragging precession. The goal of the experiment is to measure these precessions to better than 0.01% and 1%, respectively. This paper gives an overview of the experiment and a discussion of the flight hardware development and its status. This paper also includes an estimate of the geodetic and frame-dragging errors expected for the experiment.


IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity | 1997

Optimization of a SQUID system for space

J.M. Lockhart; Barry Muhlfelder; Gregory M. Gutt; M. Luo; R.C. Clappier; T.R. McGinnis; G.R. Smith

We have optimized a sensitive SQUID measurement system for use in a space flight experiment in the presence of significant interference from other sub-systems and the perturbing effects of EMI and thermal fluctuations. We will describe developments including a sapphire carrier for the SQUID chip, a precision temperature controller for the SQUID, control electronics with high bandwidth and enhanced thermal stability, and special shielding and filtering techniques used to increase EMI resistance.


Advances in Space Research | 2000

Ultralow magnetic fields and Gravity Probe B gyroscope readout

John Mester; J.M. Lockhart; Barry Muhlfelder; D.O. Murray; M. A. Taber

Abstract We describe the generation of an ultralow magnetic field of −11 Tesla in the flight dewar of the Gravity Probe B Relativity Mission. The field was achieved using expanded-superconducting-shield techniques and is maintained with the aid of a magnetic materials control program. A high performance magnetic shield system is required for the proper function of gyroscope readout. The readout system employs a dc SQUID to measure the London moment generated by the superconducting gyro rotor in order to resolve sub-milliarcsecond changes in the gyro spin direction. In addition to a low residual dc magnetic field, attenuation of external field variation is required to be 10 12 at the gyro positions. We discuss the measurement of the dc magnetic field and ac attenuation factor and the performance of the readout system.


Physica B-condensed Matter | 1994

Magnetic flux distribution on a spherical superconducting shell

Yueming Xiao; Saps Buchman; G. M. Keiser; Barry Muhlfelder; John P. Turneaure; Chang-Huei Wu

Abstract We report measurements of flux distributions on superconducting spherical shells in an ambient magnetic field of 0.2±0.1 μG. The aim of these experiments is to minimize the number of flux lines trapped in the superconducting shells, an important requirement for the Gravity Probe B gyroscopes.


Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015

Gravity Probe B data analysis: II. Science data and their handling prior to the final analysis

A S Silbergleit; John Conklin; M I Heifetz; T. Holmes; J. Li; Ilya Mandel; V G Solomonik; K Stahl; Paul Worden; C.W.F. Everitt; M Adams; J E Berberian; William J. Bencze; B. Clarke; A Al-Jadaan; G. M. Keiser; J. Kozaczuk; M Al-Meshari; Barry Muhlfelder; Michael Salomon; David I. Santiago; B Al-Suwaidan; John P. Turneaure; J Wade

The results of the Gravity Probe B relativity science mission published in Everitt et al (2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 221101) required a rather sophisticated analysis of experimental data due to several unexpected complications discovered on-orbit. We give a detailed description of the Gravity Probe B data reduction. In the first paper (Silbergleit et al Class. Quantum Grav. 22 224018) we derived the measurement models, i.e., mathematical expressions for all the signals to analyze. In the third paper (Conklin et al Class. Quantum Grav. 22 224020) we explain the estimation algorithms and their program implementation, and discuss the experiment results obtained through data reduction. This paper deals with the science data preparation for the main analysis yielding the relativistic drift estimates.


Advances in Space Research | 2003

The Gravity Probe B gyroscope readout system

Barry Muhlfelder; J.M. Lockhart; Gregory M. Gutt

Abstract We describe the superconducting gyroscope readout system to be used for measuring to a precision of 1 marcsecond in 10 hours of integration time the spin axis orientation of the Gravity Probe B (GP-B) gyroscope. The cryogenic portion of the readout system uses a dc SQUID to measure the gyroscopes London magnetic moment. Room temperature electronics appropriately bias the dc SQUID, allowing the detection and amplification of the gyroscope signal. We will describe recent advances in the system hardware including improved electronics and packaging. We will show flight quality noise performance and will discuss measurements of the systems rejection of simulated on-orbit environmental influences.


Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015

Gravity Probe B data analysis: III. Estimation tools and analysis results

John Conklin; M I Heifetz; T. Holmes; M Al-Meshari; Bradford W. Parkinson; A S Silbergleit; C.W.F. Everitt; A Al-Jaadan; G. M. Keiser; Barry Muhlfelder; V G Solomonik; H Aljabreen

This paper provides detailed descriptions of the numerical estimation algorithms used to fit physics-based models to the data from the Gravity Probe B spacecraft, as well as the scientific results of the experiment, and the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The first paper in this series of three data analysis papers derives the mathematical expressions for the signals to be analyzed, and the second paper deals with science data acquisition and their preparation for the relativistic drift rate estimation. The data from each of the four gyroscopes are partitioned into six segments, each spanning several weeks to several months. These segments are first analyzed individually to check the validity of the mathematical models and the accuracy of the estimation routine by examining the consistency of the relativistic drift rate estimates from each of these 24 gyro-segments. Then, the drift rate estimates and uncertainties are calculated for each individual gyroscope and for the four gyroscopes combined. These results are presented and compared with each other and with the prediction of general relativity.


Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015

Precision attitude control of the Gravity Probe B satellite

John Conklin; M Adams; William J. Bencze; D. DeBra; G Green; L Herman; T. Holmes; Barry Muhlfelder; Brad Parkinson; A S Silbergleit; J Kirschenbaum

The Gravity Probe B satellite used ultra-precise gyroscopes in low Earth orbit to compare the orientation of the local inertial reference frame with that of distant space in order to test predictions of general relativity. The experiment required that the Gravity Probe B spacecraft have milliarcsecond-level attitude knowledge for the science measurement, and milliarcsecond-level control to minimize classical torques acting on the science gyroscopes. The primary sensor was a custom Cassegrainian telescope, which measured the pitch and yaw angles of the experiment package with respect to a guide star. The spacecraft rolled uniformly about the direction to the guide star, and the roll angle was measured by star trackers. Attitude control was performed with sixteen proportional thrusters that used boil-off from the experiments liquid Helium cryogen as propellant. This paper summarizes the attitude control systems design and on-orbit performance.

Collaboration


Dive into the Barry Muhlfelder's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge