Bavana V. Rangan

Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions

Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs) has been associated with clinical benefit. There are no randomized controlled trials on long-term clinical outcomes after CTO PCI, limiting the available evidence to observational cohort studies. We sought to perform a weighted meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of successful versus failed CTO PCI. A total of 25 studies, published from 1990 to 2014, with 28,486 patients (29,315 CTO PCI procedures) were included. We analyzed data on mortality, subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, angina pectoris, stroke, and target vessel revascularization using random-effects models. Procedural success was 71% (range 51% to 87%). During a weighted mean follow-up of 3.11 years, compared with unsuccessful, successful CTO PCI was associated with lower mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.63), less residual angina (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.60), lower risk for stroke (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.88), less need for subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.22), and lower risk for major adverse cardiac events (0.59, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.79). There was no difference in the incidence of target vessel revascularization (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.23) or myocardial infarction (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.03). Outcomes were similar in patients who underwent balloon angioplasty only or stenting with bare metal or drug-eluting stents. Compared with failed procedures, successful CTO PCIs are associated with a lower risk of death, stroke, and coronary artery bypass grafting and less recurrent angina pectoris.

Continued Benefit From Paclitaxel-Eluting Compared With Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions During Long-Term Follow-Up of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial

OBJECTIVES This study sought to report the long-term outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions in the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial. BACKGROUND The long-term outcomes after DES implantation in SVGs are poorly studied. Apart from the SOS trial, the only other randomized trial comparing DES with bare-metal stents (BMS) in SVGs reported higher mortality in the DES group at 32 months. METHODS In the SOS trial, 80 patients with 112 lesions in 88 SVGs were randomized to a BMS or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and demonstrated improved short-term angiographic and clinical outcomes with PES. Extended clinical follow-up was subsequently obtained. RESULTS Mean age was 67 ± 9 years, and all patients were men. The indications for stenting included acute coronary syndrome in 60% and stable angina in 31% of patients. The mean SVG age was 12 ± 6 years. The baseline characteristics of the patients in the 2 study groups were similar. Procedural success was achieved in 77 patients (96%). During a median follow-up of 35 months, compared with patients randomized to BMS, those receiving PES had a lower incidence of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.32, p = 0.01), target lesion revascularization (HR: 0.20, p = 0.004), target vessel revascularization (HR: 0.41, p = 0.03), and target vessel failure (HR: 0.34, p = 0.001) as well as a trend toward less definite or probable stent thrombosis (HR: 0.15, p = 0.08). All-cause mortality (HR: 2.04, p = 0.19) and cardiac mortality (HR: 0.62, p = 0.51) did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS During long-term follow-up, use of PES was associated with significantly better clinical outcomes than BMS in SVG lesions. (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts Trial [SOS]; NCT00247208).

Prevalence and management of coronary chronic total occlusions in a tertiary veterans affairs hospital

We sought to determine the contemporary prevalence and management of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) in a veteran population.

Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing retrograde percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: A weighted meta-analysis of 3482 patients from 26 studies

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety profile of retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. We sought to perform a weighted meta-analysis of the success and complication rates of retrograde CTO PCI. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis of 26 studies published between 2006 and April 2013 reporting in-hospital outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI. Data on procedural success, frequency of death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), perforation, tamponade, stent thrombosis, major vascular or bleeding events, contrast nephropathy, and radiation skin injury were collected. RESULTS A total of 26 studies with 3482 patients and 3493 target CTO lesions were included. Primary retrograde CTO PCI was attempted in 52.4%. Pooled estimates of outcomes were as follows: procedural success 83.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79.0% to 87.7%]; death 0.7% (95% CI: 0.5% to 1.2%); urgent CABG 0.7% (95% CI: 0.4% to 1.2%); tamponade 1.4% (95% CI: 1.0% to 2.2%); collateral perforation 6.9% (95% CI: 4.6% to 10.4%); coronary perforation 4.3% (95% CI: 1.2% to 15.4%); donor vessel dissection 2% (95% CI: 0.9% to 4.5%); stroke 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2% to 1.0%); MI 3.1% (95% CI: 0.2% to 5.0%); Q wave MI 0.6% (95% CI: 0.4% to 1.1%); vascular access complications 2% (95% CI: 0.9% to 4.5%); contrast nephropathy 1.8% (95% CI: 0.8% to 3.7%); and wire fracture and equipment entrapment 1.2% (95% CI: 0.6% to 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS Retrograde CTO PCI is associated with high procedural success rate and acceptable risk for procedural complications.

Use of drug-eluting stents for chronic total occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis†

Aim: To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies reporting outcomes after drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation in chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Methods: A review of publications and online databases in January 2010 retrieved 17 published studies that reported outcomes after DES implantation in CTOs: eight uncontrolled studies, seven nonrandomized comparative studies with bare‐metal stents (BMS), one post‐hoc analysis of a randomized trial, and one randomized trial. Data were pooled using random‐effects meta‐analysis models. Results: All published studies evaluated sirolimus‐ or paclitaxel‐eluting stents. All studies reporting comparative angiographic outcomes revealed less binary angiographic restenosis with DES implantation compared to BMS (odds ratio: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.26). Over a mean follow‐up period of 18.9 ± 16.5 months, the cumulative incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis was similar between DES and BMS in all studies. Target lesion revascularization (odds ratio: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.26) and target vessel revascularization (odds ratio 0.18, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.31) at 6–12 months were consistently lower among DES‐treated patients. Similar patterns of safety and efficacy event rates were also observed in studies reporting >12 month outcomes. Conclusions: Compared with BMS, treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions with DES is associated with significant reductions in angiographic and clinical restenosis with similar safety. The consistency and magnitude of treatment effect across both individual trials and the pooled analysis establish DES as the preferred therapy for percutaneous revascularization of CTOs.

The efficacy of "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: insights from a US multicenter registry.

To examine the success and complication rates in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) caused by in‐stent restenosis (ISR).

Transradial approach for coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: Insights from a contemporary multicenter registry

To examine the impact of transradial access on the procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

Outcomes With the Use of the Retrograde Approach for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions in a Contemporary Multicenter US Registry

Background—We sought to examine the efficacy and safety of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention using the retrograde approach. Methods and Results—We compared the outcomes of the retrograde versus antegrade-only approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention among 1301 procedures performed at 11 experienced US centers between 2012 and 2015. The mean age was 65.5±10 years, and 84% of the patients were men with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (45%) and previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (34%). Overall technical and procedural success rates were 90% and 89%, respectively, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 31 patients (2.4%). The retrograde approach was used in 539 cases (41%), either as the initial strategy (46%) or after a failed antegrade attempt (54%). When compared with antegrade-only cases, retrograde cases were significantly more complex, both clinically (previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery prevalence, 48% versus 24%; P<0.001) and angiographically (mean Japan-chronic total occlusion score, 3.1±1.0 versus 2.1±1.2; P<0.001) and had lower technical success (85% versus 94%; P<0.001) and higher major adverse cardiovascular events (4.3% versus 1.1%; P<0.001) rates. On multivariable analysis, the presence of suitable collaterals, no smoking, no previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and left anterior descending artery target vessel were independently associated with technical success using the retrograde approach. Conclusions—The retrograde approach is commonly used in contemporary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention, especially among more challenging lesions and patients. Although associated with lower success and higher major adverse cardiovascular event rates in comparison to antegrade-only crossing, retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention remains critical for achieving overall high success rates.

Clinical Utility of the Japan–Chronic Total Occlusion Score in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions Results from a Multicenter Registry

Background—The performance of the Japan–chronic total occlusion (J-CTO) score in predicting success and efficiency of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention has received limited study. Methods and Results—We examined the records of 650 consecutive patients who underwent CTO percutaneous coronary intervention between 2011 and 2014 at 6 experienced centers in the United States. Six hundred and fifty-seven lesions were classified as easy (J-CTO=0), intermediate (J-CTO=1), difficult (J-CTO=2), and very difficult (J-CTO≥3). The impact of the J-CTO score on technical success and procedure time was evaluated with univariable logistic and linear regression, respectively. The performance of the logistic regression model was assessed with the Hosmer–Lemeshow statistic and receiver operator characteristic curves. Antegrade wiring techniques were used more frequently in easy lesions (97%) than very difficult lesions (58%), whereas the retrograde approach became more frequent with increased lesion difficulty (41% for very difficult lesions versus 13% for easy lesions). The logistic regression model for technical success demonstrated satisfactory calibration and discrimination (P for Hosmer–Lemeshow =0.743 and area under curve =0.705). The J-CTO score was associated with a 2-fold increase in the odds of technical failure (odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.52–2.80, P<0.001). Procedure time increased by ≈20 minutes for every 1-point increase of the J-CTO score (regression coefficient 22.33, 95% confidence interval 17.45–27.22, P<0.001). Conclusions—J-CTO score was strongly associated with final success and efficiency in this study, supporting its expanded use in CTO interventions. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02061436.

Procedural failure of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a multicenter US registry

The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly increased procedural success rates, yet some cases still fail. We sought to evaluate the causes of failure in a contemporary CTO PCI registry.