Benjamin E. Reese

Separate Progenitors for Radial and Tangential Cell Dispersion during Development of the Cerebral Neocortex

Cell lineage analyses suggest that cortical neuroblasts are capable of undertaking both radial and tangential modes of cell movement. However, it is unclear whether distinct progenitors are committed to generating neuroblasts that disperse exclusively in either radial or tangential directions. Using highly unbalanced mouse stem cell chimeras, we have identified certain progenitors that are committed to one mode of cell dispersion only. Radially dispersed neurons expressed glutamate, the neurochemical signature of excitatory pyramidal cells. In contrast, tangential progenitors gave rise to widely scattered neurons that are predominantly GABAergic. These results suggest lineage-based mechanisms for early specification of certain progenitors to distinct dispersion pathways and neuronal phenotypes.

Clonal expansion and cell dispersion in the developing mouse retina.

The present study has used two different approaches for labelling progenitor cells at the optic vesicle stage in order to examine patterns of clonal expansion and cellular dispersion within the developing retina. X‐inactivation transgenic mice and chimeric mice expressing the lacZ reporter transgene were examined during development and in adulthood to study the radial and tangential dispersion of proliferating neuroepithelial cells and postmitotic retinal cells of known identities. Chimeric retinas were used to measure tangential dispersion distances, while transgenic retinas were used to assess the frequency of tangential dispersion for individual populations of retinal neurons. Tangential dispersion is shown to be a universal feature of particular retinal cell types, being contrasted with the strictly radial dispersion of other cells. Tangential dispersion is a relatively short‐distance phenomenon, with distinct dispersion distances characteristic for cone, horizontal, amacrine and ganglion cells. Embryonic and postnatal retinas show that tangential dispersion occurs at different times for these distinct cell types, associated with their times of differentiation rather than their neurogenetic periods. These developmental results rule out the possibility that tangential dispersion is due to a passive displacement produced by the proliferation of later‐born cells, or to the lateral dispersion of a dividing sibling; rather, they are consistent with the hypothesis that tangential dispersion plays a role in the establishment of the orderly spatial distribution of retinal mosaics.

The topography of rod and cone photoreceptors in the retina of the ground squirrel

The distributions of rod and cone photoreceptors have been determined in the retina of the California ground squirrel, Spermophilus beecheyi. Retinas were fixed by perfusion and the rods and cones were detected with indirect immunofluorescence using opsin antibodies. Local densities were determined at 2-mm intervals across the entire retina, from which total numbers of each receptor type were estimated and isodensity distributions were constructed. The ground squirrel retina contains 7.5 million cones and 1.27 million rods. The peak density for the cones (49,550/mm2) is found in a horizontal strip of central retina 2 mm ventral to the elongated optic nerve head, falling gradually to half this value in the dorsal and ventral retinal periphery. Of the cones, there are 14 M cones for every S cone. S cone density is relatively flat across most of the retina, reaching a peak (4500/mm2) at the temporal end of the visual streak. There is one exception to this, however: S cone density climbs dramatically at the extreme dorso-nasal retinal margin (20,000/mm2), where the local ratio of S to M cones equals 1. Rod density is lowest in the visual streak, where the rods comprise less than 5% of the local photoreceptor population, increasing conspicuously in the ventral retina, where the rods achieve 30% of the local photoreceptor population (13,000/mm2). The functional importance of the change in S to M cone ratio at the dorsal circumference of the retina is compromised by the extremely limited portion of the visual field subserved by this retinal region. The significance for vision, if any, remains to be determined. By contrast, the change in rod/cone ratio between the dorsal and ventral halves of the retina indicates a conspicuous asymmetry in the ground squirrels visual system, suggesting a specialization for maximizing visual sensitivity under dim levels of illumination in the superior visual field.

Lim1 Is Essential for the Correct Laminar Positioning of Retinal Horizontal Cells

Although much is known about the transcriptional regulation that coordinates retinal cell fate determination, very little is known about the developmental processes that establish the characteristic laminar architecture of the retina, in particular, the specification of neuronal positioning. The LIM class homeodomain transcription factor Lim1 (Lhx1) is expressed in postmitotic, differentiating, and mature retinal horizontal cells. We show that conditional ablation of Lim1 results in the ectopic localization of horizontal cells to inner aspects of the inner nuclear layer, among the retinal amacrine cells. The ectopic cells maintain a molecular phenotype consistent with horizontal cell identity; however, these neurons adopt a unique morphology more reminiscent of amacrine cells, including a dendritic arbor positioned within the inner plexiform layer. All other retinal cell populations appear unaltered. Our data suggest a model whereby Lim1 lies downstream of horizontal cell fate determination factors and functions cell autonomously to instruct differentiating horizontal cells to the appropriate laminar position in the developing retina. This study is the first to describe a cell type-specific genetic program that is essential for targeting a discrete retinal neuron population to the proper lamina.

Genetically engineered mice with an additional class of cone photoreceptors: Implications for the evolution of color vision

Among eutherian mammals, only primates possess trichromatic color vision. In Old World primates, trichromacy was made possible by a visual pigment gene duplication. In most New World primates, trichromacy is based on polymorphic variation in a single X-linked gene that produces, by random X inactivation, a patchy mosaic of spectrally distinct cone photoreceptors in heterozygous females. In the present work, we have modeled the latter strategy in a nonprimate by replacing the X-linked mouse green pigment gene with one encoding the human red pigment. In the mouse retina, the human red pigment seems to function normally, and heterozygous female mice express the human red and mouse green pigments at levels that vary between animals. Multielectrode array recordings from heterozygous female retinas reveal significant variation in the chromatic sensitivities of retinal ganglion cells. The data are consistent with a model in which these retinal ganglion cells draw their inputs indiscriminately from a coarse-grained mosaic of red and green cones. These observations support the ideas that (i) chromatic signals could arise from stochastic variation in inputs drawn nonselectively from red and green cones and (ii) tissue mosaicism due to X chromosome inactivation could be one mechanism for driving the evolution of CNS diversity.

Development of the retina and optic pathway.

Our understanding of the development of the retina and visual pathways has seen enormous advances during the past 25years. New imaging technologies, coupled with advances in molecular biology, have permitted a fuller appreciation of the histotypical events associated with proliferation, fate determination, migration, differentiation, pathway navigation, target innervation, synaptogenesis and cell death, and in many instances, in understanding the genetic, molecular, cellular and activity-dependent mechanisms underlying those developmental changes. The present review considers those advances associated with the lineal relationships between retinal nerve cells, the production of retinal nerve cell diversity, the migration, patterning and differentiation of different types of retinal nerve cells, the determinants of the decussation pattern at the optic chiasm, the formation of the retinotopic map, and the establishment of ocular domains within the thalamus.

Modelling the mosaic organization of rod and cone photoreceptors with a minimal-spacing rule

The mosaic of photoreceptors is regarded as a prime example of the precise control of cellular positioning in the vertebrate nervous system. This study was undertaken with the idea that understanding the intrinsic geometrical features of photoreceptor mosaics is a necessary step to unveil the biological mechanisms governing their formation. We show in the retina of the ground squirrel that the arrays of both the rods and S cones are non‐random, but that nothing more than a simple minimal‐spacing rule constraining receptor positioning is sufficient to account for the spatial organization of both mosaics. The size of this ‘exclusion zone’ is an intrinsic characteristic of each cell type, and it is simply the difference in the size of this domain that accounts for the regularity of the S cone array and the irregularity of the rod array at identical density. Consequently, regularity in receptor mosaics is produced by two independent biological events, one embodying the exclusion zone, and another specifying the local density of a given receptor type.

Afferents and Homotypic Neighbors Regulate Horizontal Cell Morphology, Connectivity, and Retinal Coverage

Horizontal cells are inhibitory interneurons with laterally oriented dendrites that overlap one another, contacting the pedicles of cone photoreceptors. Because of their regular spacing, the network of horizontal cells provides a uniform coverage of the retinal surface. The developmental processes establishing these network properties are undefined, but cell-intrinsic instructions and interactions with other cells have each been suggested to play a role. Here, we show that the intercellular spacing of horizontal cells is essentially independent of genetic background and is predicted by local density, suggesting that horizontal cell positioning is modulated by proximity to other horizontal cells. Dendritic field area compensates for this variation in intercellular spacing, maintaining constant dendritic coverage between strains. Functional dendritic overlap is achieved anatomically at the level of the pedicles, where horizontal cells interact with one another to establish their connectivity: the number of dendritic terminals contacting a pedicle changes, reciprocally, between neighboring horizontal cells during development based on their relative proximity to each pedicle. Cellular morphology is also shown to be regulated by the afferents themselves: afferent elimination before innervation does not alter dendritic field size nor stratification but compromises dendritic branching and prevents terminal formation. Afferent and homotypic interactions therefore generate the morphology, spacing, and connectivity of horizontal cells underlying their functional coverage of the retina.

Determinants of the exclusion zone in dopaminergic amacrine cell mosaics

A fundamental organizing feature of the retina is the presence of regularly spaced distributions of neurons, yet we have little knowledge of how this patterning emerges during development. Among these retinal mosaics, the spatial organization of the dopaminergic amacrine cells is unique: using nearest‐neighbor and Vornoi domain analysis, we found that the dopaminergic amacrine cells were neither randomly distributed, nor did they achieve the regularity documented for other retinal cell types. Autocorrelation analysis revealed the presence of an exclusion zone surrounding individual dopaminergic amacrine cells and modeling studies confirmed this organization, as the mosaic could be simulated by a minimal distance spacing rule defined by a broad set of parameters. Experimental studies determined the relative contributions of tangential dispersion, fate determination, and cell death in the establishment of this exclusion zone. Clonal boundary analysis and simulations of proximity‐driven movement discount tangential dispersion, while data from bcl‐2 overexpressing mice rule out feedback‐inhibitory fate‐deterministic accounts. Cell death, by contrast, appears to eliminate dopaminergic amacrine cells that are within close proximity, thereby establishing the exclusion zone surrounding individual cells and in turn creating their mosaic regularity. J. Comp. Neurol. 461:123–136, 2003.

Spatial patterning of cholinergic amacrine cells in the mouse retina

The two populations of cholinergic amacrine cells in the inner nuclear layer (INL) and the ganglion cell layer (GCL) differ in their spatial organization in the mouse retina, but the basis for this difference is not understood. The present investigation examined this issue in six strains of mice that differ in their number of cholinergic cells, addressing how the regularity, packing, and spacing of these cells varies as a function of strain, layer, and density. The number of cholinergic cells was lower in the GCL than in the INL in all six strains. The nearest neighbor and Voronoi domain regularity indexes as well as the packing factor were each consistently lower for the GCL. While these regularity indexes and the packing factor were largely stable across variation in density, the effective radius was inversely related to density for both the GCL and INL, being smaller and more variable in the GCL. Consequently, despite the lower densities in the GCL, neighboring cells were more likely to be positioned closer to one another than in the higher‐density INL, thereby reducing regularity and packing. This difference in the spatial organization of cholinergic cells may be due to the cells in the GCL having been passively displaced by fascicles of optic axons and an expanding retinal vasculature during development. In support of this interpretation, we show such displacement of cholinergic somata relative to their dendritic stalks and a decline in packing efficiency and regularity during postnatal development that is more severe for the GCL. J. Comp. Neurol. 508:1–12, 2008.