Beáta Grallert

The multiple facets of the intra-S checkpoint.

In response to hydroxyurea treatment or DNA damage the total rate of DNA replication per cell is reduced. This reduction may be due to physical hindrance of the replication forks or to active, checkpoint-dependent processes. Here we review current knowledge about how and to what extent the intra-S checkpoint affects DNA replication. We discuss evidence that some checkpoint proteins are active even in a normal S phase and we suggest a model that resolves the apparent contradiction between different views on checkpoint-dependent slowing of the rate of DNA replication: does the intra-S checkpoint repress or delay the initiation of all origins or late replication origins only, and to what extent does it inhibit fork progression. Finally, the new model is discussed in the context of cancer development.

Measurement of nuclear DNA content in fission yeast by flow cytometry

Cell division cycle (cdc) mutants of Schizosaccharomyces pombe are arrested at specific points in the cell cycle when grown at restrictive temperature. Flow cytometry of such cells reveals an anomalous increase in the DNA fluorescence signal, which represents a problem in experiments designed to determine the cell cycle arrest point. The increased fluorescence signal is due to cytoplasmic constituents and has been attributed to mitochondrial DNA synthesis (S. Sazer and S. W. Sherwood, J. Cell Sci.97: 509–516, 1990). Here we have studied the cdc10 mutant by flow cytometry using different DNA‐binding fluorochromes and found no evidence that the increased fluorescence signal was caused by mitochondrial DNA synthesis. To determine more accurately the nuclear DNA content we have developed a novel method to remove most of the cytoplasmic material by exposing the cells to Triton X‐100 and hypotonic conditions after cell wall digestion. The DNA fluorescence from cells treated in this way was more constant with time of incubation at restrictive temperature in spite of a considerable increase in cell size. With this method we could determine that the recently isolated temperature sensitive orp1 mutant is arrested with a 1C DNA content. Premature and abnormal mitosis (‘cut’) could be observed for the orp1 mutant after only 4 h at restrictive temperature.

Cell-cycle analysis of fission yeast cells by flow cytometry.

The cell cycle of the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, does not easily lend itself to analysis by flow cytometry, mainly because cells in G1 and G2 phase contain the same amount of DNA. This occurs because fission yeast cells under standard growth conditions do not complete cytokinesis until after G1 phase. We have devised a flow cytometric method exploiting the fact that cells in G1 phase contain two nuclei, whereas cells in G2 are mononuclear. Measurements of the width as well as the total area of the DNA-associated fluorescence signal allows the discrimination between cells in G1 and in G2 phase and the cell-cycle progression of fission yeast can be followed in detail by flow cytometry. Furthermore, we show how this method can be used to monitor the timing of cell entry into anaphase. Fission yeast cells tend to form multimers, which represents another problem of flow cytometry-based cell-cycle analysis. Here we present a method employing light-scatter measurements to enable the exclusion of cell doublets, thereby further improving the analysis of fission yeast cells by flow cytometry.

The Gcn2 kinase as a cell cycle regulator.

Cell cycle progression through G1 phase is of particular importance because this is the phase where the decision to embark on another cell cycle is made. An aberrant G1/S transition often leads to cell cycle deregulation and cancer development. Therefore, there is a complex regulatory network to ensure timely entry into S phase, coordinating initiation of DNA replication with growth and stress signals. We have studied the response of fission yeast cells to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation in G1 phase and identified a Gcn2-dependent checkpoint that delays entry into S phase. UV irradiation activates Gcn2 which, in turn, phosphorylates the translation initiation factor eIF2α and depresses translation. Phosphorylation of eIF2α is a well-known response to various forms of stress, but whether or how this response is causing the specific cell cycle effects is not known. Here we discuss the relationships between Gcn2 activity, eIF2α phosphorylation, translation downregulation and cell cycle delay.

Intra-G1 arrest in response to UV irradiation in fission yeast

G1 is a crucial phase of cell growth because the decision to begin another mitotic cycle is made during this period. Occurrence of DNA damage in G1 poses a particular challenge, because replication of damaged DNA can be deleterious and because no sister chromatid is present to provide a template for recombinational repair. We therefore have studied the response of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells to UV irradiation in early G1 phase. We find that irradiation results in delayed progression through G1, as manifested most critically in the delayed formation of the pre-replication complex. This delay does not have the molecular hallmarks of known checkpoint responses: it is independent of the checkpoint proteins Rad3, Cds1, and Chk1 and does not elicit inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdc2. Irradiated cells eventually progress into S phase and arrest in early S by a rad3- and cds1-dependent mechanism, most likely the intra-S checkpoint. Caffeine alleviates both the intra-G1- and intra-S-phase delays. We suggest that intra-G1 delay may be widely conserved and discuss significance and possible mechanisms.

The G1-S checkpoint in fission yeast is not a general DNA damage checkpoint

Inhibitory mechanisms called checkpoints regulate progression of the cell cycle in the presence of DNA damage or when a previous cell-cycle event is not finished. In fission yeast exposed to ultraviolet light the G1-S transition is regulated by a novel checkpoint that depends on the Gcn2 kinase. The molecular mechanisms involved in checkpoint induction and maintenance are not known. Here we characterise the checkpoint further by exposing the cells to a variety of DNA-damaging agents. Exposure to methyl methane sulphonate and hydrogen peroxide induce phosphorylation of eIF2α, a known Gcn2 target, and an arrest in G1 phase. By contrast, exposure to psoralen plus long-wavelength ultraviolet light, inducing DNA adducts and crosslinks, or to ionizing radiation induce neither eIF2α phosphorylation nor a cell-cycle delay. We conclude that the G1-S checkpoint is not a general DNA-damage checkpoint, in contrast to the one operating at the G2-M transition. The tight correlation between eIF2α phosphorylation and the presence of a G1-phase delay suggests that eIF2α phosphorylation is required for checkpoint induction. The implications for checkpoint signalling are discussed.

Stress-induced inhibition of translation independently of eIF2α phosphorylation

ABSTRACT Exposure of fission yeast cells to ultraviolet (UV) light leads to inhibition of translation and phosphorylation of the eukaryotic initiation factor-2α (eIF2α). This phosphorylation is a common response to stress in all eukaryotes. It leads to inhibition of translation at the initiation stage and is thought to be the main reason why stressed cells dramatically reduce protein synthesis. Phosphorylation of eIF2α has been taken as a readout for downregulation of translation, but the role of eIF2α phosphorylation in the downregulation of general translation has not been much investigated. We show here that UV-induced global inhibition of translation in fission yeast cells is independent of eIF2α phosphorylation and the eIF2α kinase general control nonderepressible-2 protein (Gcn2). Also, in budding yeast and mammalian cells, the UV-induced translational depression is largely independent of GCN2 and eIF2α phosphorylation. Furthermore, exposure of fission yeast cells to oxidative stress generated by hydrogen peroxide induced an inhibition of translation that is also independent of Gcn2 and of eIF2α phosphorylation. Our findings show that stress-induced translational inhibition occurs through an unknown mechanism that is likely to be conserved through evolution. Summary: In contrast to textbook knowledge, the phosphorylation of translation initiation factor eIF2α is not required for UV-induced inhibition of protein synthesis, which we show in three different cell types.

Crosstalk between the Tor and Gcn2 pathways in response to different stresses.

Regulating growth and the cell cycle in response to environmental fluctuations is important for all organisms in order to maintain viability. Two major pathways for translational regulation are found in higher eukaryotes: the Tor signaling pathway and those operating through the eIF2α kinases. Studies from several organisms indicate that the two pathways are interlinked, in that Tor complex 1 (TORC1) negatively regulates the Gcn2 kinase. Furthermore, inactivation of TORC1 may be required for activation of Gcn2 in response to stress. Here, we use the model organism Schizosaccharomyces pombe to investigate this crosstalk further. We find that the relationship is more complex than previously thought. First, in response to UV irradiation and oxidative stress, Gcn2 is fully activated in the presence of TORC1 signaling. Second, during amino-acid starvation, activation of Gcn2 is dependent on Tor2 activity, and Gcn2 is required for timely inactivation of the Tor pathway. Our data show that the crosstalk between the two pathways varies with the actual stress applied.

GCN2, an old dog with new tricks

Gcn2 was first described in budding yeast as a serine/threonine protein kinase involved in the response to amino acid starvation and this is its best characterized role to date. Recent work has revealed new and exciting roles for Gcn2, which affect many aspects of cellular physiology in response to a number of stresses in addition to starvation. Furthermore, the Gcn2 pathway has been implicated in diseases such as cancer and Alzheimers disease, and therefore elucidating the new roles of Gcn2 seems ever more important.

Checkpoint regulation of DNA replication

We discuss the mechanisms regulating entry into and progression through S phase in eukaryotic cells. Methods to study the G1/S transition are briefly reviewed and an overview of G1/S-checkpoints is given, with particular emphasis on fission yeast. Thereafter we discuss different aspects of the intra-S checkpoint and introduce the main molecular players and mechanisms.