Benjamin Vitre
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Benjamin Vitre.
Nature Cell Biology | 2008
Benjamin Vitre; Frédéric Coquelle; Claire Heichette; Cyrille Garnier; Denis Chrétien; Isabelle Arnal
End binding 1 (EB1) is a plus-end-tracking protein (+TIP) that localizes to microtubule plus ends where it modulates their dynamics and interactions with intracellular organelles. Although the regulating activity of EB1 on microtubule dynamics has been studied in cells and purified systems, the molecular mechanisms involved in its specific activity are still unclear. Here, we describe how EB1 regulates the dynamics and structure of microtubules assembled from pure tubulin. We found that EB1 stimulates spontaneous nucleation and growth of microtubules, and promotes both catastrophes (transitions from growth to shrinkage) and rescues (reverse events). Electron cryomicroscopy showed that EB1 induces the initial formation of tubulin sheets, which rapidly close into the common 13-protofilament-microtubule architecture. Our results suggest that EB1 favours the lateral association of free tubulin at microtubule-sheet edges, thereby stimulating nucleation, sheet growth and closure. The reduction of sheet length at microtubule growing-ends together with the elimination of stressed microtubule lattices may account for catastrophes. Conversely, occasional binding of EB1 to the microtubule lattice may induce rescues.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013
Alain D. Silk; Lauren M. Zasadil; Andrew J. Holland; Benjamin Vitre; Don W. Cleveland; Beth A. Weaver
Significance Aneuploidy, an abnormal chromosome content that commonly occurs because of errors in chromosome segregation, can promote or suppress tumor formation. What determines how aneuploidy influences tumorigenesis has remained unclear. Here we show that the rate of chromosome missegregation, rather than the level of accumulated aneuploidy, determines the effect on tumors. Increasing the rate of chromosome missegregation beyond a certain threshold suppresses tumors by causing cell death. Increasing errors of chromosome segregation did not affect tumor formation caused by genetic mutations that do not themselves alter chromosome inheritance. These results suggest that accelerating chromosome missegregation in chromosomally unstable tumors may be a useful strategy therapeutically. Aneuploidy, a chromosome content other than a multiple of the haploid number, is a common feature of cancer cells. Whole chromosomal aneuploidy accompanying ongoing chromosomal instability in mice resulting from reduced levels of the centromere-linked motor protein CENP-E has been reported to increase the incidence of spleen and lung tumors, but to suppress tumors in three other contexts. Exacerbating chromosome missegregation in CENP-E+/− mice by reducing levels of another mitotic checkpoint component, Mad2, is now shown to result in elevated cell death and decreased tumor formation compared with reduction of either protein alone. Furthermore, we determine that the additional contexts in which increased whole-chromosome missegregation resulting from reduced CENP-E suppresses tumor formation have a preexisting, elevated basal level of chromosome missegregation that is exacerbated by reduction of CENP-E. Tumors arising from primary causes that do not generate chromosomal instability, including loss of the INK4a tumor suppressor and microsatellite instability from reduction of the DNA mismatch repair protein MLH1, are unaffected by CENP-E–dependent chromosome missegregation. These findings support a model in which low rates of chromosome missegregation can promote tumorigenesis, whereas missegregation of high numbers of chromosomes leads to cell death and tumor suppression.
Current Opinion in Cell Biology | 2012
Benjamin Vitre; Don W. Cleveland
Each time a cell divides its chromosome content must be equally segregated into the two daughter cells. This critical process is mediated by a complex microtubule based apparatus, the mitotic spindle. In most animal cells the centrosomes contribute to the formation and the proper function of the mitotic spindle by anchoring and nucleating microtubules and by establishing its functional bipolar organization. Aberrant expression of proteins involved in centrosome biogenesis can drive centrosome dysfunction or abnormal centrosome number, leading ultimately to improper mitotic spindle formation and chromosome missegregation. Here we review recent work focusing on the importance of the centrosome for mitotic spindle formation and the relation between the centrosome status and the mechanisms controlling faithful chromosome inheritance.
Nature Cell Biology | 2013
Nikita Gudimchuk; Benjamin Vitre; Yumi Kim; Anatoly Kiyatkin; Don W. Cleveland; Fazly I. Ataullakhanov; Ekaterina L. Grishchuk
During vertebrate mitosis, the centromere-associated kinesin CENP-E (centromere protein E) transports misaligned chromosomes to the plus ends of spindle microtubules. Subsequently, the kinetochores that form at the centromeres establish stable associations with microtubule ends, which assemble and disassemble dynamically. Here we provide evidence that after chromosomes have congressed and bi-oriented, the CENP-E motor continues to play an active role at kinetochores, enhancing their links with dynamic microtubule ends. Using a combination of single-molecule approaches and laser trapping in vitro, we demonstrate that once reaching microtubule ends, CENP-E converts from a lateral transporter into a microtubule tip-tracker that maintains association with both assembling and disassembling microtubule tips. Computational modelling of this behaviour supports our proposal that CENP-E tip-tracks bi-directionally through a tethered motor mechanism, which relies on both the motor and tail domains of CENP-E. Our results provide a molecular framework for the contribution of CENP-E to the stability of attachments between kinetochores and dynamic microtubule ends.
Developmental Cell | 2017
Michelle S. Levine; Bjorn Bakker; Bram Boeckx; Julia Moyett; James Lu; Benjamin Vitre; Diana C. J. Spierings; Peter M. Lansdorp; Don W. Cleveland; Diether Lambrechts; Floris Foijer; Andrew J. Holland
Centrosome amplification is a common feature of human tumors, but whether this is a cause or a consequence of cancer remains unclear. Here, we test the consequence of centrosome amplification by creating mice in which centrosome number can be chronically increased in the absence of additional genetic defects. We show that increasing centrosome number elevated tumor initiation in a mouse model of intestinal neoplasia. Most importantly, we demonstrate that supernumerary centrosomes are sufficient to drive aneuploidy and the development of spontaneous tumors in multiple tissues. Tumors arising from centrosome amplification exhibit frequent mitotic errors and possess complex karyotypes, recapitulating a common feature of human cancer. Together, our data support a direct causal relationship among centrosome amplification, genomic instability, and tumor development.
Human Genetics | 2014
Ghayda M. Mirzaa; Benjamin Vitre; Gillian Carpenter; Iga Abramowicz; Joseph G. Gleeson; Alex R. Paciorkowski; Don W. Cleveland; William B. Dobyns; Mark O'Driscoll
Defects in centrosome, centrosomal-associated and spindle-associated proteins are the most frequent cause of primary microcephaly (PM) and microcephalic primordial dwarfism (MPD) syndromes in humans. Mitotic progression and segregation defects, microtubule spindle abnormalities and impaired DNA damage-induced G2-M cell cycle checkpoint proficiency have been documented in cell lines from these patients. This suggests that impaired mitotic entry, progression and exit strongly contribute to PM and MPD. Considering the vast protein networks involved in coordinating this cell cycle stage, the list of potential target genes that could underlie novel developmental disorders is large. One such complex network, with a direct microtubule-mediated physical connection to the centrosome, is the kinetochore. This centromeric-associated structure nucleates microtubule attachments onto mitotic chromosomes. Here, we described novel compound heterozygous variants in CENPE in two siblings who exhibit a profound MPD associated with developmental delay, simplified gyri and other isolated abnormalities. CENPE encodes centromere-associated protein E (CENP-E), a core kinetochore component functioning to mediate chromosome congression initially of misaligned chromosomes and in subsequent spindle microtubule capture during mitosis. Firstly, we present a comprehensive clinical description of these patients. Then, using patient cells we document abnormalities in spindle microtubule organization, mitotic progression and segregation, before modeling the cellular pathogenicity of these variants in an independent cell system. Our cellular analysis shows that a pathogenic defect in CENP-E, a kinetochore-core protein, largely phenocopies PCNT-mutated microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism-type II patient cells. PCNT encodes a centrosome-associated protein. These results highlight a common underlying pathomechanism. Our findings provide the first evidence for a kinetochore-based route to MPD in humans.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015
Benjamin Vitre; Andrew J. Holland; Anita Kulukian; Ofer Shoshani; Maretoshi Hirai; Yin Wang; Marcus Maldonado; Thomas Cho; Jihane Boubaker; Deborah A. Swing; Lino Tessarollo; Sylvia M. Evans; Elaine Fuchs; Don W. Cleveland
Significance Centrosomes organize the microtubule cytoskeleton in interphase and mitosis. During mitosis, the centrosomes are important for the formation and positioning of the bipolar mitotic spindle on which chromosomes are segregated. The presence of more than two centrosomes can drive mitotic chromosome segregation errors and the formation of aneuploid cells. Centrosome amplification is a common feature of aneuploid cancer cells, but a long-standing question is whether this is a cause or a consequence of tumor development. To assess this question, we generated mice in which centrosome amplification can be induced widely. Despite chronic centrosome amplification, tumorigenesis was not enhanced, demonstrating that an excess of centrosomes is not sufficient to drive tumor development. Centrosomes are microtubule-organizing centers that facilitate bipolar mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. Recognizing that centrosome amplification is a common feature of aneuploid cancer cells, we tested whether supernumerary centrosomes are sufficient to drive tumor development. To do this, we constructed and analyzed mice in which centrosome amplification can be induced by a Cre-recombinase–mediated increase in expression of Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4). Elevated Plk4 in mouse fibroblasts produced supernumerary centrosomes and enhanced the expected mitotic errors, but proliferation continued only after inactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor. Increasing Plk4 levels in mice with functional p53 produced centrosome amplification in liver and skin, but this did not promote spontaneous tumor development in these tissues or enhance the growth of chemically induced skin tumors. In the absence of p53, Plk4 overexpression generated widespread centrosome amplification, but did not drive additional tumors or affect development of the fatal thymic lymphomas that arise in animals lacking p53. We conclude that, independent of p53 status, supernumerary centrosomes are not sufficient to drive tumor formation.
Molecular Biology of the Cell | 2012
Andrew J. Holland; Daniele Fachinetti; Sandrine Da Cruz; Quan Zhu; Benjamin Vitre; Mariana Lince-Faria; Denaly Chen; Nicole Parish; Inder M. Verma; Mónica Bettencourt-Dias; Don W. Cleveland
Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4) plays an essential role in centriole duplication, but recent work led to the conclusion that Plk4 also directly regulates cytokinesis. The consequence of reduced Plk4 levels in human and mouse cells is studied. It is shown that Plk4 controls centriole duplication but does not directly regulate cytokinesis.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015
Anita Kulukian; Andrew J. Holland; Benjamin Vitre; Shruti Naik; Don W. Cleveland; Elaine Fuchs
Significance The full extent to which centrosome amplification might directly contribute to human disease is poorly understood. We generated a mouse model for the induction of centrosome amplification in the skin, a tissue that remains proliferative even after its development. We uncover defects in stratification of the epidermis during development, which can be attributed to mitotic errors. The skin exhibits remarkable resiliency by clearing out these defective cells via a cell death program, however. Despite sustained centrosome amplification, adult animals are healthy and do not develop tumors or skin abnormalities. Our findings challenge the role for centrosome amplification in the initiation of skin tumorigenesis and demonstrate that certain tissues are better able to cope with its burden. As nucleators of the mitotic spindle and primary cilium, centrosomes play crucial roles in equal segregation of DNA content to daughter cells, coordination of growth and differentiation, and transduction of homeostatic cues. Whereas the majority of mammalian cells carry no more than two centrosomes per cell, exceptions to this rule apply in certain specialized tissues and in select disease states, including cancer. Centrosome amplification, or the condition of having more than two centrosomes per cell, has been suggested to contribute to instability of chromosomes, imbalance in asymmetric divisions, and reorganization of tissue architecture; however, the degree to which these conditions are a direct cause of or simply a consequence of human disease is poorly understood. Here we addressed this issue by generating a mouse model inducing centrosome amplification in a naturally proliferative epithelial tissue by elevating Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4) expression in the skin epidermis. By altering centrosome numbers, we observed multiciliated cells, spindle orientation errors, and chromosome segregation defects within developing epidermis. None of these defects was sufficient to impart a proliferative advantage within the tissue, however. Rather, impaired mitoses led to p53-mediated cell death and contributed to defective growth and stratification. Despite these abnormalities, mice remained viable and healthy, although epidermal cells with centrosome amplification were still appreciable. Moreover, these abnormalities were insufficient to disrupt homeostasis and initiate or enhance tumorigenesis, underscoring the powerful surveillance mechanisms in the skin.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Joo Seok Han; Benjamin Vitre; Daniele Fachinetti; Don W. Cleveland
Significance The mitotic checkpoint (or the spindle assembly checkpoint) ensures genome integrity by preventing premature chromosome segregation. The pathway is triggered locally by kinetochores, multiprotein complexes assembled onto centromeres. Unattached kinetochores produce Mad2 bound to Cdc20, the mitotic activator of the E3 ubiquitin ligase APC/C. The initial Mad2–Cdc20 complex is then converted into the final mitotic checkpoint inhibitor Bub3–BubR1–Cdc20 that blocks APC/C (anaphase promoting complex or cyclosome)-dependent ubiquitination of cyclin B and securin, thereby stabilizing them and preventing an advance to anaphase. In this study, we identify dual mechanisms by which Bub3 promotes mitotic checkpoint signaling. Bub3 binding to BubR1 promotes two distinct BubR1–Cdc20 interactions, one acting at unattached kinetochores and the other cytoplasmically to facilitate production of the mitotic checkpoint inhibitor. The mitotic checkpoint (also known as the spindle assembly checkpoint) prevents premature anaphase onset through generation of an inhibitor of the E3 ubiquitin ligase APC/C, whose ubiquitination of cyclin B and securin targets them for degradation. Combining in vitro reconstitution and cell-based assays, we now identify dual mechanisms through which Bub3 promotes mitotic checkpoint signaling. Bub3 enhances signaling at unattached kinetochores not only by facilitating binding of BubR1 but also by enhancing Cdc20 recruitment to kinetochores mediated by BubR1’s internal Cdc20 binding site. Downstream of kinetochore-produced complexes, Bub3 promotes binding of BubR1’s conserved, amino terminal Cdc20 binding domain to a site in Cdc20 that becomes exposed by initial Mad2 binding. This latter Bub3-stimulated event generates the final mitotic checkpoint complex of Bub3–BubR1–Cdc20 that selectively inhibits ubiquitination of securin and cyclin B by APC/CCdc20. Thus, Bub3 promotes two distinct BubR1-Cdc20 interactions, involving each of the two Cdc20 binding sites of BubR1 and acting at unattached kinetochores or cytoplasmically, respectively, to facilitate production of the mitotic checkpoint inhibitor.