Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bentley Glass is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bentley Glass.


Genetics and the Quality of Life | 1975

Ethical problems raised by genetics

Bentley Glass

Publisher Summary This chapter highlights the ethical problems raised by genetics. It is to be recognized that at present, despite the abundant evidence that conventional methods could be used to breed desired types of humans, no such programme exists anywhere. Recessive detrimental genes can become far commoner than dominant ones. The gene frequency is calculated from this value to be one in fifty, and the frequency of carriers (heterozygotes) in the population is about 4 per cent. Better nutrition, better parental care, and, above all else, improved medical treatment and prevention of disease enable the bearers of once detrimental hereditary traits to survive into the fertile years of life. As for sympathy, empathy, or cooperativeness, no scientific way of measuring them has been attained, and no information as to the degree to which they are heritable rather than conditioned can be presented at this time. In the foreseeable future, eugenics, or genetic engineering, will be restricted to the same goals as surgery and medicine. The genetic disorder is thought to result from the accumulation of the substrate for the blocked step that can endeavor by means of dietary control, as in the case of phenylketonuria, to reduce the amount of the substrate and its byproducts and is possible to remove the diseased or malignant tissue by surgical means, as in the case of retinoblastoma. Although the advances of medicine and surgery in the direction of genetic engineering inevitably increase the burden of defective genes in the human gene pool, they should be classed as detrimental only to the extent of the cost of artificially ameliorating their consequences.


Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists | 1968

Crisis in the Universities

Bentley Glass

“Joseph W. Barr, Under-Secretary of the Treasury, joined a growing group of experts in predicting that the end of the war in Vietnam could lead to very little reduction in defense spending, despite the stated cost of the war of about


Science | 1966

The Japanese science education centers.

Bentley Glass

28 billion a year, unless the nations military and diplomatic objectives are changed.“‘If the State Department maintains its current diplomatic objectives and if the Department of Defense defines its mission relative to those objectives as it did in 1965 [before Vietnam], then there is not much opportunity for substantial budget cutting in this area in the foreseeable future.’”New York Times, June 26, 1968


Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists | 1962

Information Crisis in Biology

Bentley Glass

These six Japanese science education centers signify a sweeping reform of elementary and secondary school science teaching. They achieve their striking results because they are established on a permanent, local basis and are supported mainly by the local boards of education. They have avoided control by pedagogues and specialists in education. Instead, they are operated by trained scientists and experienced school teachers who work together to devise programs specially suited to the needs of their teachers. With small and practicable steps, the teachers improve their understanding of methods which they can readily test in their own classrooms rooms and laboratories. The laboratory equipment in the science education centers is only slightly superior to that which the teachers have in their own schools, but superior enough to make them desire to improve their own facilities. Major facilities, such as x-ray machines, electron microscopes, telescopes (15-cm), and machine shops, as well as good working collections of minerals and fossils, and adequate greenhouses, permit the teachers to work with more expensive equipment, to gain a firsthand knowledge of its operation, and to bring groups of students to the center to observe what such instruments make possible. The use of American experimental course content improvement programs is widespread. Every science education center I visited is using PSSC, CHEMS, CBA, BSCS, or ESCP materials and studying the philosophy of these programs. Yet no center is entirely dependent on these programs, but uses them critically to supplement and improve its own courses. The emphasis is on good laboratory and field teaching as a basis for understanding scientific methods and concepts. Science as investigation and inquiry, instead of treatment solely as an authoritative body of facts, is coming into its own. The few defects of the science education centers of Japan inhere in the educational situation itself. The centers are at present inadequate to reach even a reasonable proportion of the science teachers within a 5-year, or even a 10-year cycle. The shortage of substitute teachers causes most of the courses to be far too brief for maximum effectiveness. Staff programming tends to be rather spotty instead of comprehensive. A major difficulty, frequently expressed, lies in the grim hold of the university entrance examination system over the science curricula of the lower schools. The university is the goal of every able student, for economic as well as intellectual reasons. To enter a university he must pass the examinations, which are established separately by each institution. The professor who makes out the examination questions therefore controls what must be taught and learned in the lower schools. This same rigorous control is in part reflected in the Ministry of Education syllabi, which must be followed by the teachers. Nevertheless, I found the men in the biological section of the Ministry of Education very enlightened and pressing for change. Many professors in the universities are also in the full current of modern biological thought, participate gladly in the programs of the science education centers, and would write examinations that emphasize interpreting data, applying tests to hypotheses, and drawing valid conclusions instead of merely memorizing and regurgitating facts. On the other hand, in many universities the upper positions are still filled by men to whom biology means classification rather than experimentation, morphology rather than biochemistry, organ physiology rather than cell biology. We cannot afford to discard taxonomy, morphology, or gross physiology-they are important parts of biology and will remain so. But they do not comprise all of biology—they are only a diminishing proportion of it. In Japan, as in the United States, the examination system must become more flexible. It must change with the development of science itself, must encourage scientific attitudes and cease defeating the introduction of new disciplines, new outlooks, new subject matter. The university and the examining boards in some educational systems indeed exhibit a rigor mortis. On balance, the science education centers in Japan may well represent the most significant educational experiment of our time. Their vitality, which springs from their local relationship to the prefectural schools and their permenent staffs, far exceeds in my own estimation that of most of the summer science institutes held in the United States, which lack that close relation to the local schools and which by their impermanency countenance ill-planned and ill-taught programs that are often little different from the usual summer school sessions. The best summer institutes in the United States are indeed very good, but far too few of them reach a passable standard. That is because, for the most part, their staffs are recruited quickly, teach their favorite subjects without much consideration of their appropriateness or suitability for improving science education in the lower schools, and depart without much contact with other members of the staff. What is needed is serious, continuous, prolonged, hard work devoted to the development of the right sorts of courses for renewing the training of science teachers. The Japanese seem to be achieving just that. We would do well, with our vast resources for the improvement of education, to emulate them. As they have profited by employing and improving upon our NSF supported programs in science education, we may likewise profit through the establishment of science education centers modeled on theirs.


Archive | 1987

Remarks of the Moderator

Bentley Glass

The exponential growth of the biological sciences has created problems in education and information retrieval that are rapidly approaching the critical stage, warns geneticist


Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists | 1973

A Voice of Conscience Is Stilled

Albert Meisel; Bernard T. Feld; Ralph E. Lapp; Hans A. Bethe; Robert F. Bacher; Philip Handler; Harvey Brooks; Bentley Glass; Alvin M. Weinberg; Frederick Seitz; Joseph Rotblat; Julian Schwinger; Cyril Stanley Smith; Walter Orr Roberts; Glenn T. Seaborg; J. A. Simpson; Detlev W. Bronk; Harold C. Urey; Sewall Wright; Philip M. Morse; I. I. Rabi

Being myself a prime example of the aging process, I think it might be useful to recall some previous symposia on aging in which I have participated. The first of these was in Gatlinburg, Tennessee, in 1956. There followed a symposium organized by the AAAS in 1960, one by the Gerontological Society in Puerto Rico, and the previous Brookhaven Symposium in 1984. In comparison with my recollections of these summations of the current state of the art, the Brookhaven Symposium of 1986 presents us with enormous advances in methodology and the advent of research on a new variety of organisms, especially Caenorhabditis elegans. Nevertheless, a few reminiscent comments may be helpful as we attempt to summarize our findings. On this occasion we miss a good number of the oldtimers in the study of aging: George Sacher, of course, to whom this symposium is dedicated: Alex Comfort, Nathan Shock, Howard Curtis, Leo Szilard, Bernard Strehler, and many others, to say nothing of such great oldtimers as H. S. Jennings, Raymond Pearl, and C. M. McCay. New insights must always be interpreted in the light of older demonstrated knowledge. Even abandoned theories of aging have their value in keeping us on the right road.


Journal of Wildlife Management | 1977

Evolution, Mammals and Southern Continents

Kai Curry-Lindahl; Allen Keast; Frank C. Erk; Bentley Glass

On the afternoon of May 18, 1973, members of his family, colleagues and friends gathered in a flower-banked chamber of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C. to pay tribute to Eugene Rabinowitch. The beautiful memorial service was illuminated by a series of eulogies, spoken by close associates of the Bulletins editor-in-chief. They heightened the realization of loss in the passing of one of the great scientist-humanists of the twentieth century.Herewith we publish excerpts from some of the eulogies which describe the life and work of Eugene Rabinowitch and which reflect his philosophy. These remarks are followed by messages from members of the world scientific community which Eugene Rabinowitch served as a powerful voice of conscience.


Archive | 1954

A Symposium on the Mechanism of Enzyme Action

William D. McElroy; Bentley Glass


Science | 1965

The Ethical Basis of Science.

Bentley Glass


Archive | 1961

A Symposium on Light and Life.

Bentley Glass; William D. McElroy

Collaboration


Dive into the Bentley Glass's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albert Meisel

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alvin M. Weinberg

Oak Ridge Associated Universities

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernard T. Feld

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cyril Stanley Smith

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Detlev W. Bronk

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge