Bastiaan Van Grootven

Effectiveness of in-hospital geriatric co-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background geriatric consultation teams have failed to impact clinical outcomes prompting geriatric co-management programmes to emerge as a promising strategy to manage frail patients on non-geriatric wards. Objective to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of in-hospital geriatric co-management. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched from inception to 6 May 2016. Reference lists, trial registers and PubMed Central Citations were additionally searched. Study selection randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies of in-hospital patients included in a geriatric co-management study. Two investigators performed the selection process independently. Data extraction standardised data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were performed independently by two investigators. Results twelve studies and 3,590 patients were included from six randomised and six quasi-experimental studies. Geriatric co-management improved functional status and reduced the number of patients with complications in three of the four studies, but studies had a high risk of bias and outcomes were measured heterogeneously and could not be pooled. Co-management reduced the length of stay (pooled mean difference, -1.88 days [95% CI, -2.44 to -1.33]; 11 studies) and may reduce in-hospital mortality (pooled odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.50-1.03]; 7 studies). Meta-analysis identified no effect on the number of patients discharged home (5 studies), post-discharge mortality (3 studies) and readmission rate (4 studies). Conclusions there was low-quality evidence of a reduced length of stay and a reduced number of patients with complications, and very low-quality evidence of better functional status as a result of geriatric co-management.

Is preoperative state anxiety a risk factor for postoperative delirium among elderly hip fracture patients

To determine if preoperative state anxiety is a risk factor for postoperative delirium in older hip fracture patients.

Quality indicators for in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes: a systematic literature review and international Delphi study

Objective To find consensus on appropriate and feasible structure, process and outcome indicators for the evaluation of in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes. Design An international two-round Delphi study based on a systematic literature review (searching databases, reference lists, prospective citations and trial registers). Setting Western Europe and the USA. Participants Thirty-three people with at least 2 years of clinical experience in geriatric co-management were recruited. Twenty-eight experts (16 from the USA and 12 from Europe) participated in both Delphi rounds (85% response rate). Measures Participants rated the indicators on a nine-point scale for their (1) appropriateness and (2) feasibility to use the indicator for the evaluation of geriatric co-management programmes. Indicators were considered appropriate and feasible based on a median score of seven or higher. Consensus was based on the level of agreement using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Results In the first round containing 37 indicators, there was consensus on 14 indicators. In the second round containing 44 indicators, there was consensus on 31 indicators (structure=8, process=7, outcome=16). Experts indicated that co-management should start within 24 hours of hospital admission using defined criteria for selecting appropriate patients. Programmes should focus on the prevention and management of geriatric syndromes and complications. Key areas for comprehensive geriatric assessment included cognition/delirium, functionality/mobility, falls, pain, medication and pressure ulcers. Key outcomes for evaluating the programme included length of stay, time to surgery and the incidence of complications. Conclusion The indicators can be used to assess the performance of geriatric co-management programmes and identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the indicators can be used to monitor the implementation and effect of these programmes.

Geriatric CO-mAnagement for Cardiology patients in the Hospital (G-COACH): study protocol of a prospective before-after effectiveness-implementation study

Introduction Although the majority of older patients admitted to a cardiology unit present with at least one geriatric syndrome, guidelines on managing heart disease often do not consider the complex needs of frail older patients. Geriatric co-management has demonstrated potential to improve functional status, and reduce complications and length of stay, but evidence on the effectiveness in cardiology patients is lacking. This study aims to determine if geriatric co-management is superior to usual care in preventing functional decline, complications, mortality, readmission rates, reducing length of stay and improving quality of life in older patients admitted for acute heart disease or for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and to identify determinants of success for geriatric co-management in this population. Methods and analysis This prospective quasi-experimental before-and-after study will be performed on two cardiology units of the University Hospitals Leuven in Belgium in patients aged ≥75 years. In the precohort (n=227), usual care will be documented. A multitude of implementation strategies will be applied to allow for successful implementation of the model. Patients in the after cohort (n=227) will undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment within 24 hours of admission to stratify them into one of three groups based on their baseline risk for developing functional decline: low-risk patients receive proactive consultation, high-risk patients will be co-managed by the geriatric nurse to prevent complications and patients with acute geriatric problems will receive an additional medication review and co-management by the geriatrician. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee UZ Leuven/KU Leuven (S58296). Written voluntary (proxy-)informed consent will be obtained from all participants at the start of the study. Dissemination of results will be through articles in scientific and professional journals both in English and Dutch and by conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT02890927.

European Academy of Nursing Science 2016 Summer Conference

Background Nurses have a twofold role in healthcare. On one hand, they provide care to patients who are not able to take care of themselves. On the other hand nurses play a vital role as guardians of patient safety. It is mainly on the second role of nurses that the EU funded RN4CAST project is focusing. Materials and methods Data from more than 33,000 nurses and 11,000 patients in 500 hospitals from 12 European countries were collected from 2009 until 2011. It is one of the largest databases in the world on nurses staffing and its impact on patient safety. Results One of the main results [1] is that an increase in a nurses’ workload by one patient increases the likelihood of an inpatient dying within 30 days of admission by 7%. And every 10% increase in bachelor’s degree nurses is associated with a decrease in this likelihood by 7%. Relating this finding to the human error theory of James Reason, there seem to be a knowledge problem in early detecting of risks and adverse events. Secondly there are some slips and lapses in execution because of a too high workload. As an example, one out of four nurses say that they didn’t have the time to perform proper patient surveillance [2]. Again, this is explained by nurse staffing, education, working environment and non-nursing tasks to be performed. Discussion and conclusions In the follow-up of the report of the Institute of Medicine on “to err is human” [3], the crucial role of nurses in patient safety is highly underestimated [4]. This is mainly because the evidence is recent and mainly based on observational data. But the evidence is growing and consistent and strong evaluated against the Bradford-Hill criteria of causation (1965), showing that mechanisms are well understood, can be replicated across populations and settings and are time and dose-response related. Based on the available evidence, we see that some countries are adapting already their legislation to provide safe nurse staffing ratios to create a safe environment for their patients.

European Academy of Nursing Science 2016 Summer Conference: Halle, Germany. 13-14 July 2016

Background Nurses have a twofold role in healthcare. On one hand, they provide care to patients who are not able to take care of themselves. On the other hand nurses play a vital role as guardians of patient safety. It is mainly on the second role of nurses that the EU funded RN4CAST project is focusing. Materials and methods Data from more than 33,000 nurses and 11,000 patients in 500 hospitals from 12 European countries were collected from 2009 until 2011. It is one of the largest databases in the world on nurses staffing and its impact on patient safety. Results One of the main results [1] is that an increase in a nurses’ workload by one patient increases the likelihood of an inpatient dying within 30 days of admission by 7%. And every 10% increase in bachelor’s degree nurses is associated with a decrease in this likelihood by 7%. Relating this finding to the human error theory of James Reason, there seem to be a knowledge problem in early detecting of risks and adverse events. Secondly there are some slips and lapses in execution because of a too high workload. As an example, one out of four nurses say that they didn’t have the time to perform proper patient surveillance [2]. Again, this is explained by nurse staffing, education, working environment and non-nursing tasks to be performed. Discussion and conclusions In the follow-up of the report of the Institute of Medicine on “to err is human” [3], the crucial role of nurses in patient safety is highly underestimated [4]. This is mainly because the evidence is recent and mainly based on observational data. But the evidence is growing and consistent and strong evaluated against the Bradford-Hill criteria of causation (1965), showing that mechanisms are well understood, can be replicated across populations and settings and are time and dose-response related. Based on the available evidence, we see that some countries are adapting already their legislation to provide safe nurse staffing ratios to create a safe environment for their patients.