Bernard Mandrand

Detection of human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16 and 18 in mucosal and cutaneous lesions by the multiplex polymerase chain reaction

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on the simultaneous amplification of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6/11, 16 and 18 in a single-step procedure was developed, using primers chosen in the E6-E7 region. The specificity and sensitivity of this technique have been proved by amplifying mixtures or various amounts of plasmid-containing HPV DNA; it allowed the detection of as few as 5-25 HPV DNA copies. Application of the multiplex PCR to 71 clinical samples showed that HPV DNA was detected in 80% (45/57 cases) of mucosal biopsies and 35% (5/14 cases) of cutaneous specimens. HPV 16 was predominant in high-grade CIN whereas HPV 6 and 11 were detected more frequently in genital condylomas and laryngeal papillomas. In cutaneous Bowens disease HPV 16, 18 or 6/11 + 16 were detected and in squamous cell carcinomas HPV 6/11 or 16 were found. After sequence amplification with primers of one HPV type, the clinical samples displayed the same HPV types but the frequency of positive and coinfected lesions increased. Thus, multiplex PCR is a valuable technique for typing HPV DNA but coinfections may be underestimated.

Detection of multiple types of human papillomavirus in a giant condyloma from a grafted patient. Analysis by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridisation, Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction

Immunosuppressed patients such as transplant recipients are known to develop multiple lesions suggestive of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. A giant anal condyloma was obtained from a transplant patient; several fragments taken from different areas were examined for the presence of HPV DNA using in situ hybridisation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern blot. Typical koilocytes were seen in routinely stained tissue sections, suggesting an HPV infection; furthermore, group specific HPV antigen was detected in one of four frozen fragments. Different results were obtained by in situ hybridisation according to the fragment tested. HPV types 6/11 were detected in each of the five fragments, frozen or fixed in Bouins or formalin solutions. However, the number of HPV DNA positive cells and the intensity of the reaction greatly varied with the specimen. HPV 16 and 18 probes also reacted positively with the sample fixed in formalin; a stronger signal was observed with HPV 18 in one large focus than with HPV 16. HPV type 5 was detected in a few isolated cells of two frozen fragments. With the Southern blot technique, the profile of an HPV 6/11 was seen only in one of two frozen fragments; in this case, the bands were intense. A slight positive reaction was also obtained in one frozen fragment with HPV 16 probe. Four frozen fragments were analyzed with PCR: HPV 6/11 was detected in each fragment; HPV 18 was detected in the four samples but with different intensities; HPV types 5 and 16 did not show any positive signal. In conclusion, the lesion is an example of infection with several HPV types, demonstrated by three different techniques. This suggests the need for careful dermatological or colposcopic follow-up of transplant recipients, in order to prevent possible malignant transformation of anogenital lesions.