Behram Tuncel

Comparison of the sealing ability of three filling techniques in canals shaped with two different rotary systems: A bacterial leakage study

OBJECTIVE This study compared the sealing ability of 3 current filling techniques in root canals shaped with 2 different rotary systems. STUDY DESIGN Eighty human extracted mandibular premolars were divided randomly into 2 similar groups of 40 each and instrumented with either ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer, Tulsa, OK; group A) or Mtwo (VDW; Antaeos, Munich, Germany; group B) rotary systems. Each group was divided into 3 subgroups (n = 10) and 2 control groups (n = 5). Canals were filled either with the tapered single-cone technique (SC; subgroups A1 and B1), with lateral condensation (LC; subgroups A2 and B2), or warm vertical compaction (WVC; subgroups A3 and B3). AH Plus was used as a root canal sealer in all groups. Samples were sterilized in an ethylene oxide sterilizer for 12 hours. The apical 3-4 mm of the roots were immersed in brain-heart infusion culture medium with phenol red indicator within culture chambers. The coronal access of each specimen was inoculated every 48 hours with a suspension of Enterococcus faecalis. Bacterial leakage was monitored every 24 hours for 8 weeks. The data obtained were analyzed using a chi-squared test, and P was set at .05. RESULTS In group A, 70% of the specimens filled with SC (subgroup A1), 50% of the specimens filled with LC (subgroup A2), and 20% of the specimens filled with WVC (subgroup A3) leaked. There was no statistically significant difference between the subgroups (P > .05). In group B, bacterial leakage was observed in 50% of SC samples (subgroup B1), 40% of LC samples (subgroup B2), and 50% of WVC samples (subgroup B3). There was no statistically significant difference between subgroups B1, B2, and B3 (P > .05). There was also no statistically significant difference between group A and group B (P > .05). CONCLUSION Filling with SC, LC, and WVC techniques in canals treated with ProTaper or Mtwo rotary instruments showed similar levels of sealing efficacy.

Time-dependent Decalcifying Effects of Endodontic Irrigants with Antibacterial Properties

The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of calcium ion (Ca(2+)) removal on root dentin after treatment with 1.25% NaOCl, 2.5% NaOCl, 5.25% NaOCl, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 2% iodine potassium iodide (IKI), and MTAD in 3 immersion time periods. Extracted human mandibular premolars were bisected longitudinally, and the root halves (n = 70) were isolated with nail varnish, leaving the root canal exposed. The specimens were immersed in the test solutions, during which the amount of Ca(2+) release into the solutions was determined at 5, 10, and 15 minutes by flame photometry. The decalcifying effect of 5%, 2.5%, and 1.25% NaOCl and 2% IKI significantly increased within time (P < .05), with 5% NaOCl extracting the greatest amount of Ca(2+) at all treatment times. For 2% CHX and distilled water, a significant increase in the amount of Ca(2+) extraction from root dentin was only evident at 10 minutes (P < .05) and did not change at 15-minute readings. Between the 5- to 10-minute and 10- to 15-minute intervals, the greatest amount of increase in the rate of Ca(2+) extraction from root dentin was observed in the 2.5% NaOCl group. At 15 minutes, 2% CHX and distilled water showed the least amount of change. Among the test solutions, MTAD extracted the least amount of Ca(2+) at 5 minutes.

Microleakage evaluation of roots filled with different obturation techniques and sealers

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the apical seal of the Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha technique and the lateral compaction technique in combination with 3 sealers (AH-26, Apexit, and Sealite-Ultra). STUDY DESIGN Seventy extracted single-root teeth were used. Root canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary instruments. Six groups were formed: (I) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with AH-26; (II) lateral compaction technique with AH-26; (III) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with Apexit; (IV) lateral compaction technique with Apexit; (V) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with Sealite-Ultra; and (VI) lateral compaction technique with Sealite-Ultra. The fluid conductance of each specimen was measured after the 7th and 30th days using a fluid filtration method. RESULTS When lateral compaction was performed, all sealers showed similar levels of leakage (P > .05). Using the single-cone technique, Sealite-Ultra showed more leakage than the others (P < .05). Comparing filling techniques, there was a significant difference only in the Sealite-Ultra groups (P < .05). CONCLUSION Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha and lateral compaction techniques showed similar sealing effect.

Effect of endodontic chelating solutions on the bond strength of endodontic sealers

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of various chelating solutions on the radicular push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based and resin-based root canal sealers. Root canals of freshly-extracted single-rooted teeth (n = 80) were instrumented by using rotary instruments. The specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the chelating solutions being tested: (1) 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); (2) 9% etidronic acid; (3) 1% peracetic acid (PAA); and (4) distilled water (control). In each group, the roots were further assigned into 2 subgroups according to the sealer used: (1) an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) and (2) a calcium silicate-based sealer (iRoot SP). Four 1 mm-thick sections were obtained from the coronal aspect of each root (n = 40 slices/group). Push-out bond strength test was performed at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min., and the bond strength data were analyzed statistically with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferronis post hoc test (p < 0.05). Failure modes were assessed quantitatively under a stereomicroscope. Irrespective of the irrigation regimens, iRoot SP exhibited significantly higher push-out bond strength values than AH Plus (p < 0.05). For both the sealers, the use of chelating solutions increased the bond strength, but to levels that were not significantly greater than their respective controls (p > 0.05). iRoot SP showed higher resistance to dislocation than AH Plus. Final irrigation with 17% EDTA, 9% Etidronic acid, and 1% PAA did not improve the bond strength of AH Plus and iRoot SP to radicular dentin.

A comparison of residual smear layer and erosion following different endodontic irrigation protocols tested under clinical and laboratory conditions.

Abstract Objective. To compare the smear layer removal efficacy and erosive effects of different irrigation protocols under clinical and laboratory conditions. Materials and methods. Mandibular third molars (n = 32) of 30–45 year-old patients were instrumented with rotary files and were randomly assigned to one of the following groups for final irrigation: (1) 5.25% NaOCl; (2) 17% EDTA; and (3) BioPure MTAD. Thereafter, the teeth were immediately extracted and processed for micromorphological investigation. In vitro specimen pairs were prepared by repeating the clinical experiments on freshly-extracted mandibular third molars. To compare open and closed systems, laboratory experiments were repeated on 32 additional teeth with enlarged apical foramen. The cleanliness of the root canals and the extent of erosion were assessed by environmental scanning electron microscopy. Results. Specimens prepared under clinical and laboratory conditions had similar cleanliness and erosion scores (p > 0.05). Under both conditions, the tested solutions were more effective in removing the smear layer in the coronal and middle regions than in the apical one. Comparison of closed and open systems showed similar levels of cleanliness and erosion in all regions (p > 0.05), with the exception of 17% EDTA showing significantly higher levels of cleanliness and erosion in the apical third of open-end specimens. Conclusions. Based on clinical correlates of in vitro root canal cleanliness and erosion, laboratory testing of root canal irrigants on extracted teeth with closed apices can serve as a reliable method to simulate the clinical condition. EDTA was the most effective final irrigation solution in removing the smear layer at the expense of yielding the greatest erosive effect.