Benjamin Buecking

The Two-incision, Minimally Invasive Approach in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures

Objectives: To present a novel two-incision minimally invasive (TIMI) method for the treatment of anterior acetabular fractures. Design: Prospective consecutive case series. Setting: Level I University Trauma Centre. Patients: Twenty-six patients (mean age, 67 ± 19 years). Intervention: The first TIMI-incision is performed by a pararectal approach at the level of the proximal third of the arcuate line of the ilium. After transection of the abdominal wall, the iliac vessels are mobilized medially and the neuromuscular bundle laterally. The second approach lies above the medial pubic bone. The soft tissue is held using a retraction system. After fracture reduction and fixation by isolated screws, a conventional reconstruction plate is inserted for fracture neutralization. Main Outcome Mesurements: Perioperative course, postoperative radiological evaluation, functional outcome Harris hip score, and quality of life (EQ 5D). Results: Mean operative time was 109 ± 30 mins. All incisions healed primarily. Postoperative radiological exam revealed an anatomic reduction in 20 fractures and a satisfactory reduction in 6. There were no local soft-tissue complications, and no revisions were needed. Follow-up examinations were performed after a minimum of 12 months in 19 patients (73%). The Harris hip score was 86,6 ± 8. Quality of life was comparable to persons in the same age group. Conclusion: The TIMI approach represents a viable alternative to the ilioinguinal approach. Despite the limited incisions, a comparable quality of fracture reduction is achieved. The authors believe this technique would be most useful in those patients with a higher risk for postoperative soft-tissue complications. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Increased age is not associated with higher incidence of complications, longer stay in acute care hospital and in hospital mortality in geriatric hip fracture patients

The number of agile patients in the 10th decade with a strong need for postoperative mobility will increase in the following decades. The present prospective study sought to prove if very old patients with hip-related fractures are disadvantaged according to incidence of complications, length of ICU and in-hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. We included 402 patients, age 60 years and older, with hip related fractures. Operative treatment consisted of osteosynthesis or endoprothesis. ASA score, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Barthel Index and Mini-Mental-Status were documented. We noted length of in-hospital stay and ICU stay as well as readmission to ICU and complications, including their dispersal according to Clavien-Dindo Classification. After univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis was performed. The examined cohorts were 85 patients aged 60-74 years, 253 75-90 years old and 64 >90 year old patients. In-hospital periods (13-14 days) mean stay on ICU (2 days) and frequency of readmission on ICU did not significantly differ statistically. Most complications were grade II, with comparable frequency and modality, displaying no significant difference throughout age-related groups (p=0.461). In-hospital mortality showing significance (p=0.014) only between 75-89 (4.4%) and >90-year-old (12.5%) cohort. Nevertheless, according to multivariate analysis, including the common risk factors, increased age was not an independent risk factor for dying (p=0.132). Patients at an advanced age with hip-related fractures showed neither a prolonged in-hospital nor ICU stay. There was no significant relation of advanced age to number and type of complications.

Early or delayed stabilization in severely injured patients with spinal fractures? Current surgical objectivity according to the Trauma Registry of DGU: treatment of spine injuries in polytrauma patients.

BACKGROUND Because of a lack of evidence, the appropriate timing of surgical stabilization of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries in severely injured patients is still controversial. Data of a large international trauma register were analyzed to investigate the medical care situation of unstable spinal column fractures in patients with multiple injuries, so as to examine the outcome related to timing of surgical stabilization. METHODS Data sets of the Trauma Registry of German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie [DGU]) (1993–2010) were analyzed. The Trauma Registry of DGU is a prospective, multicenter register that provides information on severely injured patients. All patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or greater caused by blunt trauma, subsequent treatment of 7 days or more, 16 years or older, and thoracic or lumbar spine injuries (spine Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 2) were included in our analysis. Patients with relevant spine injuries classified as having a spine AIS score of 3 or greater were further analyzed in terms of whether they got early (<72 hours) or late (>72 hours) surgical treatment due to unstable spinal column fractures. RESULTS Of 24,974 patients, 8,994 (36.0%) had documented spinal injuries (spine AIS score ≥ 2). A total of 1,309 patients who sustained relevant thoracic spine injuries (spine AIS score ≥ 3) and 994 patients who experienced lumbar spine trauma and classified as having spine AIS score of 3 or greater were more precisely analyzed. Of these, 68.2% and 71.0%, respectively, received an early thoracic or lumbar spine fixation. With an increase in spinal injury severity, an increase in early stabilization in the thoracic and lumbar spine was seen. In the group of patients with early surgical stabilization, significantly shorter hospital stays, shorter intensive care unit stays, fewer days on mechanical ventilation, and lower rates of sepsis were seen. In the case that additional body regions were affected, for example, when patients were critically ill, a delayed spinal stabilization was more often performed. CONCLUSION A spinal stabilization at an early stage (<72 hours) is presumed to be beneficial. Although some patients may require delay due to necessary medical improvement, every reasonable effort should be made to treat patients with instable spinal column fractures as soon as possible. If an early surgical treatment is feasible, severely injured patients may benefit from a shorter period of hospital treatment and a lower rate of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level III.

Use of the gamma3™ nail in a teaching hospital for trochanteric fractures: mechanical complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life

BackgroundTrochanteric fractures are common fractures in the elderly. Due to characteristic demographic changes, the incidence of these injuries is rapidly increasing. Treatment of these fractures is associated with high rates of complications. In addition, the long-term results remain poor, with high morbidity, declines in function, and high mortality. Therefore, in this study, complication rates and patients’ outcomes were evaluated after fixation of geriatric trochanteric fractures using the Gamma3™ nail.MethodsPatients aged 60 years old or older, with pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures, were included. Patients with polytrauma or pathological fractures were excluded. Age, sex, and fracture type were collected on admission. In addition, data were recorded concerning the surgeon (resident vs. consultant), time of operation, and local or systemic perioperative complications. Complications were also collected at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups after trauma. Barthel Index, IADL, and EQ-5D measurements were evaluated retrospectively on admission, as well as at discharge and during the follow-up.ResultsNinety patients were prospectively included between April 2009 and September 2010. The patients’ average age was 81 years old, and their average ASA score was 3. The incision/suture time was 53 min (95% CI 46–60 min). Hospital mortality was 4%, and overall mortality was 22% at the 12-month follow-up. Eight local complications occurred (4 haematomas, 1 deep infection, 1 cutting out, 1 irritation of the iliotibial tract, 1 periosteosynthetic fracture). The incidence of relevant systemic complications was 6%. Forty-two percent of the patients were operated on by residents in training, without significant differences in duration of surgery, complication rate, or mortality rate. The Barthel Index (82 to 71, p < .001), IADL (4.5 to 4.3, p = .0195) and EQ-5-D (0.75 to 0.66, p = .068) values did not reach pre-fracture levels during the follow-up period of 12 months.ConclusionThe results showed a relatively low complication rate using the Gamma3™ nail, even if the nailing was performed by residents in training. The high mortality, declines in function, and low quality of life could probably be attributed to pre-existing conditions, such as physical status.In summary, the Gamma3™ nail seems to be a useful implant for the nailing of trochanteric fractures, although further studies are necessary comparing different currently available devices.

Deltoid-split or deltopectoral approaches for the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures?

BackgroundProximal humeral fractures are mainly associated with osteoporosis and are becoming more common with the aging of our society. The best surgical approach for internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures is still being debated.Questions/purposesIn this prospective randomized study, we aimed to investigate whether the deltoid-split approach is superior to the deltopectoral approach with regard to (1) complication rate; (2) shoulder function (Constant score); and (3) pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) for internal fixation of displaced humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate.MethodsWe randomized 120 patients with proximal humeral fractures to receive one of these two approaches (60 patients for each approach). We prospectively documented demographic and perioperative data (sex, age, fracture type, hospital stay, operation time, and fluoroscopy time) as well as complications. Followup examinations were conducted at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, including radiological and clinical evaluations (Constant score, activities of daily living, and pain [VAS]). Baseline and perioperative data were comparable for both approaches. The sample size was chosen to provide 80% power, but it reached only 68% as a result of the loss of followups to detect a 10-point difference on the Constant score, which we considered the minimum clinically important difference.ResultsComplications or reoperations between the approaches were not different. Eight patients in the deltoid-split group (14%) needed surgical revisions compared with seven patients in the deltopectoral group (13%; p = 1.00). Deltoid-split and deltopectoral approaches showed similar Constant scores 12 months postoperatively (Deltoid-split 81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 74–87 versus deltopectoral 73; 95% CI, 64–81; p = 0.13), and there were no differences between the groups in terms of pain at 1 year (deltoid-split 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2–1.4 versus deltopectoral 2.5; 95% CI, 1.7–3.2; p = 0.14). No learning-curve effects were noted; fluoroscopy use during surgery and function and pain scores during followups were similar among the first 30 patients and the next 30 patients treated in each group.ConclusionsThe treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate is reliable using both approaches. For a definitive recommendation for one of these approaches, further studies with appropriate sample size are necessary.Level of EvidenceLevel II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Rotationally Stable Screw-Anchor With Locked Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in the Treatment of AO/OTA 31A2.2 Fracture: A Biomechanical Evaluation

Objectives: Third-generation cephalomedullary nails currently represent the gold standard in the treatment of unstable trochanteric femur fractures. Recently, an extramedullary rotationally stable screw-anchor system (RoSA) has been developed. It was designed to combine the benefits of screw and blade and to improve stability using a locked trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP). The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of RoSA/TSP and the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Methods: Standardized AO/OTA 31A2.2 fractures were induced by an oscillating saw in 10 paired human specimens (n = 20; mean age = 85 years; range: 71–96 years). The fractures were stabilized by either the RoSA/TSP (Koenigsee Implants, Allendorf, Germany) or the PFNA (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland). Femurs were positioned in 25 degrees of adduction and 10 degrees of posterior flexion and were cyclically loaded with axial sinusoidal pattern at 0.5 Hz, starting at 300 N, with stepwise increase by 300 N every 500 cycles until bone–implant failure occurred. After every load step, the samples were measured visually and radiographically. Femoral head migration was assessed. Results: The stiffness at the load up to the clinically relevant load step of 1800 N (639 ± 378 N/mm (RoSA/TSP) vs. 673 ± 227 N/mm (PFNA); P = 0.542) was comparable, as was the failure load (3000 ± 787 N vs. 3780 ± 874 N; P = 0.059). Up to 1800 N, no femoral head rotation, head migration, or femoral neck shortening were observed either for RoSA/TSP or PFNA. Whereas failure of the PFNA subsumed fractures of the greater trochanter and the lateral wall, a posterior femoral neck fracture with a significantly increased femoral neck shortening (1.7 mm vs. 0 mm; P = 0.012) was the cause of failure with RoSA/TSP. This specific kind of failure was induced by a femoral neck weakening caused by the posterior TSP stabilizing screw. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in biomechanical properties between the RoSA/TSP and the PFNA for the fracture pattern tested. However, failure modes differed between the 2 implants with greater femoral neck shortening observed in the RoSA/TSP group.

Effect of Preexisting Cognitive Impairment on In-Patient Treatment and Discharge Management among Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures

Objective: To examine the influence of cognitive impairment on the functional outcomes and complication rates of patients with hip fracture during in-patient treatment. Methods: A total of 402 patients who were surgically treated for hip fractures were consecutively enrolled at a single trauma center. The patients were grouped according to their results on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), i.e., ≥20 points (group I) and ≤19 points (group II). Complication and in-hospital mortality rates as well as postoperative functional outcomes according to the Barthel Index (BI) were compared between the groups. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for additional factors. Results: 33% of the patients had MMSE scores ≤19 points. The complication rates were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Likewise, the overall in-hospital mortality rates were similar between the patients in group I (4.5%) and those in group II (9.8%; β = 0.218, p < 0.740). Functional outcomes, as assessed by the BI, were lower in group II (β = -0.266, p < 0.001). The patients in group II were transferred to a rehabilitation clinic less frequently (52.3 vs. 76.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with lower MMSE scores are at a higher risk for poorer functional outcomes. Perioperative care should focus on the preservation of functional abilities to protect these patients from an additional loss of independence and disadvantageous clinical course.

Factors influencing the progress of mobilization in hip fracture patients during the early postsurgical period?—A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to determine the independent factors influencing mobilization progress after geriatric hip fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS 392 Hip fracture patients older than 60 years were included in this prospective, observational, cohort study. The progress of mobilization was measured with walking ability 4 days post-surgery, ability to climb stairs until discharge and the Tinetti test at discharge. Factors correlated with the progress of mobilization were determined using multivariate analyses. RESULTS The independent factors influencing walking ability 4 days post-surgery were the pre-fracture Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR=0.834, p=0.005), the American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (OR=0.550, p=0.013), pre-fracture Barthel Index ([BI], OR=1.019, p=0.012) and risk for depression, as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale, (OR=0.896, p=0.013). The probability of climbing stairs until discharge was influenced by the patients age (OR=0.840, p<0.001), pre-fracture BI (OR=1.047, p=0.042), cognitive impairment, as measured by the mini mental state examination (OR=1.182 p=0.008), pre surgical hemoglobin (OR=1.026, p=0.044), time until surgery (OR=0.961, p=0.023), duration of surgery (OR=0.982, p=0.014), and surgery type (prosthesis, OR=4.545, p=0.001). Similar variables influenced the Tinetti test ad discharge. CONCLUSION While pre-fracture co-morbidities and function cannot be changed, the treatment of patients with cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms should be optimized. Efforts should be undertaken to ensure early surgery for all hip fractures.

Locked minimally invasive plating versus fourth generation nailing in the treatment of AO/OTA 31A2.2 fractures: A biomechanical comparison of PCCP® and Intertan nail®☆

INTRODUCTION Locked minimally invasive plating and fourth generation nailing potentially could reduce the complication rate in the treatment of trochanteric femur fractures by its rotational stability and providing better lateral cortical support. The purpose of this study was (1) to compare the biomechanical properties of the Percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) and the Intertan nail (IT) with regards to implant failure and (2) to assess dynamic stability coefficients in an unstable AO/OTA 31A2.2 fracture model. METHODS In paired femurs, a standardised unstable trochanteric femur fracture was induced by an oscillating saw. The fractures were stabilised by either the PCCP (Orthofix, McKinney, TX, USA) or the IT (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA). All femurs were loaded with 300N, followed by an increase in load until failure using 300N each time (2000 cycles each, 0.5Hz). After every load step the samples were assessed visually and radiographically. We measured migration and performed a survival analysis. RESULTS 16 fractures were induced in 8 paired human specimens (mean age: 84 years, 61-100 years). The mean stiffness (PCCP vs. IT: 249±124N/mm vs. 273±153N/mm; p=0.737) was comparable. The IT proved superior to the PCCP with regard to the number of cycles reached before failure occurred (PCCP vs. IT: 12,691±4733 vs. 15,313±4875 cycles; p=0.023). Except for a higher axial migration of the IT at failure point (PCCP vs. IT: 1.3mm vs. 4.3mm; p=0.028) there were no differences between the intra- and extramedullary implants, not even in terms of rotational stability along the femoral neck axis. A fracture of the femoral neck caused test abortion in both implants in most cases. CONCLUSION This study showed a superiority of the IT compared with the PCCP with regards to number of cycles achieved under sequential load increases for unstable trochanteric femur fractures. The stiffness was comparable. Both implants showed a high rotational stability and a support of the lateral wall. STUDY TYPE Biomechanical study.

Femoral offset following trochanteric femoral fractures: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND Reconstruction of the femoral offset reportedly improves outcome following total hip arthroplasty, but little is known of its influence following hip fractures. We aimed to establish the effect of the femoral offset on the medium-term functional outcome in elderly patients who had sustained trochanteric fractures requiring proximal femoral nailing. PATIENTS AND METHODS We measured the rotation corrected femoral offset (FORC) and relative femoral offset (FORL) on plain anteroposterior radiographs of the hip in 188 patients (58 male, 130 female) with a trochanteric fracture who underwent proximal femoral nailing at our institution. The primary outcome measure was the Harris hip score (HSS) 6 and 12 months postoperatively; the Barthel index was assessed as a secondary outcome. RESULTS The mean FORC after surgery was 58 mm (±11 mm), while the mean FORL was 1.21 (±0.22). At final follow up, we found significant inverse relationships (Spearmans rank correlation coefficient, ρ) between FORC and FORL and the functional outcome assessed by the HSS (FORC: ρ = -0.207, p = 0.036; FORL: ρ = -0.247, p = 0.012), and FORL and the Barthel index (FORC: ρ = -147, p = 0.129; FORL: ρ = -0.192, p = 0.046). A consistent trend was observed after adjustment for confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS Our results underline the biomechanical importance of the femoral offset for medium-term outcomes in elderly patients with trochanteric fractures. In contrast with the published findings on total hip arthroplasty, we found an inverse correlation between functional outcome and the extent of the reconstructed femoral offset. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I - Prognostic study.