Benjamin Pariente

Development of the Crohn's disease digestive damage score, the Lemann score.

Crohns disease (CD) is a chronic progressive destructive disease. Currently available instruments measure disease activity at a specific point in time. An instrument to measure cumulative structural damage to the bowel, which may predict long-term disability, is needed. The aim of this article is to outline the methods to develop an instrument that can measure cumulative bowel damage. The project is being conducted by the International Program to develop New Indexes in Crohns disease (IPNIC) group. This instrument, called the Crohns Disease Digestive Damage Score (the Lémann score), should take into account damage location, severity, extent, progression, and reversibility, as measured by diagnostic imaging modalities and the history of surgical resection. It should not be “diagnostic modality driven”: for each lesion and location, a modality appropriate for the anatomic site (for example: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging enterography, and colonoscopy) will be used. A total of 24 centers from 15 countries will be involved in a cross-sectional study, which will include up to 240 patients with stratification according to disease location and duration. At least 120 additional patients will be included in the study to validate the score. The Lémann score is expected to be able to portray a patients disease course on a double-axis graph, with time as the x-axis, bowel damage severity as the y-axis, and the slope of the line connecting data points as a measure of disease progression. This instrument could be used to assess the effect of various medical therapies on the progression of bowel damage. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011)

Development of the Lémann Index to Assess Digestive Tract Damage in Patients With Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS There is a need for a scoring system that provides a comprehensive assessment of structural bowel damage, including stricturing lesions, penetrating lesions, and surgical resection, for measuring disease progression. We developed the Lémann Index and assessed its ability to measure cumulative structural bowel damage in patients with Crohns disease (CD). METHODS We performed a prospective, multicenter, international, cross-sectional study of patients with CD evaluated at 24 centers in 15 countries. Inclusions were stratified based on CD location and duration. All patients underwent clinical examination and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging analyses. Upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging analyses were performed according to suspected disease locations. The digestive tract was divided into 4 organs and subsequently into segments. For each segment, investigators collected information on previous operations, predefined strictures, and/or penetrating lesions of maximal severity (grades 1-3), and then provided damage evaluations ranging from 0.0 (no lesion) to 10.0 (complete resection). Overall level of organ damage was calculated from the average of segmental damage. Investigators provided a global damage evaluation (from 0.0 to 10.0) using calculated organ damage evaluations. Predicted organ indexes and Lémann Index were constructed using a multiple linear mixed model, showing the best fit with investigator organ and global damage evaluations, respectively. An internal cross-validation was performed using bootstrap methods. RESULTS Data from 138 patients (24, 115, 92, and 59 with upper tract, small bowel, colon/rectum, and anus CD location, respectively) were analyzed. According to validation, the unbiased correlation coefficients between predicted indexes and investigator damage evaluations were 0.85, 0.98, 0.90, 0.82 for upper tract, small bowel, colon/rectum, anus, respectively, and 0.84 overall. CONCLUSIONS In a cross-sectional study, we assessed the ability of the Lémann Index to measure cumulative structural bowel damage in patients with CD. Provided further successful validation and good sensitivity to change, the index should be used to evaluate progression of CD and efficacy of treatment.

Trough levels and antibodies to infliximab may not predict response to intensification of infliximab therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: Infliximab is effective for the treatment of refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nevertheless, up to 40% of patients lose response to infliximab over time. The aim was to assess the clinical value of measuring infliximab trough levels and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) concentrations in IBD patients who lost response to infliximab therapy. Methods: We retrospectively studied records of IBD patients who lost response to infliximab therapy. We first assessed clinical responses of different therapeutic strategies that were applied when patients lost response to infliximab and then we looked at the correlation between clinical response and infliximab trough levels and ATI concentrations. Results: Seventy‐six IBD patients were included. 31/76 patients (41%) continued infliximab therapy without any modification, 39 patients (51%) had an intensification of infliximab therapy, five patients (7%) had switched to adalimumab therapy, and one patient (1%) underwent surgery. Clinical response was observed in 27 patients (69%) with an intensification of infliximab therapy. There was no significant difference in mean infliximab trough level at inclusion in patients who responded to intensification of infliximab therapy (3.3 ± 4.1 &mgr;g/mL) as compared with patients who did not respond (2.3 ± 2.2 &mgr;g/mL, P = 0.85). In all, 16/76 patients (22.4%) presented detectable ATI in the serum. Ten ATI‐positive patients had an intensification of infliximab therapy and six (60%) demonstrated a clinical response. After intensification of infliximab therapy the ATI concentration decreased in five patients. Conclusions: In patients with IBD who lose response to infliximab, clinical improvement may occur upon intensification of infliximab therapy, irrespective of infliximab serum concentration or presence of ATI. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;)

Review article: why, when and how to de‐escalate therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases

Therapeutic objectives are currently evolving in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) from control of symptoms towards improvement of long‐term disease outcomes. In patients achieving remission, safety concerns – infections or neoplasia – and economic issues are prompting de‐escalation strategies.

Gastroenterology review and perspective: the role of cross-sectional imaging in evaluating bowel damage in Crohn disease.

OBJECTIVE This article will review the performance and limitations of cross-sectional imaging methods to detect and display critical features of Crohn disease (CD)-related bowel damage, including stenosis and penetrating complications (i.e., fistula, abscess). International efforts to incorporate cross-sectional imaging findings along with endoscopic and surgical findings to create a global bowel damage score over the length of the gastrointestinal tract are summarized along with the rationale for these efforts. CONCLUSION The first digestive damage score, the Lémann score, will incorporate surgical history, endoscopic findings, and imaging findings of stenosis and penetrating complications to provide a global assessment of CD-related destruction of the gastrointestinal tract. It is anticipated that the score will permit better understanding of the impact of modern therapeutics on the natural history of CD. Because CT is a technique that involves ionizing radiation and accuracy of ultrasound is highly related to CD location, MRI is proposed as first choice for nonemergent follow-up of CD patients.

One-year effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective multicentre cohort study

We recently showed that vedolizumab is effective in patients with Crohns disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior anti‐TNF failure in a multicentre compassionate early‐access programme before marketing authorisation was granted to vedolizumab.

Incidence and Phenotype at Diagnosis of Very-early-onset Compared with Later-onset Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Population-based Study [1988-2011].

Background and Aims Very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease [VEO-IBD] is a form of IBD that is distinct from that of children with an older onset. We compared changes over time in the incidence and phenotype at diagnosis between two groups according to age at IBD diagnosis: VEO-IBD diagnosed before the age of 6 years, and early-onset IBD [EO-IBD] diagnosed between 6 and 16 years of age. Methods Data were obtained from a cohort enrolled in a prospective French population-based registry from 1988 to 2011. Results Among the 1412 paediatric cases [< 17 years], 42 [3%] were VEO-IBD. In the VEO-IBD group, the incidence remained stable over the study period. In contrast, the incidence of EO-IBD increased from 4.4/105 in 1988-1990 to 9.5/105 in 2009-2011 [+116%; p < 10-4]. Crohns disease [CD] was the most common IBD, regardless of age, but ulcerative colitis [UC] and unclassified IBD were more common in VEO-IBD cases [40% vs 26%; p = 0.04]. VEO-IBD diagnosis was most often performed in hospital [69% vs 43%; p < 10-3]. Rectal bleeding and mucous stools were more common in patients with VEO-IBD, whereas weight loss and abdominal pain were more frequent in those with EO-IBD. Regarding CD, isolated colonic disease was more common in the VEO-IBD group [39% vs 14%; p = 0.003]. Conclusions In this large population-based cohort, the incidence of VEO-IBD was low and stable from 1988 to 2011, with a specific clinical presentation. These results suggest a probable genetic origin for VEO-IBD, whereas the increase in EO-IBD might be linked to environmental factors.

Lymphoid Aggregates Remodel Lymphatic Collecting Vessels that Serve Mesenteric Lymph Nodes in Crohn Disease

Early pathological descriptions of Crohn disease (CD) argued for a potential defect in lymph transport; however, this concept has not been thoroughly investigated. In mice, poor healing in response to infection-induced tissue damage can cause hyperpermeable lymphatic collecting vessels in mesenteric adipose tissue that impair antigen and immune cell access to mesenteric lymph nodes (LNs), which normally sustain appropriate immunity. To investigate whether analogous changes might occur in human intestinal disease, we established a three-dimensional imaging approach to characterize the lymphatic vasculature in mesenteric tissue from controls or patients with CD. In CD specimens, B-cell-rich aggregates resembling tertiary lymphoid organs (TLOs) impinged on lymphatic collecting vessels that enter and exit LNs. In areas of creeping fat, which characterizes inflammation-affected areas of the bowel in CD, we observed B cells and apparent innate lymphoid cells that had invaded the lymphatic vessel wall, suggesting these cells may be mediators of lymphatic remodeling. Although TLOs have been described in many chronic inflammatory states, their anatomical relationship to preestablished LNs has never been revealed. Our data indicate that, at least in the CD-affected mesentery, TLOs are positioned along collecting lymphatic vessels in a manner expected to affect delivery of lymph to LNs.

Postoperative Complications after Ileocecal Resection in Crohn’s Disease: A Prospective Study From the REMIND Group

Objectives:We sought to determine the frequency of and risk factors for early (30-day) postoperative complications after ileocecal resection in a well-characterized, prospective cohort of Crohn’s disease patients.Methods:The REMIND group performed a nationwide study in 9 French university medical centers. Clinical-, biological-, surgical-, and treatment-related data on the 3 months before surgery were collected prospectively. Patients operated on between 1 September 2010 and 30 August 2014 were included.Results:A total of 209 patients were included. The indication for ileocecal resection was stricturing disease in 109 (52%) cases, penetrating complications in 88 (42%), and medication-refractory inflammatory disease in 12 (6%). A two-stage procedure was performed in 33 (16%) patients. There were no postoperative deaths. Forty-three (21%) patients (23% of the patients with a one-stage procedure vs. 9% of those with a two-stage procedure, P=0.28) experienced a total of 54 early postoperative complications after a median time interval of 5 days (interquartile range, 4–12): intra-abdominal septic complications (n=38), extra-intestinal infections (n=10), and hemorrhage (n=6). Eighteen complications (33%) were severe (Dindo–Clavien III–IV). Reoperation was necessary in 14 (7%) patients, and secondary stomy was performed in 8 (4.5%). In a multivariate analysis, corticosteroid treatment in the 4 weeks before surgery was significantly associated with an elevated postoperative complication rate (odds ratio (95% confidence interval)=2.69 (1.15–6.29); P=0.022). Neither preoperative exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (n=93, 44%) nor trough serum anti-TNF levels were significant risk factors for postoperative complications.Conclusions:In this large, nationwide, prospective cohort, postoperative complications were observed after 21% of the ileocecal resections. Corticosteroid treatment in the 4 weeks before surgery was significantly associated with an elevated postoperative complication rate. In contrast, preoperative anti-TNF therapy (regardless of the serum level or the time interval between last administration and surgery) was not associated with an elevated risk of postoperative complications.

Long-term Outcomes of Thalidomide Therapy for Adults With Refractory Crohn’s Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS Little is known about the efficacy and safety of thalidomide therapy for patients with refractory Crohns disease (CD), particularly in respect to long-term outcomes of patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study to evaluate thalidomide efficacy and the probability of its withdrawal because of either toxicity or lack/loss of efficacy. We analyzed data from 77 patients with active intestinal and/or perineal CD, refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapies, treated with thalidomide at 5 tertiary referral inflammatory bowel disease centers in France. We also analyzed the long-term efficacy of thalidomide. RESULTS Fifty-four percent of the patients were in clinical remission after thalidomide treatment within the first year. The proportions of patients from whom thalidomide was withdrawn because of lack/loss of efficacy and/or toxicity were 35% at 3 months of treatment, 69% at 12 months, and 88% at 24 months. The proportions of patients from whom thalidomide was withdrawn because of toxicity alone were 22% at 3 months, 34% at 12 months, and 46% at 24 months. Overall, neuropathy occurred in 30 patients and was the main reason for thalidomide withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of a retrospective multicenter observational study, thalidomide therapy is effective in most patients with refractory active intestinal and/or perineal CD. However, its toxicity limits its use as a maintenance therapy.