Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Benjamin Challacombe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Benjamin Challacombe.


International Journal of Surgery | 2017

The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery

Riaz A. Agha; Mimi R. Borrelli; Martinique Vella-Baldacchino; Rachel Thavayogan; Dennis P. Orgill; Duilio Pagano; Prathamesh. S. Pai; Somprakas Basu; Jim McCaul; Frederick H. Millham; Baskaran Vasudevan; Cláudio Rodrigues Leles; Richard David Rosin; Roberto Klappenbach; David Machado-Aranda; Benjamin Perakath; Andrew J. Beamish; Mangesh A. Thorat; M. Hammad Ather; Naheed Farooq; Daniel M. Laskin; Kandiah Raveendran; Joerg Albrecht; James Milburn; Diana Miguel; Indraneil Mukherjee; James Ngu; Boris Kirshtein; Nicholas Raison; Michael Jennings Boscoe

INTRODUCTION The development of reporting guidelines over the past 20 years represents a major advance in scholarly publishing with recent evidence showing positive impacts. Whilst over 350 reporting guidelines exist, there are few that are specific to surgery. Here we describe the development of the STROCSS guideline (Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery). METHODS AND ANALYSIS We published our protocol apriori. Current guidelines for case series (PROCESS), cohort studies (STROBE) and randomised controlled trials (CONSORT) were analysed to compile a list of items which were used as baseline material for developing a suitable checklist for surgical cohort guidelines. These were then put forward in a Delphi consensus exercise to an expert panel of 74 surgeons and academics via Google Forms. RESULTS The Delphi exercise was completed by 62% (46/74) of the participants. All the items were passed in a single round to create a STROCSS guideline consisting of 17 items. CONCLUSION We present the STROCSS guideline for surgical cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies consisting of a 17-item checklist. We hope its use will increase the transparency and reporting quality of such studies. This guideline is also suitable for cross-sectional and case control studies. We encourage authors, reviewers, journal editors and publishers to adopt these guidelines.


IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering | 2010

Rolling Mechanical Imaging for Tissue Abnormality Localization During Minimally Invasive Surgery

Hongbin Liu; David P. Noonan; Benjamin Challacombe; Prokar Dasgupta; Lakmal D. Seneviratne; Kaspar Althoefer

We describe a novel approach for the localization of tissue abnormalities during minimally invasive surgery using a force-sensitive wheeled probe. The concept is to fuse the kinaesthetic information from the wheel-tissue rolling interaction into a pseudocolor rolling mechanical image (RMI) to visualize the spatial variation of stiffness within the internal tissue structure. Since tissue abnormalities are often firmer than the surrounding organ or parenchyma, a surgeon then can localize abnormalities by analyzing the image. Initially, a testing facility for validating the concept in an ex vivo setting was developed and used to investigate rolling ¿wheel-tissue¿ interaction. A silicone soft-tissue phantom with embedded hard nodules was constructed to allow for experimental comparison between an RMI and a known soft-tissue structure. Tests have also been performed on excised porcine organs to show the efficacy of the method when applied to biological soft tissues. Results indicate that the RMI technique is particularly suited to identifying the stiffness distribution within a tissue sample, as the continuous force measurement along a given rolling trajectory provides repeatable information regarding relative variations in the normal tissue response. When compared to multiple discrete uniaxial indentations, the continuous measurement approach of RMI is shown to be more sensitive and facilitates coverage of a large area in a short period of time. Furthermore, if parametric classification of tissue properties based on a uniaxial tissue indentation model is desirable, the rolling indentation probe can be easily employed as a uniaxial indenter.


BJUI | 2012

Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review

Kamran Ahmed; Amel Ibrahim; Tim T. Wang; Nuzhath Khan; Benjamin Challacombe; Mohammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta

Study Type – Therapy (systematic review)


Urology | 2011

Analysis of Early Complications of Robotic-assisted Radical Cystectomy Using a Standardized Reporting System

Mohammad Shamim Khan; Oussama Elhage; Benjamin Challacombe; Peter Rimington; Declan Murphy; Prokar Dasgupta

OBJECTIVE To analyze the early complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) with extracorporeal ileal conduit or orthotopic (Studer) bladder reconstruction using the Clavien Classification, the management of these complications, and possible preventive measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS Detailed data on all patients undergoing RARC were recorded prospectively on an encrypted database, including intraoperative or postoperative complications within 90 days of surgery. Outcome data during follow-up of up to 4 years was also collected prospectively. RESULTS A total of 50 patients (M:F 44:6) underwent RARC and extracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion (n = 45) or orthotopic bladder reconstruction (n = 5) between 2004 and 2008. The overall perioperative complication rate was 17 of 50 (34%), including 3 (6%) Clavien I, 9 (18%) Clavien II, and 5 (10%) Clavien III. Final histology showed 9 (18%) patients had no residual disease pT0, 7 (14%) pTa, 11 (22%) pT1, 9 (18%) pT2, 11 (22%) pT3, and 3 (6%) pT4. CONCLUSION Radical cystectomy remains a complex and morbid procedure with significant complication rate regardless of surgical approach. Using the Clavien reporting system, we identified early complications in 34% of patients, of which five required a significant intervention. Use of this standardized reporting system has allowed us to stratify complications after RARC, allowing easy comparison to other techniques and targeting further reductions in the future.


European Urology | 2013

Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

Muhammad Shamim Khan; Oussama Elhage; Benjamin Challacombe; Declan Murphy; Bola Coker; Peter Rimington; Tim O'Brien; Prokar Dasgupta

BACKGROUND Long-term oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer (BCa) are lacking. OBJECTIVE To report oncologic and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients who have completed a minimum of 5 yr and a maximum of 8 yr of follow-up after RARC and extracorporeal urinary diversion. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this paper, we report on the experience from one of the first European urology centres to introduce RARC. Only patients between 2004 and 2006 were included to ensure follow-up of ≥ 5 yr. We report on an analysis of oncologic outcomes in 14 patients (11 males and 3 females) with muscle-invasive/high-grade non-muscle-invasive or bacillus Calmette-Guérin-refractory carcinoma in situ who opted to have RARC. INTERVENTION RARC with pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed using the three-arm standard da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, CA, USA). Urinary diversion, either ileal conduit (n=12) or orthotopic neobladder (n=2), was constructed extracorporeally. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Parameters were recorded in a prospectively maintained database including assessment of renal function, overall survival, disease-specific survival, development of metastases, and functional outcomes. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Results were analysed using descriptive statistical analysis. Survival data were analysed and presented using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Five of the 14 patients have died. Three patients died of metastatic disease, and two died of unrelated causes. Two other patients are alive with metastases, and another has developed primary lung cancer. Six patients are alive and disease-free. These results show overall survival of 64%, disease-specific survival of 75%, and disease-free survival of 50%. None of the patients had deterioration of renal function necessitating renal replacement therapy. Three of four previously potent patients having nerve-sparing RARC recovered erectile function. The study is limited by the relatively small number of highly selected patients undergoing RARC, which was a novel technique 8 yr ago. The standard da Vinci Surgical System made extended lymphadenectomy difficult. CONCLUSIONS Within limitations, in our experience RARC achieved excellent control of local disease, but the outcomes in patients with metastatic disease seem to be equivalent to the outcomes of open radical cystectomy.


International Journal of Clinical Practice | 2012

A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy

Mohammad Shamim Khan; Benjamin Challacombe; O. Elhage; Peter Rimington; B. Coker; Declan Murphy; Andrew P. Grieve; Prokar Dasgupta

Introduction:  The role of minimally invasive radical cystectomy as opposed to open surgery for bladder cancer is not yet established. We present comparative outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic‐assisted radical cystectomy


Nature Reviews Urology | 2013

Transperineal biopsy of the prostate—is this the future?

Dwayne T. S. Chang; Benjamin Challacombe; Nathan Lawrentschuk

Transperineal prostate biopsy is re-emerging after decades of being an underused alternative to transrectal biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Factors driving this change include possible improved cancer detection rates, improved sampling of the anteroapical regions of the prostate, a reduced risk of false negative results and a reduced risk of underestimating disease volume and grade. The increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance and patients with diabetes mellitus who are at high risk of sepsis also favours transperineal biopsy as a sterile alternative to standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Factors limiting its use include increased time, training and financial constraints as well as the need for high-grade anaesthesia. Furthermore, the necessary equipment for transperineal biopsy is not widely available. However, the expansion of transperineal biopsy has been propagated by the increase in multiparametric MRI-guided biopsies, which often use the transperineal approach. Used with MRI imaging, transperineal biopsy has led to improvements in cancer detection rates, more-accurate grading of cancer severity and reduced risk of diagnosing clinically insignificant disease. Targeted biopsy under MRI guidance can reduce the number of cores required, reducing the risk of complications from needle biopsy.


BJUI | 2014

Engaging responsibly with social media: the BJUI guidelines

Declan Murphy; Stacy Loeb; Marnique Basto; Benjamin Challacombe; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mike Leveridge; Todd M. Morgan; Prokar Dasgupta; Matthew Bultitude

*Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, †Epworth Prostate Centre, Epworth Healthcare Richmond, Melbourne, Australia, ‡New York University, New York, NY, ¶Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Womens Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, **Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, §Guys Hospital, Kings College London, London, UK, and °Department of Urology, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada


BJUI | 2013

Evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours (T1a)

Saied Froghi; Kamran Ahmed; Mohammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Benjamin Challacombe

To compare laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with robotic PN (RPN) using meta‐analytical techniques, since there has been a rise in the incidence of small renal masses (SRM; <4 cm) minimally invasive approaches are becoming more popular in dealing with such pathologies.


BJUI | 2015

Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts

Kamran Ahmed; Reenam S. Khan; Alexandre Mottrie; Catherine Lovegrove; Ronny Abaza; Rajesh Ahlawat; Thomas E. Ahlering; Göran Ahlgren; Walter Artibani; Eric Barret; Xavier Cathelineau; Benjamin Challacombe; Patrick Coloby; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Jacques Hubert; Maurice Stephan Michel; Francesco Montorsi; Declan Murphy; Joan Palou; Vipul R. Patel; Pierre-Thierry Piechaud; Hendrik Van Poppel; P. Rischmann; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; S. Siemer; Michael Stoeckle; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Jean-Etienne Terrier; Joachim W. Thueroff; Christophe Vaessen

To explore the views of experts about the development and validation of a robotic surgery training curriculum, and how this should be implemented.

Collaboration


Dive into the Benjamin Challacombe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Declan Murphy

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Declan Cahill

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge