Benjamin Banderas

Development and initial psychometric evaluation of patient-reported outcome questionnaires to evaluate the symptoms and impact of hidradenitis suppurativa

Abstract Background: Two patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires, the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Assessment (HSSA) and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Impact Assessment (HSIA), were developed to measure signs, symptoms and impacts of HS in treatment efficacy studies. Methods: In accordance with FDA guidelines and published best practices, four stages of research were conducted to create the questionnaires: concept elicitation, questionnaire construction, content evaluation and psychometric evaluation. Results: Subjects (N = 20) who participated in the concept elicitation stage reported 15 unique HS-related signs and symptoms and 51 impacts. Following this, eight sign and symptom concepts and 21 impacts were selected for construction of the HSSA and HSIA, respectively. During content evaluation, cognitive debriefing interviews with HS subjects (N = 20) confirmed subjects could read, comprehend and meaningfully respond to both questionnaires. Modifications made after this stage of work resulted in a nine-item HSSA and a 17-item HSIA. The HSSA and HSIA were subsequently entered into a US-based observational study (N = 40), and the scores produced by each were found to be reliable, construct valid, and able to distinguish among clinically distinct groups. Conclusions: The HSSA and HSIA are content-valid, HS-specific, PRO questionnaires with demonstrated ability to generate reliable, valid scores when administered to patients with HS in a research setting.

Development of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptom Questionnaire (RASQ): a patient reported outcome scale for measuring symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic, progressive inflammatory, autoimmune disease, can substantially reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and lead to severe disability and early mortality. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are used to assess the patient experience of RA symptoms and impacts, and can capture RA treatment effects. To address limitations in existing PRO instruments, this research aimed to establish the content validity of a new instrument, the Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptom Questionnaire (RASQ), to assess the signs and symptoms of RA. Method: The most important and relevant sign and symptom concepts for RA patients were identified through a targeted review of the published literature, expert opinion, and concept elicitation patient interviews. Cognitive interviews were conducted with patients to test the comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of the RASQ. Results: Seven symptoms emerged consistently across the conceptual research: joint pain, joint swelling, joint stiffness, joint tenderness, joint warmth, muscle pain, and tiredness. Draft item content was developed to assess these symptoms, in addition to a single impact item, resulting in three RASQ versions: two utilizing a 7 day recall period (one assessing symptoms at their worst, the other on average) and a third using a 24 hour recall period assessing symptoms at their worst. Cognitive interview results demonstrated patient understanding and ability to use the instrument. Conclusions: Content validity of the RASQ was established in accordance with instrument development guidelines. The RASQ fills a measurement gap by assessing the RA signs and symptoms most important to patients. Research evaluating the RASQ’s psychometric properties is underway.

Psychometric assessment of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Symptom Event Log

PurposeDiarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) can considerably impact patients’ lives. Patient-reported symptoms are crucial in understanding the diagnosis and progression of IBS-D. This study psychometrically evaluates the newly developed IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Symptom Event Log (hereafter, “Event Log”) according to US regulatory recommendations.MethodsA US-based observational field study was conducted to understand cross-sectional psychometric properties of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Event Log. Analyses included item descriptive statistics, item-to-item correlations, reliability, and construct validity.ResultsThe IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Event Log had no items with excessive missing data. With the exception of two items (“frequency of gas” and “accidents”), moderate to high inter-item correlations were observed among all items of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Event Log (day 1 range 0.67–0.90). Item scores demonstrated reliability, with the exception of the “frequency of gas” and “accidents” items of the Diary and “incomplete evacuation” item of the Event Log. The pattern of correlations of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Event Log item scores with generic and disease-specific measures was as expected, moderate for similar constructs and low for dissimilar constructs, supporting construct validity. Known-groups methods showed statistically significant differences and monotonic trends in each of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary item scores among groups defined by patients’ IBS-D severity ratings (“none”/“mild,” “moderate,” or “severe”/“very severe”), supporting construct validity.ConclusionsInitial psychometric results support the reliability and validity of the items of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Event Log.

Cultural adaptation: translatability assessment and linguistic validation of the patient-reported outcome instrument for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea

Background and objective Following a 2009 US Food and Drug Administration guidance, a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument was developed to support end points in multinational clinical trials assessing irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) symptom severity. Our objective was to assess the translatability of the IBS-D PRO instrument into ten languages, and subsequently perform a cultural adaptation/linguistic validation of the questionnaire into Japanese and US Spanish. Materials and methods Translatability assessments of the US English version of the IBS-D PRO were performed by experienced PRO translators who were native speakers of each target language and currently residing in target-language countries. Languages were Chinese (People’s Republic of China), Dutch (the Netherlands), French (Belgium), German (Germany), Japanese (Japan), Polish (Poland), Portuguese (Brazil), Russian (Russia), Spanish (Mexico), and Spanish (US). The project team assessed the instrument to identify potential linguistic and/or cultural adaptation issues. After the issues identified were resolved, the instrument was translated into Spanish (US) and Japanese through a process of two forward translations, one reconciled translation, and one backward translation. The project team reviewed the translated versions before the instruments were evaluated by cognitive debriefing interviews with samples of five Spanish (US) and five Japanese IBS-D patients. Results Linguistic and cultural adaptation concerns identified during the translatability assessment required minor revisions, mainly the presentation of dates/times and word structure. During the cognitive debriefing interviews, two of five Spanish respondents misunderstood the term “bowel movement” to mean only diarrhea in the Spanish version. Consequently, the term was changed from “movimiento intestinal” to “evacuaciones”. None of the Japanese respondents identified issues with the Japanese version. Conclusion The translatability of the IBS-D PRO instrument into ten target languages was confirmed, with only minor changes made to the translations of the instrument. The translation and linguistic validation into Spanish (US) and Japanese provide evidence that this instrument can be used in multinational trials and clinical settings.

Development of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure on the Impact of Nighttime Urination (INTU) in patients with nocturia-Psychometric validation

To psychometrically evaluate the Impact of Nighttime Urination (INTU) questionnaire, a new patient‐reported outcome measure developed to assess the impact of nocturia on health and functioning in a multicenter, behavioral modification (fluid restriction) study.

Development and validation of a novel patient-reported treatment satisfaction measure for hyperfunctional facial lines: facial line satisfaction questionnaire

Facial lines or wrinkles are among the most visible signs of aging, and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are becoming increasingly popular.

Quality of Care in Rheumatoid Disease from the Clinician Perspective: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach

IntroductionTo establish clinical consensus on important and relevant quality-of-care (QoC) attributes in rheumatic disease (RD) treatment that may improve treatment outcomes and guide best practices.MethodsTwenty-three QoC attributes were identified in a literature review. Fifteen European-based clinicians were selected based on their contributions to RD guidelines, publications, and patient care. A three-round (an interview round and two web-based rounds) modified Delphi panel was conducted to reach consensus and finalize a QoC attribute list.ResultsIn round 1 (clinician interviews), clinicians reported 52 unique QoC attributes across 14 themes, with the greatest number of attributes reported in the “treatment goals” (n = 7) and “remote monitoring” (n = 7) themes. During rounds 2 and 3, the critically important QoC attributes most frequently reported were access to care/treatment (n = 14, 93.3%), safety of treatment (round 2 n = 14, 93.3%, round 3 n = 13, 86.7%), and access to clinicians and specialists (round 2: n = 13, 86.7%, round 3: n = 14, 93.3%). The final list contained 53 QoC attributes.ConclusionThe study demonstrates consensus across several themes of QoC. Quality of care is a complex, multidimensional, and fluid concept that can be improved by ensuring patients have access to care, open communication between patients and clinicians, and the use of novel strategies, such as remote monitoring. Utilization of the attribute list can potentially improve the lives of patients, provide clinicians with tools to provide greater QoC, and improve the healthcare system as a whole.FundingMerck & Co., Inc.

Quality of Care in Ulcerative Colitis: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach

Objectives: To establish clinical consensus on important and relevant quality-of-care (QoC) attributes in ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment that may improve treatment outcomes and guide best practices. Methods: Thirty-eight QoC attributes were identified in a literature review. Sixteen European-based experts were selected based on their contributions to UC guidelines, publications, and patient care. A 3-round, modified Delphi panel was conducted including an interview round, and 2 web-based rounds to reach consensus and finalize a QoC attribute list. Results: The draft QoC attribute list derived from a literature review and Round 1, expert interviews, comprised 63 attributes. In Rounds 2 and 3, the QoC attributes frequently rated as critically important were diagnosis (n = 15, 93.8%), treatment adherence (n = 15, 93.8%), and access to care/treatment (Round 2: n = 14, 87.5%; Round 3: n = 15, 93.8%). The final QoC attribute list consisted of 61 attributes across 20 domains, with the most attributes reported in the “treatment goals” domain (n = 9). Conclusion: QoC is a complex and evolving concept that can improve outcomes while maximizing healthcare resources. Limited time and resources hamper clinicians’ ability to openly and empathetically communicate with patients; novel technology may help to offer solutions.

Patient-reported treatment satisfaction with rivaroxaban in Japanese non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: an observational study

Abstract Objectives: Rivaroxaban has previously been shown to be as efficacious and safe as warfarin for the prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Therefore, treatment satisfaction becomes an important consideration. Here we examine treatment satisfaction in Japanese NVAF patients who were switched from warfarin to rivaroxaban. Methods: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data were collected as part of a prospective, multi-center, post-marketing surveillance (PMS) of a direct oral-anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, in Japan. The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II (TSQM-II) were collected at baseline, month 3, and month 6. Change in scores from baseline to month 3 and month 6 were assessed. Exploratory analyses included change in scores by patient characteristics. Safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban were also assessed. Results: ACTS Burdens scores significantly improved at month 3 (54.6 ± 6.3) and month 6 (54.5 ± 6.5) compared to baseline (51.0 ± 7.6) (p < .001). ACTS Benefits score remained stable over time (baseline = 10.1 ± 2.8, month 3 = 10.2 ± 3.1, month 6 = 10.1 ± 3.1). Mean TSQM-II sub-scale scores significantly improved at month 3 and month 6 compared to baseline for all four domains (all p < .001). Conclusions: Findings suggest treatment satisfaction may improve in Japanese NVAF patients after a switch from warfarin to rivaroxaban. Higher treatment satisfaction may translate into improved treatment adherence, which is critical for the long-term prevention of stroke.

Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population:

Background: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed seven-item Irritable Bowel Syndrome – Diarrhea predominant (IBS-D) Daily Symptom Diary and four-item Event Log using phase II clinical trial safety and efficacy data in patients with IBS-D. This instrument measures diarrhea (stool frequency and stool consistency), abdominal pain related to IBS-D (stomach pain, abdominal pain, abdominal cramps), immediate need to have a bowel movement (immediate need and accident occurrence), bloating, pressure, gas, and incomplete evacuation. Methods: Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the instrument were evaluated in a clinical trial population [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01494233]. Results: A total of 434 patients were included in the analyses. Significant differences were found among severity groups (p < 0.01) defined by IBS Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and IBS Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C). Severity scores for each Diary and Event Log item score and five-item, four-item, and three-item summary scores were calculated. Between-group differences in changes over time were significant for all summary scores in groups stratified by changes in PGI-S (p < 0.05), two of six Diary items, and three of four Event Log items; a one-grade change in PGI-S was considered a meaningful difference with mean change scores on all Diary items −0.13 to −0.86 [standard deviation (SD) 0.79–1.39]. Similarly, for patients who reported being ‘slightly improved’ (considered a clinically meaningful difference) on the PGI-C, mean change scores on Diary items ranged from −0.45 to −1.55 (SD 0.69–1.39). All estimates of clinically important change for each item and all summary scores were small and should be considered preliminary. These results are aligned with the previous standalone psychometric study regarding reliability and validity tests. Conclusions: These analyses provide evidence of the psychometric properties of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Event Log in a clinical trial population.