Bernard Gardner
University of California, San Francisco
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bernard Gardner.
Cancer | 1983
Bernard Fisher; Madeline Bauer; D. Lawrence Wickerham; Carol K. Redmond; Edwin R. Fisher; Anatolio B. Cruz; Roger S. Foster; Bernard Gardner; Harvey J. Lerner; Richard G. Margolese; Roger Poisson; Henry Shibata; Herbert Volk
The current findings completely affirm the validity of our original observations indicating the appropriateness of grouping primary breast cancer patients into those with negative, 1 to 3, or ≫4 positive nodes. Results, however, reveal that there is a risk in combining all patients with ≫4 positive nodes into a single group. Since there was a 25% greater disease‐free survival and an 18% greater survival in those with 4 to 6 than in those with ≫13 positive axillary nodes, such a unification may provide misleading information regarding patient prognosis, as well as the worth of a therapeutic regimen when compared with another from a putatively similar patient population. Of particular interest were findings relating the conditional probability, i.e., the hazard rate, of a treatment failure or death each year during the 5‐year period following operation to nodal involvement with tumor. Whereas the hazard rate for those with negative, or 1 to 3 positive nodes, was relatively low and constant, in those with ≫4 positive nodes the risk in the early years was much greater, but by the fifth year it was similar to that occurring when 1‐3 nodes were involved, and not much different from negative node patients. The same pattern existed whether 4 to 6 or ≫13 nodes were positive. When the current findings are considered relative to other factors with predictive import, it is concluded that nodal status still remains the primary prognostic discriminant.
Cancer | 1977
Bernard Fisher; Eleanor D. Montague; Carol K. Redmond; Bruce Barton; Donna Borland; Edwin R. Fisher; Melvin Deutsch; George Schwarz; Richard G. Margolese; William L. Donegan; Herbert Volk; Carl Konvolinka; Bernard Gardner; Isidore Cohn; Gerson Lesnick; Anatolio B. Cruz; Walter Lawrence; Thomas F. Nealon; Harvey R. Butcher; Richard Lawton; other Nsabp investigators
In 1971, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) implemented a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the worth of alternative treatments with radical mastectomy in women with primary operable breast cancer. Information has been obtained from 1,665 patients eligible for follow‐up from 34 NSABP member institutions in Canada and the United States. Results from that trial, at present in its sixth year with patients on study for an average of 36 months, (26 to 62 months), fail to demonstrate an advantage for those who had a radical mastectomy. No significant difference in the treatment failure or survival has as yet been observed in clinically negative node patients who have been randomly managed by conventional radical mastectomy, total mastectomy with postoperative regional radiation or total mastectomy followed by axillary dissection of those patients who subsequently develop positive nodes. Similarly, there presently exists no difference between patients with clinically positive nodes treated by radical mastectomy or by total mastectomy followed by radiation. Of particular interest is the observation that based upon findings from radical mastectomy patients, there may be as many as 40% of patients having a total mastectomy who had histologically positive nodes unremoved, to date only 15% have developed positive nodes requiring an axillary dissection. The persistence of such a difference in incidence would have profound biological significance. The discovery that leaving behind positive axillary nodes has as yet not been influential in enhancing the incidence of distant metastases or the overall proportion of treatment failures and that a disproportionate number of treatment failures in the total mastectomy group occurred in those patients who subsequently required axillary dissection provides reinforcement to the view that positive axillary lymph nodes are not the predecessor of distant tumor spread but are a manifestation of disseminated disease.
Experimental Biology and Medicine | 1962
Bernard Gardner; Gilbert S. Gordan; Joseph Witt
Summary (1) Urinary calcium excretion and creatinine clearance were measured in 8 patients before and after hypophysectomy for advanced breast cancer. (2) Mean creatinine clearance for the group was lower than in patients in an earlier stage of metastatic breast cancer. (3) No consistent changes in urinary calcium excretion could be correlated either with polyuria, spontaneous interphase, or vasopressin-induced reduction in urinary volume.
Cancer | 1962
Bernard Gardner; Arthur N. Thomas; Gilbert S. Gordan
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 1963
Bernard Gardner; William P. Graham; Gilbert S. Gordan; Hans F. Loken; Arthur N. Thomas; James S. Teal
JAMA Internal Medicine | 1963
Joseph Witt; Bernard Gardner; Gilbert S. Gordan; William P. Graham; Arthur N. Thomas
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 1962
Bernard Gardner; Gilbert S. Gordan
Cancer | 1965
Bernard Gardner; Eugene Eisenberg; Dragutin M. Schmidt
JAMA Internal Medicine | 1964
William P. Graham; Bernard Gardner; Gilbert S. Gordan
Springer US | 2009
Kenneth B. Olson; Edward T. Krementz; W. P. Laird Myers; George J. Hill; Faan Josephine K. Craytor Rn; Susan J. Mellette; DSc Edwin A. Mirand PhD; Sol Silverman Jr. Ma; Facr Bernard S. Aron Md; Louis Bernard; Daisilee Berry; C. Michael Brooks EdD; Samuel Brown Jr. EdD; Norbert J. Burzynski Dds; Bernard Gardner; E. Milly L. Haagedoom Md; Erich Hirschberg; Harmon J. Eyre; Diane J. Fink; Harold B. Haley; Arthur I. Holleb; S. Benham Kahn; Barbara Lamb; Walter Lawrence; Henry M. Lemon; Mario G. Martinez Jr. Dmd; Condict Moore; Joseph F. O'Donnell; Mph Sidney J. Saltzstein Md; Charles D. Sherman
Collaboration
Dive into the Bernard Gardner's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs