Bashar S. Hmoud

Evolving frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation based on etiology of liver disease.

Background In the background of availability of better treatments for specific liver diseases and listing of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) as an etiology for liver transplantation (LT), data are unclear on the impact of disease etiology on the frequency of LT and liver posttransplantation outcomes. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing database (1994–2009) was queried for adults receiving first LT for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC; n=3052), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; n=3854), hepatitis C virus (HCV; n=15,147), alcoholic cirrhosis (AC; n=8940), HCV+alcohol (n=6066), NASH (n=1368), cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC; n=5856), hepatitis B virus (HBV; n=1816), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n=8588). Graft and patient survival were compared and Cox models were built to determine independent prediction of outcomes by disease etiology. Results The frequency of LT increased for NASH, HCC, and HCV+alcohol, remained stable for AC, and decreased for PBC, PSC, HCV, CC, and HBV. The proportion of simultaneous liver-kidney transplants increased from approximately 3% in 2001 to 10% in 2009. Compared with PBC, 5-year graft and patient survival were (a) similar for PSC, NASH, and HBV (80–85%), (b) poorer for AC and CC (hazard ratio, 1–1.5), and (c) worst for HCV, HCV+alcohol, and HCC (hazard ratio, 1.5–2.4). Five-year outcomes for HCV-associated HCC were poorer compared with HCC due to other etiologies. Conclusions LT performed for NASH and HCC are increasing. Potent treatment options resulted in a decrease in number of transplants for HBV, HCV, and PBC. Better treatment modalities for HCV are expected to further reduce the number of LT for HCV. Excellent posttransplantation outcomes for NASH and AC are encouraging, resulting in wider acceptance of transplants for these etiologies.

Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Cirrhosis Due to Alcohol and Hepatitis C: Comparison to Alcoholic Cirrhosis and Hepatitis C Cirrhosis

Background and Aim: Data on outcome of patients after liver transplantation (LT) for cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV+) alcohol are limited. Methods and Results: Analysis from United Network for Organ sharing data set (1991 to 2010) for cirrhotics with first LT for HCV (group I, N=17,722), alcohol or alcoholic cirrhosis (AC; group II, N=9617), and alcohol+HCV (group III, N=6822). Five-year graft and patient survival for group III were similar to group I (73% vs. 69%; P=0.33 and 76% vs. 76%; P=0.87) and worse than group II (70% vs. 74%; P<0.0001 and 76% vs. 79%; P<0.0001). Cox regression analysis adjusted for recipient and donor characteristics showed (a) graft survival for group III similar to group I [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-1.09)] and worse than group II [HR 1.27 (95% CI, 1.19-1.35)] and (b) patient survival for group III worse than both groups I [HR 1.09 (95% CI, 1.02-1.15)] and II [HR 1.27 (95% CI, 1.19-1.36)]. In group III, graft failure was common for graft and patient loss and de novo malignancy more common compared with group I. Conclusions: Patients undergoing LT for cirrhosis due to combined alcohol and HCV have (a) graft survival similar to patients with HCV cirrhosis and worse than AC and (b) worse patient survival compared with AC and HCV cirrhosis. Better strategies for anti-HCV treatment and screening for tumors are needed for patients undergoing LT for combined alcohol and HCV.

Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis

Mesenteric vein thrombosis is increasingly recognized as a cause of mesenteric ischemia. Acute thrombosis commonly presents with abdominal pain and chronic type with features of portal hypertension. Contrast enhanced CT scan of abdomen is quite accurate for diagnosing and differentiating two types of mesenteric venous thrombosis. Prothrombotic state, hematological malignancy, and local abdominal inflammatory conditions are common predisposing conditions. Over the last decade, JAK-2 (janus kinase 2) mutation has emerged as an accurate biomarker for diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasm, an important cause for mesenteric venous thrombosis. Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice for acute mesenteric venous thrombosis. Thrombolysis using systemic or transcatheter route is another option. Patients with peritoneal signs or refractory to initial measures require surgical exploration. Increasing recognition of mesenteric venous thrombosis and use of anticoagulation for treatment has resulted in reduction in the need for surgery with improvement in survival.

Outcomes of liver transplantation alone after listing for simultaneous kidney: comparison to simultaneous liver kidney transplantation.

Background Data on patient and liver graft survival comparing liver transplantation alone after listing for kidney with simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplantation are scanty. Methods United Network Organ Sharing network database (1994–2011) queried for liver transplantation alone after being listed for kidney and SLK transplants. Results Of 65,206 first liver transplants, 3549 were listed for simultaneous kidney. Of these, 422 (12%) received only liver (LIST) and differed from SLK recipients for the white race (64% vs. 57%; 0.005), diabetes (27% vs. 37%; P = 0.02), model for end-stage liver disease era (68% vs. 82%; P = 0.0001), serum creatinine (2.9±1.9 vs. 4.3±2.5; P < 0.0001), dialysis (35% vs. 64%; P < 0.0001), and donor risk index (1.6±0.4 vs. 1.5±0.3; P < 0.0001). Overall survival was poorer in the LIST group (55% vs. 76%; P < 0.0001). A higher proportion of patients died within 2 days of transplantation in LIST group (11% vs. 0.5%; P < 0.0001), mostly from cardiovascular causes. After excluding these patients, odds of patient mortality and liver graft loss were about 1.2-fold and twofold higher in the LIST group. A total of 103 (24%) patients needed a renal transplantation in the LIST group with 16 (4%) receiving kidney within first year after transplantation. After excluding patients receiving kidney within first year, about 33% recovered renal function to above estimated GFR of greater than 60 mL per min. Conclusion Guidelines are needed for patient selection to list for and receipt of simultaneous liver kidney transplantation.

Corticosteroids and Occurrence of and Mortality from Infections in Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Trials

Prednisolone is the first‐line therapy for severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH). Patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis often develop severe infections that negatively impact short‐term prognosis.

Early colonoscopy in patients with acute diverticular bleeding is associated with improvement in healthcare-resource utilization

Abstract Background Diverticular bleeding (DB) is the most common cause of severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in developed countries. The role of early colonoscopy (<24 hours) continues to remain controversial and data on early colonoscopy in acute DB are scant. We aimed to evaluate the effect of timing of colonoscopy on outcomes in patients with acute DB using a nationwide inpatient sample. Methods Data from the nationwide inpatient sample from 2012 to 2014 were used. The ninth version of the International Classification of Diseases coding system ICD 9 was used for patient selection. We included discharges with the primary and secondary inpatient diagnosis of diverticulosis with bleeding and diverticulitis with bleeding. Discharges with no primary or secondary diagnosis of diverticulosis with bleeding, diverticulitis with bleeding, patients who were less than 18 years old and those who did not undergo colonoscopy during the admission were excluded. The primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and total hospitalization costs. Results A total of 88 600 patients were included in our analysis, amongst whom 45 020 (50.8%) had colonoscopy within 24 hours of admission (early colonoscopy), while 43 580 (49.2%) patients had colonoscopy after 24 hours of admission (late colonoscopy). LOS was significantly lower in patients with early colonoscopy as compared to those with late colonoscopy (3.7 vs 5.6 days, P < 0.0001). Total hospitalization costs were also significantly lower in patients with early colonoscopy (

Factors associated with waiting time on the liver transplant list: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database

9317 vs

Sa1258 PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT. WHERE DO WE STAND NOW? DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL INPATIENT SAMPLE 2013

11 767, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in mortality between both groups (0.7 vs 0.8%). After adjusting for potential confounders, the differences in LOS and total hospitalization costs between early and late colonoscopy remained statistically significant. Conclusions Early colonoscopy in acute DB significantly reduced LOS and total hospitalization costs. There was no significant difference in mortality observed. Performance of early colonoscopy in the appropriate patients presenting with acute DB can have potential cost-saving implications. Further research is needed to identify which patients would benefit from early colonoscopy in DB.

Mo1063 Early Placement of Gastrostomy Tube Is Associated With Lower Rates of Pneumonia and Decreased Inpatient Mortality

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is an important treatment for acute liver failure and end-stage liver disease. In 2002, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was incorporated to prioritize patients awaiting LT. Although there is data on how the MELD score affects waiting times, there is a paucity of literature regarding other components. We aimed to evaluate the factors affecting LT waiting times in the United States. Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, patients aged 12-75 years listed for LT over the years 2002-2015 were included. Variables tested in the model included patient characteristics, pertinent laboratory values, ABO blood type, region of listing, primary payer, ethnicity, and listing for simultaneous transplantation. Results: A total of 75,771 patients were included in the final analysis. The components of the MELD score were associated with shorter waiting times. Other factors associated with shorter waiting times were the need of mechanical ventilation and region 3 of transplantation. ABO blood type, primary payer, and placement of a transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt also influenced time on the LT waiting list. Conclusions: MELD score is utilized in the prioritization of liver allocation, and was expected to predict waiting-list time. Mechanical ventilation and other markers of disease severity are associated with higher MELD scores and thus shorter waiting times. Further research is needed to address reasons for the variation in waiting times between regions and payment systems in an attempt to decrease time to LT, standardize the listing process, and improve patient outcomes.