Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bernadette Daelmans is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bernadette Daelmans.


The Lancet | 2010

Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000–10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival

Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Mickey Chopra; Henrik Axelson; Peter Berman; Ties Boerma; Jennifer Bryce; Flavia Bustreo; Eleonora Cavagnero; Giorgio Cometto; Bernadette Daelmans; Andres de Francisco; Helga Fogstad; Neeru Gupta; Laura Laski; Joy E Lawn; Blerta Maliqi; Elizabeth Mason; Catherine Pitt; Jennifer Requejo; Ann Starrs; Cesar G. Victora; Tessa Wardlaw

The Countdown to 2015 for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Survival monitors coverage of priority interventions to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) for child mortality and maternal health. We reviewed progress between 1990 and 2010 in coverage of 26 key interventions in 68 Countdown priority countries accounting for more than 90% of maternal and child deaths worldwide. 19 countries studied were on track to meet MDG 4, in 47 we noted acceleration in the yearly rate of reduction in mortality of children younger than 5 years, and in 12 countries progress had decelerated since 2000. Progress towards reduction of neonatal deaths has been slow, and maternal mortality remains high in most Countdown countries, with little evidence of progress. Wide and persistent disparities exist in the coverage of interventions between and within countries, but some regions have successfully reduced longstanding inequities. Coverage of interventions delivered directly in the community on scheduled occasions was higher than for interventions relying on functional health systems. Although overseas development assistance for maternal, newborn, and child health has increased, funding for this sector accounted for only 31% of all development assistance for health in 2007. We provide evidence from several countries showing that rapid progress is possible and that focused and targeted interventions can reduce inequities related to socioeconomic status and sex. However, much more can and should be done to address maternal and newborn health and improve coverage of interventions related to family planning, care around childbirth, and case management of childhood illnesses.


The Lancet | 2008

Countdown to 2015 for maternal, newborn, and child survival: the 2008 report on tracking coverage of interventions.

Jennifer Bryce; Bernadette Daelmans; A Dwivedi; Fauveau; Joy E Lawn; Elizabeth Mason; Holly Newby; Anuraj H. Shankar; Ann Starrs; Tessa Wardlaw

BACKGROUND The Countdown to 2015 for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Survival initiative monitors coverage of priority interventions to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) for reduction of maternal and child mortality. We aimed to report on 68 countries which have 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide, and on 22 interventions that have been proven to improve maternal, newborn, and child survival. METHODS We selected countries with high rates of maternal and child deaths, and interventions with the most potential to avert such deaths. We analysed country-specific data for maternal and child mortality and coverage of selected interventions. We also tracked cause-of-death profiles; indicators of nutritional status; the presence of supportive policies; financial flows to maternal, newborn, and child health; and equity in coverage of interventions. FINDINGS Of the 68 priority countries, 16 were on track to meet MDG 4. Of these, seven had been on track in 2005 when the Countdown initiative was launched, three (including China) moved into the on-track category in 2008, and six were included in the Countdown process for the first time in 2008. Trends in maternal mortality that would indicate progress towards MDG 5 were not available, but in most (56 of 68) countries, maternal mortality was high or very high. Coverage of different interventions varied widely both between and within countries. Interventions that can be routinely scheduled, such as immunisation and antenatal care, had much higher coverage than those that rely on functional health systems and 24-hour availability of clinical services, such as skilled or emergency care at birth and care of ill newborn babies and children. Data for postnatal care were either unavailable or showed poor coverage in almost all 68 countries. The most rapid increases in coverage were seen for immunisation, which also received significant investment during this period. INTERPRETATION Rapid progress is possible, but much more can and must be done. Focused efforts will be needed to improve coverage, especially for priorities such as contraceptive services, care in childbirth, postnatal care, and clinical case management of illnesses in newborn babies and children.Background The Countdown to 2015 for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Survival initiative monitors coverage of priority interventions to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) for reduction of maternal and child mortality. We aimed to report on 68 countries which have 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide, and on 22 interventions that have been proven to improve maternal, newborn, and child survival.


British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2015

Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision

Ӧ Tunçalp; Wm Were; C MacLennan; Olufemi T. Oladapo; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; Rajiv Bahl; Bernadette Daelmans; Matthews Mathai; Lale Say; F Kristensen; Marleen Temmerman; Flavia Bustreo

In 2015, as we review progress towards Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), despite significant progress in reduction of mortality, we still have unacceptably high numbers of maternal and newborn deaths globally. Efforts over the past decade to reduce adverse outcomes for pregnant women and newborns have been directed at increasing skilled birth attendance.1, 2 This has resulted in higher rates of births in health facilities in all regions.3 The proportion of deliveries reportedly attended by skilled health personnel in developing countries rose from 56% in 1990 to 68% in 2012.4 With increasing utilisation of health services, a higher proportion of avoidable maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity have moved to health facilities. In this context, poor quality of care (QoC) in many facilities becomes a paramount roadblock in our quest to end preventable mortality and morbidity.


The Lancet | 2014

Every Newborn: health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries

Kim E Dickson; Aline Simen-Kapeu; Mary V Kinney; Luis Huicho; Linda Vesel; Eve M. Lackritz; Joseph de Graft Johnson; Severin von Xylander; Nuzhat Rafique; Mariame Sylla; Charles Mwansambo; Bernadette Daelmans; Joy E Lawn

Universal coverage of essential interventions would reduce neonatal deaths by an estimated 71%, benefit women and children after the first month, and reduce stillbirths. However, the packages with the greatest effect (care around birth, care of small and ill newborn babies), have low and inequitable coverage and are the most sensitive markers of health system function. In eight of the 13 countries with the most neonatal deaths (55% worldwide), we undertook a systematic assessment of bottlenecks to essential maternal and newborn health care, involving more than 600 experts. Of 2465 bottlenecks identified, common constraints were found in all high-burden countries, notably regarding the health workforce, financing, and service delivery. However, bottlenecks for specific interventions might differ across similar health systems. For example, the implementation of kangaroo mother care was noted as challenging in the four Asian country workshops, but was regarded as a feasible aspect of preterm care by respondents in the four African countries. If all high-burden countries achieved the neonatal mortality rates of their regions fastest progressing countries, then the mortality goal of ten or fewer per 1000 livebirths by 2035 recommended in this Series and the Every Newborn Action Plan would be exceeded. We therefore examined fast progressing countries to identify strategies to reduce neonatal mortality. We identified several key factors: (1) workforce planning to increase numbers and upgrade specific skills for care at birth and of small and ill newborn babies, task sharing, incentives for rural health workers; (2) financial protection measures, such as expansion of health insurance, conditional cash transfers, and performance-based financing; and (3) dynamic leadership including innovation and community empowerment. Adapting from the 2005 Lancet Series on neonatal survival and drawing on this Every Newborn Series, we propose a country-led, data-driven process to sharpen national health plans, seize opportunities to address the quality gap for care at birth and care of small and ill newborn babies, and systematically scale up care to reach every mother and newborn baby, particularly the poorest.


The Lancet | 2016

Countdown to 2015: a decade of tracking progress for maternal, newborn, and child survival

Cesar G. Victora; Jennifer Requejo; Aluísio J. D. Barros; Peter Berman; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Ties Boerma; Mickey Chopra; Andres de Francisco; Bernadette Daelmans; Elizabeth Hazel; Joy E Lawn; Blerta Maliqi; Holly Newby; Jennifer Bryce

Conceived in 2003 and born in 2005 with the launch of its first report and country profiles, the Countdown to 2015 for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Survival has reached its originally proposed lifespan. Major reductions in the deaths of mothers and children have occurred since Countdowns inception, even though most of the 75 priority countries failed to achieve Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5. The coverage of life-saving interventions tracked in Countdown increased steadily over time, but wide inequalities persist between and within countries. Key drivers of coverage such as financing, human resources, commodities, and conducive health policies also showed important, yet insufficient increases. As a multistakeholder initiative of more than 40 academic, international, bilateral, and civil society institutions, Countdown was successful in monitoring progress and raising the visibility of the health of mothers, newborns, and children. Lessons learned from this initiative have direct bearing on monitoring progress during the Sustainable Development Goals era.


Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2006

Responsive parenting: interventions and outcomes

Neir Eshel; Bernadette Daelmans; Meena Cabral de Mello; Jose Martines

In addition to food, sanitation and access to health facilities children require adequate care at home for survival and optimal development. Responsiveness, a mothers/caregivers prompt, contingent and appropriate interaction with the child, is a vital parenting tool with wide-ranging benefits for the child, from better cognitive and psychosocial development to protection from disease and mortality. We examined two facets of responsive parenting -- its role in child health and development and the effectiveness of interventions to enhance it -- by conducting a systematic review of literature from both developed and developing countries. Our results revealed that interventions are effective in enhancing maternal responsiveness, resulting in better child health and development, especially for the neediest populations. Since these interventions were feasible even in poor settings, they have great potential in helping us achieve the Millennium Development Goals. We suggest that responsiveness interventions be integrated into child survival strategies.


Maternal and Child Nutrition | 2013

The World Health Organization's global target for reducing childhood stunting by 2025: rationale and proposed actions

Mercedes de Onis; Kathryn G. Dewey; Elaine Borghi; Adelheid W. Onyango; Monika Blössner; Bernadette Daelmans; Ellen Piwoz; Francesco Branca

In 2012, the World Health Organization adopted a resolution on maternal, infant and young child nutrition that included a global target to reduce by 40% the number of stunted under-five children by 2025. The target was based on analyses of time series data from 148 countries and national success stories in tackling undernutrition. The global target translates to a 3.9% reduction per year and implies decreasing the number of stunted children from 171 million in 2010 to about 100 million in 2025. However, at current rates of progress, there will be 127 million stunted children by 2025, that is, 27 million more than the target or a reduction of only 26%. The translation of the global target into national targets needs to consider nutrition profiles, risk factor trends, demographic changes, experience with developing and implementing nutrition policies, and health system development. This paper presents a methodology to set individual country targets, without precluding the use of others. Any method applied will be influenced by country-specific population growth rates. A key question is what countries should do to meet the target. Nutrition interventions alone are almost certainly insufficient, hence the importance of ongoing efforts to foster nutrition-sensitive development and encourage development of evidence-based, multisectoral plans to address stunting at national scale, combining direct nutrition interventions with strategies concerning health, family planning, water and sanitation, and other factors that affect the risk of stunting. In addition, an accountability framework needs to be developed and surveillance systems strengthened to monitor the achievement of commitments and targets.


The Lancet | 2017

Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development

Linda Richter; Bernadette Daelmans; Joan Lombardi; Jody Heymann; Florencia López Bóo; Jere R. Behrman; Chunling Lu; Jane E. Lucas; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla; Tarun Dua; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Karin Stenberg; Paul J. Gertler; Gary L. Darmstadt

Building on long-term benefits of early intervention (Paper 2 of this Series) and increasing commitment to early childhood development (Paper 1 of this Series), scaled up support for the youngest children is essential to improving health, human capital, and wellbeing across the life course. In this third paper, new analyses show that the burden of poor development is higher than estimated, taking into account additional risk factors. National programmes are needed. Greater political prioritisation is core to scale-up, as are policies that afford families time and financial resources to provide nurturing care for young children. Effective and feasible programmes to support early child development are now available. All sectors, particularly education, and social and child protection, must play a role to meet the holistic needs of young children. However, health provides a critical starting point for scaling up, given its reach to pregnant women, families, and young children. Starting at conception, interventions to promote nurturing care can feasibly build on existing health and nutrition services at limited additional cost. Failure to scale up has severe personal and social consequences. Children at elevated risk for compromised development due to stunting and poverty are likely to forgo about a quarter of average adult income per year, and the cost of inaction to gross domestic product can be double what some countries currently spend on health. Services and interventions to support early childhood development are essential to realising the vision of the Sustainable Development Goals.


The Lancet | 2015

Countdown to 2015 and beyond: fulfilling the health agenda for women and children

Jennifer Requejo; Jennifer Bryce; Aluísio J. D. Barros; Peter Berman; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Mickey Chopra; Bernadette Daelmans; Andres de Francisco; Joy E Lawn; Blerta Maliqi; Elizabeth Mason; Holly Newby; Carole Presern; Ann Starrs; Cesar G. Victora

The end of 2015 will signal the end of the Millennium Development Goal era, when the world can take stock of what has been achieved. The Countdown to 2015 for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Survival (Countdown) has focused its 2014 report on how much has been achieved in intervention coverage in these groups, and on how best to sustain, focus, and intensify efforts to progress for this and future generations. Our 2014 results show unfinished business in achievement of high, sustained, and equitable coverage of essential interventions. Progress has accelerated in the past decade in most Countdown countries, suggesting that further gains are possible with intensified actions. Some of the greatest coverage gaps are in family planning, interventions addressing newborn mortality, and case management of childhood diseases. Although inequities are pervasive, country successes in reaching of the poorest populations provide lessons for other countries to follow. As we transition to the next set of global goals, we must remember the centrality of data to accountability, and the importance of support of country capacity to collect and use high-quality data on intervention coverage and inequities for decision making. To fulfill the health agenda for women and children both now and beyond 2015 requires continued monitoring of country and global progress; Countdown is committed to playing its part in this effort.


Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2014

Success factors for reducing maternal and child mortality

Shyama Kuruvilla; Julian Schweitzer; David Bishai; Sadia Chowdhury; Daniele Caramani; Laura Frost; Rafael Cortez; Bernadette Daelmans; Andres de Francisco; Taghreed Adam; Robert E. Cohen; Y. Natalia Alfonso; Jennifer Franz-Vasdeki; Seemeen Saadat; Beth Anne Pratt; Beatrice Eugster; Sarah Bandali; Pritha Venkatachalam; Rachael Hinton; John Murray; Sharon Arscott-Mills; Henrik Axelson; Blerta Maliqi; Intissar Sarker; Rama Lakshminarayanan; Troy Jacobs; Susan Jacks; Elizabeth Mason; Abdul Ghaffar; Nicholas Mays

Reducing maternal and child mortality is a priority in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and will likely remain so after 2015. Evidence exists on the investments, interventions and enabling policies required. Less is understood about why some countries achieve faster progress than other comparable countries. The Success Factors for Womens and Childrens Health studies sought to address this knowledge gap using statistical and econometric analyses of data from 144 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) over 20 years; Boolean, qualitative comparative analysis; a literature review; and country-specific reviews in 10 fast-track countries for MDGs 4 and 5a. There is no standard formula--fast-track countries deploy tailored strategies and adapt quickly to change. However, fast-track countries share some effective approaches in addressing three main areas to reduce maternal and child mortality. First, these countries engage multiple sectors to address crucial health determinants. Around half the reduction in child mortality in LMICs since 1990 is the result of health sector investments, the other half is attributed to investments made in sectors outside health. Second, these countries use strategies to mobilize partners across society, using timely, robust evidence for decision-making and accountability and a triple planning approach to consider immediate needs, long-term vision and adaptation to change. Third, the countries establish guiding principles that orient progress, align stakeholder action and achieve results over time. This evidence synthesis contributes to global learning on accelerating improvements in womens and childrens health towards 2015 and beyond.

Collaboration


Dive into the Bernadette Daelmans's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Blerta Maliqi

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth Mason

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rajiv Bahl

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer Bryce

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henrik Axelson

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tarun Dua

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge