Benny Dua

OX40L blockade and allergen‐induced airway responses in subjects with mild asthma

The OX40/OX40L interaction contributes to an optimal T cell response following allergic stimuli and plays an important role in the maintenance and reactivation of memory T effector cells.

Myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells in induced sputum after allergen inhalation in subjects with asthma

BACKGROUND Dendritic cells are professional antigen presenting cells that mediate the response to inhaled allergens. In animal models, the induction and maintenance of allergic airway inflammation is primarily a function of myeloid dendritic cells, whereas the tolerization to inhaled allergens is likely a function of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. OBJECTIVE To investigate changes in sputum myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells after allergen inhalation in subjects with asthma. Also, the number of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells expressing both CCR6 and 7 and their chemokine ligands macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3alpha and 3beta were measured in sputum supernatants. METHODS Sputum was induced from 12 dual-responder subjects with allergic asthma before and 7 hours, 24 hours, and 72 hours after inhalation of diluent and allergen. Dendritic cells were enumerated via flow cytometry and the chemokines by using ELISAs. RESULTS The number of sputum myeloid dendritic cells was significantly higher 24 hours after allergen challenge compared with diluent. Similarly, sputum plasmacytoid dendritic cells increased significantly at 24 hours after allergen challenge. Also, a significant increase in CCR6(+) myeloid dendritic cells numbers occurred 72 hours after allergen challenge. In contrast, CCR7(+) myeloid dendritic cells, as well as the number of CCR6(+) and CCR7(+) plasmacytoid dendritic cells, were not different between challenges. Finally, allergen challenge increased sputum levels of MIP-3alpha, but not MIP-3beta, compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS Both myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells increase in the sputum of subjects with asthma after allergen challenge, suggesting that both subsets are involved in the pathogenesis of allergen responses in asthma.

IL-25 and IL-25 Receptor Expression on Eosinophils from Subjects with Allergic Asthma

Background: Allergic asthma is an inflammatory airway disease in which Th2 cytokines play an important role. Epithelial-derived interleukin (IL)-25 has been suggested to be important in the maintenance of Th2-type responses. The effects of IL-25 are mediated by the IL-25 receptor, composed of two subunits, IL-17RA and IL-17RB. Eosinophils are effector cells in allergic asthma. The role of IL-25 in eosinophil function is unknown. This study examined the expression of IL-25 and its receptor on eosinophils in allergic asthmatics compared to atopic nonasthmatics and normal controls. Methods: The expression of IL-25, IL-17RA and IL-17RB on eosinophils, and levels of plasma IL-25 were measured in 14 normal control subjects, 15 atopic nonasthmatics and 14 mild allergic asthmatics. Results: The expression of IL-17RB on eosinophils was significantly higher in allergic asthmatics (43.08%, range 33.96-59.98%) than in atopic nonasthmatics (11.98%, range 6.33-27.11%, p = 0.002) and normal controls (17.70%, range 10.97-38.9%, p = 0.01). IL-17RA expression was also significantly higher in the allergic asthmatic group. No differences were observed in the intracellular expression of IL-25. The concentration of IL-25 in plasma was significantly increased in the allergic asthmatics (145 ng/ml, range 64-290 ng/ml) when compared to the normal controls (21 ng/ml, range 0-116 ng/ml, p = 0.012), but not compared to atopic nonasthmatics. There was a significant negative correlation between FEV1 % predicted and the IL-25 level in the plasma (r = -0.443, p = 0.003). Conclusions: The increased IL-25 levels in plasma and the expression of IL-17RA and IL-17RB on eosinophils in allergic asthma patients suggests that IL-25 may activate eosinophils during allergic inflammation.

Myeloid dendritic cells type 2 after allergen inhalation in asthmatic subjects

Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen‐presenting cells that mediate the response to inhaled allergen. A major division in DC ontogeny exists between myeloid DCs (mDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). A subtype of mDC expressing thrombomodulin, termed myeloid DCs type 2 (mDC2s), has been identified in both the circulation and lung and has recently been suggested to have a role in allergic asthma.

Myeloid dendritic cells type 2 in allergic asthma

Myeloid dendritic cells type 2 (mDC2s) are a new subtype of DCs identified in both the circulation and the lung and suggested to have a role in allergic asthma.

Interleukin-18 and interleukin-18 receptor-α expression in allergic asthma

To the Editors: The inflammatory process in allergic asthma is initiated by T-helper (Th) type-2 cells, which produce a repertoire of cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13, which are necessary for immunoglobulin (Ig)E production, airway eosinophilia and goblet cell hyperplasia [1]. IL-18 is another pro-inflammatory cytokine, initially described as interferon (IFN)-γ-inducing factor [2]. IL-18 can act as a cofactor for Th2 cell development and IgE production [3]. Recently, an IL-18 gene polymorphism was reported to be associated with asthma severity and higher serum IL-18 levels: the rs5744247 variant, which has higher transcriptional activity than the wildtype allele [4]. In addition, the IL-18 receptor (IL-18R) gene (on 2q21) has been identified as a candidate gene associated with increased susceptibility to asthma in children [5], and polymorphisms of the gene have been associated with allergic asthma and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) [6]. We have evaluated serum levels of IL-18 and the expression of IL-18Rα, as well as other Th2-associated cytokines, in stable allergic asthmatic subjects, compared with allergic nonasthmatic subjects and healthy controls. We studied 36 subjects, which included 15 allergic asthmatic subjects, 11 nonasthmatic allergic subjects and 10 healthy controls (table 1). All subjects underwent a methacholine inhalation challenge [7] and had skin-prick tests to a panel of 16 environmental allergens. Total IgE, and serum IL-18, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13 and IFN-γ were measured using commercially available ELISA kits (Medical and Biological Laboratories Co., Nagoya, Japan; RD DRG International Inc., Mountainside, NJ, USA). The allergic subjects were studied outside …

Allergen inhalation challenge in smoking compared with non-smoking asthmatic subjects.

Background Smoking asthmatics experience more severe symptoms, require more rescue medication and have more asthma‐related hospitalizations than non‐smoking asthmatics. However, studies in mice suggest that mainstream cigarette smoke may reduce airway inflammation and may attenuate airway hyperresponsiveness. A comparison of allergen‐induced airway inflammatory responses of smoking and non‐smoking atopic asthmatics has not been examined previously.

Treatment with anti-OX40L or anti-TSLP does not alter the frequency of T regulatory cells in allergic asthmatics

OX40‐OX40L interactions and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) are important in the induction and maintenance of Th2 responses in allergic disease, whereas T regulatory cells (Treg) have been shown to suppress pro‐inflammatory Th2 responses. Both OX40L and TSLP have been implicated in the negative regulation of Treg. The effect of anti‐asthma therapies on Treg is not well known. Our aim was to assess the effects of two monoclonal antibody therapies (anti‐OX40L and anti‐TSLP) on Treg frequency using a human model of allergic asthma. We hypothesized that the anti‐inflammatory effects of these therapies would result in an increase in circulating Treg (CD4+CD25+CD127lowFoxp3+ cells) frequency. We measured Treg using flow cytometry, and our results showed that neither allergen challenge nor monoclonal antibody therapy altered circulating Treg frequency. These data highlight the need for assessment of airway Treg and for a more complete understanding of Treg biology so as to develop pharmacologics/biologics that modulate Treg for asthma therapy.

Inhibition of Allergen-Induced Basophil Activation by ASM-024, a Nicotinic Receptor Ligand

Background: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) were identified on eosinophils and shown to regulate inflammatory responses, but nAChR expression on basophils has not been explored yet. Objective: We investigated surface receptor expression of nAChR α4, α7 and α1/α3/α5 subunits on basophils. Furthermore, we examined the effects of ASM-024, a synthetic nicotinic ligand, on in vitro anti-IgE and in vivo allergen-induced basophil activation. Methods: Basophils were enriched from the peripheral blood of allergic donors and the expression of nAChR subunits and muscarinic receptors was determined. Purified basophils were stimulated with anti-IgE in the presence of ASM-024 with or without muscarinic or nicotinic antagonists for the measurement of CD203c expression and histamine release. The effect of 9 days of treatment with 50 and 200 mg ASM-024 on basophil CD203c expression was examined in the blood of mild allergic asthmatics before and after allergen inhalation challenge. Results: nAChR α4, α7 and α1/α3/α5 receptor subunit expression was detected on basophils. Stimulation of basophils with anti-IgE increased CD203c expression and histamine release, which was inhibited by ASM-024 (10-5 to 10-3 M, p < 0.05). The effect of ASM-024 was reversed in the presence of muscarinic and nicotinic antagonists. In subjects with mild asthma, ASM-024 inhalation significantly inhibited basophil CD203c expression measured 24 h after allergen challenge (p = 0.03). Conclusion: This study shows that ASM-024 inhibits IgE- and allergen-induced basophil activation through both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, and suggests that ASM-024 may be an efficacious agent for modulating allergic asthma responses.

Evaluation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists on interleukin-5-induced eosinophil differentiation

Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor (PPAR) agonists have been suggested as novel therapeutics for the treatment of inflammatory lung disease, such as allergic asthma. Treatment with PPAR agonists has been shown to inhibit airway eosinophilia in murine models of allergic asthma, which can occur through several mechanisms including attenuated generation of chemoattractants (e.g. eotaxin) and decreased eosinophil migrational responses. In addition, studies report that PPAR agonists can inhibit the differentiation of several cell types. To date, no studies have examined the effects of PPAR agonists on interleukin‐5 (IL‐5) ‐induced eosinophil differentiation from haemopoietic progenitor cells. Non‐adherent mononuclear cells or CD34+ cells isolated from the peripheral blood of allergic subjects were grown for 2 weeks in Methocult® cultures with IL‐5 (10 ng/ml) and IL‐3 (25 ng/ml) in the presence of 1–1000 nm PPARα agonist (GW9578), PPARβ/δ agonist (GW501516), PPARγ agonist (rosiglitazone) or diluent. The number of eosinophil/basophil colony‐forming units (Eo/B CFU) was quantified by light microscopy. The signalling mechanism involved was assessed by phosphoflow. Blood‐extracted CD34+ cells cultured with IL‐5 or IL‐5 + IL‐3 formed Eo/B CFU, which were significantly inhibited by rosiglitazone (100 nm, P < 0·01) but not GW9578 or GW501516. In addition, rosglitazone significantly inhibited IL‐5‐induced phosphorylation of extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 1/2. We observed an inhibitory effect of rosiglitazone on eosinophil differentiation in vitro, mediated by attenuation of the extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 1/2 signalling pathway. These findings indicate that the PPARγ agonist can attenuate tissue eosinophilia by interfering with local differentiative responses.