Benjamin J. Hindson

Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR

Nanoliter-sized droplet technology paired with digital PCR (ddPCR) holds promise for highly precise, absolute nucleic acid quantification. Our comparison of microRNA quantification by ddPCR and real-time PCR revealed greater precision (coefficients of variation decreased 37–86%) and improved day-to-day reproducibility (by a factor of seven) of ddPCR but with comparable sensitivity. When we applied ddPCR to serum microRNA biomarker analysis, this translated to superior diagnostic performance for identifying individuals with cancer.

Droplet Digital™ PCR quantitation of HER2 expression in FFPE breast cancer samples

UNLABELLEDnThe human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, also known as erbB2) gene is involved in signal transduction for cell growth and differentiation. It is a cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase and a proto-oncogene. Overexpression of HER2 is of clinical relevance in breast cancer due to its prognostic value correlating elevated expression with worsening clinical outcome. At the same time, HER2 assessment is also of importance because successful anti-tumor treatment with Herceptin® is strongly correlated with HER2 overexpression in the tumor (approximately 30% of all breast tumors overexpress HER2). In a comprehensive national study, Wolff et al. [1] state that Approximately 20% of current HER2 testing may be inaccurate which underscores the importance of developing more accurate methods to determine HER2 status. Droplet Digital™ PCR (ddPCR™) has the potential to improve upon HER2 measurements due to its ability to quantitate DNA and RNA targets with high precision and accuracy. Here we present a study which investigates whether ddPCR can be used to assess HER2 transcript levels in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) human breast tumors and whether these ddPCR measurements agree with prior assessments of these same samples by pathologists using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in some cases fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We also determined the copy number of HER2 in these samples as compared to the CEP17 reference gene.nnnRESULTSnClinical FFPE samples were successfully studied using ddPCR and compared to results from standard FISH and IHC methodology. The results demonstrate that ddPCR can rank order the samples in complete agreement with the current standard methods and that ddPCR has the added benefit of providing quantitative results, rather than relying on the expert skill of a seasoned pathologist for determination.

Droplet Digital PCR Measurement of HER2 Copy Number Alteration in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Breast Carcinoma Tissue

BACKGROUNDnHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing is routinely performed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses for all new cases of invasive breast carcinoma. IHC is easier to perform, but analysis can be subjective and variable. FISH offers better diagnostic accuracy and added confidence, particularly when it is used to supplement weak IHC signals, but it is more labor intensive and costly than IHC. We examined the performance of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as a more precise and less subjective alternative for quantifying HER2 DNA amplification.nnnMETHODSnThirty-nine cases of invasive breast carcinoma containing ≥30% tumor were classified as positive or negative for HER2 by IHC, FISH, or both. DNA templates for these cases were prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues to determine the HER2 copy number by ddPCR. ddPCR involved emulsifying hydrolysis probe-based PCR reaction mixtures containing the ERBB2 [v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2, neuro/glioblastoma derived oncogene homolog (avian); also known as HER2] gene and chromosome 17 centromere assays into nanoliter-sized droplets for thermal cycling and analysis.nnnRESULTSnddPCR distinguished, through differences in the level of HER2 amplification, the 10 HER2-positive samples from the 29 HER2-negative samples with 100% concordance to HER2 status obtained by FISH and IHC analysis. ddPCR results agreed with the FISH results for the 6 cases that were equivocal by IHC analyses, confirming 2 of these samples as positive for HER2 and the other 4 as negative.nnnCONCLUSIONSnddPCR can be used as a molecular-analysis tool to precisely measure copy number alterations in FFPE samples of heterogeneous breast tumor tissue.

Abstract 4859: Ultra-sensitive detection of rare mutants by droplet digital PCR with conventional TaqMan assays

Molecular tests for genetic mutations play an important role in the diagnosis of cancer. Somatic mutations that drive the pathological features of most tumors have increasing promise as biomarkers for cancer prognosis and therapeutic efficacy. The detection of somatic mutations poses an analytical challenge due to the heterogeneous nature of most samples, where a gene carrying a mutation may differ from the highly abundant wild type sequence by only a single nucleotide. Although a variety of methods exist for mutation analysis, many have poor selectivity and fail to detect mutant sequence below 1 in 100 wildtype sequences. Methods that provide better discrimination and quantitation of somatic mutations are desirable. Here we present a simple strategy using droplet digital™ PCR (ddPCR™) for the detection of somatic mutations with high selectivity and sensitivity. Based on the simple principle of sample partitioning into water-in-oil microdroplets, this ddPCR method increases the abundance of a mutant DNA sequence up to 20,000 times compared to an equivalent bulk PCR reaction. Using conventional TaqMan chemistries and workflow, selectivities of up to 1/100,000 can readily be achieved in any laboratory. Here we present results on the use of ddPCR for the detection and quantitation of several clinically important mutations, including KRAS, c-KIT D816V and JAK2 from clinical samples such as bone marrow aspirates and FFPE. Results from ddPCR are compared to those of conventional approaches including allele specific real-time PCR and sequencing. This ddPCR method may play an important role in the earlier detection of cancer, monitoring the progress of disease and response to therapeutics. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4859. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4859

Abstract 3399: Detection of rare mutations in plasma by droplet digital PCR

Detection and quantitation of specific mutations in circulating plasma holds promise for earlier and less invasive diagnosis of disease. This presents significant analytical challenges, particularly as the biomarker may differ from its highly abundant wildtype by only a single nucleotide. Conventional methods have poor selectivity and fail to detect mutant sequence below 1 in 100 wildtype sequences. Compounding this, the amount of circulating nucleic acid in plasma is low. Here we present a simple strategy using droplet digital™ PCR (ddPCR™) for the detection of somatic mutations with high selectivity and sensitivity. Based on the simple principle of sample partitioning into water-in-oil microdroplets, this ddPCR method increases the abundance of a mutant DNA sequence up to 20,000 times compared to an equivalent bulk PCR reaction. Using conventional TaqMan chemistries and workflow, selectivities of up to 1/100,000 can readily be achieved in any laboratory. We evaluated ddPCR for the detection and quantitation of several clinically important mutations in the EGFR and KRAS loci from clinical samples derived from normal and tumor plasma samples. We also demonstrate the feasibility of multiplexing of Kras and EGFR assays to improve sample processing efficiency. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3399. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3399