Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Benjamin N. Sulman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Benjamin N. Sulman.


Nature Climate Change | 2014

Microbe-driventurnoverosetsminer al-mediated storage of soil carbon under elevated CO 2

Benjamin N. Sulman; Richard P. Phillips; A. Christopher Oishi; Elena Shevliakova; Stephen W. Pacala

Much uncertainty in the response of soil organic carbon (SOC) to climate change relates to the relative effects of microbial priming and mineral protection. Now research indicates that although protected C provides an important constraint on microbial priming, it is not sufficient to prevent reduced SOC storage in most terrestrial areas.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2015

Explicitly representing soil microbial processes in Earth system models

William R. Wieder; Steven D. Allison; Eric A. Davidson; Katerina Georgiou; Oleksandra Hararuk; Yujie He; Francesca M. Hopkins; Yiqi Luo; Matthew J. Smith; Benjamin N. Sulman; Katherine E. O. Todd-Brown; Ying-Ping Wang; Jianyang Xia; Xiaofeng Xu

©2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. Microbes influence soil organic matter decomposition and the long-term stabilization of carbon (C) in soils. We contend that by revising the representation of microbial processes and their interactions with the physicochemical soil environment, Earth system models (ESMs) will make more realistic global C cycle projections. Explicit representation of microbial processes presents considerable challenges due to the scale at which these processes occur. Thus, applying microbial theory in ESMs requires a framework to link micro-scale process-level understanding and measurements to macro-scale models used to make decadal- to century-long projections. Here we review the diversity, advantages, and pitfalls of simulating soil biogeochemical cycles using microbial-explicit modeling approaches. We present a roadmap for how to begin building, applying, and evaluating reliable microbial-explicit model formulations that can be applied in ESMs. Drawing from experience with traditional decomposition models, we suggest the following: (1) guidelines for common model parameters and output that can facilitate future model intercomparisons; (2) development of benchmarking and model-data integration frameworks that can be used to effectively guide, inform, and evaluate model parameterizations with data from well-curated repositories; and (3) the application of scaling methods to integrate microbial-explicit soil biogeochemistry modules within ESMs. With contributions across scientific disciplines, we feel this roadmap can advance our fundamental understanding of soil biogeochemical dynamics and more realistically project likely soil C response to environmental change at global scales.


Journal of Ecology | 2018

Interactions among decaying leaf litter, root litter and soil organic matter vary with mycorrhizal type

Luke M. Jacobs; Benjamin N. Sulman; Edward R. Brzostek; John J. Feighery; Richard P. Phillips

Handling Editor: Karina Clemmensen Abstract 1. Root-derived inputs are increasingly viewed as primary controls of soil organic matter (SOM) formation; however, we have a limited understanding of how root decay rates depend on soil factors, and how decaying roots influence the breakdown of leaf litter and SOM. 2. We incubated root and leaf litter (alone and in combination) from arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) trees in soils collected from forest plots dominated by AM and ECM trees in a factorial design. In each microcosm, we quantified litter decay rates and the effects of decaying litters on soil C balance. We hypothesized that (1) AM root litters would decompose faster than ECM root litters, (2) root litter decay would be greatest when decomposed in “home” soils (e.g. AM litters in AM soils and ECM litters in ECM soils) and (3) root and leaf litters would decompose faster when decaying in the same microcosms than when decaying in separate microcosms, resulting in the largest CO2 losses. 3. Overall, AM root litter decomposed faster than ECM root litter, and the magnitude of this effect depended on soil origin. AM litters decayed fastest in AM soils, but ECM and mixed AM–ECM litters were unaffected by soil origin. Decaying roots increased leaf litter mass loss, but only in microcosms containing soils of the same origin (e.g. AM litters in AM soils; mixed litters in mixed soils). 4. Carbon losses were dominated by microbial respiration, and the magnitude of this flux depended on litter type and soil origin. When leaves and roots decayed together, respiratory losses exceeded those from microcosms containing leaves and roots alone, with the largest losses occurring in each litters’ “home” soil. In AM soils, elevated losses were driven by roots accelerating leaf decay, while in ECM soils, elevated losses resulted from roots and leaves accelerating the decay of SOM; in mixed soils, root-induced increases in leaf and SOM decay contributed to elevated C losses. 5. Synthesis. Our results suggest that root, leaf and SOM decay are intertwined, and that measurements of these processes in isolation may lead to incorrect estimates of the magnitude and source of C losses from soils.


Global Change Biology | 2018

Soil carbon cycling proxies: Understanding their critical role in predicting climate change feedbacks

Vanessa L. Bailey; Ben Bond-Lamberty; Kristen M. DeAngelis; A. Stuart Grandy; Christine V. Hawkes; Kate Heckman; Kate Lajtha; Richard P. Phillips; Benjamin N. Sulman; Katherine Todd-Brown; Matthew D. Wallenstein

The complexity of processes and interactions that drive soil C dynamics necessitate the use of proxy variables to represent soil characteristics that cannot be directly measured (correlative proxies), or that aggregate information about multiple soil characteristics into one variable (integrative proxies). These proxies have proven useful for understanding the soil C cycle, which is highly variable in both space and time, and are now being used to make predictions of the fate and persistence of C under future climate scenarios. However, the C pools and processes that proxies represent must be thoughtfully considered in order to minimize uncertainties in empirical understanding. This is necessary to capture the full value of a proxy in model parameters and in model outcomes. Here, we provide specific examples of proxy variables that could improve decision-making, and modeling skill, while also encouraging continued work on their mechanistic underpinnings. We explore the use of three common soil proxies used to study soil C cycling: metabolic quotient, clay content, and physical fractionation. We also consider how emerging data types, such as genome-sequence data, can serve as proxies for microbial community activities. By examining some broad assumptions in soil C cycling with the proxies already in use, we can develop new hypotheses and specify criteria for new and needed proxies.


Nature | 2018

Hydraulic diversity of forests regulates ecosystem resilience during drought

William R. L. Anderegg; Alexandra G. Konings; Anna T. Trugman; Kailiang Yu; David R. Bowling; Robert Gabbitas; Daniel S. Karp; Stephen W. Pacala; John S. Sperry; Benjamin N. Sulman; Nicole Zenes

Plants influence the atmosphere through fluxes of carbon, water and energy1, and can intensify drought through land–atmosphere feedback effects2–4. The diversity of plant functional traits in forests, especially physiological traits related to water (hydraulic) transport, may have a critical role in land–atmosphere feedback, particularly during drought. Here we combine 352 site-years of eddy covariance measurements from 40 forest sites, remote-sensing observations of plant water content and plant functional-trait data to test whether the diversity in plant traits affects the response of the ecosystem to drought. We find evidence that higher hydraulic diversity buffers variation in ecosystem flux during dry periods across temperate and boreal forests. Hydraulic traits were the predominant significant predictors of cross-site patterns in drought response. By contrast, standard leaf and wood traits, such as specific leaf area and wood density, had little explanatory power. Our results demonstrate that diversity in the hydraulic traits of trees mediates ecosystem resilience to drought and is likely to have an important role in future ecosystem–atmosphere feedback effects in a changing climate.The diversity in the hydraulic traits of trees mediates ecosystem resilience to drought and will probably have an important role in future ecosystem–atmosphere feedback effects.


Biogeochemistry | 2018

Multiple models and experiments underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics

Benjamin N. Sulman; Jessica A. M. Moore; Rose Z. Abramoff; Colin Averill; Stephanie N. Kivlin; Katerina Georgiou; Bhavya Sridhar; Melannie D. Hartman; Gangsheng Wang; William R. Wieder; Mark A. Bradford; Yiqi Luo; Melanie A. Mayes; Eric W. Morrison; William J. Riley; Alejandro Salazar; Joshua P. Schimel; Jinyun Tang; Aimée T. Classen

Soils contain more carbon than plants or the atmosphere, and sensitivities of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks to changing climate and plant productivity are a major uncertainty in global carbon cycle projections. Despite a consensus that microbial degradation and mineral stabilization processes control SOC cycling, no systematic synthesis of long-term warming and litter addition experiments has been used to test process-based microbe-mineral SOC models. We explored SOC responses to warming and increased carbon inputs using a synthesis of 147 field manipulation experiments and five SOC models with different representations of microbial and mineral processes. Model projections diverged but encompassed a similar range of variability as the experimental results. Experimental measurements were insufficient to eliminate or validate individual model outcomes. While all models projected that CO2 efflux would increase and SOC stocks would decline under warming, nearly one-third of experiments observed decreases in CO2 flux and nearly half of experiments observed increases in SOC stocks under warming. Long-term measurements of C inputs to soil and their changes under warming are needed to reconcile modeled and observed patterns. Measurements separating the responses of mineral-protected and unprotected SOC fractions in manipulation experiments are needed to address key uncertainties in microbial degradation and mineral stabilization mechanisms. Integrating models with experimental design will allow targeting of these uncertainties and help to reconcile divergence among models to produce more confident projections of SOC responses to global changes.


Biogeosciences | 2009

Contrasting carbon dioxide fluxes between a drying shrub wetland in Northern Wisconsin, USA, and nearby forests

Benjamin N. Sulman; Ankur R. Desai; Bruce D. Cook; N. Saliendra; D. S. Mackay


Geophysical Research Letters | 2010

CO2 fluxes at northern fens and bogs have opposite responses to inter‐annual fluctuations in water table

Benjamin N. Sulman; Ankur R. Desai; Nicanor Z. Saliendra; Peter M. Lafleur; Lawrence B. Flanagan; Oliver Sonnentag; D. Scott Mackay; Alan G. Barr; Garth van der Kamp


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012

Impact of hydrological variations on modeling of peatland CO2 fluxes: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

Benjamin N. Sulman; Ankur R. Desai; Nicole M. Schroeder; Daniel M. Ricciuto; Alan Barr; Andrew D. Richardson; Lawrence B. Flanagan; Peter M. Lafleur; Hanqin Tian; Guangsheng Chen; Robert F. Grant; Benjamin Poulter; Hans Verbeeck; Philippe Ciais; Bruno Ringeval; Ian T. Baker; Kevin Schaefer; Yiqi Luo; Ensheng Weng


Biogeosciences | 2012

Modelling contrasting responses of wetland productivity to changes in water table depth

R. F. Grant; Ankur R. Desai; Benjamin N. Sulman

Collaboration


Dive into the Benjamin N. Sulman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ankur R. Desai

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard P. Phillips

Indiana University Bloomington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kimberly A. Novick

Indiana University Bloomington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce D. Cook

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. S. Mackay

State University of New York System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge