Bedri Beydemir

Resin shear bond strength to porcelain and a base metal alloy using two polymerization schemes

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Fractures in ceramometal restorations can occur and need to be repaired because replacements are not an economic solution. PURPOSE This study evaluated the shear bond strengths of 4 porcelain repair systems (Metabond C&B [ME], Silistor [SI], Clearfil Lustre [CL], and Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus [SQ]) to a base metal alloy and porcelain in relation with the polymerization shrinkage of a visible light-cured composite superstructure and compared with the ceramometal bond strength (Vita VMK 68). MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-two samples were prepared for each bonding system: 16 for resin-metal bond strength test, and 16 for resin-porcelain bond strength test. For each group, bonding agent was applied to 8 substructures and the resin superstructure was polymerized onto the bonding agent; and for the remaining 8 specimens, prepolymerized resin superstructures were bonded with bonding agent. All specimens were subjected to 500 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C with 20 seconds dwell time. Tests were performed in a mechanical testing machine with a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. RESULTS All materials showed an increase in shear bond strength when prepolymerized resin superstructures were used. However, the effect of polymerization shrinkage of resin superstructure was statistically significant only for CL group (P <. 05). The highest metal-resin bond was obtained from ME group with prepolymerized resin superstructures (35.27 +/- 2.40 MPa), and the lowest value was obtained for the SI group in which resin superstructures were polymerized in situ (8.71 +/- 1.03 MPa). The highest porcelain-resin bond was obtained from SC group with prepolymerized resin superstructures (20.71 +/- 1.13 MPa) and the lowest was obtained from SI group (9.99 +/- 1.52 MPa). CONCLUSION Higher bond strength values were obtained with prepolymerized resin superstructures compared to in situ polymerized superstructures. Metabond C&B provided the best results for both prepolymerized and in situ polymerized resin superstructure preparation techniques at the failures where metal was exposed. The best results in situations in which the fracture is limited into porcelain were obtained with the use of Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus material. However, a variety of in vivo and in vitro tests are required before a final judgment is made.

Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.

PURPOSE The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of two feldspathic ceramic materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred twenty metal discs were cast (Remanium CS). A low-fusing feldspathic ceramic (Vita Omega 900) was fired onto 60 metal discs, and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic (Finesse) was fired onto the other 60 metal discs. Six surface treatment methods were selected: (1) autoglazing (AUG), (2) overglazing (OVG), (3) polishing (POL), (4) fine diamond disc grinding + polishing + autoglazing (FDPA), (5) coarse diamond disc grinding + polishing + autoglazing (CDPA), (6) polishing + autoglazing (PA). Omega specimens were assigned to six experimental groups representing six surface treatment methods (Om-AUG, Om-OVG, Om-POL, Om-FDPA, Om-CDPA, Om-PA) (n = 10). Finesse specimens were also assigned to six experimental groups (Fn-AUG, Fn-OVG, Fn-POL, Fn-FDPA, Fn-CDPA, Fn-PA) (n = 10). Treated ceramic surfaces were examined by means of profilometry and transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS In Omega groups mean roughness values ranged as follows: group Om-AUG = Om-POL > Om-OVG > Om-CDPA = Om-FDPA > Om-PA (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between groups Om-AUG/Om-POL and Om-CDPA/Om-FDPA (p > 0.05). In Finesse groups mean roughness values ranged as follows: Fn-CDPA > Fn-FDPA = Fn-AUG = Fn-POL = Fn-OVG > Fn-PA (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between Fn-FDPA, Fn-AUG, Fn- POL and Fn-OVG (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS For both ceramic types, the smoothest surfaces were obtained with polishing prior to autoglazing. Diamond disc grinding prior to polishing and autoglazing (Fn-FDPA, Fn-CDPA) displayed the roughest surfaces in ultra low-fusing ceramic (Finesse). Autoglazing alone and polishing displayed the roughest surfaces in low-fusing ceramic material (Om-AUG, Om-POL).

Treatment of a microvascular reconstructed mandible using an implant-supported fixed partial denture: case report.

Oral rehabilitation of patients with mandibular discontinuity defects is a problem that faces both the oral surgeon and the restorative dentist. Advances in microvascular surgery can provide the mandible with vital bone grafts. Often, reconstruction of the bony defect alone does not guarantee an adequate foundation for successful conventional prosthetic rehabilitation. Osseointegrated implants placed in the microvascularized grafted bone offer an opportunity for improved function and patient satisfaction. This case report describes the use of an implant-supported bridge in a vascularized fibular bone graft to reconstruct a traumatic partially resected mandible.