Benjamin C. Paul

Diagnostic accuracy of history, laryngoscopy, and stroboscopy

Although clinical dogma suggests the value of laryngeal visualization (flexible laryngoscopy and stroboscopy) in dysphonic patients, recently published clinical guidelines suggest that, in many cases, history and/or physical examination are sufficient to guide clinical decision‐making regarding the timing of such examinations. We sought to prospectively quantify the diagnostic accuracy of history, laryngoscopy, and stroboscopy using direct laryngoscopy as the gold standard.

Morbidity and Patient Perception of Flexible Laryngoscopy

Objectives: The recently published Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) revealed major deficits in the literature regarding relatively routine clinical decision-making. One of the more controversial points in the Guideline regarded the utility and timing of laryngeal visualization via flexible laryngoscopy, potentially because of sparse literature regarding the risks and potential morbidity. We sought to prospectively address this issue in order to optimize evaluation protocols. Methods: Two-hundred fifty consecutive patients with a variety of complaints completed a survey after undergoing flexible laryngoscopy. The survey queried 1) demographics; 2) discomfort of pretreatment anesthesia and scope placement in the nose and pharynx; 3) fear of future examinations; and 4) patient perception and past experience. Concurrently, the laryngoscopist reported the complications and anatomic variations encountered. Results: The discomfort and pain ratings from both the anesthetic spray and the scope placement were low. No statistically significant differences were observed with regard to sex; however, women reported greater fear associated with examinations (p = 0.0001). Anatomic abnormalities were observed in 14.4% of patients, and these patients reported greater discomfort, pain, and fear regarding the examination. No adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Flexible laryngoscopy was well tolerated, with little to no risk. The presence of nasal anatomic abnormalities predicted increased discomfort.

Hoarseness and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Survey of Primary Care Physician Practice Patterns

IMPORTANCE Current approaches to the diagnosis and subsequent management of specific voice disorders vary widely among primary care physicians (PCPs). In addition, sparse literature describes current primary care practice patterns concerning empirical treatment for vocal disorders. OBJECTIVE To examine how PCPs manage patients with dysphonia, especially with regard to laryngopharyngeal reflux. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective, questionnaire-based study by an academic laryngology practice among academic PCPs from all major US geographic regions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES A 16-question web-based survey, distributed via e-mail, concerning management and possible empirical treatment options for patients with dysphonia. RESULTS Of 2441 physicians who received the e-mail broadcast, 314 (12.9%) completed the survey. Among those who completed the survey, 46.3% were family practitioners, 46.5% were trained in internal medicine, and 7.2% identified as specialists. Among all respondents, 64.0% preferred to treat rather than immediately refer a patient with chronic hoarseness (symptoms persisting for >6 weeks) of unclear origin. Reflux medication (85.8%) and antihistamines (54.2%) were the most commonly selected choices for empirical treatment. Most physician respondents (79.2%) reported that they would treat chronic hoarseness with reflux medication in a patient without evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Most PCPs who responded to our survey report empirically treating patients with chronic hoarseness of unknown origin. Many physician respondents were willing to empirically prescribe reflux medication as primary therapy, even when symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease were not present. These data suggest that PCPs strongly consider reflux a common cause of dysphonia and may empirically treat patients having dysphonia with reflux medication before referral.

Multi-institutional experience with the in-office potassium Titanyl phosphate laser for laryngeal lesions

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS To determine the efficacy of the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser in lesion reduction, as well as preservation of mucosal wave and glottic closure in a cohort of patients with benign laryngeal pathology across multiple institutions. STUDY DESIGN Multi-institutional and retrospective. METHODS One hundred two patients who underwent in-office KTP procedures at multiple academic laryngology practices with at least a single follow-up visit were included. Image analysis was used to quantify vocal fold lesion size before and after treatment. A subset of images was analyzed by expert reviewers to determine the impact of this treatment on glottic closure and mucosal wave. RESULTS Statistically, when considering all lesions, KTP induced a significant reduction in lesion size. Post hoc analyses revealed some lesion specificity; all lesions decreased in size, with the exception of vocal fold scar. Mucosal wave and glottic closure were improved or unchanged in more than 90% of the patients examined. The inter- and intrarater reliabilities of the lesion quantification method were excellent. CONCLUSIONS With great care and insight, the KTP laser appears to be a valuable tool for the treatment of various benign laryngeal lesions. Furthermore, KTP laser therapy appears to preserve or improve mucosal wave and glottic closure. The lesion measurement protocol previously described by our group appears to be reliable.

Diagnosis and management of new-onset hoarseness: a survey of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.

Objectives: The recently published Clinical Practice Guideline raised issues related to the value and timing of laryngoscopy in patients with hoarseness. We sought to determine the extent to which these guidelines concur with clinical practice among members of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association (ABEA). Methods: A web-based survey was distributed to ABEA members, composed of four sections: 1) background and demographics; 2) information regarding the appropriate length of time that new-onset dysphonia may be managed before laryngeal visualization, given particular comorbidities; 3) the frequency and risks of office-based flexible transnasal laryngoscopy; and 4) the overall value of laryngoscopy and stroboscopy. Results: Seventy-one ABEA members completed the survey; they had a combined 1,468 years of post-residency experience. Approximately 75% of respondents were involved in a fully academic practice. Across all respondents, an average of 11 patients with new voice complaints were seen per week. Overall, 98.6% of respondents believe that laryngoscopy is very valuable. Stridor in a neonate and potential foreign bodies were both conditions necessitating laryngoscopy on the day of presentation. In patients with no serious underlying condition(s), the mean duration until laryngoscopy was 12.96 days (range, 0 to 30 days). Conclusions: These data suggest that the current practice patterns among experts in the field are divergent from the recently published Guideline.

Glucocorticoids in laryngology: a review.

To provide the otolaryngologist an evidence‐based sound review of glucocorticoid use for laryngeal pathology.

Smad3: An emerging target for vocal fold fibrosis

To determine the efficacy of small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting Smad3 to mediate fibroplasia in vitro, to investigate the temporal regulation of Smad3 following vocal fold (VF) injury, and to determine the local and distal effects of Smad3 siRNA VF injection.

Glucocorticoids for Vocal Fold Disease: A Survey of Otolaryngologists

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS Glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly used in the treatment of laryngeal disorders despite the absence of clear guidelines regarding their use. We sought to assess clinical practice patterns regarding GC use for various vocal fold diseases and to ascertain factors underlying the selection of particular GCs for different vocal fold pathology. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, survey. METHODS A web-based 20-question survey querying clinical indications for GC use and other factors influencing decision making in GC administration was distributed to 5280 otolaryngologists via e-mail using a commercially available database. RESULTS The overall response rate for the survey was 4% (212/5280). Of the respondents, 99% reported GCs to be valuable in their practice. Previous experience/results, familiarity, and use in practice (68%, 54%, and 37%, respectively) were the most commonly cited reasons for choosing a particular GC; pharmacokinetic profile and academic literature were infrequently cited reasons. Fifty-four percent of respondents were more likely to prescribe GCs for vocal performers compared with other patients. Additionally, most respondents stated that the potential for side effects only occasionally prevented GC utilization. CONCLUSIONS GC prescription practices vary greatly among otolaryngologists. Drug choice appears to be driven primarily by clinician preference and personal experience rather than by specific pharmacologic or physiologic rationale. These findings likely reflect the current lack of well-constructed studies in the laryngology literature to guide GC selection and administration for benign disorders of the larynx and highlight an important potential area for future studies.

The utility of the potassium titanyl phosphate laser in modulating vocal fold scar in a rat model

We hypothesize that the KTP laser has the potential to augment wound healing in a rat model, and this modality may serve as a therapeutic tool for the management of vocal fold fibrosis.

Endoscope‐assisted approach to excision of branchial cleft cysts

The purpose of this study is to describe an endoscope‐assisted surgical technique for the excision of branchial cleft cysts and compare it to the standard approach.