Bart Middernacht

Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis

Background and purpose Despite good clinical results with the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, inferior scapular notching remains a concern. We evaluated 6 different solutions to overcome the problem of scapular notching. Methods An average and a “worst case scenario” shape in A-P view in a 2-D computer model of a scapula was created, using data from 200 “normal” scapulae, so that the position of the glenoid and humeral component could be changed as well as design features such as depth of the polyethylene insert, the size of glenosphere, the position of the center of rotation, and downward glenoid inclination. The model calculated the maximum adduction (notch angle) in the scapular plane when the cup of the humeral component was in conflict with the scapula. Results A change in humeral neck shaft inclination from 155° to 145° gave a 10° gain in notch angle. A change in cup depth from 8 mm to 5 mm gave a gain of 12°. With no inferior prosthetic overhang, a lateralization of the center of rotation from 0 mm to 5 mm gained 16°. With an inferior overhang of only 1 mm, no effect of lateralizing the center of rotation was noted. Downward glenoid inclination of 0º to 10º gained 10°. A change in glenosphere radius from 18 mm to 21 mm gained 31° due to the inferior overhang created by the increase in glenosphere. A prosthetic overhang to the bone from 0 mm to 5 mm gained 39°. Interpretation Of all 6 solutions tested, the prosthetic overhang created the biggest gain in notch angle and this should be considered when designing the reverse arthroplasty and defining optimal surgical technique.

Omarthrose ecentrée: symposium

Cuff tear arthropathy is defined as the combination of a gleno-humeral arthritis and a massive rotators cuff tear. It is generally admitted that the cuff tear, or its deficiency jeopardises the results of anatomic prosthesis. Grammont imagined and grew the concept of the reverse prosthesis whose aim was to remedy the insufficiency of the rotator cuff and whose use has dramatically modified the therapeutic approach in these complicated situations. The aim of this symposium is to analyse the results of shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic prosthesis, bipolar or reverse) in cuff tear arthropathy, in massive and isolated cuff tears which justify the use of prosthetic surgery, and in centered osteoarthritis with deficient cuff also justifying this use. Massive cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy have been considered as the stages of a same pathology by Hamada whose classification has been used for the purposes of this study. Out of the 738 initial prosthesis, 111 have been eliminated because of death, incomplete files or lost of sight, without any known complication. Out of the remaining 627 who were used as a basis for this symposium (representing 85% of initial cases), 570 who still had their prosthesis were reviewed and their functional results analysed after 2 years or more. The population was mainly female (72%) who were injured on the dominant side (75%) with a mean age of 72 years. The preoperative Constant score was in average 24 and 24% of the patients had already been operated on their shoulder. For those who had an acetabulization of the acromion, the strength in external rotation was significantly less satisfying and the lesion of the infraspinatus and the teres minor were more frequent. 48 hemiarthroplasties, 52 bipolar and 527 reverse prosthesis were studied. At revision, with an average follow up of 52 months, the revision rate was 23% for hemiarthroplasties, 14% for reversed prosthesis and only 8% for bipolar prosthesis. The prosthesis was removed in 21% of hemiarthroplasties, 5% of reverse and 2% of bipolar. No infection to report in the hemi group or the bipolar group, whereas there was an infection rate of 5% in the reverse group. Nevertheless, the Constant score was significantly better with reverse (62) than with bipolar (45) or hemi (44). The active elevation was also better with the reverse whereas the external rotation was not as good as with anatomic prosthesis. The analytic study of the results of the reverse prosthesis shows a negative influence of the lesion of the sub-scapularis and the teres minor. The results are disappointing with young patients and those who had surgical precedents. On X-ray, we can notice 0.5% of humeral loosening withouth any correlation to the fact that the implant is cemented or not, 3.6% of glenoid loosening and 68% of scapular notches without any significant change on the Constant score. Their occurrence is correlated to a preoperative rising of the humeral head and a superior glenoid lesion. It is observed more frequently with the supero-lateral approach compared to the delto-pectoral one. The frequency of these notches grows with the follow up and their occurrence is often associated to humeral radiolucent lines. On the long term, the survival rate of these prosthesis is 89% at 10 years. The Constant score deteriorates gradually after 7 years; this seems to be linked to the occurrence of x-ray modifications in the years that followed. The main complications observed with reverse prosthesis were the infections (5.1%), the glenoid problems (5.1%), the instabilities (3.6%), the acromion fractures (3.0%). Infections can be treated by a wash out and antibiotics in the first 3 months, then the removal of the prosthesis becomes necessary. The instabilities occur more often for males, with delto-pectoral approach and with 36mm diameter glenoids. The glenoid problems are frequent in the first years and often due to technical errors or material defects (unscrewing of the glenosphere). Acromion fractures have an important clinical impact when they concern the spine and there healing is difficult to obtain, whichever method is used. In conclusion, the use of a prosthesis for cuff tear arthropathies must be thought about, especially in massive cuff tear without osteoarthritis, in patients with previous surgery, and in patients younger than 70. If the active elevation is conserved and the patient is young, the use of an hemi or a bipolar prosthesis can be debated. In other cases, the indication of a reverse prosthesis is preferable given that the clinical results are better. In these cases, the surgical technique must be accurate, bearing in mind the advantages and disadvantages of the two possible approaches, the type of implant (36 vs 42), the position and orientation of the glenoid baseplate according to the pre-operative bone wear, the orientation of the humeral implant, the need for reinsertion of the subscapularis and, maybe, the possibility of an associated transfer of the latissimus dorsi.Cuff tear arthropathy is defined as the combination of a gleno-humeral arthritis and a massive rotators cuff tear. It is generally admitted that the cuff tear, or its deficiency jeopardises the results of anatomic prosthesis. Grammont imagined and grew the concept of the reverse prosthesis whose aim was to remedy the insufficiency of the rotator cuff and whose use has dramatically modified the therapeutic approach in these complicated situations. The aim of this symposium is to analyse the results of shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic prosthesis, bipolar or reverse) in cuff tear arthropathy, in massive and isolated cuff tears which justify the use of prosthetic surgery, and in centered osteoarthritis with deficient cuff also justifying this use. Massive cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy have been considered as the stages of a same pathology by Hamada whose classification has been used for the purposes of this study. Out of the 738 initial prosthesis, 111 have been eliminated because of death, incomplete files or lost of sight, without any known complication. Out of the remaining 627 who were used as a basis for this symposium (representing 85% of initial cases), 570 who still had their prosthesis were reviewed and their functional results analysed after 2 years or more. The population was mainly female (72%) who were injured on the dominant side (75%) with a mean age of 72 years. The preoperative Constant score was in average 24 and 24% of the patients had already been operated on their shoulder. For those who had an acetabulization of the acromion, the strength in external rotation was significantly less satisfying and the lesion of the infraspinatus and the teres minor were more frequent. 48 hemiarthroplasties, 52 bipolar and 527 reverse prosthesis were studied. At revision, with an average follow up of 52 months, the revision rate was 23% for hemiarthroplasties, 14% for reversed prosthesis and only 8% for bipolar prosthesis. The prosthesis was removed in 21% of hemiarthroplasties, 5% of reverse and 2% of bipolar. No infection to report in the hemi group or the bipolar group, whereas there was an infection rate of 5% in the reverse group. Nevertheless, the Constant score was significantly better with reverse (62) than with bipolar (45) or hemi (44). The active elevation was also better with the reverse whereas the external rotation was not as good as with anatomic prosthesis. The analytic study of the results of the reverse prosthesis shows a negative influence of the lesion of the sub-scapularis and the teres minor. The results are disappointing with young patients and those who had surgical precedents. On X-ray, we can notice 0.5% of humeral loosening withouth any correlation to the fact that the implant is cemented or not, 3.6% of glenoid loosening and 68% of scapular notches without any significant change on the Constant score. Their occurrence is correlated to a preoperative rising of the humeral head and a superior glenoid lesion. It is observed more frequently with the supero-lateral approach compared to the delto-pectoral one. The frequency of these notches grows with the follow up and their occurrence is often associated to humeral radiolucent lines. On the long term, the survival rate of these prosthesis is 89% at 10 years. The Constant score deteriorates gradually after 7 years; this seems to be linked to the occurrence of x-ray modifications in the years that followed. The main complications observed with reverse prosthesis were the infections (5.1%), the glenoid problems (5.1%), the instabilities (3.6%), the acromion fractures (3.0%). Infections can be treated by a wash out and antibiotics in the first 3 months, then the removal of the prosthesis becomes necessary. The instabilities occur more often for males, with delto-pectoral approach and with 36mm diameter glenoids. The glenoid problems are frequent in the first years and often due to technical errors or material defects (unscrewing of the glenosphere). Acromion fractures have an important clinical impact when they concern the spine and there healing is difficult to obtain, whichever method is used. In conclusion, the use of a prosthesis for cuff tear arthropathies must be thought about, especially in massive cuff tear without osteoarthritis, in patients with previous surgery, and in patients younger than 70. If the active elevation is conserved and the patient is young, the use of an hemi or a bipolar prosthesis can be debated. In other cases, the indication of a reverse prosthesis is preferable given that the clinical results are better. In these cases, the surgical technique must be accurate, bearing in mind the advantages and disadvantages of the two possible approaches, the type of implant (36 vs 42), the position and orientation of the glenoid baseplate according to the pre-operative bone wear, the orientation of the humeral implant, the need for reinsertion of the subscapularis and, maybe, the possibility of an associated transfer of the latissimus dorsi.

Consequences of Scapular Anatomy for Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The reverse total shoulder prosthesis provides successful functional outcome in many patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy. However, scapular notching, a direct consequence of mechanical impingement between the humeral prosthesis and the glenoid, remains a major concern. We presumed a better knowledge of the anatomy of the scapula would enable design or placement modifications to minimize this phenomenon. After establishing a uniform spatial reference system using easy locatable surgical reference points and planes, we analyzed 200 dry bony scapulae and defined the glenoid and infraglenoid anatomy relative to the reference system. The bony rim of the two inferior quadrants of the glenoid forms a semicircle the center of which can be used perioperatively as an easy locatable bony reference point. The infraglenoid tubercle varies in width and length, and can interfere with the humeral part of the reverse prosthesis, creating scapular notching. To avoid notching, we suggest using a convex base plate with a smaller radius than currently used, placing it as low as possible with a 42-mm glenosphere eccentrically assembled to create a posterior offset. If prosthetic overhang cannot be obtained, we suggest removing part of the infraglenoid tubercle.

Erratum: Glenosphere Disengagement: A Potentially Serious Default in Reverse Shoulder Surgery

Implant failure is a serious complication in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We determined the incidence of glenosphere disengagement in a cohort of 479 reverse shoulder prostheses (468 Delta III TM (DePuy International Ltd, Leeds, UK), 11 Aequalis TM (Tornier, Grenoble, France)). We also determined whether disengagement adversely affected clinical outcomes. The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 28.6 months; range, 12-72 months). Disengagement of the glenosphere occur- red in 16 of 479 shoulders (3.2%). In 13 patients, the disengagement was partial (clear step-off between the baseplate and the glenosphere) and was not associated with a poor functional outcome with this short-term followup. In three patients, the disengagement led to a fracture of the central screw, leading to a complete disengagement of the glenosphere from the baseplate, necessitating revision in two; the third refused revision. Partial disengagement was seen in five of 11 Aequalis TM prostheses (45.4%) and eight of 468 Delta III TM prostheses (1.7%). The three total dis- engagements with central screw breakage all occurred in Delta III TM prostheses. We believe differences in the type of locking screws may explain the differences observed between the two types of reverse prostheses. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Critical Review on Prosthetic Features Available for Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty is a popular treatment in rotator cuff arthropathy and in displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly. In 2016, 29 models of commercially available designs express this popularity. This study describes all the different design parameters available on the market. Prosthetic differences are found for the baseplate, glenosphere, polyethylene, and humeral component and these differences need to be weighed out carefully for each patient knowing that a gain in one mechanical parameter can balance the loss of another. Patient specific implants may help in the future.