Belinda J. Yauger
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Belinda J. Yauger.
Journal of Cell Biology | 2012
Boris Baibakov; Nathan A. Boggs; Belinda J. Yauger; Galina Baibakov; Jurrien Dean
Use of transgenic mouse eggs expressing human zona pellucida proteins identifies an N-terminal domain of ZP2 that is essential for human sperm–egg binding.
Fertility and Sterility | 2008
Eric D. Levens; Brian W. Whitcomb; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N. James; Belinda J. Yauger; F.W. Larsen
OBJECTIVE To assess cycle outcome among day 5 and day 6 cryopreserved frozen-thawed blastocyst embryo transfers (FBET). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Military-based assisted reproduction technology (ART) center. PATIENT(S) One hundred seventy-two nondonor, programmed cryopreserved embryo cycles. INTERVENTION(S) Fully expanded blastocysts on day 5 were cryopreserved on day 5, and those achieving this state on day 6 were cryopreserved on day 6. Leuprolide acetate was given for ovulation inhibition, and endometrial supplementation was by oral and vaginal estradiol. Progesterone in oil was administered, and blastocyst transfer occurred in the morning of the sixth day of progesterone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Implantation, pregnancy, and live-birth rates. RESULT(S) Fresh and frozen cycle characteristics were similar between groups. Day-5 FBET had statistically significantly higher implantation rates (32.2% vs. 19.2%), which remained significant even when adjusting for covariates (odds ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.00, 3.67). Live-birth rates trended toward improvement after adjusting for covariates (odds ratio: 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.61, 2.30). CONCLUSION(S) Cryopreserved day-5 blastocysts have higher implantation rates and trend toward improved pregnancy outcomes compared with cryopreserved day-6 blastocysts. This suggests that embryo development rate may, in part, predict implantation and subsequent FBET outcomes, although embryos not achieving the blastocyst stage until day 6 still demonstrate acceptable outcomes.
Fertility and Sterility | 2010
John M. Csokmay; Belinda J. Yauger; M.B. Henne; Alicia Y. Armstrong; John T. Queenan; James H. Segars
OBJECTIVE To compare the cost of two treatment regimens for moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): conservative inpatient versus outpatient management with paracentesis. DESIGN A decision-tree mathematical model comparing conservative inpatient versus outpatient management of moderate to severe OHSS was created. The common final pathway of either management was resolution of OHSS. Sensitivity analyses were performed over the range of variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Total management cost of OHSS. RESULT(S) The cost of conservative therapy including first-tier complications was
Reproduction | 2011
Belinda J. Yauger; Nathan A. Boggs; Jurrien Dean
10,099 (range
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2016
M.W. Healy; Brian Schexnayder; M.T. Connell; Nancy Terry; Alan H. DeCherney; John M. Csokmay; Belinda J. Yauger; M.J. Hill
9,655-
Fertility and Sterility | 2016
G.D. Royster; Kavitha Krishnamoorthy; John M. Csokmay; Belinda J. Yauger; Rebecca J. Chason; Alan H. DeCherney; E.F. Wolff; M.J. Hill
15,044). The cost of outpatient management with paracentesis was
Fertility and Sterility | 2008
Rebecca J. Chason; Eric D. Levens; Belinda J. Yauger; M. Payson; Kenneth Cho; F.W. Larsen
1954 (range
Reproductive Sciences | 2017
Torie C. Plowden; M.J. Hill; Shana Miles; Benjamin W. Hoyt; Belinda J. Yauger; James H. Segars; John M. Csokmay; Rebecca J. Chason
788-
Fertility and Sterility | 2011
Kara N. Goldman; K.S. Moon; Belinda J. Yauger; M. Payson; James H. Segars; B.J. Stegmann
12,041). This resulted in an estimated cost savings of
Fertility and Sterility | 2008
Belinda J. Yauger; Eve C. Feinberg; Eric D. Levens; R.L. Gustofson; F.W. Larsen; Alan H. DeCherney
8145 with outpatient management with paracentesis. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Varying the probability of admission after outpatient treatment still indicated that outpatient treatment was the most cost-effective (probability = 1.0, cost =