Bastian Bertzky
United Nations Environment Programme
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bastian Bertzky.
Science | 2013
Soizic Le Saout; Michael R. Hoffmann; Yichuan Shi; A. Hughes; Cyril Bernard; Thomas M. Brooks; Bastian Bertzky; Stuart H. M. Butchart; Simon N. Stuart; Tim Badman; Ana S. L. Rodrigues
Increasing the collective contribution of protected areas toward preventing species extinctions requires the strategic allocation of management efforts. Although protected areas (PAs) cover 13% of Earths land (1), substantial gaps remain in their coverage of global biodiversity (2). Thus, there has been emphasis on strategic expansion of the global PA network (3–5). However, because PAs are often understaffed, underfunded, and beleaguered in the face of external threats (6, 7), efforts to expand PA coverage should be complemented by appropriate management of existing PAs. Previous calls for enhancing PA management have focused on improving operational effectiveness of each PA [e.g., staffing and budgets (6)]. Little guidance has been offered on how to improve collective effectiveness for meeting global biodiversity conservation goals (3). We provide guidance for strategically allocating management efforts among and within existing PAs to strengthen their collective contribution toward preventing global species extinctions.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Alison E. Beresford; George W. Eshiamwata; Paul F. Donald; Andrew Balmford; Bastian Bertzky; Andreas Brink; Lincoln D. C. Fishpool; Philippe Mayaux; Ben Phalan; Dario Simonetti; Graeme M. Buchanan
There is an emerging consensus that protected areas are key in reducing adverse land-cover change, but their efficacy remains difficult to quantify. Many previous assessments of protected area effectiveness have compared changes between sets of protected and unprotected sites that differ systematically in other potentially confounding respects (e.g. altitude, accessibility), have considered only forest loss or changes at single sites, or have analysed changes derived from land-cover data of low spatial resolution. We assessed the effectiveness of protection in reducing land-cover change in Important Bird Areas (IBAs) across Africa using a dedicated visual interpretation of higher resolution satellite imagery. We compared rates of change in natural land-cover over a c. 20-year period from around 1990 at a large number of points across 45 protected IBAs to those from 48 unprotected IBAs. A matching algorithm was used to select sample points to control for potentially confounding differences between protected and unprotected IBAs. The rate of loss of natural land-cover at sample points within protected IBAs was just 42% of that at matched points in unprotected IBAs. Conversion was especially marked in forests, but protection reduced rates of forest loss by a similar relative amount. Rates of conversion increased from the centre to the edges of both protected and unprotected IBAs, but rates of loss in 20-km buffer zones surrounding protected IBAs and unprotected IBAs were similar, with no evidence of displacement of conversion from within protected areas to their immediate surrounds (leakage).
ISPRS international journal of geo-information | 2016
Grégoire Dubois; Lucy Bastin; Bastian Bertzky; Andrea Mandrici; Michele Conti; Santiago Saura; Andrew Cottam; Luca Battistella; Javier Martínez-López; Martino Boni; Mariagrazia Graziano
The Digital Observatory for Protected Areas (DOPA) has been developed to support the European Union’s efforts in strengthening our capacity to mobilize and use biodiversity data so that they are readily accessible to policymakers, managers, researchers and other users. Assessing protected areas for biodiversity conservation at national, regional and international scales implies that methods and tools are in place to evaluate characteristics such as the protected areas’ connectivity, their species assemblages (including the presence of threatened species), the uniqueness of their ecosystems, and the threats these areas are exposed to. Typical requirements for such analyses are data on protected areas, information on species distributions and threat status, and information on ecosystem distributions. By integrating all these global data consistently in metrics and indicators, the DOPA provides the means to allow end-users to evaluate protected areas individually but also to compare protected areas at the country and ecoregion level to, for example, identify potential priorities for further conservation research, action and funding. Since the metrics and indicators are available through web services, the DOPA further allows end-users to develop their own applications without requiring management of large databases and processing capacities. In addition to examples illustrating how the DOPA can be used as an aid to decision making, we discuss the lessons learnt in the development of this global biodiversity information system, and outline planned future developments for further supporting conservation strategies
Remote Sensing | 2016
Javier Martínez-López; Bastian Bertzky; Francisco Javier Bonet-García; Lucy Bastin; Grégoire Dubois
Protected areas (PAs) need to be assessed systematically according to biodiversity values and threats in order to support decision-making processes. For this, PAs can be characterized according to their species, ecosystems and threats, but such information is often difficult to access and usually not comparable across regions. There are currently over 200,000 PAs in the world, and assessing these systematically according to their ecological values remains a huge challenge. However, linking remote sensing with ecological modelling can help to overcome some limitations of conservation studies, such as the sampling bias of biodiversity inventories. The aim of this paper is to introduce eHabitat+, a habitat modelling service supporting the European Commissions Digital Observatory for Protected Areas, and specifically to discuss a component that systematically stratifies PAs into different habitat functional types based on remote sensing data. eHabitat+ uses an optimized procedure of automatic image segmentation based on several environmental variables to identify the main biophysical gradients in each PA. This allows a systematic production of key indicators on PAs that can be compared globally. Results from a few case studies are illustrated to show the benefits and limitations of this open-source tool.
Archive | 2015
Grégoire Dubois; Javier Martínez-López; Andrew Cottam; William Temperley; Bastian Bertzky; Mariagrazia Graziano; Lucy Bastin
The Digital Observatory for Protected Areas (DOPA) has been developed to support the European Union’s efforts in strengthening our capacity to mobilize and use biodiversity data, information and forecasts so that they are readily accessible to policymakers, managers, experts and other users. Conceived as a set of web based services, DOPA provides a broad set of free and open source tools to assess, monitor and even forecast the state of and pressure on protected areas at local, regional and global scale. DOPA Explorer 1.0 is a web based interface available in four languages (EN, FR, ES, PT) providing simple means to explore the nearly 16,000 protected areas that are at least as large as 100 km2. Distinguishing between terrestrial, marine and mixed protected areas, DOPA Explorer 1.0 can help end users to identify those with most unique ecosystems and species, and assess the pressures they are exposed to because of human development. Recognized by the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) as a reference information system, DOPA Explorer is based on the best global data sets available and provides means to rank protected areas at the country and ecoregion levels. Inversely, DOPA Explorer indirectly highlights the protected areas for which information is incomplete. We finally invite the end-users of DOPA to engage with us through the proposed communication platforms to help improve our work to support the safeguarding of biodiversity.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Stuart H. M. Butchart; Jörn P. W. Scharlemann; Michael I. Evans; Suhel Quader; Salvatore Arico; Julius Arinaitwe; Mark Balman; Leon Bennun; Bastian Bertzky; Charles Besançon; Timothy M. Boucher; Thomas M. Brooks; Ian J. Burfield; Neil D. Burgess; Simba Chan; Rob P. Clay; Mike Crosby; Nicholas Davidson; Naamal De Silva; Christian Devenish; Guy Dutson; David Fernández Fernández; Lincoln D. C. Fishpool; Claire Fitzgerald; Matt Foster; Melanie Heath; Marc Hockings; Michael R. Hoffmann; David L. Knox; Frank W. Larsen
Conservation Letters | 2015
Stuart H. M. Butchart; Martin Clarke; Robert J. Smith; Rachel Sykes; Jörn P. W. Scharlemann; Mike Harfoot; Graeme M. Buchanan; Ariadne Angulo; Andrew Balmford; Bastian Bertzky; Thomas M. Brooks; Kent E. Carpenter; Mia T. Comeros-Raynal; John B. Cornell; G Francesco Ficetola; Lincoln D. C. Fishpool; Richard A. Fuller; Jonas Geldmann; Heather Harwell; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Michael Hoffmann; Ackbar Joolia; Lucas Joppa; Naomi Kingston; Ian May; Amy Milam; Beth A. Polidoro; Gina M. Ralph; Nadia I. Richman; Carlo Rondinini
Archive | 2014
Diego Juffe-Bignoli; Neil D. Burgess; Heather Bingham; E.M.S. Belle; M.G. de Lima; Marine Deguignet; Bastian Bertzky; Amy Milam; Javier Martínez-López; E. Lewis; April Eassom; Sylvia Wicander; Jonas Geldmann; A. van Soesbergen; Andrew P. Arnell; B. O’Connor; Sun Hwa Park; Yichuan Shi; F.S. Danks; B. MacSharry; Naomi Kingston
Archive | 2012
Stephen Woodley; Bastian Bertzky; Nigel Crawhall; Nigel Dudley; Julia Miranda Londoño; Kathy MacKinnon; Kent H. Redford
Archive | 2013
Ameer Abdulla; Bastian Bertzky; David Obura; Yichuan Shi
Collaboration
Dive into the Bastian Bertzky's collaboration.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
View shared research outputsInternational Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
View shared research outputs