Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bastian J Schroeder is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bastian J Schroeder.


SHRP 2 Report | 2013

Proposed Chapters for Incorporating Travel Time Reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual

Paul Ryus; James A Bonneson; Richard Dowling; John D Zegeer; Mark Vandehey; Wayne Kittelson; Nagui M. Rouphail; Bastian J Schroeder; Ali Hajbabaie; Behzad Aghdashi; Thomas Chase; Soheil Sajjadi; Richard Margiotta

This document contains two proposed chapters for the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) that introduce the concept of travel time reliability and offer new analytic methods. Proposed Chapters 36 and 37 set out methodologies for incorporating reliability into the HCM analytic procedures for freeway facilities and urban streets. The approach is to generate many freeway and urban street scenarios involving various causes of nonrecurring congestion, such as incidents, weather, and work zones, and use the scenarios as input to a computational engine to calculate travel time over a segment. The travel times for each scenario are used to construct a distribution of travel time from which reliability performance measures can be derived. Chapter 37 supplements Chapter 36. It provides reliability values for selected U.S. facilities, offers an alternative freeway incident prediction method, elaborates on the freeway and urban street scenario generators, explains how to measure reliability in the field, and gives an example problem. The chapters were prepared under the Transportation Research Board’s second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Project L08, Incorporation of Travel Time Reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual, but they have not been officially accepted by the Highway Capacity and Quality of Service (HCQS) Committee of the Transportation Research Board.


Transportation Research Record | 2016

Modeling Freeway Work Zones with Mesoscopic Dynamic Traffic Simulator: Validation, Gaps, and Guidance

Shams Tanvir; Nabaruna Karmakar; Nagui M. Rouphail; Bastian J Schroeder

This study developed a validation procedure for a dynamic traffic assignment–based mesoscopic simulator and identified its relevant data requirements. Model inconsistencies at the network level can be detected through route-based validation with probe vehicle travel time data. Simultaneously, link-based validation uses point detector–based volume and speed data. A procedure for filtering the validation data set to make it consistent and comparable with the simulation results is outlined in the paper. Two assignment methods were tested with a detailed validation data set through a case study. The no-diversion assignment approach yielded higher travel time than the field-observed average time. In contrast, simulated travel time with the optimal diversion method implied a more rational behavior by drivers than was observed in the field, along with more diversion of trips on arterial routes in the vicinity of a work zone. Finally, a link-based performance comparison revealed worse queue spillback effects on the upstream links of the work zone than in reality.


SHRP 2 Report | 2014

Incorporating Travel Time Reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual

John D Zegeer; James A Bonneson; Richard Dowling; Paul Ryus; Mark Vandehey; Wayne Kittelson; Nagui M. Rouphail; Bastian J Schroeder; Ali Hajbabaie; Behzad Aghdashi; Thomas Chase; Soheil Sajjadi; Richard Margiotta; Lily Elefteriadou

This publication presents a summary of the work conducted during the development of two proposed new chapters for the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM2010). These chapters demonstrated how to apply travel time reliability methods to the analysis of freeways and urban streets. The two proposed HCM chapters, numbers 36 and 37, introduce the concept of travel time reliability and offer new analytic methods. The prospective Chapter 36 for HCM2010 concerns freeway facilities and urban streets, and the prospective supplemental Chapter 37 elaborates on the methodologies and provides an example calculation. The chapters are proposed; they have not yet been accepted by the Transportation Research Boards Highway Capacity and Quality of Service (HCQS) Committee. The HCQS Committee has responsibility for approving the content of HCM2010. The second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Reliability Project L08 has also released the FREEVAL and STREETVAL computational engines. The FREEVAL-RL computational engine employs a scenario generator that feeds the Freeway Highway Capacity Analysis methodology in order to generate a travel time distribution from which reliability metrics can be derived. The STREETVAL-RL computational engine employs a scenario generator that feeds the Urban Streets Highway Capacity Analysis methodology in order to generate a travel time distribution from which reliability metrics can be derived.


Transportation Research Record | 2017

Lane Utilization Model Development for Diverging Diamond Interchanges

Chunho Yeom; Bastian J Schroeder; Christopher Cunningham; Katy Salamati; Nagui M. Rouphail

The diverging diamond interchange (DDI), also known as the double crossover diamond interchange, has been a successful, if unconventional, solution used in many parts of the United States ever since its first installation in Springfield, Missouri, in June 2009. One of the challenges to agencies in planning and operating DDIs is to apply to them methodologies developed for a conventional diamond interchange. The Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010) provides lane use analysis models for various lane configurations. However, there is no guarantee that these models will work for DDIs. For this reason, 11 DDIs were studied nationwide (a) to examine whether the current HCM lane use models provided accurate results for DDIs and (b) to develop new lane use models for them if the HCM models did not work. As a result of the study, unique multiregime lane utilization models were proposed, separated by the number of approach lanes and validated by field data not used in the model development.


Transportation Letters | 2017

Driver types and their behaviors within a high level of pedestrian activity environment

Yinan Zheng; Richard Thomas Chase; Lily Elefteriadou; Virginia P Sisiopiku; Bastian J Schroeder

Driver behavior analysis has recently been the focus of research to enhance traffic simulation modeling. Previous research has developed algorithms to model different driver types in both urban networks and freeways, and defined driver behavioral parameters based on pre-categorized driver groups. However, driver behaviors within the more confined, low speed, high pedestrian flow environment (such as CBD of a major city, urban downtown, campus) may be quite different and research concentrating on such locations is limited. The objective of this study is to assess and evaluate the relation between driver type and driver behavior within a relatively restrictive environment with high levels of pedestrian–vehicle interactions and develop suitable schemes to categorize driver types. To meet this objective, the University of Florida campus environment was used as the starting point of analyzing such driver types and behaviors, and a diverse pool of drivers was selected based on age, gender, driving experiences, etc. to participate in surveys and an instrumented vehicle study. The instrumented vehicle was used to collect vehicle trajectory and driver behavior data from the study subjects on the campus at the University of Florida. Two performance measures (namely, driver-desired speed and yield behavior) were applied to categorize driver types. These two categorizations provided consistent results and indicated that either one can be effectively applied in future studies for driver type classifications. Additional comparisons of driver background and personal characteristics obtained from questionnaires further confirmed the driver classification results.


Transportation Research Record | 2016

Innovative Method for Remotely Fine-Tuning Offsets Along a Diverging Diamond Interchange Corridor

Sangkey Kim; Shannon Warchol; Bastian J Schroeder; Christopher Cunningham

Diverging diamond interchanges (DDIs) are relatively new in the United States, and signal coordination between the crossovers and adjacent intersections is challenging. This paper provides a method for remotely fine-tuning offsets for a DDI and its adjacent intersections. The proposed method uses the dynamic bandwidth analysis tool (DBAT). The tool uses actuated phase times from the signal controller to optimize the dynamic bandwidth on the basis of that entry data set. Four performance measures evaluated the proposed method: delay, stop severity index, maximum queue, and vehicle trajectory plots. The test results confirmed that DBAT provided a better offset solution than other bandwidth optimization tools that generally optimized programmed bandwidth only and did not account for early return to green caused by skipped or gapped-out movements. Under the DBAT offsets, delay for the through movements on the corridor decreased by 52.8% for northbound vehicles and 46.83% for southbound vehicles. The average delay reduction over all measured paths for uncongested and congested scenarios was 13.88% and 3.50%, respectively. The proposed method and workflow can significantly reduce the offset retiming work process. Normally, this manual process takes more than a day, but the proposed method can be completed in less than an hour without visiting the study site. Furthermore, the proposed method can coordinate any set of movements, as well as multiple travel paths. The authors believe that the proposed method and workflow will significantly help both retiming and new timing of arterial signal coordination along DDI corridors and other signal systems.


Transportation Research Record | 2016

Signal Timing for Diverging Diamond Interchanges: Fundamentals, Concepts, and Recommended Applications

Christopher Cunningham; Bastian J Schroeder; Stacie Phillips; Thomas Urbanik; Shannon Warchol; Alison Tanaka

A diverging diamond interchange (DDI) is an innovative interchange design that is being used with increasing frequency in the United States because of the ability to use existing right-of-way and infrastructure frequently. This paper documents the state of the practice in DDI signal phasing with principles established in the Signal Timing Manual, namely, that it uses consistent phase numbering in a logical format to describe each of the phasing concepts being considered and discussed in this paper. Although some literature exists on several methods of signal phasing for DDIs, inconsistency in the reporting leaves practitioners scratching their heads when attempting to decipher what phasing scheme to use. In response, three fundamental phasing schemes are presented, one each for volume patterns with two, three, and four critical movements. Each scheme is described with a consistent naming convention, and, when possible, each is manipulated to provide varying coordination strategies. In addition, concepts such as use of actuation and barriers to improve coordination are described, and methods for reducing lost time are introduced. Other supplemental information related to preemption and pedestrians is discussed briefly. In conclusion, practitioners are given some basic guidance on when one phasing scheme may be more appropriate than another.


Transportation Research Board 88th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board | 2009

Observational Study of Pedestrian Behavior Along a Signalized Urban Corridor

Bastian J Schroeder; Nagui M. Rouphail; Brendan A Lehan


Archive | 2014

Diverging Diamond Interchange: Informational Guide

Bastian J Schroeder; Christopher Cunningham; Brian Ray; Andy Daleiden; Pete Jenior; Julia Knudsen


Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board | 2013

Empirical Study and Assessment of Operational Performance of Double Crossover Diamond Interchanges

Christopher Vaughan; Christopher Cunningham; Bastian J Schroeder; Joseph E. Hummer

Collaboration


Dive into the Bastian J Schroeder's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nagui M. Rouphail

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher Cunningham

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Soheil Sajjadi

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali Hajbabaie

Washington State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nabaruna Karmakar

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sangkey Kim

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Seyedbehzad Aghdashi

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shannon Warchol

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge