Ben Lawrence
University of Auckland
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ben Lawrence.
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy | 2017
Eva Segelov; Florian Lordick; David Goldstein; Lorraine A. Chantrill; Daniel Croagh; Ben Lawrence; Dirk Arnold; I. Chau; Radka Obermannová; Timothy Jay Price
ABSTRACT Introduction: Despite recent progress, the outlook for most patients with pancreatic cancer remains poor. There is variation in how patients are managed globally due to differing interpretations of the evidence, partly because studies in this disease are challenging to undertake. This article collates the evidence upon which current best practice is based and offers an expert opinion from an international faculty on how latest developments should influence current treatment paradigms. Areas covered: Optimal chemotherapy for first and subsequent lines of therapy; optimal management of locally advanced, non-metastatic cancer including the role of neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, current evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy, major advances in pancreatic cancer genomics and challenges in supportive care particularly relevant to patients with pancreatic cancer. For each section, literature was reviewed by comprehensive search techniques, including clinical trial websites and abstracts from international cancer meetings. Expert commentary: For each section, a commentary is provided. Overall the challenges identified were: difficulties in diagnosing pancreatic cancer early, challenges for performing randomised clinical trials in all stages of the disease, some progress in systemic therapy with new agents and in identifying molecular subtypes that may be clinically relevant and move towards personalized therapy, but still, pancreatic cancer remains a very poor prognosis cancer with significant palliative care needs.
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology | 2010
Ben Lawrence; Michael Findlay
Systemic treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma achieves only modest benefits, with evidence indicating a survival advantage with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) over best supportive care alone, and further advantage of single-agent gemcitabine over 5-FU. There are very few regimens better than single-agent gemcitabine despite multiple trials of cytotoxic and targeted agents. The addition of a platinum agent has improved response rate but not survival. The addition of erlotinib has improved survival but only by a small margin. The use of gemcitabine in multidrug regimens containing one or more of: a platinum agent; fluoropyrimidine; anthracycline; and taxane has demonstrated advantages in response rate, progression-free survival and, in one randomized study, overall survival. After gemcitabine failure, second-line therapy with oxaliplatin and 5-FU provides a further survival advantage. Further advances depend upon the current and future clinical trials investigating enhanced delivery of current agents, new agents and novel modalities, improved supportive care, and treatment more tailored to the individual patient and tumour.
npj Genomic Medicine | 2018
Ben Lawrence; Cherie Blenkiron; Kate Parker; Peter Tsai; Sandra Fitzgerald; Paula Shields; Tamsin Robb; Mee Ling Yeong; Nicole Kramer; Sarah James; Mik Black; Vicky Fan; Nooriyah Poonawala; Patrick Yap; Esther Coats; Braden Woodhouse; Reena Ramsaroop; Masato Yozu; Bridget A. Robinson; Kimiora Henare; Jonathan B. Koea; Peter Johnston; Richard Carroll; Saxon Connor; Helen R. Morrin; Marianne S. Elston; Christopher Jackson; Papaarangi Reid; John A. Windsor; Andrew D. MacCormick
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are uncommon cancers arising from pancreatic islet cells. Here we report the analysis of gene mutation, copy number, and RNA expression of 57 sporadic well-differentiated pNETs. pNET genomes are dominated by aneuploidy, leading to concordant changes in RNA expression at the level of whole chromosomes and chromosome segments. We observed two distinct patterns of somatic pNET aneuploidy that are associated with tumor pathology and patient prognosis. Approximately 26% of the patients in this series had pNETs with genomes characterized by recurrent loss of heterozygosity (LoH) of 10 specific chromosomes, accompanied by bi-allelic MEN1 inactivation and generally poor clinical outcome. Another ~40% of patients had pNETs that lacked this recurrent LoH pattern but had chromosome 11 LoH, bi-allelic MEN1 inactivation, and universally good clinical outcome. The somatic aneuploidy allowed pathogenic germline variants (e.g., ATM) to be expressed unopposed, with RNA expression patterns showing inactivation of downstream tumor suppressor pathways. No prognostic associations were found with tumor morphology, single gene mutation, or expression of RNAs reflecting the activity of immune, differentiation, proliferative or tumor suppressor pathways. In pNETs, single gene mutations appear to be less important than aneuploidy, with MEN1 the only statistically significant recurrently mutated driver gene. In addition, only one pNET in the series had clearly actionable single nucleotide variants (SNVs) (in PTEN and FLCN) confirmed by corroborating RNA expression changes. The two clinically relevant patterns of LoH described here define a novel oncogenic mechanism and a plausible route to genomic precision oncology for this tumor type.Cancer: Frequent chromosome loss in rare pancreatic tumorsThe loss of entire chromosomes seems to be a fundamental driver of tumors arising from the hormone-producing cells of the pancreas. A team led by Cristin Print and Ben Lawrence from the University of Auckland, New Zealand, performed genomic and pathological analysis of 57 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, a rare form of cancer caused by the abnormal growth of hormone-producing islet cells within the pancreas. The researchers observed two distinct patterns of chromosome loss, with 26% of the samples missing one copy of 10 specific chromosomes and another 40% lacking a copy of chromosome 11. In both groups, the abnormal chromosome count prompts abnormal gene activity patterns, with recessive mutations unleashed and expressed unopposed. Single gene mutations seem to play only a minor role, suggesting that single gene-targeted drugs will provide little benefit in this disease setting, with more nuanced approaches required.
Journal of The Royal Society of New Zealand | 2018
Colina McKeown; Samantha Connors; Rachel Stapleton; Timothy R. Morgan; Ian Hayes; Katherine Neas; J. Dixon; Kate Gibson; David Markie; Peter Tsai; Cherie Blenkiron; Sandra Fitzgerald; Paula Shields; Patrick Yap; Ben Lawrence; Cristin Print; Stephen P. Robertson
ABSTRACT We report the results of a pilot project for clinical DNA sequencing in New Zealand. This project aimed to estimate the diagnostic yield of next generation sequencing in the New Zealand clinical environment. Trio whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on germline DNA of 40 individuals from 12 families with presumptive Mendelian disorders. In addition, both WES and deep targeted sequencing (DTS) was performed on tumours, metastases and corresponding normal blood leukocytes from two cancer patients. For the rare Mendelian disorder cohort, the diagnostic yield was 6/12, including previously recognised pathogenic mutations and novel mutations. In tumour sequence analysis, WES identified somatic single nucleotide mutations and copy number aberrations in both cancer patients; however, DTS was required to obtain clinically informative information. This study showed that diagnostic germline and tumour WES and DTS could be easily undertaken in New Zealand, and identified specific infrastructural challenges that must be solved to facilitate its clinical use.
JAMA Oncology | 2018
Simron Singh; Lesley Moody; David Chan; David C. Metz; Jonathan R. Strosberg; Timothy R. Asmis; Dale L. Bailey; Emily K. Bergsland; Kari Brendtro; Richard Carroll; Sean P. Cleary; Michelle K. Kim; Grace Kong; Calvin Law; Ben Lawrence; Alexander J.B. McEwan; Caitlin Mcgregor; Michael Michael; Janice L. Pasieka; Nick Pavlakis; Rodney F. Pommier; Michael C. Soulen; David Wyld; Eva Segelov
There is no consensus on optimal follow-up for completely resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Published guidelines for follow-up are complex and emphasize closer surveillance in the first 3 years after resection. Neuroendocrine tumors have a different pattern and timescale of recurrence, and thus require more practical and tailored follow-up. The Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration convened an international multidisciplinary expert panel, in collaboration with the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, to create patient-centered follow-up recommendations for completely resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This panel used the RAND/UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Appropriateness Method to generate recommendations. A large international survey was conducted outlining current the surveillance practice of neuroendocrine tumor practitioners and shortcomings of the current guidelines. A systematic review of available data to date was supplemented by recurrence data from 2 large patient series. The resultant guidelines suggest follow-up for at least 10 years for fully resected small-bowel and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and also identify clinical situations in which no follow-up is required. These recommendations stratify follow-up strategies based on evidence-based prognostic factors that allow for a more individualized patient-centered approach to this complex and heterogeneous malignant neoplasm.
Cancer Research | 2018
Sandra Fitzgerald; Annette Lasham; Cherie Blenkiron; Paula Shields; Ben Lawrence; Cristin G. Print
A sea-change is imminent for cancer medicine, due to the use of non-invasive genomic biomarkers in blood to inform screening, diagnosis and the selection of treatment. This technology may be used routinely in oncology within five years. Although numerous studies, including work in our laboratory, have shown that genomic analysis of blood can detect the presence and even the type of cancer, researchers have only scratched the surface of what this technology can do. There are still many technical challenges that need to be addressed before these biomarkers can be used routinely in the clinic. In our laboratory, we are generating new methods to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of non-invasive tests mutation detection in cancer patients.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2018
B. Woodhouse; Tamsin Robb; James I. Hearn; P.S. Houseman; G. Hayward; R. Miller; A.P. Restall; Michael Findlay; Ben Lawrence; Cristin G. Print; Kate Parker; Cherie Blenkiron
Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin tumour with an incidence of 0.88 per 100,000 people in New Zealand (NZ), one of the highest in the world1 and almost on par with close neighbours Australia2 . Current local diagnostic guidelines do not require analysis of the oncogenic Merkel Cell Polyoma Virus (MCPyV), therefore it has never been questioned whether the NZ-MCC MCPyV rate is similar to North American and European studies (40-89%) or indeed lower, as reported in Australian cohorts (18-24%) in which a UV-mediated etiology is dominant3-5 . To investigate the presence of the MCPyV in NZ-MCCs we established droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, Bio-Rad) assays to amplify viral gene LTA6 and gene expression of LTA, in parallel with a viral protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay using the commercial CM2B4 antibody4 . This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Linear & Multilinear Algebra | 2017
Ben Lawrence
Abstract Given a set of matrices, it is often of interest to determine the algebra they generate. Here we exploit the concept of the Burnside graph of a set of matrices, and show how it may be used to deduce properties of the algebra they generate. We prove two conditions regarding a set of matrices generating the full algebra; the first necessary, the second sufficient. An application of these results is given in the form of a new family of counterexamples to the Kippenhahn conjecture, of order and greater.
Journal of Global Oncology | 2017
Eva Segelov; David Chan; Ben Lawrence; Nick Pavlakis; Hagen F. Kennecke; Christopher Jackson; Calvin Law; Simron Singh
Purpose Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a diverse group of malignancies that pose challenges common to all rare tumors. The Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumor Collaboration (CommNETS) was established in 2015 to enhance outcomes for patients with NETs in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. A modified Delphi process was undertaken involving patients, clinicians, and researchers to identify gaps in NETs research to produce a comprehensive and defensible research action plan. Methods A three-round modified Delphi process was undertaken with larger representation than usual for medical consensus processes. Patient/advocate and health care provider/researcher expert panels undertook Round 1, which canvassed 17 research priorities and 42 potential topics; in Round 2, these priorities were ranked. Round 3 comprised a face-to-face meeting to generate final consensus rankings and formulate the research action plan. Results The Delphi groups consisted of 203 participants in Round 1 (64% health care providers/researchers, 36% patient/advocates; 52% Canadian, 32% Australian, and 17% New Zealander), of whom 132 participated in Round 2. The top eight priorities were biomarker development; peptide receptor radionuclide therapy optimization; trials of new agents in advanced NETs; functional imaging; sequencing therapies for metastatic NETs, including development of validated surrogate end points for studies; pathologic classification; early diagnosis; interventional therapeutics; and curative surgery. Two major areas were ranked significantly higher by patients/advocates: early diagnosis and curative surgery. Six CommNETS working parties were established. Conclusion This modified Delphi process resulted in a well-founded set of research priorities for the newly formed CommNETS collaboration by involving a large, diverse group of stakeholders. This approach to setting a research agenda for a new collaborative group should be adopted to ensure that research plans reflect unmet needs and priorities in the field.
Gastrointestinal Cancer: Targets and Therapy | 2012
Ben Lawrence; Malcolm Cameron Anderson; Simon Schimmack; Michael Findlay; Mark Kidd; Irvin Modlin
Timely and appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastroentero- pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is a difficult clinical endeavor. The field is particularly dynamic, not only in terms of expanding therapeutic options, but in the classifications and bio - logical principles that underpin good decision-making. Acknowledging the confusion created by past changes and the inevitability of future development, we combine our clinical experience with a review of the literature to frame the current understanding of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in terms of a set of principles that have stabilized in the midst of this change. Firstly, we present five principles that guide classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms; specifically principles of prognostic classification, mechanisms of tumorigenesis, undiagnosed disease burden, clues regarding genetic etiology, and typical clinical presentation. Secondly, we offer five clinical principles upon which to build a therapeutic strategy. Specifically, these treatment principles include the separation of options by tumor cell differentiation, and the site of the primary lesion in well differentiated tumors. Chromogranin A is a moderately useful biomarker. Treatment should only be considered by clinicians in a multidisciplinary team, and in the face of multiple potential therapeutic options without a supporting evidence base, clinical trial enrolment remains imperative. Therefore, we provide a current synopsis of classification of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, and their etiology, clinical presentation, and management in a novel framework of ten relatively stable principles.