Bernard M. Tijink

Improved tumor targeting of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor Nanobodies through albumin binding: taking advantage of modular Nanobody technology

The ∼15-kDa variable domains of camelid heavy-chain-only antibodies (called Nanobodies) can easily be formatted as multivalent or multispecific single-chain proteins. Because of fast excretion, however, they are less suitable for therapy of cancer. In this study, we aimed for improved tumor targeting of a bivalent anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Nanobody (αEGFR-αEGFR) by fusion to a Nanobody unit binding to albumin (αAlb). Biodistributions of αEGFR-αEGFR, αEGFR-αEGFR-αAlb (∼50 kDa), αTNF-αTNF-αAlb (control, binding tumor necrosis factor-α), and the ∼150-kDa anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab were compared in A431 xenograft-bearing mice. The proteins were radiolabeled with 177Lu to facilitate quantification. Tumor uptake of 177Lu-αEGFR-αEGFR decreased from 5.0 ± 1.4 to 1.1 ± 0.1 %ID/g between 6 and 72 h after injection. Due to its rapid blood clearance, tumor-to-blood ratios >80 were obtained within 6 h after injection. Blood clearance became dramatically slower and tumor uptake became significantly higher by introduction of αAlb. Blood levels of αEGFR-αEGFR-αAlb were 21.2 ± 2.5, 11.9 ± 0.6, and 4.0 ± 1.4 and tumor levels were 19.4 ± 5.5, 35.2 ± 7.5, and 28.0 ± 6.8 %ID/g at 6, 24, and 72 h after injection, respectively. Tumor uptake was at least as high as for cetuximab (15.5 ± 3.9, 27.1 ± 7.9, and 25.6 ± 6.1 %ID/g) and significantly higher than for αTNF-αTNF-αAlb. αEGFR-αEGFR-αAlb showed faster and deeper tumor penetration than cetuximab. These data show that simple fusion of αEGFR and αAlb building blocks results in a bifunctional Nanobody format, which seems more favorable for therapy as far as pharmacokinetics and tumor deposition are concerned. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(8):2288–97]

A phase I dose escalation study with anti-CD44v6 bivatuzumab mertansine in patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus.

Purpose: To assess safety, pharmacokinetics, maximum tolerated dose, and preliminary efficacy of bivatuzumab mertansine. Bivatuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD44v6, which previously seemed to be safe in phase I radioimmunotherapy trials, whereas the conjugated mertansine is a potent maytansine derivative. Experimental Design: Patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus were eligible. Bivatuzumab was given weekly for 3 consecutive weeks by i.v. infusion. One patient was planned to be treated at each dose tier as long as toxicity did not reach grade 2; otherwise, three patients had to be treated until dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Starting dose was 20 mg/m2 and dose was subsequently escalated in steps of 20 mg/m2. Patients without disease progression and not experiencing dose-limiting toxicity were eligible for repeated courses. Blood serum samples were taken throughout the treatment period to determine the pharmacokinetic properties of bivatuzumab mertansine and to assess the human anti–bivatuzumab mertansine antibody response. Results: Seven patients received a total of 23 weekly doses of bivatuzumab mertansine. One patient at the 100 mg/m2 and one at the 120 mg/m2 level experienced stable disease during treatment phase but also developed grade 1 skin toxicity (desquamation). One of them received a second treatment course. At the highest dose level achieved in this study (140 mg/m2), one patient developed toxic epidermal necrolysis after two infusions and died. Massive apoptosis of skin keratinocytes had occurred, whereas only symptomatic therapy for skin toxicity was available. The risk-benefit assessment of all patients treated in the total phase I program (4 clinical trials, 70 patients) turned out to be negative after consideration of this case of a toxic epidermal necrolysis and the skin-related adverse events observed in the other trials. Therefore, development of the conjugate was discontinued. Interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic variables was low and exposure to BIWI 1 increased proportionally with dose. No anti–bivatuzumab mertansine reactions were observed. Conclusion: The main toxicity of bivatuzumab mertansine was directed against the skin, most probably due to CD44v6 expression in this tissue. The majority of skin reactions was reversible; however, one fatal drug-related adverse event had occurred. Clinical development was discontinued before reaching maximum tolerated dose.

Electroporation Therapy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Potentially Effective Novel Treatment

Purpose. Examination of the potential of electroporation therapy (EPT) in a patient with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Patient. A 24-year-old male who underwent extensive resection and postoperative radiotherapy for a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in the right infratemporal fossa with intracranial extension and invasion of the maxillary sinus and mandible had a recurrence in the scar of his craniotomy for which he was initially treated with doxorubicin. After discontinuation of doxorubicin he developed a metastatic mass at the same site for which he was treated with electroporation therapy. Method. The subcutaneous metastasis was infiltrated with bleomycin and electroporated. Results. Gradually the tumor became increasingly necrotic and demarcated from surrounding tissue. After 10 weeks no tumor was seen anymore. The wound healed secondarily. Discussion. Intralesional bleomycin followed by EPT is potentially effective, well tolerated, and easy to perform in well accessible soft tissue sarcoma sites.

Quality assurance in head and neck surgical oncology: EORTC 24954 trial on larynx preservation

BACKGROUND The Head and Neck Cancer Group (HNCG) of the EORTC conducted a quality assurance program in the EORTC 24954 trial on larynx preservation. In this multicentre study, patients with resectable advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx or hypopharynx were randomly assigned for treatment with sequential or alternating chemoradiation. The need for a quality assurance program is the evaluation and prevention of differences in treatments between centres in this multidisciplinary study. METHOD The surgical subcommittee of the HNCG prepared a questionnaire, and clinical records of all patients were verified during audits of independent teams. Data relating institutional practices were collected during a face to face interview with members of the local team. RESULTS 271 clinical records from the nine main contributing centres were reviewed. The main difference between centres was the time interval between first consultation and treatment initiation, with a mean of 45 days. On the pathology report the nodal involvement was described by level in 36% of the cases according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery classification. Extranodal spread was not always described in neck dissection specimens. CONCLUSION The EORTC 24954 trial on larynx preservation was the first prospective trial with a quality assurance program in head and neck surgical oncology. The analysis shows similarities in practices, but also points out some important differences between centres. Operation reports were fairly complete, but uniformity in pathology reports should be improved.

A phase I dose escalation study with anti-CD44V6 bivatuzumab mertansine in patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus

PURPOSE To assess safety, pharmacokinetics, maximum tolerated dose, and preliminary efficacy of bivatuzumab mertansine. Bivatuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD44v6, which previously seemed to be safe in phase I radioimmunotherapy trials, whereas the conjugated mertansine is a potent maytansine derivative. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus were eligible. Bivatuzumab was given weekly for 3 consecutive weeks by i.v. infusion. One patient was planned to be treated at each dose tier as long as toxicity did not reach grade 2; otherwise, three patients had to be treated until dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Starting dose was 20 mg/m2 and dose was subsequently escalated in steps of 20 mg/m2. Patients without disease progression and not experiencing dose-limiting toxicity were eligible for repeated courses. Blood serum samples were taken throughout the treatment period to determine the pharmacokinetic properties of bivatuzumab mertansine and to assess the human anti-bivatuzumab mertansine antibody response. RESULTS Seven patients received a total of 23 weekly doses of bivatuzumab mertansine. One patient at the 100 mg/m2 and one at the 120 mg/m2 level experienced stable disease during treatment phase but also developed grade 1 skin toxicity (desquamation). One of them received a second treatment course. At the highest dose level achieved in this study (140 mg/m2), one patient developed toxic epidermal necrolysis after two infusions and died. Massive apoptosis of skin keratinocytes had occurred, whereas only symptomatic therapy for skin toxicity was available. The risk-benefit assessment of all patients treated in the total phase I program (4 clinical trials, 70 patients) turned out to be negative after consideration of this case of a toxic epidermal necrolysis and the skin-related adverse events observed in the other trials. Therefore, development of the conjugate was discontinued. Interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic variables was low and exposure to BIWI 1 increased proportionally with dose. No anti-bivatuzumab mertansine reactions were observed. CONCLUSION The main toxicity of bivatuzumab mertansine was directed against the skin, most probably due to CD44v6 expression in this tissue. The majority of skin reactions was reversible; however, one fatal drug-related adverse event had occurred. Clinical development was discontinued before reaching maximum tolerated dose.