Bernard E. Vaissière
Institut national de la recherche agronomique
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bernard E. Vaissière.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2007
Alexandra-Maria Klein; Bernard E. Vaissière; James H. Cane; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Saul A. Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Teja Tscharntke
The extent of our reliance on animal pollination for world crop production for human food has not previously been evaluated and the previous estimates for countries or continents have seldom used primary data. In this review, we expand the previous estimates using novel primary data from 200 countries and found that fruit, vegetable or seed production from 87 of the leading global food crops is dependent upon animal pollination, while 28 crops do not rely upon animal pollination. However, global production volumes give a contrasting perspective, since 60% of global production comes from crops that do not depend on animal pollination, 35% from crops that depend on pollinators, and 5% are unevaluated. Using all crops traded on the world market and setting aside crops that are solely passively self-pollinated, wind-pollinated or parthenocarpic, we then evaluated the level of dependence on animal-mediated pollination for crops that are directly consumed by humans. We found that pollinators are essential for 13 crops, production is highly pollinator dependent for 30, moderately for 27, slightly for 21, unimportant for 7, and is of unknown significance for the remaining 9. We further evaluated whether local and landscape-wide management for natural pollination services could help to sustain crop diversity and production. Case studies for nine crops on four continents revealed that agricultural intensification jeopardizes wild bee communities and their stabilizing effect on pollination services at the landscape scale.
Ecological Monographs | 2008
Catrin Westphal; Riccardo Bommarco; Gabriel Carré; Ellen Lamborn; Nicolas Morison; Theodora Petanidou; Simon G. Potts; Stuart Roberts; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Thomas Tscheulin; Bernard E. Vaissière; Michal Woyciechowski; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; William E. Kunin; Josef Settele; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Bee pollinators are currently recorded with many different sampling methods. However, the relative performances of these methods have not been systematically evaluated and compared. In response to the strong need to record ongoing shifts in pollinator diversity and abundance, global and regional pollinator initiatives must adopt standardized sampling protocols when developing large-scale and long-term monitoring schemes. We systematically evaluated the performance of six sampling methods (observation plots, pan traps, standardized and variable transect walks, trap nests with reed internodes or paper tubes) that are commonly used across a wide range of geographical regions in Europe and in two habitat types (agricultural and seminatural). We focused on bees since they represent the most important pollinator group worldwide. Several characteristics of the methods were considered in order to evaluate their performance in assessing bee diversity: sample coverage, observed species richness, species richness estimators, collector biases (identified by subunit-based rarefaction curves), species composition of the samples, and the indication of overall bee species richness (estimated from combined total samples). The most efficient method in all geographical regions, in both the agricultural and seminatural habitats, was the pan trap method. It had the highest sample coverage, collected the highest number of species, showed negligible collector bias, detected similar species as the transect methods, and was the best indicator of overall bee species richness. The transect methods were also relatively efficient, but they had a significant collector bias. The observation plots showed poor performance. As trap nests are restricted to cavity-nesting bee species, they had a naturally low sample coverage. However, both trap nest types detected additional species that were not recorded by any of the other methods. For large-scale and long-term monitoring schemes with surveyors with different experience levels, we recommend pan traps as the most efficient, unbiased, and cost-effective method for sampling bee diversity. Trap nests with reed internodes could be used as a complementary sampling method to maximize the numbers of collected species. Transect walks are the principal method for detailed studies focusing on plant-pollinator associations. Moreover, they can be used in monitoring schemes after training the surveyors to standardize their collection skills.
Nature Communications | 2015
David Kleijn; Rachael Winfree; Ignasi Bartomeus; Luísa G. Carvalheiro; Mickaël Henry; Rufus Isaacs; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Claire Kremen; Leithen K. M'Gonigle; Romina Rader; Taylor H. Ricketts; Neal M. Williams; Nancy Lee Adamson; John S. Ascher; András Báldi; Péter Batáry; Faye Benjamin; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; Eleanor J. Blitzer; Riccardo Bommarco; Mariëtte R. Brand; Vincent Bretagnolle; Lindsey Button; Daniel P. Cariveau; Rémy Chifflet; Jonathan F. Colville; Bryan N. Danforth; Elizabeth Elle; Michael P. D. Garratt; Felix Herzog
There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Tom D. Breeze; Bernard E. Vaissière; Riccardo Bommarco; Theodora Petanidou; Nicos Seraphides; Lajos Kozák; Jeroen Scheper; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; David Kleijn; Steen Gyldenkærne; Marco Moretti; Andrea Holzschuh; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Jane C. Stout; Meelis Pärtel; Martin Zobel; Simon G. Potts
Declines in insect pollinators across Europe have raised concerns about the supply of pollination services to agriculture. Simultaneously, EU agricultural and biofuel policies have encouraged substantial growth in the cultivated area of insect pollinated crops across the continent. Using data from 41 European countries, this study demonstrates that the recommended number of honeybees required to provide crop pollination across Europe has risen 4.9 times as fast as honeybee stocks between 2005 and 2010. Consequently, honeybee stocks were insufficient to supply >90% of demands in 22 countries studied. These findings raise concerns about the capacity of many countries to cope with major losses of wild pollinators and highlight numerous critical gaps in current understanding of pollination service supplies and demands, pointing to a pressing need for further research into this issue.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Laura Fortel; Mickaël Henry; Laurent Guilbaud; Anne Guirao; Michael Kuhlmann; Hugues Mouret; Orianne Rollin; Bernard E. Vaissière
Background Wild bees are important pollinators that have declined in diversity and abundance during the last decades. Habitat destruction and fragmentation associated with urbanization are reported as part of the main causes of this decline. Urbanization involves dramatic changes of the landscape, increasing the proportion of impervious surface while decreasing that of green areas. Few studies have investigated the effects of urbanization on bee communities. We assessed changes in the abundance, species richness, and composition of wild bee community along an urbanization gradient. Methodology/Principal Findings Over two years and on a monthly basis, bees were sampled with colored pan traps and insect nets at 24 sites located along an urbanization gradient. Landscape structure within three different radii was measured at each study site. We captured 291 wild bee species. The abundance of wild bees was negatively correlated with the proportion of impervious surface, while species richness reached a maximum at an intermediate (50%) proportion of impervious surface. The structure of the community changed along the urbanization gradient with more parasitic species in sites with an intermediate proportion of impervious surface. There were also greater numbers of cavity-nesting species and long-tongued species in sites with intermediate or higher proportion of impervious surface. However, urbanization had no effect on the occurrence of species depending on their social behavior or body size. Conclusions/Significance We found nearly a third of the wild bee fauna known from France in our study sites. Indeed, urban areas supported a diverse bee community, but sites with an intermediate level of urbanization were the most speciose ones, including greater proportion of parasitic species. The presence of a diverse array of bee species even in the most urbanized area makes these pollinators worthy of being a flagship group to raise the awareness of urban citizens about biodiversity.
Grana | 1994
Bernard E. Vaissière; S. Bradleigh Vinson
Abstract Honey bees, Apis mellifera, forage readily on flowers of upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, to harvest nectar. The abundant pollen gets caught in the haircoat of the bees, but cotton pollen is nevertheless rarely collected. Honey bee pollen collection effectiveness was therefore investigated in a flight room using cotton and five other spheroidal pollen taxa presented in sequence. Honey bees visited all pollen dishes, but okra pollen (Abelmoschus esculentus) was never packed successfully by the bees landing in the pollen dish. Cotton pollen was collected by 16% of the landing foragers, pumpkin pollen (Cucurbita pepo) by 71%, and pollen of corn (Zea mays), pigweed (Amaranthus palmeri), and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) were readily collected by nearly all foragers. The amount of time spent in the pollen dish was always short (1 to 9 seconds) and homogeneous among all pollen taxa, indicating that none of them was strongly repellent to the bees. The reduced effectiveness with which honey bees collec...
Ecological Research | 2011
Anders Nielsen; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Catrin Westphal; Olivia Messinger; Simon G. Potts; Stuart Roberts; Josef Settele; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Bernard E. Vaissière; Michalis Vaitis; Michal Woyciechowski; Ioannis Bazos; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; Riccardo Bommarco; William E. Kunin; Thomas Tscheulin; Ellen Lamborn; Theodora Petanidou
The decline of bees has raised concerns regarding their conservation and the maintenance of ecosystem services they provide to bee-pollinated wild flowers and crops. Although the Mediterranean region is a hotspot for bee species richness, their status remains poorly studied. There is an urgent need for cost-effective, reliable, and unbiased sampling methods that give good bee species richness estimates. This study aims: (a) to assess bee species richness in two common Mediterranean habitat types: semi-natural scrub (phrygana) and managed olive groves; (b) to compare species richness in those systems to that of other biogeographic regions, and (c) to assess whether six different sampling methods (pan traps, variable and standardized transect walks, observation plots and trap nests), previously tested in other European biogeographic regions, are suitable in Mediterranean communities. Eight study sites, four per habitat type, were selected on the island of Lesvos, Greece. The species richness observed was high compared to other habitat types worldwide for which comparable data exist. Pan traps collected the highest proportion of the total bee species richness across all methods at the scale of a study site. Variable and standardized transect walks detected the highest total richness over all eight study sites. Trap nests and observation plots detected only a limited fraction of the bee species richness. To assess the total bee species richness in bee diversity hotspots, such as the studied habitats, we suggest a combination of transect walks conducted by trained bee collectors and pan trap sampling.
Journal of Apicultural Research | 2011
Simon G. Potts; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; Riccardo Bommarco; Antonio Felicioli; Markus Fischer; Pekka Jokinen; David Kleijn; Alexandra-Maria Klein; William E. Kunin; Peter J. Neumann; Lyubomir Penev; Theodora Petanidou; Pierre Rasmont; Stuart Roberts; Henrik G. Smith; Peter Sørensen; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Bernard E. Vaissière; Montserrat Vilà; Ante Vujić; Michal Woyciechowski; Martin Zobel; Josef Settele; Oliver Schweiger
Summary Pollinating insects form a key component of European biodiversity, and provide a vital ecosystem service to crops and wild plants. There is growing evidence of declines in both wild and domesticated pollinators, and parallel declines in plants relying upon them. The STEP project (Status and Trends of European Pollinators, 2010–2015, www.step-project.net) is documenting critical elements in the nature and extent of these declines, examining key functional traits associated with pollination deficits, and developing a Red List for some European pollinator groups. Together these activities are laying the groundwork for future pollinator monitoring programmes. STEP is also assessing the relative importance of potential drivers of pollinator declines, including climate change, habitat loss and fragmentation, agrochemicals, pathogens, alien species, light pollution, and their interactions. We are measuring the ecological and economic impacts of declining pollinator services and floral resources, including effects on wild plant populations, crop production and human nutrition. STEP is reviewing existing and potential mitigation options, and providing novel tests of their effectiveness across Europe. Our work is building upon existing and newly developed datasets and models, complemented by spatially-replicated campaigns of field research to fill gaps in current knowledge. Findings are being integrated into a policy-relevant framework to create evidence-based decision support tools. STEP is establishing communication links to a wide range of stakeholders across Europe and beyond, including policy makers, beekeepers, farmers, academics and the general public. Taken together, the STEP research programme aims to improve our understanding of the nature, causes, consequences and potential mitigation of declines in pollination services at local, national, continental and global scales.
PeerJ | 2014
Ignasi Bartomeus; Simon G. Potts; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Bernard E. Vaissière; Michal Woyciechowski; Kristin M. Krewenka; Thomas Tscheulin; Stuart Roberts; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Catrin Westphal; Riccardo Bommarco
Background. Up to 75% of crop species benefit at least to some degree from animal pollination for fruit or seed set and yield. However, basic information on the level of pollinator dependence and pollinator contribution to yield is lacking for many crops. Even less is known about how insect pollination affects crop quality. Given that habitat loss and agricultural intensification are known to decrease pollinator richness and abundance, there is a need to assess the consequences for different components of crop production. Methods. We used pollination exclusion on flowers or inflorescences on a whole plant basis to assess the contribution of insect pollination to crop yield and quality in four flowering crops (spring oilseed rape, field bean, strawberry, and buckwheat) located in four regions of Europe. For each crop, we recorded abundance and species richness of flower visiting insects in ten fields located along a gradient from simple to heterogeneous landscapes. Results. Insect pollination enhanced average crop yield between 18 and 71% depending on the crop. Yield quality was also enhanced in most crops. For instance, oilseed rape had higher oil and lower chlorophyll contents when adequately pollinated, the proportion of empty seeds decreased in buckwheat, and strawberries’ commercial grade improved; however, we did not find higher nitrogen content in open pollinated field beans. Complex landscapes had a higher overall species richness of wild pollinators across crops, but visitation rates were only higher in complex landscapes for some crops. On the contrary, the overall yield was consistently enhanced by higher visitation rates, but not by higher pollinator richness. Discussion. For the four crops in this study, there is clear benefit delivered by pollinators on yield quantity and/or quality, but it is not maximized under current agricultural intensification. Honeybees, the most abundant pollinator, might partially compensate the loss of wild pollinators in some areas, but our results suggest the need of landscape-scale actions to enhance wild pollinator populations.
Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology | 2006
M. Valantin-Morison; Bernard E. Vaissière; Christian Gary; P. Robin
Summary Competition for assimilates affects fruit quality in many species, while seed content is reported to influence only fruit weight. Our study was aimed at determining whether and/or how source-sink balance and seed content in cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L.) could affect flowering, fruit set, growth and fruit quality including the physiological disorder “water-soaking” which is important for the market-value of this fruit. We followed standard cultivation practices for early cantaloupe production under greenhouse conditions and studied fruit and flower removal over 2 years with two “Charentais” cantaloupes cultivars, and limited hand-pollination treatment for 1 year on one cultivar, and recorded the quality attributes of the fruit. Reproductive development in both cultivars was characterised by the production of a large number of female flowers on plants bearing a single fruit. Fruit set and fruit growth rate were affected by the intensity of pollination, probably by the ability of fertilisation to promote cell division and increase the sink strength of the young ovary. Fruit load did not affect the average number of seeds per fruit, yet individual seeds were lighter under high fruit load. A significant difference in final fruit weights obtained with similar cultivars and treatments between the 2 years is discussed. Fruit quality was affected by source-sink balance. Seed content within a fruit correlated with individual fruit weight, affected flesh firmness, the sweetness of the flesh and slightly affected the occurrence of “water-soaking”. Competition for assimilates within a plant decreased the sweetness of the flesh and dramatically increased the occurrence of “water-soaking” in both years and in both cultivars. Climacterium also increased with a low source-sink balance, and an ethylene burst was confirmed to be closely-related to flesh firmness.