Bella Nisenbaum

Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TURANDOT): primary endpoint results of a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND The randomised phase 3 TURANDOT trial compared two approved bevacizumab-containing regimens for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in terms of efficacy, safety, and quality of life. The interim analysis did not confirm non-inferior overall survival (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 1·04; 97·5% repeated CI [RCI] -∞ to 1·69). Here we report final results of our study aiming to show non-inferior overall survival with first-line bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS In this multinational, open-label, randomised phase 3 TURANDOT trial, patients aged 18 years or older who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 and measurable or non-measurable HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had received no previous chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were stratified and randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of size six to either bevacizumab plus paclitaxel (bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 plus paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks) or bevacizumab plus capecitabine (bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Stratification factors were oestrogen or progesterone receptor status, country, and menopausal status. The primary objective was to show non-inferior overall survival with bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel in the per-protocol population by rejecting the null hypothesis of inferiority (HR ≥1·33) using a stratified Cox proportional hazard model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00600340. FINDINGS Between Sept 10, 2008, and Aug 30, 2010, 564 patients were randomised, representing the intent-to-treat population. The per-protocol population comprised 531 patients (266 in the bevacizumab plus paclitaxel group and 265 in the bevacizumab plus capecitabine group). At the final overall survival analysis after 183 deaths (69%) in 266 patients receiving bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and 201 (76%) in 265 receiving bevacizumab plus capecitabine in the per-protocol population, median overall survival was 30·2 months (95% CI 25·6-32·6 months) versus 26·1 months (22·3-29·0), respectively. The stratified HR was 1·02 (97·5% RCI -∞ to 1·26; repeated p=0·0070), indicating non-inferiority. The unstratified Cox model (HR 1·13 [97·5% RCI -∞ to 1·39]; repeated p=0·061) did not support the primary analysis. Intent-to-treat analyses were consistent with the per-protocol results. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (54 [19%] of 284 patients in the bevacizumab plus paclitaxel group vs 5 [2%] of 277 patients in the bevacizumab plus capecitabine group), hand-foot syndrome (1 [<1%] vs 43 [16%]), peripheral neuropathy (39 [14%] vs 1 [<1%]), leucopenia (20 [7%] vs 1 [<1%]), and hypertension (12 [4%] vs 16 [6%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 65 (23%) of 284 patients receiving bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and 68 (25%) of 277 receiving bevacizumab plus capecitabine. Deaths in two (1%) of 284 patients in the bevacizumab plus paclitaxel group were deemed by the investigator to be treatment-related. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the bevacizumab plus capecitabine group. INTERPRETATION Bevacizumab plus capecitabine represents a valid first-line treatment option for HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, offering good tolerability without compromising overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel. Although progression-free survival with the bevacizumab plus capecitabine combination is inferior to that noted with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel, we suggest that physicians should consider possible predictive risk factors for overall survival, individuals treatment priorities, and the differing safety profiles. FUNDING Roche.

Abstract P5-08-02: Real-life analysis evaluating 1594 N0/Nmic breast cancer patients for whom treatment decisions incorporated the 21-gene recurrence score result: 5-year KM estimate for breast cancer specific survival with recurrence score results ≤30 is >98%

Background: The 21-Gene Recurrence Score® Assay (Oncotype DX®) has been validated as a prognostic and predictive tool in estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer in multiple studies using archival specimens of clinical trials with long term follow up. Prospective outcome data from patients where treatment decisions incorporated the Recurrence Score results have not been reported. We evaluated treatments and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing Recurrence Score testing in 9 medical centers within Clalit Health Services (CHS), the largest HMO in Israel. Methods: Medical records of patients with N0/Nmic ER+ HER2-negative disease undergoing testing from 12/2004 to 12/2010 in 9 medical centers (Rabin, Lin, Soroka, Meir, Kaplan, Hadassah, Ha9emek, Rambam, and Shaare Zedek) within CHS were individually reviewed to verify treatments given, recurrence, and survival status. 5-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) and standard error estimates for distant recurrence and breast cancer specific survival were determined. Results: 1594 patients were evaluated with 5.9 years median follow-up. Median age, 61 (25-85) years; N0/Nmic (90%/10%); Grade I (16%), II (48%), III (16%), N/A (19%); histology, IDC (80%), lobular (13%), other (7%). Distribution of Recurrence Score risk groups (Recurrence Score results of Conclusions: These are the first prospective long term clinical outcome data from approximately 1600 patients for whom the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay has been incorporated in real-life clinical decision making. The documented use of CT was appropriately based on the Recurrence Score result, and the outcomes for recurrence and survival are consistent with previously reported prospective-retrospective studies of the 21-gene assay. The 5 year KM estimates for distant recurrence rate in patients with low and intermediate Recurrence Score results who were treated based upon their Recurrence Score results were very low (0.5% and 1.2%, respectively). Citation Format: Stemmer SM, Steiner M, Rizel S, Soussan-Gutman L, Geffen DB, Nisenbaum B, Ben-Baruch N, Isaacs K, Fried G, Rosengarten O, Uziely B, Svedman C, Rothney M, Klang SH, Ryvo L, Kaufman B, Evron E, Zidan J, Shak S, Liebermann N. Real-life analysis evaluating 1594 N0/Nmic breast cancer patients for whom treatment decisions incorporated the 21-gene recurrence score result: 5-year KM estimate for breast cancer specific survival with recurrence score results ≤30 is >98%. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-02.

Clinical outcomes in patients with node-negative breast cancer treated based on the recurrence score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry

The 21-gene Recurrence Score® (RS) assay is a validated prognostic/predictive tool in ER + early-stage breast cancer. However, clinical outcome data from prospective studies in RS ≥ 11 patients are lacking, as are relevant real-life clinical practice data. In this retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry, we evaluated treatments/clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RS-testing through Clalit Health Services. The analysis included N0 ER + HER2-negative breast cancer patients who were RS-tested from 1/2006 through 12/2010. Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. The cohort included 1801 patients (median follow-up, 6.2 years). Median age was 60 years, 50.4% were grade 2 and 81.1% had invasive ductal carcinoma; 48.9% had RS < 18, 40.7% RS 18–30, and 10.4% RS ≥ 31, with chemotherapy use of 1.4, 23.7, and 87.2%, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 0.8, 3.0, and 8.6%, for patients with RS < 18, RS 18–30 and RS ≥ 31, respectively; the corresponding 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for breast cancer death were 0.0, 0.9, and 6.2%. Chemotherapy-untreated patients with RS < 11 (n = 304) and 11–25 (n = 1037) (TAILORx categorization) had 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence risk/breast cancer death of 1.0%/0.0% and 1.3%/0.4%, respectively. Our results extend those of the prospective TAILORx trial: the 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence and breast cancer death rate for the RS < 18 patients were very low supporting the use of endocrine therapy alone. Furthermore, in chemotherapy-untreated patients with RS 11–25 (where TAILORx patients were randomized to chemoendocrine or endocrine therapy alone), 5-year distant recurrence rates were also very low, suggesting that chemotherapy would not have conferred clinically meaningful benefit.Genetic testing: Diagnostic shows which node-negative patients need chemoPatients with early breast cancer that hasn’t spread to lymph nodes can likely forgo chemotherapy if they score under 25 on Oncotype DX. That’s the finding of a retrospective analysis led by Salomon Stemmer from Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikvah, Israel, that looked at 1801 women with node-negative, ER-positive, HER2-negative disease who received the diagnostic test, which measures the expression levels of 21 genes within tumor cells. Rates of disease recurrence and death were low for patients who received only anti-hormone treatment and had low-to-intermediate Oncotype DX results, suggesting no need for additional chemotherapy (which carries an appreciable risk of toxicity). Previously, a prospective US study called TAILORx established that women with scores under 11 could be spared chemotherapy. The Israeli trial validates and extends the results to include women with scores up to 25.

Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry

The Recurrence Score® is increasingly used in node-positive ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry evaluated treatments/outcomes in node-positive breast cancer patients who were Recurrence Score-tested through Clalit Health Services from 1/2006 through 12/2011 (N = 709). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Median follow-up, 5.9 years; median age, 62 years; 53.9% grade 2; 69.8% tumors ≤ 2 cm; 84.5% invasive ductal carcinoma; 42.0% N1mi, and 37.2%/15.5%/5.2% with 1/2/3 positive nodes; 53.4% Recurrence Score < 18, 36.4% Recurrence Score 18–30, and 10.2% Recurrence Score ≥ 31. Overall, 26.9% received adjuvant chemotherapy: 7.1%, 39.5%, and 86.1% in the Recurrence Score < 18, 18–30, and ≥ 31 group, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 3.2%, 6.3%, and 16.9% for these respective groups and the corresponding 5-year breast cancer death estimates were 0.5%, 3.4%, and 5.7%. In Recurrence Score < 18 patients, 5-year distant-recurrence rates for N1mi/1 positive node/2–3 positive nodes were 1.2%/4.4%/5.4%. As patients were not randomized to treatment and treatment decision is heavily influenced by Recurrence Score, analysis of 5-year distant recurrence by chemotherapy use was exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously: In Recurrence Score < 18, recurrence rate was 7.7% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 27) and 2.9% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 352); P = 0.245. In Recurrence Score 18–30, recurrence rate in chemotherapy-treated patients (n = 102) was significantly lower than in untreated patients (n = 156) (1.0% vs. 9.7% P = 0.019); in Recurrence Score ≤ 25 (the RxPONDER study cutoff), recurrence rate was 2.3% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 89) and 4.4% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 488); P = 0.521. In conclusion, our findings support using endocrine therapy alone in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer patients with micrometastases/1–3 positive nodes and Recurrence Score < 18.Genetic testing: Gene panel guides treatment for node-positive patientsWomen with breast cancer that has spread to the lymph nodes do well on anti-hormone treatment alone if they score under 18 on OncotypeDX. Salomon Stemmer from Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikvah, Israel, and colleagues conducted the first analysis of a large prospectively designed registry in which patients with breast cancer cells in the underarm lymph nodes have taken the 21-gene expression analysis known as OncotypeDX to guide their treatment. Among the 709 women with node-positive, ER-positive, HER-negative disease, patients with test scores under 18 did just as well if they received chemotherapy or not in addition to anti-hormone treatment, whereas those with scores of 18 to 30 had significantly lower recurrence rates if they received both therapies. The findings suggest that only women with OncotypeDX scores under 18 can safely forgo chemotherapy.

Everolimus Plus Letrozole for Treatment of Patients With HR+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing on Endocrine Therapy: An Open-label, Phase II Trial

Purpose: In the Breast cancer trials of OraL EveROlimus‐2 (BOLERO‐2) trial, everolimus plus exemestane improved progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor‐positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) recurring or progressing on/after prior endocrine therapy (ET), suggesting that dual blockade using targeted therapy and ET was an effective treatment option. Here, we investigated the clinical benefit of combining everolimus with different endocrine partner, letrozole, in a similar patient population. Methods: In this phase II, open‐label, single‐arm, multicenter trial, postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC who had recurrence/progression on/after prior ET received everolimus 10 mg daily and letrozole 2.5 mg daily. The primary end point was objective response rate; key secondary end points included disease‐control rate, PFS, overall survival, and safety. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled and followed‐up for a median duration of 11.4 months. Everolimus plus letrozole achieved an overall response rate of 23.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.4%‐36.0%). The median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 6.6‐11.0 months), and the overall survival was 22.9 months (95% CI, 18.5‐28.9 months). Disease‐control rate was achieved in 51 (85%) patients. The safety profile was consistent with previously published data: The most frequently reported any grade adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (61.1%), stomatitis (54.2%), and rash (33.4%). The most frequently reported grade 3 AEs were stomatitis and anemia (8.3% each), fatigue and diarrhea (5.6% each), and hyperglycemia (4.2%). Only 1 patient had grade 4 AE of anemia. Conclusions: Everolimus plus letrozole demonstrated clinical benefit and could be a valid treatment option for postmenopausal women recurring/progressing on prior endocrine therapy.

Abstract OT1-1-05: Phase III study of palbociclib in combination with exemestane vs. capecitabine, in hormonal receptor (HR) positive/HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with resistance to non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI): PEARL study (GEICAM/2013-02_CECOG/BC.1.3.006)

TPS631 Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone treatment for HR–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) patients. AIs have become the treatment of choice in postmenopausal patients. The high efficacy with ET in these patients is partially undermined by the resistance developed by most of them over time. On early disease recurrence/progression to AIs, treatment options include other AI, estrogen-receptor antagonists or chemotherapy (being capecitabine one of the best options). Preclinical data suggest that ER+/HER2- BC are dependent on cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) function; inhibition of this target may be effective in delaying/reverting endocrine resistance. Palbociclib is an oral novel CDK4/6 inhibitor that seems to be synergistic with ET in preclinical and clinical studies. Methods: Phase III, international (5 countries) study. Patients are randomized 1:1 to exemestane (25 mg daily) plus palbociclib (125 mg daily x3 weeks q4w) vs. capecitabine (1,250 mg/m2 twice daily x2 weeks ...